09.22.19

Openwashing Report: ‘Open Source’ Without Any or Most of the Benefits

Posted in Deception, Free/Libre Software, Microsoft at 12:07 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Weekly openwashing report

Summary: The cheapening of the term “Open Source” continues; sooner or later everything out there will be called “open” irrespective of what it really is

FOR well over a month we’ve written Openwashing Reports every weekend. Eventually we might have lots of examples we can cluster together based on common themes. Eventually we may get a list or a ‘catalogue’ of openwashing patterns that can be presented concisely in a wiki page. This is work in progress. This weekend we’ve split the Openwashing Report into 4 parts. We also have a guest contributor to this series. There’s growing interest in the subject, particularly in light of events like Stallman’s ‘exit’. There an upsurge of “Open Core” a.k.a. "Enterprise Edition" etc. (dual-licensing) and we need to keep up with these emergent threats, at the very least by explaining them.

“Eventually we may get a list or a ‘catalogue’ of openwashing patterns that can be presented concisely in a wiki page.”“Open Source” in 2019 does not mean what it meant in 2009 and in 1999. The de facto definition or what people perceive it to be changes over time. According to the Linux Foundation, which is no longer about Linux, Microsoft is king.

Sometimes “open source” means nothing; sometimes it means Microsoft’s proprietary software. Sometimes ‘open source’ comes to mean just “something you can replace”, as in this new example (“Teams to discuss ‘open source’ parts idea for 2021″).

Readers question what they nowadays read about “open source” or “open-source” or “Open Source”. As one reader put it: “Is this open source? (“Open-source” parts proposed as F1 standardisation alternative by Adam Cooper)

“Sometimes “open source” means nothing; sometimes it means Microsoft’s proprietary software”“The FIA has proposed an “open-source” alternative…”

“I think it’s a really good idea, where teams publish their design on the FIA website and all teams can see what they’re using and pick and choose the bits that they want to.”

From the article: “The FIA has proposed an “open-source” alternative to standard Formula 1 parts for 2021 that would see teams sharing their designs for certain elements of the car.

“The governing body has been keen to introduce standard parts as cost-saving measure, with several items having gone to tender.”

That’s an odd slant on what Open Source originally meant, either in the intelligence context or software. Notice how they use scare quotes around “open-source” and add a dash. They know that they’re ‘torturing’ this term.

Our reader had caught this before we did. Some readers report this stuff to us. They’re not too happy.

“Notice how they use scare quotes around “open-source” and add a dash. They know that they’re ‘torturing’ this term.”Surveillance code is being spun as “open”, war is being marketed as “open”, and here’s a new example from Google (“Google simplifies open-source software with Cloud Dataproc on Kubernetes”).

One of the more troubling patterns we’ve come across is “open” code that cannot run freely. “Open” but runs only on proprietary platforms? Apparently that has become rather common, especially on iOS and Windows. If your so-called ‘open’ stuff requires proprietary software to merely execute, then you must be wasting your time developing it. How about “Exadel Launches Adobe Experience Manager Authoring Toolkit as Open Source Tool for Digital Marketing Community”? Adobe is a foe of Software Freedom; why not support the Free software alternatives to it? To quote: “The Toolkit supports an automatic yet versatile and extendable generation of UI elements for AEM authors and provides a next-gen authoring experience in Adobe’s Coral UI-powered environment.”

But it’s proprietary. So the code basically steers people away from freedom.

“It’s unfortunate to see that a lot of so-called ‘open’ programs are designed to run only under Windows. What is being accomplished?”Here’s another new example of so-called ‘open’ code that runs only on proprietary software, Windows, with its back doors (the protocol itself and the operating system). The headline says “New open source tool helps prevent brute force and ransomware attacks”. It’s called Cameyo and it is also hosted by Microsoft (GitHub, the proprietary software trap), which puts the NSA back doors in there in the first place. What good is ‘security’ software on top of a platform designed to not be secure? Here’s another new example. It’s so-called ‘Open-Source’ which has neither source code (for now) nor disclosure date and can only run on Windows with NSA back doors. What kind of farcical security can this thing really offer? And here’s a third new example, MobaXterm. What good is an SSH client that only runs on a platform with NSA back doors? Users expose private keys etc.

Things to look out for nowadays aren’t just the licences but also supported platforms. It’s unfortunate to see that a lot of so-called ‘open’ programs are designed to run only under Windows. What is being accomplished?

“I would love to see all open source innovation happen on top of Windows.”

Steve Ballmer, Microsoft CEO

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. InteLeaks – Part XXX: Harbor Research's Pseudo-scientific 'Research' for Intel, Bizarrely Suggesting a Microsoft Partnership for a Domain Largely Controlled or Dominated by Linux

    The full document that Intel paid for and in turn used to justify cracking down on Free software (obliterating Free software-based workflows inside Intel), instead outsourcing all sorts of things to proprietary software traps of Microsoft



  2. Chromium and Chrome Are Not Free Software But an Example of Microsoft-Fashioned Openwashing Tactics

    It's time to reject Google's Web monopoly (shared with other companies but still an oligopoly); removing its Web browser would be a good start



  3. Links 23/1/2021: Chromium Pains and New Debian Maintainers

    Links for the day



  4. InteLeaks – Part XXIX: Harbor Research Did Not Produce a Study But an Elaborate Hoax for Intel, Suggesting Microsoft Partnership and Outsourcing Based on Zero Evidence and No Solid Rationale

    The pseudo-scientific ‘report’ from Harbor Research is more of the same nonsense we’ve grown accustomed to; unethical if not rogue firms are being paid to lie — or to perpetuate falsehoods which someone stands to gain from



