UEFI
From Techrights
Secure Boot, UEFI, or "Restricted Boot" as the FSF calls it, is a threat to computing freedom. It was covered in the following posts.
Contents |
[edit] 2013
[edit] May
- UEFI Restricted Boot Good for Microsoft Agenda, Not for Security
- Prominent GNU/Linux/KDE Developer Jonathan Riddell Complains About UEFI Restricted Boot, Calling it “a giant Microsoft conspiracy to make installing Linux more faffy than it already is.”
- Debian Should Consider Adding Weight to Antitrust Complaint Over Microsoft’s Restricted Boot Tactics, Wheezy Cannot Boot on New Hardware
- Despite Vista 8 Failing in the Market, GNU/Linux Slow to Capitalise Due in Part to Microsoft’s UEFI Tricks
[edit] April
- Microsoft’s UEFI Restricted Boot Delays GNU/Linux Releases, Causes Many Issues for Windows ‘Refugees’
- UEFI Restricted Boot No Longer Valid for Security, Keys Leaked
[edit] March
- UEFI Continues to be a Headache for GNU/Linux Users
- Awareness of UEFI Restricted Boot Injustice Raised
- European Commission Finally Receives Complaint About Microsoft’s UEFI Restricted Boot Scheme
- Why Samsung Hardware With UEFI Boot Gets Bricked by Linux
- UEFI War on Linux: Not as Simple as Disabling Restricted (‘Secure’) Boot
- Microsoft Control Over Users
- Microsoft Tax Goes Deeper Into Hardware While Microsoft Pays No Tax
- FreeBSD Makes UEFI Mistake
- UEFI Restricted Boot: Torvalds Asks Developers Not to “Please Microsoft by Doing Idiotic Crap Approach”, Petition Set Up to Nail Microsoft for This Antitrust Abuse
[edit] February
- Torvalds Curses Over UEFI Stupidity, Gets Upset at Red Hat
- ZaReason Criticises Microsoft’s UEFI Restricted Boot Practices
- Ubuntu Release Cycles Controlled by Microsoft UEFI Restricted Boot
- UEFI Disasters Are Microsoft’s Fault, Stop Blaming Linux or Samsung
- Advertising and Legitimising Microsoft Control of Linux
- FAT is Free (Gratis) as Long as You Serve Microsoft’s Agenda
- Former Novell Employees in Microsoft’s Fight Against GNU/Linux Adoption
- Complain About — Don’t Work Around — Microsoft’s Abusive UEFI Scheme
- Adventures in UEFI Mischief and Selective Criticism of Google
- Ignore the Spin: Microsoft’s UEFI Programme Still Bricking Laptops
[edit] January
- New Fedora Suffers From UEFI While Desktops Suffer Steep Decline and Sales Drop
- Vista 8 Worse Than Vista, So Microsoft Must Block Competition to Save Windows
- 2013: The Age of Linux-Hostile PCs
- Free Software Foundation (FSF) Seeks Funds to Help Those Who Cannot Use GNU and Linux on New PCs Due to UEFI
- Latest Case of Microsoft Using Hardware Companies to Block GNU/Linux Coincides With Denying Previous Such Case
- Microsoft’s Anticompetitive Attack on GNU/Linux Booting is Bricking Laptops
[edit] 2012
[edit] December
- Vista 8 Fails This Xmas, UEFI Blocks GNU and Linux While Microsoft Tries Collecting in China, Stopping Sales of Open PCs
- Vista 8 Continues to Fail, But Succeeds at Suppressing GNU and Linux Installs
- Supporting UEFI in 2012 is Like Supporting OOXML in 2007
- Guest Post: UEFI’s Effects on the User
- New Reports Show How Microsoft Rendered New Hardware Linux-hostile Out of the Box Using UEFI Demands
[edit] November
- UEFI Apologists Versus Germany’s Government Judgment on UEFI Insecurity
- Vista 8 Signals the End of Windows Domination; Microsoft Starts Lying (Fake Numbers), Block GNU/Linux
- New PCs Cannot Boot Linux Due to Microsoft Dirty Tricks
- Microsoft Proves Techrights Right by Screwing UEFI ‘Partners’
- Vista 8 is Not Selling, But Microsoft’s UEFI Scheme Blocks Linux Installations/Booting
- Garrett a Microsoft Apologist
- Ubuntu Decided to Stay With GPLv3 After Public Backlash
[edit] October
- Microsoft Can’t Understand Security (Lesson for UEFI Apologists)
- Linux Wins the Devices OS War, Microsoft Tries to Lock it Out With UEFI
- Microsoft Breaks the Web and Linux
[edit] September
[edit] August
- The Early Demise of Vista 8 and the Obsolescence of UEFI
- SUSE to Help Microsoft With UEFI Agenda
- Microsoft Cannot Defend UEFI
[edit] July
- Microsoft Corporation — Not Just Microsoft Windows — a SPAM Leader; UEFI Not the Answer
- Microsoft Dictatorship Divides and Conquers Linux With Novell, Red Hat, and Ubuntu
- Red Hat Does Not Want to Defend Its Position on UEFI
- Restricted Boot Arguably Fought Against by Linux, Not Just GNU
- UEFI Problems Addressed by Linux Developers, Not Distributions
- TechBytes Episode 69: Richard Stallman on ‘Secure’ Boot (UEFI), Coreboot, GRUB, and Boot Freedom
- UEFI Debate Rages on While New Workarounds and Advice Surface
- Debian Follows the FSF’s — Not Red Hat’s — Footsteps Regarding UEFI
- FSF and FSFE Both Speak Out Against UEFI; Ubuntu Drifts Away From FSF, Whereas Debian Comes Closer to FSF
- Features of Vista 8 Focused on Errors, Antifeatures
- Canonical and Red Hat Receive Negative Publicity Over Submissive UEFI Choices
- Coverage of the Free Software Foundation’s Response to UEFI
- The FSF Moves From Petition to Recommendations Regarding UEFI Fight
[edit] June
- With UEFI, Microsoft Assaults the General Public License (GPL) and Computing Freedom in General
- Answers to Microsoft’s UEFI Plot Summarised, More Pretence That Microsoft is ‘Open’
- Vista 8 Will Drive More OEMs to GNU/Linux
- FSF Says Microsoft’s Flagging of Its Site as ‘Gambling’ is Wrong; FSF’s Anti-UEFI Petition Grows Popular, Debian Joins
- Ubuntu and UEFI
- Red Hat Fails to Convince That UEFI is Tolerable, Uses ‘Security’ as Talking Point
- Red Hat Was Wrong About UEFI, Failed to Ask the Users
- Linus Torvalds Disputes Security of UEFI
- Red Hat Criticised for Advancing Microsoft’s UEFI Agenda
- Microsoft’s Monopolistic Abuses Continue as Red Hat and Fedora Tax Are Put in Place


