06.06.21

Gemini version available ♊︎

EPO G 1/21 Update: Fresh Allegations of Cronyism Against Campinos

Posted in Courtroom, Deception, Europe, Law, Patents at 8:21 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Campinos piggybacking
Fresh allegations of Club Med cronyism against António Campinos.

Summary: The Club Med cronyism of Benoît Battistelli continues under António Campinos; people can see this, mention this, and the EPO then censors these observations

There has been another interesting development in the high-profile Enlarged Board of Appeal (of the EPO) referral case G 1/21.

This new development concerns the submission of further “third party observations” following the oral proceedings held on 28 May 2021.

“This new development concerns the submission of further “third party observations” following the oral proceedings held on 28 May 2021.”For readers who are unfamiliar with the minutiae of the European Patent Convention it is pointed out that, according to Article 115 EPC (warning: epo.org link; potential privacy risk to readers), “… any third party may, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations, present observations concerning the patentability of the invention to which the application or patent relates.”

The EPO provides an online form (warning: epo.org link) for the submission of such observations.

Article 115 EPC is intended to allow interested third parties, including members of the public, to present observations about patentability in examination, opposition and appeal proceedings. For example, it can be used to submit new prior art documents that have not been considered in the proceedings so far and to explain their relevance or to give details of public prior use that are not readily available on the public record. Such observations and submissions can be made anonymously.

“Article 115 EPC is intended to allow interested third parties, including members of the public, to present observations about patentability in examination, opposition and appeal proceedings.”According to Rule 114(2) EPC (warning: epo.org link), “[a]ny such observations shall be communicated to the applicant for or proprietor of the patent, who may comment on them.”

In the case of G 1/21, the online form for third party observations (TPO) has been used to file a significant number of anonymous submissions containing various objections to the composition of the panel dealing with the case.

As far as can be determined from the publicly accessible file register in case no. G 1/21 – which can be consulted here (warning: epo.org link) – between 21 March and 10 May 2021, a total of twelve such TPOs were filed [PDF].

Previous TPOs - between 21 March and 10 May 2021
TPOs between 21 March and 10 May 2021

Many of these submissions focused on the role of the former chairman, Carl Josefsson, and his insistence on participating in the procedure despite his obvious conflict of interest and confirmed by the Enlarged Board of Appeal in its intermediate decision of 17 May.

Following the oral proceedings held on 28 May, a further TPO was filed on 1 June under the Latin pseudonym “Non Nominatus” (meaning “not named”).

TPO observations
Are the Third Party Observations submitted on 1 June 2021 being subjected to censorship by the EPO?

At the time of writing this submission has not appeared in the public file register so it is not currently accessible to the public. It has been many days now…

“But what possible motive could Campinos have for preventing public access to the TPO of 1 June 2021? Why should he care about comments made by anonymous third parties in referral proceedings before the Enlarged Board of Appeal?”There are suspicions that Campinos or his minions may be acting to suppress public disclosure of this document. It should be recalled that under Rule 144(d) EPC (warning: epo.org link), the President of the Office has wide discretionary powers to exclude documents in the file register from public inspection “on the ground that such inspection would not serve the purpose of informing the public about the European patent application or the European patent”.

But what possible motive could Campinos have for preventing public access to the TPO of 1 June 2021? Why should he care about comments made by anonymous third parties in referral proceedings before the Enlarged Board of Appeal?

The answer to these questions can perhaps be found in the substantive content of the document which is reproduced below.

A snippet of submission
The substantive content of the TPO of 1 June 2021

Under the heading of “6.4 Further observations”, the pseudonymous “Non Nominatus” begins by referring to the submissions of the President of the Office (warning: epo.org link) dated 27 April 2021 which argue in favour of mandatory ViCos for oral proceedings. Here’s the file from the EPO President [PDF] and PDF preview as animated GIF:

Comments of the EPO President - 27 April 2021
‘Marching orders’ from Team Campinos

He then raises allegations of rampant “cronyism” at the EPO, claiming that Campinos has recruited a large number of his “buddies” from Alicante who have no interest in moving to Munich to work at the EPO.

According to “Non Nominatus”, the attempt to impose mandatory ViCos for oral proceedings forms part of the EPO’s master-plan for the “New Normal” which is primarily motivated by the personal interests of Campinos and his buddies.

“However, the submission and the allegations which it contains might be of interest to members of the public who are concerned about the governance of the EPO.”In essence, it is alleged that Campinos is using the Covid pandemic as a pretext for restructuring the EPO in a manner which will allow him and his buddies to “hang out and ‘chill’ in Spain” while remotely managing their serfs in Munich, Berlin and The Hague.

The original text of the submission is in German which indicates that the author is a German – or perhaps Austrian or Swiss – who is not impressed by the "Club Med" antics of Campinos and his “buddies”.

An English translation of the text is presented below to allow readers to form their own opinion about its content.

I refer to the submission of the President of the European Patent Office dated 27 April 2021.

In this submission the President comes to the conclusion that oral proceedings conducted via videoconference are in accordance with the EPC, regardless of whether or not the parties agree that they be conducted by videoconference.

Most/all of the authors of the other submissions see this differently.

As someone who has DEEP insights into the EPO’s machinations and cronyism, I further wish to express the following points.

The President has hired a lot of buddies from Alicante, who perform just as little useful work as those of the previous President from Paris. These people have left their families in Spain and therefore have ZERO desire to be in Munich. That was also the reason why Home Office was introduced at the EPO and is now enforced and operated in a blanket manner. Simply so that none of the buddies has to sit here [in Munich], but can hang out and “chill” in Spain. Corona just happened to come along at an opportune time.

Therefore I request that the submission of the President is rejected, because he only represents his own and personal interests.

In the alternative, I request that the President be examined as a witness to question him as to whether he is biased and to provide information about which buddies he has employed and at what rates of pay, and where their families live.

It goes without saying the Enlarged Board of Appeal is unlikely to pay any attention to the contents of this submission. They can easily find some formal legalistic reason for dismissing it as “unsubstantiated” or otherwise “irrelevant”.

However, the submission and the allegations which it contains might be of interest to members of the public who are concerned about the governance of the EPO.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Links 24/05/2022: nginx-1.22.0 and WordPress 6.0

    Links for the day



  2. [Meme] Divine Protection

    You won’t find Monopoly Tony (António Campinos) wearing a mask at the EPO because the rules of the Office do not apply to him



  3. António Campinos and the Alicante Clique (EPO Management, Appointed Based on Nepotism Despite Lack of Qualifications) Nowadays Exploiting Kids for PR Charades

    The sick old habit of exploiting kids for Public Relations (PR) and marketing purposes is all too common at the EPO (they’re constantly exploiting “the children” to associate criticism of the EPO with demeaning the young and innocent), but the management — which enjoys nepotism and immunity rather than relevant skills — carries on today and it’s being called “inaugural”



  4. [Meme] Snake on a Plane

    The EPO‘s President ‘Monopoly Tony’ (António Campinos), whom you never see wearing a mask (none of the photo ops; he does not even socially distance himself from peers, he wears sneakers instead of masks) during the height of a pandemic, is the "f***ing president"; don’t tell him to wear one…



  5. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part XX — Entering Phase II

    We're about to resume the long-running series about the sick clique which ran GitHub until the assault on women became too much of a liability (among other wrongdoings and PR blunders)



  6. Links 24/05/2022: Fedora 37 Test Days and Tor Browser 11.0.13

    Links for the day



  7. Microsoft Vidal, as USPTO Director, Already Plays 'Political Cards' to Disguise and Deflect Away From the Corporate Agenda

    Microsoft Vidal, another corporate pawn in charge of the world’s most dangerous patent system, is using soft-spoken defle



  8. Links 24/05/2022: WAL-G 2.0

    Links for the day



  9. IRC Proceedings: Monday, May 23, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, May 23, 2022



  10. Unethical Advertising, Published as So-called 'Articles', in CNX Software

    As we noted earlier this year, the CNX team is looking for money in the wrong places



  11. Links 23/05/2022: Broadcom to Buy VMware?

    Links for the day



  12. LibreOffice Conference 2022, As Before, Puts the Keynotes on Sale (the Rich Buy Influence, the Price Doubles)

    Discrimination against the community; talks and mentions are based on money, not merit ($2000 has become $4000 in just one year)



  13. Links 23/05/2022: Kdenlive 22.04.1 and New Alpine Linux Released

    Links for the day



  14. António Campinos Promotes Software Patents Using Buzzwords and Sketchy Loopholes With Dubious Legal Basis

    ‘Monopoly Tony’ (António Campinos) is shamelessly manipulating EPO processes at both ends (sender and receiver) to facilitate the illegal granting of invalid European software patents; we’re meant to think this former EU official and imposter (banker) is some guru in the sciences because he reads a lousy speech crafted for him with lots of meaningless buzzwords peppered all over it (he’s not good at reading it, either)



  15. [Meme] Jorgotta Be Kidding Us, Campinos!

    Monopoly Tony (António Campinos) runs the EPO by attacking the very legal basis of the EPO’s existence



  16. Unified Patent Court (UPC) Relies Too Much on Lies and Mischief Without Any Basis in Law

    Today’s video runs through the typical (weekly) lies from Team UPC — lies that are very easy to debunk; Team UPC not only drafted the thing but also looks to profit from it while misleading politicians and bribing publishers to spread intentionally misleading statements (lies)



  17. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, May 22, 2022

    IRC logs for Sunday, May 22, 2022



  18. Links 23/05/2022: Fedora 36 Reviewed

    Links for the day



  19. [Meme] It's My Working Party... And I'll Cry If I Want to!

    EPO President António Campinos is still not being held accountable for his Code of Conduct violations



  20. Links 22/05/2022: The 5.18 Kernel is Out

    Links for the day



  21. Gemini is Bigger Than Most People Care to Realise

    Geminispace has gotten to the point where it's too computationally expensive (or outright pricey) to study, let alone keep abreast of, Gemini capsules or the domain space as a whole



  22. Links 22/05/2022: Rock64 and Peppermint OS Release

    Links for the day



  23. [Meme] UPC is Always Next Year (and Next Year It'll Surely be the Year After That)

    The UPC will come “next year”, just like every year (since almost a decade ago) just because the lunatic promises so and crushes the law, quite frankly as usual, cusioned and protected by the UPC lobby



  24. UPC: Turning Patent Lawyers Into Liars and the Media Into Their Money-Grabbing Megaphone (Platform for Fake News)

    The above 26 screenshots (with necessary annotation added) hopefully illuminate the degree of deceit, manipulation, bribery and distortion of public discourse (fake news and advocacy of patently unlawful activities)



  25. Number of Working/Online Gemini Capsules, Known to Totally Legit Gemini Search (TLGS) and to Lupa, Exceeds 2,500

    Assuming that Lupa reduced its crawling capacity (this graph seems to confirm this), we’ve decided to aggregate data from 3 sources and assess the size of Geminispace; Lupa says it can see 1,947 active capsules, but there are many more it has not kept track of



  26. [Meme] Monopoly Tony

    The gentlest, kindest president the EPO ever had



  27. It Took Campinos Three or More Years to Undo Illegal Battistelli Actions on Boards of Appeal and Strike Regulations (Only After Losing at ILO-AT!), But He Does Not Mention That

    Let’s all remember that as the EPO‘s so-called ‘President’ António Campinos (Monopoly Tony) vigorously defended completely unlawful actions of Benoît Battistelli until courts compelled him to stop doing that (Strike Regulations); notice how, in the video above — a portion of this full clip from several months ago — he did not bother mentioning that for 3.5 years that he had “led” the Office the Boards of Appeal were in exile, in direct violation of the EPC, yet nobody is being held accountable for it



  28. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 21, 2022

    IRC logs for Saturday, May 21, 2022



  29. Links 22/05/2022: Free Software Developments in Bratislava

    Links for the day



  30. Gemini is the Direction the Paginated Internet Should Have Taken (Not Bloated Web With JavaScript and DRM)

    An update on Gemini and why you might wish to explore it (if you aren't using it already)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts