EPO Management Consciously Breaking European Union Laws: Staff and Stakeholders Subjected to Illegal Tactics and Practices, Now Exam Takers As Well

Posted in Europe, Patents at 1:37 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Orwell’s nightmare, now with diplomatic immunity and no oversight whatsoever

Mirrored objective

Summary: The EPO routinely breaks privacy laws, knowing that there’s not even an attempt to enforce the law against the EPO’s dictators; we’ve lost count of the instances/number of privacy scandals at the EPO, but we keep adding more to our list

Staff and stakeholders have their privacy rights violated, as we noted last month and again this morning. Under normal circumstances, Benoît Battistelli, António Campinos and their ilk would risk arrest for what they do at the EPO. But they have diplomatic immunity and half a decade ago we saw Battistelli getting away with very serious crimes, e.g. visitors subjected to illegal surveillance on EPO premises (it was all over the media at the time, back when the media actually bothered covering EPO scandals).

Wall of MirrorsThe Commission's whitewash of corruption at the EPO means that EU law won’t be enforced and rules won’t be honoured; just like that… more abuse, more immunity, more impunity…

Rose Hughes (AstraZeneca and EPO apologist) has just been advertising a sham exam (EQE) with extra surveillance now added to it. The corruption associated with EQE was covered here in a series earlier this year. Nobody was held accountable. Nobody.

Based on this post, the EPO adopts more spyware; basically malware. It’s as if COVID-19 makes ‘magic’ and renders the illegal “excusable” ever so magically. To quote: “The EPO has released the first detailed information for candidates on the arrangements for the online pre-EQE and EQE next year. Full details can be read here. The examinations are scheduled to take place the week of 1 March 2021. The online exams will be taken using the dramatically named “LockDown browser”, which candidates are being advised to log in to 20 minutes before the exam.”

“A lot of things like the “LockDown browser” are being imposed on students despite being in violation of human rights.”So the data is going to Microsoft’s next-door neighbours at Respondus, who are flirting with GDPR violations and looking for cleverly-worded excuses. A lot of things like the “LockDown browser” are being imposed on students despite being in violation of human rights. Lack of actual enforcement is a very serious problem. Laws without enforcement are toothless tigers.

We’d like to bring up an old document (2019) [PDF] in which staff representatives at the EPO named several GDPR violations. Here’s the full document for the PDF-hostile/averse folks.







Notice the part about the UPC: “In the near future the EPO might be entrusted by the EU to process patent application in the framework of the Unitary Patent. It is unlikely that member states and applicants would accept a situation in which the EPO would process personal data of EU citizens in the name of the European Union without respecting EU legislation for data protection.”

Here’s the corresponding and more concise message to EPO staff:

Data protection @ EPO, quo vadis?

Data protection guidelines at the EPO should be aligned to European regulations


New EU Data Protection Regulations

New regulations for data protection have been introduced by the EU in 2018, the General Data Protection Regulation[1] (GDPR). It safeguards EU citizen’s fundamental right to protection of their data and it is directly binding for all EU member states. However, it is not binding for the EPO.

EPO has its own data protection policies

The EPO follows its own data protection policies: the Data Protection Guidelines[2] (DPG). Staff representatives pointed numerous times to the gap between the DPG and the European regulations. Commenting on the GDPR, former VP5 Raimund Lutz stated that the EPO is very close to EU legislation, because the EPO always has applied the “highest level of data protection [...] including the nomination of an independent Data Protection Officer (DPO)”. Furthermore, a recent audit report (2017) has been cited which “has confirmed a close alignment with the GDPR legal framework.”[3]

Data protection and the Unitary Patent

In the near future the EPO might be entrusted by the EU to process patent application in the framework of the Unitary Patent. It is unlikely that member states and applicants would accept a situation in which the EPO would process personal data of EU citizens in the name of the European Union without respecting EU legislation for data protection.

EPO data protection guidelines do not meet EU standards

An independent and external legal analysis[4] in 2016 concluded that the DPG did not meet the standards of data protection laws in the EU at that time. The analysis further stated that there is a lack of independent oversight, of an effective system of checks and balances to prevent abuses, and of effective means of redress in circumstances where the rights of individuals are infringed.

Staff representation proposes to align EPO policies to EU policies

Staff representation finds that the introduction of the new European guidelines is an opportunity to re-open the discussion on data protection at the EPO: The data protection policies at the EPO can be improved in order to better protect the data of staff and applicants/users alike. The EPO used to have a long tradition to strive to comply with the highest standards in data protection[5]. The last reform in 2014 can only be seen as deterioration in this matter[6]. An alignment of its data protection guidelines to EU regulations would be a step towards a modern data protection framework and would contribute to establish the EPO as the leading patent office.

Staff representation suggests to:

The EPO policies on data protection should be aligned to the EU regulations, which present at the moment the most comprehensive and modern legislation in data protection matters.

The role of the Data Protection Officer, who is responsible for the implementation of the EPO data protection, should be enforced and its independence should be assured.

An external and independent oversight body should be appointed with the task to monitoring the application of data protection policies at the EPO.

Separate data protection policies should be defined for investigative procedures (e.g., misconduct or fraud). Its implementation should be the responsibility of a distinct Data Protection Officer nominated, e.g., by the Administrative Council.

Rules to safeguard data processing should be mended. For example, transfer of personal data to third countries and the change of purpose, e.g., using personal data for purposes for which the user has not consented to, should be tightly regulated.


[1] GDPR, link

[2] Guidelines for the protection of personal data in the European Patent Office, link

[3] VP5 announcement on Intranet, 25.05.2018, link

[4] See section 9 “Data protection framework”, Breaches of basic and fundamental rights at the EPO, Bretton Woods Law, Legal Opinion, 2016, link

[5] Data protection – Current situation in the EPO and in Europe, Gazette 15/95, 03.07.1995, page 8, link

[6] GAC/AV 4/2014, Opinion of the CSC about Data Protection Guidelines, link

It is hardly shocking that “EPO data protection guidelines do not meet EU standards” and to think they’re now subjecting people who merely take an exam to the same low (and non-complying) standards is the cherry on the cake. We await — whilst expectations are admittedly low — EU enforcement action/s. Maybe the German ministry of injustice can once again come up with a bunch of nonsense (lies) about why this is perfectly acceptable.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New

  1. Kluwer Patent Spin and Distortion of Facts (Regarding UPC and More)

    Kluwer Patent Blog disgraces the firm that puts its name on it; instead of sticking to facts they're distorting the facts and the sole/principal goal is to manipulate/mislead the public and public servants

  2. Links 26/1/2021: 4MLinux 35.1, GParted 1.2, Gnuastro 0.14

    Links for the day

  3. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 25, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, January 25, 2021

  4. It's Wrong to Assume Red Hat Competes With Microsoft

    The community ought to stop pretending that one monopoly seeks to replace another despite close partnerships (some would say "collusion") between the two

  5. EPO Staff Representation Complains That EPO Management Exploits Pandemic and 'House Arrests' to Overwork Staff, Lower Quality

    The EPO keeps breaking its promises to workers; not only are key employees seeing their net salary cut (inflation factored in) but pensioners too are being robbed and in the meantime the total time spent on work is increasing

  6. Fake News is Not a 'Wing' Thing

    The two-party corporate-led system (and media) would have us obsess/bicker about accuracy of news based on some binary/dual system of blind loyalty rather than underlying facts and priorities

  7. Links 25/1/2021: Huawei on GNU/Linux, NuTyX 20.12.1, Whisker Menu 2.5.3, Lutris, Linux 5.11 RC5

    Links for the day

  8. Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) in ZDNet is the Norm

    ZDNet continues to emit lots of garbage 'journalism', in effect Microsoft PR and what's known as "black PR" for Linux; just like Bleeping Computer, which ZDNet hired this writer from, there's no adherence to facts, just smears and innuendo

  9. Truth Tellers Aren't an Enemy of Free Software

    There's a perpetual attack on people who speak out against actors and corporations in positions of great power, however subtle and indirect those attacks may seem on the surface (they don't wish to be held accountable for defaming activists)

  10. The Linux Foundation, With Over 124 Million Dollars in Annual Revenue, is in Trouble Because of the Pandemic, So It's Trying to Reinvent Itself as Training and Certifications Outfit

    With mountains of cash and a Public Relations (PR) or marketing business model the so-called 'Linux' Foundation became reliant on travel, lodging, booths and speeches on sale; COVID-19 is a great risk to that business model

  11. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 24, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 24, 2021

  12. Our Move Further Away From the World Wide Web, the Browser Monopolies, HTTP, and HTML

    The World Wide Web (WWW) is going down a bad path and a clearly regressive direction; the solution isn't going 'retro' but exploring more sophisticated systems which are robust to censorship (localised or globalised) and downtime (related to censorship) while reducing surveillance by leveraging encryption at the endpoints

  13. Important Issues Not Entertained in the Community, Especially Critics of the Status Quo

    here's corporate infiltration inside communities (for oligarchy hunts volunteer, unpaid labour) and those who speak about that as a threat to our cause and objectives are painted as misguided outcasts who must be ignored

  14. Internet Origins of the Mob

    Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock

  15. When Proprietary Software Users Dictate the Freedom-Leaning Communities

    Fedora doesn't care about software freedom and its steward (or parent company) is sometimes imposing proprietary software on staff; they've quit caring

  16. In 2020 Onwards 'Open Source' is Just a Marketing Ploy of Monopolies, Unlike Free Software

    More people are nowadays seeing or witnessing 'Open Source' for what it truly is; the term has become a misleading marketing term of proprietary software firms looking to rebrand as "ethical" (e.g. by sharing some code with other proprietary software firms, over proprietary platforms such as GitHub)

  17. Microsoft: The Year After We Bought GitHub There Was a Significant Decline in Number of New Projects on GitHub

    Microsoft has just admitted that in 2019 GitHub saw a very significant decline in number of new projects (and users, which it is conveniently miscounting by adding 'phantom' ones) on the site. Just what we had heard before they confirmed it (and they foresaw this effect of the takeover, hence the lies about "loving" Linux).

  18. Social Control Media is a Passing Fad, We Should All Go Back to Blogging and Subscribing to RSS Feeds

    The whole "social control media" phenomenon has been oversold or promoted using lies; in reality, as a mountain of evidence serves to show, it's a way to manage society at a macro scale

  19. As Andrei Iancu Removes Himself From the Patent and Trademark Office All Eyes Are on Biden's Next Nomination

    Patent zealots and their front groups already lobby Joe Biden to put one of them in charge of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; we'll soon see if Joe Biden "means business" or simply means monopoly/large corporations (and their law firms/departments)

  20. Data Point: GNU/Linux Share in Desktops/Laptops Nearly Tripled in the Past Decade, Peaking This Past Month (All-Time High)

    Contrary to what some publishers try to tell us, GNU/Linux is still growing and mostly at the expense of Windows

  21. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, January 23, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, January 23, 2021

  22. Links 24/1/2021: Nouveau X.Org Driver Release and GhostBSD 21.01.20

    Links for the day

  23. InteLeaks – Part XXX: Harbor Research's Pseudo-scientific 'Research' for Intel, Bizarrely Suggesting a Microsoft Partnership for a Domain Largely Controlled or Dominated by Linux

    The full document that Intel paid for and in turn used to justify cracking down on Free software (obliterating Free software-based workflows inside Intel), instead outsourcing all sorts of things to proprietary software traps of Microsoft

  24. Chromium and Chrome Are Not Free Software But an Example of Microsoft-Fashioned Openwashing Tactics

    It's time to reject Google's Web monopoly (shared with other companies but still an oligopoly); removing its Web browser would be a good start

  25. Links 23/1/2021: Chromium Pains and New Debian Maintainers

    Links for the day

  26. InteLeaks – Part XXIX: Harbor Research Did Not Produce a Study But an Elaborate Hoax for Intel, Suggesting Microsoft Partnership and Outsourcing Based on Zero Evidence and No Solid Rationale

    The pseudo-scientific ‘report’ from Harbor Research is more of the same nonsense we’ve grown accustomed to; unethical if not rogue firms are being paid to lie — or to perpetuate falsehoods which someone stands to gain from

  27. Video: The State of Communities Surrounding GNU/Linux Distributions

    A discussion about the state of volunteer efforts going into the development, maintenance (in the 'maintainership' sense) and support/advocacy of GNU/Linux distros

  28. IRC Proceedings: Friday, January 22, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, January 22, 2021

  29. InteLeaks – Part XXVIII: Intel Served Report From Microsoft Boosters, Who Provide No Actual Evidence and No Science to Back Their Supposed 'Findings'

    Findings and recommendations from Harbor 'Research' aren't based on any scientific methods, just perceived loyalty, branding, and a bunch of unsourced quotes (from unnamed people with ridiculous job titles like a soup of buzzwords)

  30. Erosion of Communities, Ascent of Corporate-Industrial Fake Communities

    Despite the attempts to manipulate/trick developers (and sometimes users) into becoming unpaid workforce of for-profit companies, there's an exodus back to real communities, which aren't subjected to the fury of wealthy shareholders who utterly dislike or simply don't care for software freedom

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts