04.15.20

Gemini version available ♊︎

British Government Again Confirms Death of the UPC, But Team UPC is Not Listening

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 11:30 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Woman with headphones listening to music

Summary: The British government states very clearly that the UPC isn’t happening (as far as the UK is concerned); without the UK the UPC won’t exist (ever), but the spin carries on

MOVE over, António Campinos.

Drop the wine bottle, Mr. Battistelli.

There are liars even bigger than you two.

This new piece from Taylor Wessing’s Simon Cohen and Paul England openly asks what will follow the collapse of Europe’s plans for a UPC…

The headline is of course a lie, as usual…

“They weaponise or at least utilise this media to tell loads of lies, perpetuating that lingering illusion if not delusion about the EPO.”The media — The Global Legal Post in this case (rather malicious although the publication’s title clearly implies it’s by/for the legal domain/litigation matters) — is being hijacked by mouthpieces of patent trolls. They weaponise or at least utilise this media to tell loads of lies, perpetuating that lingering illusion if not delusion about the EPO‘s ‘darling’ — a ‘takeover’ of courts. We recently published a 20-part series about it (index here) and as we said in the last part (posted over the past weekend) we knew it would not stop there. The law firm calls the fall of the UPC “a backward step” (for trolls and lawyers) and they — the two authors — at least aren’t denying the severity of it. In their own words (taking into account Poland, Spain, Hungary and the Czech Republic — something Team UPC deliberately omits):

‘Null and void.’

So held the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany on 20 March 2020, delivering what could be the final blow to the pan-EU Unified Patent Court (UPC) project – nearly 50 years in the making.

In essence, the Bundestag did not use the correct two-thirds majority vote procedure when enacting this agreement into German law. It might be thought straightforward to remedy this problem: just re-enact the agreement using the necessary majority.

However, circumstances have moved on quickly in recent months. Poland and Spain declined to participate in the UPC early in the project, and they have recently been joined by Hungary and the Czech Republic, for constitutional and economic reasons, respectively.

Taylor Wessing’s Simon Cohen and Paul England pretend that the death of the UPC somehow makes it harder to handle a pandemic when it’s so obvious that the exact opposite is true! Lawyers lying for a quid. This is that typical nonsense; we saw similar lies spread in Germany, alarmingly implying we’ll all die from a virus unless UPC becomes a reality! In their words: “The demise of the UPC is therefore a backward step, particularly at a time of pandemic, when there is so much emphasis on the need for international solutions and cooperation. The differences in national patent law risks consolidating silos of innovation and creating trade friction, rather than increasing cooperation of R&D centres around the world.”

“The headline is of course a lie, as usual…”What on Earth were you guys smoking? The very opposite is true! It’s so obvious. Because “increasing cooperation of R&D centres around the world” is a lot easier in an atmosphere of reduced tensions over patents. UPC strives to do the exact opposite. As Benjamin Henrion recalled, citing and quoting an old article [1, 2]: “Schneider: “It will be a hermetic, self-governing system of technocratic experts, the EPO, patent attorneys and large firms, with hardly any control mechanisms. It will have a disregard of public interests and human rights.” [...] Schneider criticizes the lack of democratic control of parliaments and EU institutions on the UPC system and perceives a clear danger of tunnel vision and pro-patent bias.”

Henrion has also just taken note of JUVE’s obvious and blatant bias when he said: “JUVE interviews UPC software patent boosters such as Nokia/Ericsson/Siemens, an SME should probably be a patent applicant https://www.juve-patent.com/news-and-stories/legal-commentary/european-industry-reacts-to-german-upc-judgment/ … They forgot to mention that defense will be 3.5x more expensive in Germany.”

“To the JUVE “think tank” the “European industry” is only few conglomerates with loads of patents,” I responded. “How JUVE has fallen… and how fast.”

Earlier this week we noticed that Bristows’ Rich Pinckney reposted this… or the page got altered along with several others (their CMS is very weak/flaky, odd and quite likely arcane, just like the firm itself). Pinckney is editing or maybe tidying up all of his old but somewhat recent articles, maybe even hiding some false statements or inaccuracies in retrospect. Is the intention to save face? Or just a badly broken CMS? Would the UPC’s CMS be equally poor? Then good riddance.

“Taylor Wessing’s Simon Cohen and Paul England pretend that the death of the UPC somehow makes it harder to handle a pandemic when it’s so obvious that the exact opposite is true!”Meticulous comparisons with archived/cached pages would be needed to prove that there’s some kind of ‘coverup’ (sometimes they do edit old blog posts). Pinckney’s latest post says “IP Minister confirms UK’s non-participation in UPC” (they did back in February!) and I responded to their tweet with: “You cannot participate in things that do not exist..”

The post can be found here. Richard Pinckney said that the “IP” [sic] Minister had “confirmed that “the Government will not be seeking the UK’s continued participation in the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court.” Her explanation for that decision expanded slightly on that of the government spokesperson on 27 February (which the media had reported, i.e.“Participating in a court that applies EU law and bound by the CJEU is inconsistent with our aims of becoming an independent self-governing nation.”). She referred to the government’s approach to future relations with the EU published on 27 February (here) ruling out any obligation for UK laws to be aligned with the EU’s or for the EU’s institutions (including the CJEU) to have any jurisdiction in the UK, and explained that continued participation in the UPC would mean “ceding jurisdiction over key patent disputes in the UK to a court that is bound to apply and respect the supremacy of EU law, including judgments of the CJEU” would be incompatible with that approach.”

OK, would that be enough to shut down that blog or shut up the UPC boosters of Bristows? Not likely…

“All in all, hooray to yet more low-quality media, misleading publishers, lying law firms and people who “still want to believe” (like alien enthusiasts, where UPC is the extraterrestrial with antennas and all).”Over at IP Kat they’ve just spoken about “Katfriends Darren Meale (Simmons & Simmons),” so the ‘Kats’ are friends with the very worst of Team UPC; they still have Bristows staff among their staff (albeit she left Bristows some months ago).

All in all, hooray to yet more low-quality media, misleading publishers, lying law firms and people who “still want to believe” (like alien enthusiasts, where UPC is the extraterrestrial with antennas and all).

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. The Demolition of the EPO Was Made Possible With Assistance From Countries That Barely Have European Patents

    The legal basis of today's EPO has been crushed; a lot of this was made possible by countries with barely any stakes in the outcome



  2. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXII: The Balkan League - North Macedonia and Albania

    We continue to look at Benoît Battistelli‘s enablers at the EPO



  3. Links 24/10/2021: GPS Daemon (GPSD) Bug and Lots of Openwashing

    Links for the day



  4. Links 24/10/2021: XWayland 21.1.3 and Ubuntu Linux 22.04 LTS Daily Build

    Links for the day



  5. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, October 23, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, October 23, 2021



  6. Links 24/10/2021: Ceph Boss Sage Weil Resigns and Many GPL Enforcement Stories

    Links for the day



  7. GAFAM-Funded NPR Reports That Facebook Let Millions of People Like Trump Flout the So-called Rules. Not Just “a Few”.

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission



  8. Some Memes About What Croatia Means to the European Patent Office

    Before we proceed to other countries in the region, let’s not forget or let’s immortalise the role played by Croatia in the EPO (memes are memorable)



  9. Gangster Culture in the EPO

    The EPO‘s Administrative Council was gamed by a gangster from Croatia; today we start the segment of the series which deals with the Balkan region



  10. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXI: The Balkan League – The Doyen and His “Protégée”

    The EPO‘s circle of corruption in the Balkan region will be the focus of today’s (and upcoming) coverage, showing some of the controversial enablers of Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos, two deeply corrupt French officials who rapidly drive the Office into the ground for personal gain (at Europe’s expense!)



  11. Links 23/10/2021: FreeBSD 12.3 Beta, Wine 6.20, and NuTyX 21.10.0

    Links for the day



  12. IRC Proceedings: Friday, October 22, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, October 22, 2021



  13. [Meme] [Teaser] Crime Express

    The series about Battistelli's "Strike Regulations" (20 parts thus far) culminates as the next station is the Balkan region



  14. Links 23/10/2021: Star Labs/StarLite, Ventoy 1.0.56

    Links for the day



  15. Gemini on Sourcehut and Further Expansion of Gemini Space

    Gemini protocol is becoming a widely adopted de facto standard for many who want to de-clutter the Internet by moving away from the World Wide Web and HTML (nowadays plagued by JavaScript, CSS, and many bloated frameworks that spy)



  16. Unlawful Regimes Even Hungary and Poland Would Envy

    There’s plenty of news reports about Polish and Hungarian heads of states violating human rights, but never can one find criticism of the EPO’s management doing the same (the mainstream avoids this subject altogether); today we examine how that area of Europe voted on the illegal "Strike Regulations" of Benoît Battistelli



  17. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XX: The Visegrád Group

    The EPO‘s unlawful “Strike Regulations” (which helped Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos illegally crush or repress EPO staff) were supported by only one among 4 Visegrád delegates



  18. [Meme] IBM Has Paid ZDNet to Troll the Community

    Over the past few weeks ZDNet has constantly published courses with the word "master" in their headlines (we caught several examples; a few are shown above); years ago this was common, also in relation to IBM itself; clearly IBM thinks that the word is racially sensitive and offensive only when it's not IBM using the word and nowadays IBM pays ZDNet — sometimes proxying through the Linux Foundation — to relay this self-contradictory message whose objective is to shame programmers, Free software communities etc. (through guilt they can leverage more power and resort to projection tactics, sometimes outright slander which distracts)



  19. [Meme] ILO Designed to Fail: EPO Presidents Cannot be Held Accountable If ILOAT Takes Almost a Decade to Issue a Simple Ruling

    The recent ILOAT ruling (a trivial no-brainer) inadvertently reminds one of the severe weaknesses of ILOAT; what good is a system of accountability that issues rulings on decisions that are barely relevant anymore (or too late to correct)?



  20. Links 22/10/2021: Trump's AGPL Violations and Chrome 95 Released

    Links for the day



  21. [Meme] How Corporate Monopolies Demonise Critics of Their Technically and Legally Problematic 'Products'

    When the technical substance of some criticism stands (defensible based upon evidence), and is increasingly difficult to refute based on facts, make up some fictional issue — a straw man argument — and then respond to that phony issue based on no facts at all



  22. Links 22/10/2021: Global Encryption Day

    Links for the day



  23. [Meme] Speaking the Same Language

    Language inside the EPO is misleading. Francophones Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos casually misuse the word “social”.



  24. António Campinos Thinks Salary Reductions Months Before He Leaves is “Exceptional Social Gesture”

    Just as Benoît Battistelli had a profound misunderstanding of the concept of “social democracy” his mate seems to completely misunderstand what a “social gesture” is (should have asked his father)



  25. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, October 21, 2021

    IRC logs for Thursday, October 21, 2021



  26. Links 21/10/2021: MX Linux 21 and Git Contributors’ Summit in a Nutshell

    Links for the day



  27. [Meme] [Teaser] Miguel de Icaza on CEO of Microsoft GitHub

    Our ongoing series, which is very long, will shed much-needed light on GitHub and its goals (the dark side is a lot darker than people care to realise)



  28. Gemini Protocol and Gemini Space Are Not a Niche; for Techrights, Gemini Means Half a Million Page Requests a Month

    Techrights on gemini:// has become very big and we’ll soon regenerate all the pages (about 37,500 of them) to improve clarity, consistency, and general integrity



  29. 'Satellite States' of EPO Autocrats

    Today we look more closely at how Baltic states were rendered 'voting fodder' by large European states, looking to rubber-stamp new and oppressive measures which disempower the masses



  30. [Meme] Don't Mention 'Brexit' to Team UPC

    It seems perfectly clear that UPC cannot start, contrary to what the EPO‘s António Campinos told the Council last week (lying, as usual) and what the EPO insinuates in Twitter; in fact, a legal challenge to this should be almost trivial


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts