EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.29.18

USPTO Under Iancu: Making Patents Low Quality (Again)

Posted in America, Patents at 2:14 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

What they mean by “great” is the number (quantity), not the quality

Make Patents Great Again

Summary: Patents of questionable legitimacy are being granted, passed around, and used for litigation; the net effect may be financially beneficial to the lawsuits ‘industry’, but taxpayers and science suffer the most

THE USPTO has descended or deteriorated into “law firm” mentality. The goal is money and the Director comes from a firm that judges its “success” by number of lawsuits, patents etc. Why was such leadership appointment by Trump? Maybe past business relations, maybe something even more nefarious than this.

To demonstrate the psyche of the people who now “run the asylum” (to use a crude metaphor), consider this new post which shows how patent law firms view everything. “In order to increase utilization of patents,” it says. Like what, lawsuits? They love patent wars, they provoke fights and lawsuits. It’s how they make a living. To quote a broader context:

In order to increase utilization of patents, there seems to be a need for development of such new applications. Actually, Xinova has issued the Request for Application (RFA) to identify new applications for an existing technology of its customer in November 2017. I’m wondering if universities may also need such an service to explore possible applications for their technology seeds. Anyway, it would be necessary to study how to valuate such ideas of new applications and how to reward the inventors, especially when working with outside persons.

They don’t care about inventors, let alone rewarding anyone but themselves (with legal bills).

A Republican pundit has meanwhile written for Watchtroll about Federal, i.e. taxpayers-funded, work being passed to patent trolls owing to the Bayh-Dole lunacy. Yes, only a few days ago Watchtroll promoted more of this lunacy, merely a few days after we had explained why this is morally wrong. “Much of the research and development done by NASA has broader applications than space and have been used in many everyday commercial products,” Above the Law summarised. This is an example where taxpayers’ money was invested in patenting decent ideas that the general public can use to make life better. Bayh-Dole, however, turned over such patents to trolls. The trolls sue taxpayers using patents acquired at the expense of those taxpayers. Speaking of taxes, there’s a new article titled “New 2019 French Patent/Software box regime” by Bird & Bird (Brent Springael, Laurence Clot and Coralie Crespin). Bird & Bird of Team UPC infamy (the patent trolls’ proponents) are now advocating tax evasion using patenting/accounting tricks. Isn’t that lovely?

But even worse issues persist at the moment. As always, we’re primarily focused on patent scope. According to Donald Zuhn, a proponent of patents on life, the USPTO has changed its Web site (perhaps to help distract from over a week of systems' downtime; that would be a neat spin/diversion attempt) and it has “extended [...] limited amount of non-production time — three hours for utility and reissue applications — to consider responses filed following a final rejection.”

Here are the key parts:

In a Patent Alert e-mail distributed earlier this month, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office announced that the After-Final Consideration Pilot 2.0 (AFCP 2.0) program has been extended to September 30, 2019.

The AFCP, which was implemented in April 2012 (see “USPTO to Assess After Final Consideration Pilot Program”), modified in May 2013 (see “USPTO News Briefs”), and extended since then provides examiners with a limited amount of non-production time — three hours for utility and reissue applications — to consider responses filed following a final rejection.

To be fair, this didn’t start with Iancu, but one has to wonder about the impact on patent quality. Over the past week we’ve seen some questionable Google patents and the Office has apparently just granted fake (bogus) software patents to Skillz. “Skillz,” they speaks of themselves, “the worldwide leader in mobile eSports, announced today that the United States Patent and Trademark Office has issued the company two new patents. The company now has exclusive rights to a total of 13 eSports-related patents.”

They say that the “latest patent from Skillz, however, is the first to provide such a feature for mobile games” and they allude to something which is software, abstract. In a rather pragmatic sense, software patents no longer have validity. Here is another example of such patents. How about this new one? It sounds like GrowPath received bogus/fake software patents from the Office (not before Alice/Section 101/AIA as it seems a lot newer, post-ten million). To quote:

GrowPath, a software firm born out of the privacy-obsessed legal industry, has developed and now patented a personalized solution that utilizes an owner’s personal photos as the second step in a two-factor authentication process on mobile devices.

[...]

The new patent (#10,097,538) is the third for GrowPath. The company’s other patents focus on data obfuscation (cyber) and a logic tool which facilitates, among other things, the ability to easily customize algorithms without advanced science or mathematics training.

The new patent also means more tattoos for inventor Sanchez. A former Marine, Growpath’s chief product officer notches all of his patent numbers on his right forearm. With the latest addition, his count is now three. “Software is a crowded field, but the one sure way to distinguish yourself and your business is to truly innovate,” Sanchez explains. “I can’t think of a more personal way to show my pride in that innovation than to wear the patents on my body.”
Images capturing Sanchez’s ever-expanding roster of patent tattoos are here and the video is here.

They actually tattoo patent numbers, embedding them deep insode their skin. There are photos there, too. How much more insane can it get?

We’ve also noticed this press release [1, 2] that speaks of “[t]he first patent entitled “System and Method for Consolidating Account Data” Canadian Patent No. 2821002 recognized the Canadian patent protection for Qvinci’s original invention as improved. The second Canadian patent entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Providing Data Normalization, Scalability and Maintainability” Canadian Patent No. 2829665 recognized Canadian patent protection for Qvinci’s normalizer application.”

This isn’t a US patent; it’s in Canada. Nevertheless, one must bear in mind that the Canadian patent office usually follows the US.

As we noted here before, the USPTO keeps granting abstract software patents provided people surf hype waves like blockchain (yes, it’s software patents — all of them). Here is a brand-new example: “Nasdaq, the $10 trillion dollar stock exchange, has patented a blockchain newswire service. Filed in January 2017, the patent is titled “Systems and methods for securing and disseminating time-sensitive information using a blockchain.” The patent was released to the public earlier this week.”

Nasdaq is already involved in some court battles with software patents. PTAB might invalidate these. If not PTAB, then maybe the higher court/s. Such litigation activity helps nobody but law firms and days ago we learned that Immervision is suing LG. They issued a press release about it and it certainly seems as though AP had been reduced to pay-to-say of patent trolls or opportunistic parasites when they sue real companies.

Ultimately, a lot of resources go into unproductive activities. The Office doesn’t seem to care.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Science Minister Sam Gyimah and the EPO Are Eager to Attack Science by Bringing Patent Trolls to Europe/European Union and the United Kingdom

    Team UPC has managed to indoctrinate or hijack key positions, causing those whose job is to promote science to actually promote patent trolls and litigation (suppressing science rather than advancing it)



  2. USF Revisits EPO Abuses, Highlighting an Urgent Need for Action

    “Staff Representation Disciplinary Cases” — a message circulated at the end of last week — reveals the persistence of union-busting agenda and injustice at the EPO



  3. Links 14/11/2018: KDevelop 5.3, Omarine 5.3, Canonical Not for Sale

    Links for the day



  4. Second Day of EPOPIC: Yet More Promotion of Software Patents in Europe in Defiance of Courts, EPC, Parliament and Common Sense

    Using bogus interpretations of the EPC — ones that courts have repeatedly rejected — the EPO continues to grant bogus/fake/bunk patents on abstract ideas, then justifies that practice (when the audience comes from the litigation ‘industry’)



  5. Allegations That António Campinos 'Bought' His Presidency and is Still Paying for it

    Rumours persist that after Battistelli had rigged the election in favour of his compatriot nefarious things related to that were still visible



  6. WIPO Corruption and Coverup Mirror EPO Tactics

    Suppression of staff representatives and whistleblowers carries on at WIPO and the EPO; people who speak out about abuses are themselves being treated like abusers



  7. Links 13/11/2018: HPC Domination (Top 500 All GNU/Linux) and OpenStack News

    Links for the day



  8. The USPTO and EPO Pretend to Care About Patent Quality by Mingling With the Terms “Patent” and “Quality”

    The whole "patent quality" propaganda from EPO and USPTO management continues unabated; they strive to maintain the fiction that quality rather than money is their prime motivator



  9. Yannis Skulikaris Promotes Software Patents at EPOPIC, Defending the Questionable Practice Under António Campinos

    The reckless advocacy for abstract patents on mere algorithms from a new and less familiar face; the EPO is definitely eager to grant software patents and it explains to stakeholders how to do it



  10. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is Working for Patent Trolls and Patent Maximalists

    The patent trolls' propagandists are joining forces and pushing for a patent system that is hostile to science, technology, and innovation in general (so as to enable a bunch of aggressive law firms to tax everybody)



  11. Team UPC, Fronting for Patent Trolls From the US, is Calling Facts “Resistance”

    The tactics of Team UPC have gotten so tastelessly bad and its motivation so shallow (extortion in Europe) that one begins to wonder why these people are willing to tarnish everything that's left of their reputation



  12. The Federal Circuit Bar Association (FCBA) Will Spread the Berkheimer Lie While Legal Certainty Associated With Patents Remains Low and Few Lawsuits Filed

    New figures regarding patent litigation in the United States (number of lawsuits) show a decrease by about a tenth in just one year; there's still no sign of software patents making any kind of return/rebound in the United States, contrary to lies told by the litigation 'industry' (those who profit from frivolous lawsuits/threats)



  13. Links 12/11/2018: Linux 4.20 RC2, Denuvo DRM Defeated Again

    Links for the day



  14. Automation of Searches Will Not Solve the Legitimacy Problem Caused by Patents Lust

    The false belief that better searches and so-called 'AI' can miraculously assess patents will simply drive/motivate bad decisions and already steers bad management towards patent maximalism (presumption of examination/validation where none actually exists)



  15. The Federal Circuit and PTAB Are Not Slowing Down; Patent Maximalists Claim It's 'Harassment' to Question a Patent's Validity

    There’s no sign of stopping when it comes to harassment of judges and courts; those who make a living from patent threats and litigation do anything conceivable to stop the ‘bloodbath’ of US patents which were never supposed to have been granted in the first place



  16. Patent Maximalists Will Latch Onto Return Mail v US Postal Service in an Effort to Weaken or Limit Post-Grant Reviews of US Patents

    An upcoming case, dealing with what governments can and cannot do with/to patents (specifically the US government and US patents), interests the litigation 'industry' because it loathes reviews of low-quality and/or controversial patents (these reviews discourage litigation or stop lawsuits early on in the cycle)



  17. Guest Post: EPO Spins Censorship of Staff Representation

    Another concrete example of Campinos' cynical story-telling



  18. Andrei Iancu and Laura Peter Are Two Proponents of Patent Trolls at the Top of the USPTO

    Patent offices do not seem to care about the law, about the courts, about judges and so on; all they care about is money (and litigation costs) and that’s a very major problem



  19. The Patent 'Industry' Wants Incitations and Feuds, Not Innovation and Collaboration

    The litigation giants and their drones keep insisting that they're interested in helping scientists; but sooner or later the real (productive) industry learns to kick them to the curb and work together instead of suing



  20. EPO 'Outsourcing' Rumours

    The EPO advertises jobs in Prague and Lisbon; this leads to speculations less than a year after António Campinos sent EU-IPO jobs to India (for cost reduction)



  21. Links 11/11/2018: Bison 3.2.1 and FreeBSD 12.0 Beta 4

    Links for the day



  22. Pro-Litigation Front Groups Like CIPA and Team UPC Control the EPO, Which Shamelessly Grants Software Patents

    With buzzwords and hype like "insurtech", "fintech", "blockchains" and "AI" the EPO (and to some degree the USPTO as well) looks to allow a very wide range of software patents; the sole goal is to grant millions of low-quality patents, creating unnecessary litigation in Europe



  23. Latest Loophole: To Get Software Patents From the EPO One Can Just Claim That They're 'on a Car'

    The EPO has a new 'study' (accompanied by an extensive media/PR campaign) that paints software as "SDV" if it runs on a car, celebrating growth of such software patents



  24. The Huge Cost of Wrongly-Granted European Patents, Recklessly Granted by the European Patent Office (EPO)

    It took 4 years for many thousands of people to have just one patent of Monsanto/Bayer revoked; what does that say about the impact of erroneous patent awards?



  25. Links 10/11/2018: Mesa 18.3 RC2, ‘Linux on DeX’ Beta and Windows Breaking Itself Again

    Links for the day



  26. Unified Patents Takes Aim at Velos Media SEPs, Passed From Patent Aggressor Qualcomm

    The latest endeavour from Unified Patents takes aim at notorious standard-essential patents (SEPs), which are not compatible with Free/Open Source software and are typically invalid as per 35 U.S.C. § 101 as well



  27. Stacked Panels of Front Groups Against PTAB and in Favour of Patents on Life/Nature

    So-called 'panels' where the opposition is occluded or excluded try to sell the impression that greatness comes from patent maximalism (overpatenting) rather than restriction based on merit and rational scope



  28. With Patent Trolls Like Finjan and Blackbird Tech out There, Microsoft in OIN Does Not Mean Safety

    With many patent trolls out there (Microsoft’s Intellectual Ventures alone has thousands of them) it’s not at all clear how Microsoft can honestly claim to have reached a “truce”; OIN deals with issues which last manifested/publicly revealed themselves a decade ago (Microsoft suing directly, not by proxy)



  29. Links 9/11/2018: Qt 5.12.0 Beta 4, Ubuntu On Samsung Galaxy Devices, Rust 1.30.1

    Links for the day



  30. Microsoft is Supporting Patent Trolls, Still. New Leadership at USPTO Gives Room for Concern.

    New statements from Microsoft's management (Andersen) serve to show that Microsoft hasn't really changed; it's just trying to sell "Azure IP Advantage", hoping that enough patent trolls with their dubious software patents will blackmail GNU/Linux users into adopting Azure for 'protection'


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts