Bonum Certa Men Certa

Stallman Was Right About 'Secure' Boot (Matthew Garrett's Work Now Used to Prevent Users Adopting New Ubuntu Releases/Derivatives)

Summary: Matthew Garrett pushed a malicious 'feature' (antifeature) of Microsoft and now we all pay for it; instead of working to remove the restrictions, Garrett is nowadays working hard to remove RMS (the messenger)

MS in 2021:

You cannot upgrade Ubuntu
Sources: It's FOSS, OMG!Ubuntu and plenty more (if they make it enough of a pain or a risk, they hope people will stay with Windows and maybe use WSL, not real GNU/Linux)



RMS in 2012: Direct download as Ogg (0:13:28, 5.5 MB)

Dr. Roy Schestowitz: I want to know how big a threat you think the so-called "secure" boot is considered to be to the Free software movement.

Richard StallmanDr. Richard Stallman: It's a disaster. Well, except that it's not secure boot that's a disaster, it's restricted boot. Those are not the same. When it's front of the control of the user, secure boot is a security feature. It allows the user to control what programs can run on a machine and thus prevent -- you might say -- unexpected malware from running. We have to distinguish the unexpected malware such as viruses from the expected malware such as Windows or Mac OS or Flash Player and so on, which are also malware; they have features that hurt the user but users know what they are installing. In any case, what secure boot does is that it causes the machine to only work with (?) programs that are signed with a certain key, your keys. And as long as the user controls which keys they are, then it's a security feature. However, it can be chained into a set of digital handcuffs when the user doesn't control the keys. And this [is] happening.

"We have to distinguish the unexpected malware such as viruses from the expected malware such as Windows or Mac OS..."Microsoft demands that ARM computers sold for Windows 8 be set up so that the user cannot change the keys; in other words, turn it into restricted boot. Now, this is not a security feature. This is abuse of the users. I think it ought to be illegal.

It's a matter of control by the vendor of course, not control by the user himself

Exactly, and that's why it's wrong. That's why non-free software is wrong. The users deserve to have control of their computers/

I think that not only Windows is going to be an issue in fact, if you consider the fact that even a modified kernel is going to be in a position where it's perhaps not seen as verified for execution. Right, I'm saying, it might not only be a malicious feature in case of something like Windows running on it, it's also for -- let's say -- a user of the offered operating system but it's free if the user wants to modify the operating system, for example...

The thing is, if the user doesn't control the keys, then it's a kind of shackle, and that would be true no matter what system it is. After all, why is GNU/Linux better than Windows? Not just 'cause it has a different name. The reason it's better is because it's freedom-respecting Free software that the users control. But if the machine has restricted boot and the users can't control the system, then it would be just as bad as Windows. So, if the machine will only run a particular version of GNU/Linux, that is a restriction feature. And I haven't heard anyone doing that yet with GNU/Linux, but that's what Red Hat and Ubuntu are proposing to do things -- somewhat like that -- for future PCs that are shipped for Windows. But it's not exactly that. And my reason is, the users will be able to change the keys. They will be able to boot their own modified version of the system of Fedora or Ubuntu if they want. So, what Fedora and Ubuntu were proposing doesn't go all the way there. They're proposing to do things to make it more convenient for users to install the standard version of those systems. But if things go as it has been announced, users will still be able to change the keys and boot their own versions. So, if all the restricted boot -- but it will be something that goes sort of half-way there -- it's somewhat distasteful.

"The thing is, if the user doesn't control the keys, then it's a kind of shackle, and that would be true no matter what system it is."On the other hand, with Android, which is another mostly Free operating system which contains Linux but doesn't contain GNU, it's quite common for the product to have something equivalent to restricted boot, and people have to struggle to figure out how they can install a modified and more free version of Android. So, the presence of the kernel Linux in a system doesn't guarantee it's going to be better. And I've heard someone say -- oh, it hasn't been checked -- that a particular or kind of Android device is actually using an Intel chip with restricted boot.

One of the concerns that I think is worth raising is the fact that, as far as I know, with many of the embedded devices, especially those based on ARM, I believe it's not even possible to get into boot menu to disable so-called "secure"...

That's where Microsoft is really going all out, because Microsoft has ordered essentially -- demanded -- that those shipping ARM devices for Windows 8 make it restricted boot with no way to get around it.

Yeah, which also means of course waste of... all sorts of impacts on the environment. Any time that hardware become obsolete with the operating system itself is not being used of course...

"So it's a very damaging thing that Microsoft is doing and so we need to look for every possible way to stop them or tweak what they're doing."Well, it's worse than that. It means basically that those devices, you have to throw them out if you want to escape to the free world. And this -- in the past -- we were able to install, to liberate a computer by installing Free software on it instead of its user-restricting operation system, and this of course was tremendously helpful to the spread of GNU/Linux because it meant that users could move to freedom. It would be much harder if they had to buy another computer to do so. So it's a very damaging thing that Microsoft is doing and so we need to look for every possible way to stop them or tweak what they're doing.

As embedded (HTML5):





Keywords: UEFI Coreboot GRUB GNU FSF

Download:

Ogg Theora



Recent Techrights' Posts

Upcoming Articles About Microsoft's Ongoing War on Linux (From the Inside)
coming soon
[Meme] UEFI 'Choice'
Windows, Linux, and Microsoft
Microsoft Tightens the Screws on Linux, Just as We Predicted All Along
More control (by Microsoft) over users is not greater security but a giant gaping hole
The Demise of Bytedance/TikTok Would Do Good for Free Speech Online and Offline
Don't be mistaken; this isn't about free speech, it's about exercising control over people
Julian Assange Verdict: What to Watch Out for
A friend of mine said that it does seem like the court aims to keep the Assange verdict as low key as they can
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, March 14, 2024
IRC logs for Thursday, March 14, 2024
Willy Minnoye, Who Helped Benoît Battistelli Break the Law and Publicly Boasted About Immunity, Wants to be 'King' of EPO Pensions
It's like a Soviet era dictatorship with people governing into their 80s
Links 14/03/2024: Google Layoffs Not Complete and Family Dollar and Dollar Tree to Close 1,000 Stores
Links for the day
Gemini Links 14/03/2024: Lindwyrm and Low Priority Guix
Links for the day
Debian: transgender threats to transgender death, Lucy Wayland, RIP
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 14/03/2024: Lots of TikTok Trouble, Putin Signals Conflict Beyond Ukraine
Links for the day
[Teaser] Willy (Guillaume) Minnoye Planning His Comeback
famously boasted he'd ignore court rulings from the highest court in The Netherlands
Links 14/03/2024: Fentanylware/TikTok Ban Passed (US), Navalny Aide Attacked With Hammer
Links for the day
Catholic abuse reports, the Mafia, FSFE & Debian CoC abuse blackmail
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Gemini Links 14/03/2024: Tales of a Smartphone and Google to Update Search to Fight Spam
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, March 13, 2024
IRC logs for Wednesday, March 13, 2024
4,000 Known Gemini Capsules by Springtime? By Summertime?
we're less than 200 short of 4,000
Debian Conflict of Interest Register
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 13/03/2024: Chatbots Failing Quite Badly, TikTok in Trouble (US)
Links for the day
Gemini Links 13/03/2024: Humbling Experiences and Genuine Spaces
Links for the day
Months After IRC Turned 35 So Does the World Wide Web (WWW)
Big milestone
New Zealand's Adoption of GNU/Linux Only High If One Counts Chromebooks
Windows down from over 90% to 66% in 1.5 decades
Undoing Enshittification of Gulag Noise (Google News)
Microsoft tries to turn vandalism into profit
Sexual harassment: Nicolas Dandrimont & Debian Account Managers collective gullibility on Jacob Appelbaum
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Linux Foundation's Nithya Ruff (From the Linux Foundation's Board) Gives Some Credit to "Richard" (Stallman)
That talk was only published weeks ago
Combating Pseudonymous and Nymshifting Abuse/Vandalism in Internet Relay Chat (IRC)
Vandalism is not "free speech"
[Meme] Send Us Your EPO 'Scoops'
"António, we have another leak"
A Sincere Word of Solidarity to Patent Examiners at the EPO
A call for EPO leakers and whistleblowers
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, March 12, 2024
IRC logs for Tuesday, March 12, 2024