EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.05.19

Truly and Completely Out of Control, the Unhinged European Patent Office Calls Applicants “Customers” While Offering Patents on Nature, Life, Maths

Posted in Europe, Patents at 7:25 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

2015: Battistelli’s EPO Loses ‘Customers’ Because It Plays ‘Favourites’ With Large Corporations

Everything must go
Everything Must Go (film)

Summary: The European Patent Office (EPO) lost sight of what patent offices exist for; it’s now doing totally insane things while treating the law like a nuisance rather than something to be served

WHAT do patent offices exist for?

It’s a fair question, right? Not rhetorical.

They tell us it’s about innovation. Sometimes words like “protection” get used (but not “protectionism”). Or do patent offices now exist to maximise their own bottom line? Are they a public service? What are they? The EPO has taken these questions to new extremes, stretching the rule of law to levels that discredit the very system it derives its powers from (how can an institution claim to uphold and enforce law when it breaks its own laws?). Earlier today we wrote about the real costs associated with the EPO and it’s not a pretty picture. The extrernalities show that the EPO has become a net loss to the European economy.

“The extrernalities show that the EPO has become a net loss to the European economy.”Earlier today we also published two articles about software patents in Europe. Nothing has yet changed for the better and in fact just hours later the EPO resumed promoting software patents that are not allowed. Well, the EPO does not allow obeying the law, either. “Four days to go until we close the registration for this event where we will discuss computer-implemented inventions,” it wrote, adding the usual “SME” and “medical” buzz (to make it seem like it’s helping the small people and saves lives). Hours earlier the EPO published this “[r]eport on the results of the user consultation on increased flexibility in the timing of examination process” (warning: epo.org link) and notice that it has nothing to do with patent quality, only speed. They measure performance in terms of speed and almost nothing else. As it turns out, based on another new tweet, words like “customers” and “IP” are still being misused in conjunction with “SMEs” (that the EPO systematically discriminates against).

Then there’s the question of patents on life. When did nature become “IP portfolio” and life “innovation”? It’s saddening if not maddening to see Intellectual Property ‘Watch’ still carrying this propaganda for crazy people who lie in order to rob us. Here is what it published this afternoon: “Chris Holly is a practicing intellectual property lawyer with extensive experience helping clients leverage IP portfolios in the agriculture, food, microbiology and biotechnology industries. Intellectual Property Watch’s David Branigan interviewed Holly to gain his perspective on the technological, regulatory and intellectual property considerations of next generation plant breeding techniques, in particular those that involve gene editing using CRISPR technology.”

“Innovation” as in the headline just means “patenting”; these lawyers want patents on life and nature, so they just call it all “invention” etc. Remember 'Teffgate'?

Peri Hankey remarked on this ‘ownership’ by telling me: “This kind of property is theft of our natural commons, enclosure of life. The underlying theory is that what is not yet anyone’s property must be taken before it it taken by others. It’s the socio-political creed of scavenging brigands. It’s the theory that drives us — to ruin.”

Information Age meanwhile promotes ‘owning’ mathematics and mere ideas (processes of the mind). Earlier today it wrote that the “European Patent Office (EPO) recently issued fresh guidelines last year examining the patentability of AI and machine learning based on the principle that all patentable innovations must not be obvious.”

Here’s corporate media once again spreading the lie and the nonsense which is “AI” (nowadays it is typically just a meaningless synonym for “computer” or “computer program”). Do we want more surveillance startups? Or is that just software patents promotion?

Notice how many times they misuse the term “AI” in these three passages alone:

“The European Patent Office (EPO) recently issued fresh guidelines last year examining the patentability of AI and machine learning based on the principle that all patentable innovations must not be obvious.

“By default, the application of AI in almost every function and across every sector it touches – from AI-powered toothbrushes to AI weather forecasting tools, from medtech to fintech to e-commerce – renders such inventions obvious, unpatentable and, ultimately, far from innovative in and of themselves. What’s more, the vast majority of AI algorithms are open source, making the implementation of the technology even less innovative or intrinsically valuable. Even the EPO are looking into implementing AI in order to streamline processes. Yet this clearly does not make them an AI or a tech organisation.

“AI is simply a tool and should be viewed as such by the wider market. The AI conversation should be focussed more on how businesses use this tool to create truly groundbreaking and critical inventions that are of real, tangible benefit to the wider innovation market.”

In all the above, “AI” just means algorithms, nothing else. Courts would reject patents on those.

“Even the EPO now understands that UPC has died, based on this tweet from a few hours ago (about the third of this kind in the past fortnight).”In an effort to override national courts and somehow allow such ridiculous patents to endure, Team UPC worked hard for years, pushing for a hideous replacement (under the guise of “community”, “harmony” and “unity”), thankfully in vain. UKIPO “commissioned Powell Gilbert to collect data on patent and non-patent cases,” it said yesterday. “This has allowed us to evaluate the performance of the UPC once it is in operation. This data is published as part of the reports.”

“Counting patent and non-patent cases at the High Court 2015/2016″ is the title. Remember that this court rarely tolerates some of the more controversial European Patents. “The IPO requires detailed information on UK patent and non-patent cases. This will fulfill the UK’s obligations under the Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA),” it said. But there’s no UPC. It’s dead. Nevertheless, Bristows is already leaping at it and this new post from Alan Johnson said (hours ago):

The UK IPO published yesterday (here) information on the number of IP cases commenced in the High Court in 2015 and 2016.

If one considers pertinent cases and their outcomes, it then becomes clear that British patent law isn’t quite compatible with what the EPO has been doing in recent years. The above is merely a formality that accompanies what Gyimah had done before he resigned. Even the EPO now understands that UPC has died, based on this tweet from a few hours ago (about the third of this kind in the past fortnight). The EPO’s worst enemy is itself or its own misbehaviour.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. OSI Did Not Guard the Open Source Brand; Now Its Own Name, Open Source Initiative, is Being 'Diluted' and “Open Source” is Almost Meaningless

    The term or the brand “Open Source” is becoming worthless because those who use it typically engage in production of proprietary software falsely marketed as “Open Source” (that's what openwashing is inherently about)



  2. Microsoft is Not an Open Source Authority But an Opponent of Open Source

    Various outlets that are closely connected to Microsoft are trying to convince us that Microsoft is now 'king' of Open Source; nothing could be further from the truth however



  3. Links 22/9/2019: KMyMoney 5.0.7, Lennart's Latest Plan

    Links for the day



  4. Summits of Open Bear Traps: The Open Core Summit and Other 'Open' Events That Actually Attack Software Freedom

    Conferences that call themselves "open" something are sometimes nothing but an attack on openness (not to mention freedom) and promotion of FUD about Free/Open Source software (FOSS); there's an ample set of examples to that effect



  5. Openwashing Report: 'Open Source' Without Any or Most of the Benefits

    The cheapening of the term "Open Source" continues; sooner or later everything out there will be called "open" irrespective of what it really is



  6. Patent Extremism is Not Normal and Not an Innocent Mindset

    Reflection upon the sad state of the European patent system and how media turns a blind eye to it; worldwide, in general, the discussion about patents is being warped by the litigation giants, whose sole goal is to maximise the number of lawsuits/shakedowns (personal gain)



  7. Links 22/9/2019: LLVM 9.0.0 and FreeBSD 12.1 Beta

    Links for the day



  8. Links 21/9/2019: Plasma 5.17 Beta in Kubuntu, Cockpit 203

    Links for the day



  9. IBM Cannot Become a True Friend of Free Software Because of Its Current Patent Policy

    IBM needs to quit bullying people/companies with software patents; that would help towards appeasement of IBM critics and sceptics



  10. When Patent 'Professionals' Sound Like Children Who Learned to Parrot Some Intentionally-Misleading Buzzwords, Myths and Lies

    With buzzwords like "AI" and misleading terms like "IP" the litigation zealots are trying to convince themselves (and the public) that software is a physical thing and a "property" which needs "protecting" from "theft"; it doesn't seem to bother these people that copyright law already covers software



  11. The European Parliament Needs to Become More Outspoken About EPO Abuses

    There are few encouraging signs in Europe right now because the EPO's disregard for patent law (striving to just grant as many patents as possible) earned it much-needed backlash from the European Parliament



  12. Links 19/9/2019: German Federal Ministry of the Interior Wants FOSS, Top Snaps Named

    Links for the day



  13. Buying the Voices of 'Linux' People to Repeat Microsoft's Talking Points While Removing Our Icons and Leaders (Calling Them Sexist)

    The dirty games leveraged by several companies including Microsoft target charismatic people who are essential for morale and leadership; these tactics aren't particularly novel



  14. When the EPO Sees Itself as Above European Law, Grants Patents in Defiance of the EPC (Its Founding Document) and Violates Staff's Labour Rights/Protections (International Law)

    The absurd state of affairs at the EPO has reached the point where laws at every level are being violated and even judges are being threatened or vainly ignored; the EU is belatedly trying to tackle these issues, which have actually cost its credibility a great deal and threaten the perception of Rule of Law at multiple levels



  15. Links 19/9/2019: Samba 4.11.0 and Kubernetes 1.16

    Links for the day



  16. Update on Koch v EPO: Internal Appeals Committee (IAC) Composition Still Likely Illegal

    An important EPO case, concerning a dismissed staff representative, shows what ILO-AT and the EPO's Internal Appeals Committee boil down to



  17. Links 18/9/2019: Fedora Linux 31 Beta, PCLinuxOS 2019.09 Update

    Links for the day



  18. Links 17/9/2019: CentOS 7.7 and Funtoo Linux 1.4 Released

    Links for the day



  19. EPO is Not European

    Internationalists and patent trolls are those who stand to benefit from the 'globalisation' of low-quality and law-breaking patents such as patents on algorithms, nature and life itself; the EPO isn't equipped to serve its original goals anymore



  20. The EPO's Central Staff Committee and SUEPO (Staff Union) Respond to “Fascist Bills” Supported by EPO President António Campinos

    Raw material pertaining to the latest Campinos "scandal"; what Campinos said, what the Central Staff Committee (CSC) said, and what SUEPO said



  21. Storm Brewing in the European Patent Office After a Hot Summer

    Things aren't rosy in EPOnia (to say the least); in fact, things have been getting a lot worse lately, but the public wouldn't know judging by what media tells the public (almost nothing)



  22. Why I Once Called for Richard Stallman to Step Down

    Guest post from the developer who recently authored "Getting Stallman Wrong Means Getting The 21st Century Wrong"



  23. As Richard Stallman Resigns Let's Consider Why GNU/Linux Without Stallman and Torvalds Would be a Victory to Microsoft

    Stallman has been ejected after a lot of intentionally misleading press coverage; this is a dark day for Software Freedom



  24. Links 16/9/2019: GNU Linux-libre 5.3, GNU World Order 13×38, Vista 10 Breaks Itself Again

    Links for the day



  25. Links 16/9/2019: Qt Quick on Vulkan, Metal, and Direct3D; BlackWeb 1.2 Reviewed

    Links for the day



  26. Richard Stallman's Controversial Views Are Nothing New and They Distract From Bill Gates' Vastly Worse Role

    It's easier to attack Richard Stallman (RMS) using politics (than using his views on software) and media focus on Stallman's personal views on sexuality bears some resemblance to the push against Linus Torvalds, which leans largely on the false perception that he is sexist, rude and intolerant



  27. Links 16/9/2019: Linux 5.3, EasyOS Releases, Media Backlash Against RMS

    Links for the day



  28. Openwashing Report on Open Networking Foundation (ONF): When Open Source Means Collaboration Among Giant Spying Companies

    Massive telecommunications oligopolies (telecoms) are being described as ethical and responsible by means of openwashing; they even have their own front groups for that obscene mischaracterisation and ONF is one of those



  29. 'Open Source' You Cannot Run Without Renting or 'Licensing' Windows From Microsoft

    When so-called ‘open source’ programs strictly require Vista 10 (or similar) to run, how open are they really and does that not redefine the nature of Open Source while betraying everything Free/libre software stands for?



  30. All About Control: Microsoft is Not Open Source But an Open Source Censor/Spy and GitHub/LinkedIn/Skype Are Its Proprietary Censorship/Surveillance Tools

    All the big companies which Microsoft bought in recent years are proprietary software and all of the company’s big products remain proprietary software; all that “Open Source” is to Microsoft is “something to control and censor“


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts