Bonum Certa Men Certa

The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XLVII: Institutionalised Injustice at the EPO?



Series parts:

  1. The EPO's Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part I: Let the Sunshine In!
  2. "unanimous"
  3. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part III: Three Missing Votes
  4. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part IV: The Founding States
  5. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part V: Germany Says “Ja”
  6. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part VI: A Distinct Lack of Dutch Courage
  7. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part VII: Luxembourgish Laxity
  8. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part VIII: Perfidious Albion and Pusillanimous Hibernia
  9. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part IX: More Holes Than Swiss Cheese
  10. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part X: Introducing the Controversial Christian Bock
  11. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XI: “General Bock” - Battistelli's Swiss Apprentice?
  12. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XII: The French Connection
  13. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XIII: Battistelli's Iberian Facilitators - Spain
  14. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XIV: Battistelli's Iberian Facilitators - Portugal
  15. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XV: Et Tu Felix Austria…
  16. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVI: The Demise of the Austrian Double-Dipper
  17. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVII: The Non-Monolithic Nordic Bloc
  18. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVIII: Helsinki's Accord
  19. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part IXX: The Baltic States
  20. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XX: The Visegrád Group
  21. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXI: The Balkan League – The Doyen and His “Protégée”
  22. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXII: The Balkan League - North Macedonia and Albania
  23. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXIII: The Balkan League - Bulgaria
  24. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXIV: The Balkan League - Romania
  25. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXV: The Balkan League - Fresh Blood or Same Old, Same Old?
  26. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXVI: A Trojan Horse on the Budget and Finance Committee
  27. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXVII: Cypriot Complicity
  28. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXVIII: Benoît and António's Loyal “Habibi”
  29. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part IXXX: The EPOnian Micro-States - Monaco and Malta
  30. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXX: San Marino and the Perfidious Betrayal of Liberty
  31. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXXI: The Abstentionists
  32. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXXII: “Plucky Little Belgium”?
  33. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXXIII: Swedish Scepticism
  34. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXXIV: An “Extremely Dubious” Proposal
  35. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXXV: Slovakian Scruples
  36. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXXVI: Serbian Sour Grapes
  37. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXXVII: Stubbornly Independent Slovenia
  38. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXXVIII: Ensnared in the Tentacles of the SAZAS Octopus
  39. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXXIX: On the Slippery Slope to Capture
  40. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXXX: The Idiosyncratic Italians
  41. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXXXI: Public Service or Self-Service?
  42. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXXXII: A Parcel of Rogues?
  43. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXXXIII: A Legal No-Man's Land
  44. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXXXIV: Immunity = Impunity?
  45. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXXXV: In the Shadow of “Waite and Kennedy”
  46. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXXXVI: An Erosion of Fundamental Rights Protection?
  47. YOU ARE HERE ☞ Institutionalised Injustice at the EPO?


ILOAT and injustice
Publications by the EPO Staff Committee [PDF] criticising deficiencies in the internal dispute settlement system were censored by Team Battistelli in 2016.



Summary: For nearly a decade already the EPO has had a profoundly dysfunctional court for staff, much like the court for stakeholders, which is beholden to the Office management (no separation of powers)

The main focus of the present series is the EPO "Strike Regulations" which were proposed by the EPO President Benoît Battistelli and adopted with the "unanimous" approval of the organisation's Administrative Council in June 2013.



"As we shall see in due course, one of the most noteworthy aspects of this affair is the bizarre and incongruous role played by a former judge of the European Court of Human Rights, Sir Paul Mahoney."The fact that the vast majority of Council delegates had no reservations about blindly rubber-stamping these manifestly deficient regulations is in itself an outrageous affront to the staff of the EPO.

But what is equally, if not more, outrageous is the fact that, following Battistelli's departure at the end of June 2018, the regulations were maintained in force for another three years under the reign of his successor António Campinos until they were finally struck down by the ILOAT on 7 July 2021.

However, Campinos had a perfect excuse for upholding the regulations which had been introduced by his predecessor.

This is because, in May 2019, the EPO's internal appeals committee issued an opinion which purported to give the disputed "Strike Regulations" a clean bill of legal health.

"As is well known, the shenanigans at the EPO during the Battistelli era caused a massive explosion in litigation, which has in turn led to a huge backlog of cases at the ILOAT, thereby causing severe delays for litigants."As we shall see in due course, one of the most noteworthy aspects of this affair is the bizarre and incongruous role played by a former judge of the European Court of Human Rights, Sir Paul Mahoney.

But before coming to that particular detail, we will begin by taking a look at the EPO's "internal dispute settlement procedure", which provides a textbook example of a dysfunctional justice system at an international organisation.

As is well known, the shenanigans at the EPO during the Battistelli era caused a massive explosion in litigation, which has in turn led to a huge backlog of cases at the ILOAT, thereby causing severe delays for litigants.

ILOAT caseload
The shenanigans at the EPO during the "Battistelli era" caused a massive explosion in litigation which in turn led to a huge backlog of cases at the ILOAT, causing severe delays for litigants. The problem was aggravated by dysfunctional nature of the EPO's internal appeals committee.



Indeed, it is no exaggeration to say that under Battistelli the EPO's internal appeal system was reduced to a joke.

In 2014, as social tensions within the EPO escalated, the elected Staff Committee took the position that the level of repression inside the EPO was so severe that it could not nominate members to the Appeals Committee unless certain guarantees were given by the Office management.

"Indeed, it is no exaggeration to say that under Battistelli the EPO's internal appeal system was reduced to a joke."Faced with this situation, Battistelli ordered the internal appeals committee to continue processing appeals without the two members who should ordinarily have been appointed by the Staff Committee.

Subsequently, Battistelli called for staff "volunteers" to fill the vacant positions and proceeded to appoint these hand-picked "volunteers" in place of the missing Staff Committee members.

In Judgment No. 3694 [PDF] delivered in July 2016 (local copy [PDF]), the ILOAT found that the composition of the internal appeals committee without staff members was irregular, because the committee thus composed lacked "a fundamental guarantee of its impartiality".

In Judgment No. 3785 [PDF] delivered in November 2016 (local copy [PDF]), the ILOAT likewise found that the composition of the internal appeals committee with "volunteers" appointed by the President was irregular because it was not in accordance with the applicable rules which required those members to be appointed by the EPO Staff Committee.

These ILOAT Judgments effectively invalidated all decisions of the EPO's internal appeals committee taken between October 2014 and November 2016. This resulted in a huge number of cases being remitted back from the ILOAT to the EPO for renewed treatment by the internal appeals committee.

"These ILOAT Judgments effectively invalidated all decisions of the EPO's internal appeals committee taken between October 2014 and November 2016."This legal ping-pong between the Tribunal and the EPO aggravated the already intolerable delays that litigants were forced to suffer.

It is small wonder that the EPO Staff Committee described the situation as "institutionalised injustice" in a report issued in 2016. This report which exposed serious deficiencies in the EPO's internal justice system was censored by the Principal Director of Human Resources, Elodie Bergot, who personally vetoed its publication on the EPO intranet.

The dysfunctionality of the EPO's internal justice system under Battistelli was an unmitigated disaster for staff, but there appears to have been one fortunate beneficiary of this fiasco.

"The dysfunctionality of the EPO's internal justice system under Battistelli was an unmitigated disaster for staff, but there appears to have been one fortunate beneficiary of this fiasco."Karoline Kerber-Zubrzycka, a law graduate from the University of Passau, joined the EPO's legal department as a lawyer in October 2003. In April 2013 she received the dubious distinction of being selected by Battistelli to chair the internal appeals committee, a position which she held without interruption until December 2017.

Karoline Kerber-Zubrzycka
Karoline Kerber-Zubrzycka chaired the EPO's dysfunctional internal appeals committee between April 2013 and December 2017. After a brief interlude on the Administrative Tribunal of the CTA, she was appointed as a legally-qualified member of the EPO's Boards of Appeal by the Administrative Council in September 2021.



Kerber-Zubrzycka then returned to the EPO's legal department and subsequently left the organisation in August 2018 to take up a new position as Vice-President of the Administrative Tribunal of another international organisation, namely the Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA) based in Wageningen in the Netherlands.

"She returned to her old stomping-ground at the EPO in September 2021 when she was appointed as a "legally qualified member" of the Boards of Appeal, the EPO's legal fudge factory currently located in Haar."The CTA is a joint organisation of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States and the European Union (EU). It operates under the framework of the Cotonou Agreement and is funded by the EU.

The CTA used to be under the jurisdiction of the ILOAT. However, after the ILOAT delivered a number of judgments against the CTA in 2015 and dismissed the organisation's requests for a review of these judgments, the CTA withdrew from the Tribunal's jurisdiction and proceeded to set up its own internal "Administrative Tribunal" in 2018.

Kerber-Zubrzycka sat on the CTA's Administrative Tribunal between November 2018 and June 2021. According to her curriculum vitae, she moved to the OECD in August 2021 where she was appointed Deputy Chair of the "Joint Advisory Board" (JAB). The JAB is the OECD's equivalent of an internal appeals committee.

"In the next part we shall examine the role played by a former judge of the European Court of Human Rights in this sorry saga of "institutionalised injustice"."She returned to her old stomping-ground at the EPO in September 2021 when she was appointed as a "legally qualified member" of the Boards of Appeal, the EPO's legal fudge factory currently located in Haar.

It's not clear whether Kerber-Zubrzycka still holds onto her position at the OECD following her subsequent appointment to the EPO's Boards of Appeal but her entry on LinkedIn suggests that both appointments are currently active.

In the next part we shall examine the role played by a former judge of the European Court of Human Rights in this sorry saga of "institutionalised injustice".

Recent Techrights' Posts

Doing My Share to Tackle Online Slop and SPAM
Trying my best to 'fix' the Web
Slopwatch: Fakes, FUD, Duplicates, and Charlatans Galore
The Web as we once know it is collapsing. Some opportunists try to replace it with low-quality slop.
The Register UK Seems to Have Become American and Management is Changing (Microsofter as Editor in Chief)
The Register 'UK' is now controlled by the Directions on Microsoft guy
 
Trajectory of The Register: From News Site/s Into "B2B"... and Into Microsoft Salespeople
Something isn't right at The Register
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, July 26, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, July 26, 2025
Misinformation in Social Control Media
Social control media passes around all sorts of tropes
Slopwatch: Fake Linux 'Articles' and Slopfarms With "Linux" in Their Names/Domains
throwing bots at "Linux" to make some fake articles
Links 26/07/2025: Amazon Shutdown in China, Russian Economy Slows
Links for the day
Gemini Links 26/07/2025: History of Time (1988) and Gemini Games
Links for the day
Links 26/07/2025: 50 Percent Tariffs in Amazon, Dying Intel Offloads Network and Edge Group (NEX)
Links for the day
Blaming Programming Languages for Users' and Developers' Bad Practices
That's like blaming cars for drivers who crash into things
Many People Still Read Techrights Because It Says the Truth, Produces Evidence, and Does Not Self-Censor
Unlike so many other sites
The Register is Desperate for Money, According to The Register
I decided to check how they're doing as a business
Microsoft Finally Finds a Use Case for Slop?
Create low-quality chaff to shift the media's attention?
Microsoft Windows Lost 400 Million Users in a Few Years, Why Does The Register Double Down on Windows With New US Editor?
days ago they hired a new US editor
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, July 25, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, July 25, 2025
For Libel Reform One Must First Bring (or Raise) Awareness to the Issues and Their Magnitude
I myself know, from personal experience
Links 26/07/2025: Rationed Meals in the US and TikTok Repels Investments (Too Toxic)
Links for the day
Gemini Links 26/07/2025: "Bloody Google" and New People in Geminispace
Links for the day
Response to Solderpunk (Father of Gemini Protocol) About the Gemini Community
Solderpunk responds to non-sequitur
HTML and the Web Used to be Something a Child Could Learn, "Modern" Web is a Puzzle of Frameworks, Bloat, and Worse
When the Web was more like Gemini Protocol
New US Editor in The Register is 84% Microsoft/Windows Booster
It'll be worrying if it carries on like this
Links 25/07/2025: Slop Blunders and China Has Code of Conduct for Lawmakers in HK
Links for the day
Gemini Links 25/07/2025: Some Books and Babies and Capital
Links for the day
Links 25/07/2025: NOAA Cuts Endanger Lives, "Europe's Self Inflicted Cloud Crisis"
Links for the day
They Try to Lecture Us on Ethics
They even removed "master" from Microsoft GitHub
The Future of the Web is One Rendering Engine or 'Flavours' of Chrome
The future of the Web does not look bright at all
Best Sites Are Not Optimised for Any Browser, They Work Equally Well With All of Them
Red Hat (IBM) is making rubbish sites
YouTube is a Spamfarm, Slopfarm, and Clickfarm (a Lot of Numbers There Are Fake)
Those who don't fake look unpopular and unimportant
We Don't Do JavaScript and Pages Are Small
Thankfully Gemini Protocol has nothing like JavaScript
'Tech' is Not Technology
Some people use terms like 'Old Tech'
IBM's Debt Rose by Almost 10 Billion Dollars in the Past 6 Months Alone
The "hey hi" circus is coming to an end
Yes, Master
Gaslighting by actual racists
Microsoft Bribes and Buys Politicians to Tell Europe What to Do About Free Software (Which It's Attacking)
Microsoft: we speak for the thing that we are attacking! Follow the money...
Making Backups Quickly and Reliably
Backups are imperative, more so in an age of uncertainty, unpredictable weather, and worsening standards (quality of products going down while prices go up)
Techrights Investigation: Estimating the Point in Time LinuxIac Turned Into LLM Slop (Part of the Time)
Bobby Borisov got lazy
10th Month, Ten Weeks From Now, at Ten AM
In Wentworth Institute of Technology in Boston
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, July 24, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, July 24, 2025
A Nadella Memo Distracts From Microsoft's Cheapening Of the Workforce
Right now the "MSM" (mainstream media) is flooded/overwhelmed by garbage pieces that relay lies for Nadella
Vanishing Faces of GNU/Linux
Free software projects do not depend on any one person or company to still exist
Microsoft Says It Lost 400 Million Windows Users, Now It's Waiting for GNU/Linux to Stop Booting on 'Old' PCs
When it comes to Windows, Microsoft is fully aware of the issue and statements it made earlier this summer suggest it lost 400 million Windows users
Slopwatch: LinuxTechLab, linuxsecurity.com, LinuxIac, and More
Also: The Register's Microsoft agenda (new editor)
Gemini Links 25/07/2025: Gemtext Aware Titan Editor and Gemini Protocol Comeback
Links for the day