  5. Video: The State of Communities Surrounding GNU/Linux Distributions

    A discussion about the state of volunteer efforts going into the development, maintenance (in the 'maintainership' sense) and support/advocacy of GNU/Linux distros



  6. IRC Proceedings: Friday, January 22, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, January 22, 2021



  7. InteLeaks – Part XXVIII: Intel Served Report From Microsoft Boosters, Who Provide No Actual Evidence and No Science to Back Their Supposed 'Findings'

    Findings and recommendations from Harbor 'Research' aren't based on any scientific methods, just perceived loyalty, branding, and a bunch of unsourced quotes (from unnamed people with ridiculous job titles like a soup of buzzwords)



  8. Erosion of Communities, Ascent of Corporate-Industrial Fake Communities

    Despite the attempts to manipulate/trick developers (and sometimes users) into becoming unpaid workforce of for-profit companies, there's an exodus back to real communities, which aren't subjected to the fury of wealthy shareholders who utterly dislike or simply don't care for software freedom



  9. The Corporate 'Left' and the Open Source Pseudo 'Movement'

    President Biden may not be as bad as his predecessor, but that hardly means very much; software freedom is still threatened, along with many other things



  10. Links 22/1/2021: pfSense Plus, Endless OS Foundation, and Many Laptops With GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  11. The Linux Foundation is Trying to Obscure Racism Using Microsoft-Inspired Tactics (Vouchers Disguised as Actual Money)

    The Linux Foundation and its PR stunts don’t help combat racism; one might argue that the Foundation is leveraging racism, which prevails in the US, to paint itself as benevolent and caring (offering immaterial things and self-serving press releases)



  12. InteLeaks – Part XXVII: 'Pulling a Nokia' on Intel (Outsourcing to Microsoft)

    The recommendation of an Intel marriage with Microsoft (even in units that deal mostly with Linux) is an insulting slap across the face of developers employed there; we take a look at recommendations made to IoTG (Intel) by a firm with Microsoft orientation



  13. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, January 21, 2021

    IRC logs for Thursday, January 21, 2021



  14. InteLeaks – Part XXVI: Harbor Research is Horrible 'Research', Lacking Actual Technical Background

    Having looked at the members of staff of Harbor Research (individually), it seems clearer now why they have an affinity for Microsoft and why they're directing Intel to liaise with Microsoft and become a prisoner of Microsoft (even in areas where Microsoft is increasingly irrelevant)



  15. Links 21/1/2021: Raspberry Pi Pico, Ubuntu 21.04 Picks GNOME 3.38, KDE Plasma 5.21 Beta

    Links for the day



  16. How a Newly Inaugurated President Biden Can Advance Software Freedom (If He Actually Wishes to Do So)

    Techrights has 'Four Suggestions' to President Biden, the 46th 'front end' of American plutocracy



  17. InteLeaks – Part XXV: Intel's Brain Drain Leads to Unusual Measures

    As the company once known as 'chipzilla' loses its relevance and dominance in the market it's reaching out to retired people, trying to get them back onboard



  18. Hey Hi (AI) is Just a Trojan Horse for Illegal Software Patents, According to EPO Management and Litigation Firms It's in Bed With

    The longtime pushers or the lobby of patent profiteers just carry on pushing for software patents, nowadays latching onto the inane and unwarranted media hype around Hey Hi (AI) — a hype wave that was co-opted by EPO management to grant unlawful patents



  19. The Central Staff Representatives (CSC) of the EPO Are Petitioning to End the Assault on EPO Staff

    The EPO, just one month after the staff went on strike, is about to receive a compelling petition to stop the assault on EPO staff



  20. InteLeaks – Part XXIV: Love for Microsoft, Not for Free Software or Whatever Replaces Microsoft

    Intel is basing its big decisions on buzzwords and firms that master buzzwords; it's sad that instead of listening to Intel's own (in-house) engineers it's relying on a bunch of clowns who push 'Clown Computing' and 'apps' and 'UX'...



  21. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, January 20, 2021

    IRC logs for Wednesday, January 20, 2021



  22. Links 21/1/2021: Google Tightens the Screws on Chromium, VideoLAN VLC 3.0.12

    Links for the day



  23. IBM Panics and Resorts to 'Customer Retention' Tactics With Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

    IBM 'frees' RHEL but with limitations that can restrict growth of small companies (or subject them to financial barriers, originally unforeseen)



  24. Recent Techrights Articles About President Joe Biden

    Instead of writing yet more stuff about the latest US president, let's look back at what we wrote in recent weeks/months



  25. Links 20/1/2021: LibreOffice 7.1 RC2 and the RHEL Contingency

    Links for the day



  26. InteLeaks – Part XXIII: Intel Paying for Bogus 'Research' 'Insights' Which Merely Seek to Justify Outsourcing to Microsoft and Imposing Microsoft's Proprietary Software on Free Software Developers

    Intel's preference for Microsoft monopoly (an imposed/top-down decision) was seemingly certified by so-called 'consultants' and 'analysts' from the outside rather than the inside, basically manufacturing a false perception of consent after managers had already made up their minds



  27. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part V: How FSF Secrecy Ended Up Insulting People, Alienating Trans Developers

    Having just uploaded this introductory video, we delve into the backstory or the real reason the FSF sank into somewhat of a crisis with the trans community almost half a decade ago



  28. InteLeaks – Part XXII: Bubbles and Buzzwords, No Substance at Intel's Internet of Things (IoT) Group (IOTG)

    The video above is continuation of the previous part about a document full of superficial buzzwords (not technical jargon anywhere), in effect recommending to managers that they blindly follow trends and cargo cults (such as Clown Computing) and not what’s most suitable for technical excellence



  29. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 19, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, January 19, 2021



  30. Links 20/1/2021: WireGuard for pfSense and New US President

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts