EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

06.04.20

Weakening GNU/Linux by Disempowering Its Leaders and Founders, Replacing Them With Microsoft Employees and GNU/Linux-Hostile Moles

Posted in Deception, GNU/Linux, Microsoft at 12:16 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

While bribing all the major publishers to glorify Microsoft’s co-founders

How could it be... Popular?: GNU/Linux - Let's try that - WTH? - Bottled at Microsoft

Summary: The coup to remove (or remove power from) Stallman and Torvalds, the GNU and Linux founders respectively, is followed by outsourcing of their work to Microsoft’s newly-acquired monopoly (GitHub) and appointment of Microsoft workers or Microsoft-friendly people, shoehorning them into top roles under the disingenuous guise of "professionalism"

THREE days ago we wrote about what it would take for Linus Torvalds to regain leadership of his own project, seeing that he’s no longer in charge (especially since 2018). We’ll come to that in a moment.

Well, a couple of hours ago Linux.com published this awkward article (it’s awkward enough that they publish any article at all because that site is practically dead; all the editors and journalists were fired a year ago without warning and without telling the public anything at all!).

And now?

Well, now things are different. It feels like the site is now owned and composed by Microsoft employees. The above article isn’t really an article but a paid placement, a self-serving puff piece. You now go to Linux.com for news about Linux and instead you read a puff piece from matt.butcher@microsoft.com about Github and “VS Code extensions”…

“You now go to Linux.com for news about Linux and instead you read a puff piece from matt.butcher@microsoft.com about Github and “VS Code extensions”…”The company behind the “Cancer” slur and its anti-GPL nonsense is now running Linux.com, at least indirectly. Does that make sense at all? Remember that the official blog of the Linux Foundation is also nowadays run by a former Microsoft employee. Does the Foundation hand over its messaging to Microsofters? Does that make any sense?

How did we come to this? Today’s Linux Foundation is not merely defunct. It is corrupt. It takes money from Microsoft and outsources projects to Microsoft (GitHub). It helps promote Microsoft’s proprietary software! This is the very opposite of what it was supposed to do! Look at the management team and Board, both of which are now stacked with Microsoft employees including top-level executives. These are the bosses of Linus Torvalds. Surely he can sense their presence.

Shoehorning Microsoft didn’t happen overnight; it’s a slow process and it’s always moving or advancing in one direction. Under misleading banners (lies) such as “Microsoft loves Linux…”

“Shoehorning Microsoft didn’t happen overnight; it’s a slow process and it’s always moving or advancing in one direction.”And suffice to say, those who dislike Microsoft no longer belong in the Foundation. So keep quiet, Mr. Torvalds, shut up about Microsoft. You don’t want the Board to oust you again, do you? The media can easily be weaponised to achieve that; we know who pays the media…

We’ve already seen what the media did to Richard Stallman a week or two after a major Bill Gates scandal at MIT; so-called ‘journalists’ (salaried by Microsoft- and Gates-funded publications) are just shaming, canceling ‘targets’, inducing guilt and self-shame upon them. We’ve long seen the media presenting/painting them as ‘zealots’ for opposing things that large corporations want until they ‘soften’ and obey. Sometimes the media calls them “arrogant” for merely holding the same position in defiance of antagonists, as if principles are a weakness…

Yesterday there was an article entitled “TrueNAS isn’t abandoning BSD—but it is adopting Linux” and one reader told us: “Sure, both GitHub and Linux kernel are co-opted by Microsoft. This is how they slowly attack BSD — get free software crowd to adopt Github, get BSD crowd to adopt Linux kernel. That’s a cheap way to get their claws in.”

“We’ve already seen what the media did to Richard Stallman a week or two after a major Bill Gates scandal at MIT; so-called ‘journalists’ (salaried by Microsoft- and Gates-funded publications) are just shaming, canceling ‘targets’, inducing guilt and self-shame upon them.”“Articles aiming at Torvalds,” another person told us yesterday, highlight the stages of the ‘coup’ against Torvalds as the “benevolent dictator” of Linux. The pattern is worth taking note of, for it highlights a certain modus operandi.

“Sorry I can’t find much,” the person told us, “even though the attacks against Linus Torvalds have gone on for well over a decade it is terribly hard to find key articles.”

The Internet rots very quickly. Several of the links below are dead already (some died as recently as months ago when domains were abandoned).

“Here is a small sampling of recent aggressions,” the person said. “They have been gunning for him continuously for years because of the direction he has kept the code base moving towards. Remember he is focusing on the code, but that is exactly what upsets microsofters and worse groups so they go ad hominem on him. Too bad but that works.”

In 2019 Linux Journal published “25 Years Later: Interview with Linus Torvalds” (just before the site went offline, then came back albeit without any staff). The person who curated these links asked, “can you find the original article which it refers to?”

“The pattern is worth taking note of, for it highlights a certain modus operandi.”Well, it’s right here. Notice the people involved back then. Same familiar faces even in the mid-nineties.

In 2012 (MS)BBC News [sic] published this awkwardly-titled piece, “Linus Torvalds: Linux succeeded thanks to selfishness and trust”; the publisher that worked to oust Torvalds in 2018 published “Nvidia Responds to F-Bomb From Linus Torvalds”; unlike “Linux founder Linus Torvalds delivers a smackdown like no other”

A year later, in 2013, Torvalds confronted a troll from Intel. He argued: “The fact is, people need to know what my position on things are. And I can’t just say “please don’t do that”, because people won’t listen. I say “On the internet, nobody can hear you being subtle”, and I mean it.”

He also said: “The thing is, the “victim card” is exactly about trying to enforce your particular expectations on others, and trying to do so in a very particular way. It’s the old “think of the children” argument. And it’s bogus. Calling things “professional” is just more of the same – trying to enforce some kind of convention on others by trying to claim that it’s the only acceptable way.”

The Register (close to Microsoft since that old Microsoft partnership) published “Dear Linus, STOP SHOUTING and play nice – says Linux kernel dev” and there were many articles to that effect back then (we too wrote about it). The original from the troll was entitled “No more verbal abuse” and it’s now offline, much like the person (nobody hears about this troll anymore; technical career over).

“The Internet rots very quickly.”The Register published 3 years later (in 2016) “Linus Torvalds in sweary rant about punctuation in kernel comments” — the typical attempt to portray Torvalds as rude and unruly. A year earlier the publisher that worked to oust Torvalds in 2018 (together with the above troll) published “Linus Torvalds on why he isn’t nice: “I don’t care about you”” (Garrett working with the troll, using the Microsoft-funded Ars Technica to quote Torvalds out of context).

In 2018 the Microsoft-manned BBC published “Linus Torvalds: ‘I’ll never be cuddly but I can be more polite’” and the media where he lives published “Linux creator Linus Torvalds ‘truly sorry’ for online behavior, plans to take time off”. The message contained herein (“Linus Torvalds: Linux 4.19-rc4 released, an apology, and a maintainership note”) seems to include a sort of forced “apology”…

“The big smear campaign was spearheaded by an IBM-owned (partly) and Microsoft-funded publisher, which managed to ‘oust’ Torvalds — at least temporarily — and then publicly bragged about it.”Even back then you could already sense someone else was controlling him and his words…

The big smear campaign was spearheaded by an IBM-owned (partly) and Microsoft-funded publisher, which managed to ‘oust’ Torvalds — at least temporarily — and then publicly bragged about it. It wasn’t an act of journalism but shareholder ‘activism’. See “After Years of Abusive E-mails, the Creator of Linux Steps Aside”.

Torvalds was never a big fan of how the Internet treated him and cherry-picked his words; see “Linus Torvalds calls social media a disease” (site now offline).

“The employer of Torvalds is now full of Microsoft people (still receiving their entire salary from Microsoft) and the site called Linux.com is composed by Microsoft employees, promoting proprietary software of Microsoft.”The provocations and trolling go a long way back, but most press coverage about it is nowhere to be found anymore. As our reader put it, “remember this troll?” See “Is Torvalds really the father of Linux?” from CNET, now owned by the same company as ZDNet, a totally shameless Microsoft propaganda site.

So here we are, almost 30 years after Linux was released (with a GPL badge). The employer of Torvalds is now full of Microsoft people (still receiving their entire salary from Microsoft) and the site called Linux.com is composed by Microsoft employees, promoting proprietary software of Microsoft. It’s pro-monopoly; Microsoft’s monopoly. As recently as 2-3 hours ago. But no, no… there’s definitely no coup. It’s just an illusion… nothing to see here, move along. Microsoft isn’t leveraging cult-like tactics; the only “cult” is “overzealous” people who oppose Microsoft.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Slashdot

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 29/9/2020: Fedora 33 Beta, Krita 4.4.0 Beta 2, Stellarium 0.20.3 and Mesa 20.2 Released; 20 Million Downloads From the LVFS

    Links for the day



  2. Another Day of ZDNet Being ZDNet, Calling Windows “Linux” (to Confuse People and Help Microsoft Sell Vista 10)

    Microsoft propaganda site ZDNet is keeping up with the tradition of presenting Windows as "Linux" and promoting Windows even in the "Linux" section of the site



  3. [Meme] It's Crazy Not to Eliminate Lame Words That Might Offend Somebody

    If the word “stupid” offends you, then maybe programming isn’t for you, in the same sense that submitting patches with Git over E-mail shouldn't be hard if/when you can develop decent code with sanity checks



  4. IBM Fought for 'Master Race' and Now It's Banning the Word 'Master'

    A lot of the current push to ban the word "master" came from Red Hat (soon IBM, helped by Intel and Microsoft for the most part); we take a hard look at IBM's history to better understand the incredible double standards and what the real motivations might be



  5. IBM's Founder, Mr. Watson (Yes, That Watson), Had “Very Keen Sense of Public Relations”

    "Watson" is a lot more offensive than those supposedly offensive words IBM is working to purge; think about those hundreds of Red Hat workers who are black and were never told about ethnic purges of blacks facilitated by IBM (their new boss)



  6. Under IBM's Leadership Red Hat Becomes a SPAM Marketing Operation, Sending Mass Mails Without Authorisation and Making It Impossible to Unsubscribe

    Red Hat seems incapable of respecting people's inboxes; it subscribes people to things which they never ever subscribed to and makes it impossible to unsubscribe; what has Red Hat become or succumbed to?



  7. EFF: Sitting on a Massive Pile of Money and Members Are Less Than a Third of the Revenue

    As part of our series which explores non-profits turning against their goals (sometimes in pursuit of money, even if that means sellout) we take a good look at the EFF in this age of unprecedented consolidation of wealth and power



  8. IRC Proceedings: Monday, September 28, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, September 28, 2020



  9. [Meme] Running Public (or Private) Interest Groups for Profit

    The Linux Foundation is picking up some more ‘surveillance capitalism’ money, in the name of… ‘helping’ Linux?



  10. The Concept of Martyrdom in Free Software and the Threat of Demonisation in the Media

    Leaders or figureheads of public interest advocacy are being dismissed as crazy and rude whilst corporations that maim and kill millions of people are spun as "professional" and even "altruistic"; don't fall for it



  11. More Money Does Not Necessarily Mean More Stable Organisations

    The corporate takeover of Free software (privatising the Commons) is a real problem that nobody in the media seems to be talking about, partly because this media is itself corporate and hence part of (participant in) the 'coup'



  12. EPO Management Looks for New and 'Innovative' Ways to Exploit Scientists and Distract From EPO Corruption

    EPO management is desperate for puff pieces, having just produced some greenwashing nonsense (about a dozen press items about this non-event) and now a bunch of self-promotional videos



  13. Before the New York Times Did a Number on Donald Trump It Changed Bill Gates' Tune

    When you speak strictly through a spokesperson it often means you're lying and/or hiding something; the Gates enigma remains unsolved more than a year later



  14. Links 28/9/2020: Linux 5.9 RC7, Review of Linuxfx 10.6, OpenSSH 8.4

    Links for the day



  15. Speaking Through Spokespeople is a Sign of Weakness, Such as Non-Denying and False Denials (or: Bill Gates Never Denied His Connections to MIT Through Jeffrey Epstein)

    Big liars lie shamelessly; the biggest liars lie through proxies and today we examine the evasive tactics of Bill Gates and his associates (who were closely connected to Jeffrey Epstein but refuse to even talk about that, except indirectly)



  16. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, September 27, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, September 27, 2020



  17. Accounting for Debconf 19 Travel... in 2020

    A deeper look or analysis of Debian expenditures, which grew more than twicefold for travel last year



  18. Don't Let Microsoft Make 'Open Source' Synonymous With Proprietary Monopoly GitHub

    Now that the OSI works for Microsoft instead of Open Source (no, GitHub isn’t Open Source; it’s inherently against Open Source) we need to understand the modus operandi and learn from old mistakes



  19. Links 27/9/2020: Puppy Linux 9.5, Nitrux 1.3.3

    Links for the day



  20. Public Relations and Tolerance Stunts Are Very, Very Cheap

    It's 2020 and people are asked to focus on superficial aspects of corporations rather than anything of substance (like the effects on society at large, notably exploitation and long-term harm)



  21. Open to Everything

    It always starts with good intentions...



  22. The OSI's President Apparently Does Not Know That His Own Employer (Salesforce) Works for ICE

    The hypocrisy (or double standard) of the OSI’s President is astounding; taking salaries paid in part by ICE budget (Salesforce works for ICE and similarly evil agencies) while protesting in a proprietary software platform of Microsoft (GitHub) about ICE (all this whilst actively participating in it regardless)



  23. [Meme] Communist Tactics

    To Microsoft, Linux is communism until Microsoft controls it (and then runs over it to crush it, the typical modus operandi)



  24. OSI President: Most or Half of the OSI's Money (Even Individual Donors' Money) Goes to a Microsoft-Led Initiative

    The OSI has turned from advocate of "Open Source" (a disingenuous attempt to set aside Free/libre software) to advocate of Microsoft and GitHub in just 3 years (since taking Microsoft's money/bribes)



  25. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, September 26, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, September 26, 2020



  26. The 24/7 'Tech' Worker (Babysitter of User-hostile Computing) and 'Expensive' Programmer

    The rights of workers are being reduced to nothing (many in their older years made redundant), even in an occupation that is indirectly responsible for automating and thus deprecating jobs in many other occupations



  27. Why Techrights is Totally Unexcited About the New Owner of Linux Journal

    Linux Journal might soon become an anti-Linux site (veiled hostility) if Slashdot's editorial preferences are anything to go by (Slashdot has just seized control of Linux Journal)



  28. The Cheapening of the Programmer is a Threat to Human Rights of All Computer Users

    From the era of computer experts (down to the low level of computing with transistors), mathematicians, physics gurus and respected technicians we've come to orders-following, user-apathetic engineers who are overworked, grossly underpaid, and way too fearful of raising ethical concerns (voicing disagreement can result in prompt dismissal, followed by perpetual unemployment) and this ensures digital oppression without checks and balances



  29. Links 26/9/2020: Wine 5.18, FreeBSD 12.2-BETA3 and Debian 10.6 Released

    Links for the day



  30. 'Appeal to Novelty' as a Lever for Proprietary Software Monopolies, Bloat (Planned Obsolescence) and More Surveillance

    Novelty is generally fine, but in many cases products are developed iteratively (not cumulatively) not to advance society or to objectively improve services, only to increase control over people (because emergent ‘freemium’-like business models nowadays revolve around addiction and subjugation, e.g. ‘brain-farming’ and manipulation of minds)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts