Bonum Certa Men Certa

When EPO Does Not Control and Coerce the Judges — Part III — ILOAT Judgment No. 4551

Series parts:

  1. When EPO Does Not Control and Coerce the Judges — Part I — ILOAT 134th Session: Two More Bittersweet Victories for EPO Staff
  2. When EPO Does Not Control and Coerce the Judges — Part II — ILOAT Judgment No. 4550
  3. YOU ARE HERE ☞ ILOAT Judgment No. 4551


EPO censorship
In Judgment No. 4551, the Tribunal found that "the true reason for the requirement of the prior authorisation was to exercise a prior censorship on the content of the communications."



Summary: EPO censorship of staff communications isn't compatible with the law, said a ruling one week ago, but the ruling is nearly a decade late

The ILOAT Judgment which we will look at in this part - No. 4551 - concerns a challenge by a group of three staff representatives to measures adopted by EPO management in May 2013 (!) for the purpose of preventing EPO staff representatives from sending mass e-mails to staff.



One of the complainants against these measures was Laurent Prunier, a staff representative who was viciously targeted and defamed by Benoît Battistelli and subjected to another politically-motivated disciplinary procedure by Elodie Bergot which led to his dismissal in 2016.

As noted above, the measures impugned in the case of Judgment 4551 date back to May 2013 (!).

"The Tribunal found that the restrictions imposed by the communiqué of 31 May 2013 were unlawful and breached the fundamental right to freedom of association."On 13 May 2013, Battistelli issued Communiqué No. 26 entitled “When enough is enough – the use of mass emails within the Office”. He complained that staff representatives were using mass emails increasingly, and claimed that, in many instances, these emails were polemical and factually incorrect.

Battistelli announced that he would shortly be setting up rules on mass communications and he delegated this task to his trusted "Croatian bulldog", the notorious union-buster Željko Topić.

António Campinos and Željko Topić
On 30 May 2013, Battistelli’s "Croatian bulldog", the notorious union-buster Željko Topić (r.), issued a communiqué imposing unlawful restrictions on EPO staff representatives with regard to the use of mass e-mails for communicating with staff. These oppressive measures were maintained intact by Battistelli’s successor, António Campinos (l.).



On 31 May 2013, Topić issued a communiqué decreeing that as from 3 June 2013, the sending of emails to more than fifty addressees would be restricted and that prior authorisation would be required. The communiqué noted that there was a facility for communication by the staff representation and the trade unions via dedicated intranet pages under their sole responsibility.

The Tribunal found that the restrictions imposed by the communiqué of 31 May 2013 were unlawful and breached the fundamental right to freedom of association.

According to the Tribunal’s assessment, the communiqué of 31 May 2013 was unlawful because it set out an indiscriminate limitation on the use of mass e-mails, without providing specific reasons for this measure which, moreover, was intended to apply for an indefinite time.

The EPO failed to establish that the prior authorisation was required for technical reasons, and it provided no evidence that mass emails to more than fifty addressees could jeopardise the operation of its IT systems.

"The EPO failed to establish that the prior authorisation was required for technical reasons, and it provided no evidence that mass emails to more than fifty addressees could jeopardise the operation of its IT systems."As a matter of fact, the wording of the two impugned communiqués revealed that "the true reason for the requirement of the prior authorisation was to exercise a prior censorship on the content of the communications."

The Tribunal was satisfied that the content of the mass e-mails which irritated EPO management did not exceed the limits to freedom of opinion and speech, and therefore did not justify the imposition of a requirement for prior authorisation.

"The [EPO] did not have the power to prevent or to impede communications among staff representatives and staff members only on the basis that they appeared, according to the Organisation, to be “polemical” or “factually incorrect”, or to substantiate “vindictive personal attacks”.

The EPO failed to provide evidence that the communications went beyond the bounds of legitimate, though harsh, criticism, and trespassed into the realm of gross violations of the rights of the Organisation or individuals. In the present case, the measures taken by the Organisation were disproportionate."


The Tribunal recalled that according to its case law, the ability of a body representing the staff to circulate emails to all staff members is not “a privilege”. On the contrary, such body “has a legitimate right to avail itself of this facility, unless there is good cause for restricting it” (Judgment 3156).

"The complainants were collectively awarded costs of € 900 euros."Although the Tribunal found in favour of Laurent and his co-complainants, it rejected their claim for an award of € 20,000 in moral damages for the “serious breach” of their rights since 2013.

According to the Tribunal, "the annulment of the impugned decision is in itself a sufficient remedy for any moral injury the complainants may have conceivably suffered."

The complainants were collectively awarded costs of € 900 euros.

In the concluding part of this mini-series we will look at the wider implications of ILOAT Judgments nos. 4550 and 4551 for the EPO’s notoriously dysfunctional internal justice system.

Recent Techrights' Posts

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Hijacked Again by Patent Litigation Industry, as President Cheeto Prioritises Aggressors
The "mafia" has taken over the "industry" and the Federal system (justice and constitutions trampled upon)
Ubuntu Slop and FUD Manufactured With LLMs and Funded (by Oneself) 'Studies'
Slop and FUD are ruining the Web
Gemini Links 01/04/2025: Games and More
Links for the day
Why We're Reporting Brett Wilson LLP for Apparently Misusing Their Licence to Protect American Microsofters Who Attack Women
For those who have not been keeping abreast
Stefano Maffulli and His Microsoft-Funded OSI Staff Are Killing the OSI and Killing "Open Source" (All for Money!)
This is far from over
Techrights Headlines as Semaphore
"If you are hearing this, thank you"
 
Gemini Protocol Has Growing Appeal (the Web Got Too Bloated and Full of LLM Slop)
For any "data plan" with bandwidth limits or "tiers" it would be cheaper to use/browse Geminispace
The Web Can Survive LLM Slop, But Only If We Collectively Shun and Discourage Serial Sloppers
Doing nothing ought not be a possibility
Amid Secret Shut-downs and Mass Layoffs at Microsoft (4 Waves of Layoffs in 3 Months of 2025) Some Microsoft Staff Expected to Go On Strike
workers going on strike
Gemini Links 02/04/2025: No more on Mastodon and Gemini Mention Script in Go
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, April 01, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, April 01, 2025
My Motion Disbarring or “Striking Off” Brett Wilson LLP for Enabling Violent Americans Who Try to Crush Microsoft Critics in the United Kingdom by Multiple SLAPPs
"Guns for hire" (for Microsoft people who received Microsoft salaries)
Links 01/04/2025: Apple Fined $162M for Privacy Abuses, Disinformation Online a Growing Concern
Links for the day
Newer Press Reports Confirm That Microsoft Shuts Down 'Hey Hi' (AI) Labs Despite All the Hype
The "hey hi" (AI) bubble is not sustainable
Links 01/04/2025: Mass Layoffs at Eidos and "Microsoft Pulls Back on Data Centers" (Demand Lacking); "Racist and Sexist" Slop From Microsoft
Links for the day
Gemini Links 01/04/2025: XKCDpunk and worldclock.py
Links for the day
50 Years of Sabotage and a Gut Punch to Computer Science (and Science in General)
Will we get back to science-based computing rather than cult-like following?
3 Months in 2025, 4 Waves of Mass Layoffs at Microsoft, Now Offices Shut Down Permanently
"A recent visit by the South China Morning Post confirmed that the office was dark, unoccupied, and had its logo removed."
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, March 31, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, March 31, 2025
Links 31/03/2025: China Tensions, Bombs Falling in Myanmar After Earthquake
Links for the day
Gemini Links 31/03/2025: Falling Out of Love With Tech, Sunsetting openSNP
Links for the day
R.T.O. at IBM in Texas and Atlanta (State of Georgia) Expected as "Soft Layoffs" Catalyst This Coming Year
It also sounds like more IBM layoffs are in the making
Law Firms Can Also Lose Their Licence for Clearly Misusing It
The bottom line is, never made the false assumption that because you can pile up SLAPPs in a docket you will not suffer from bad reputation or even get disbarred
Link between institutional abuse, Swiss jurists, Debianism and FSFE
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
LLM Slop Piggybacking News About GNU/Linux and Distorting It
new examples
Links 31/03/2025: Press and Democracy Under Further Attacks in the US, Attitudes Towards Slop Sour
Links for the day
Open Source Initiative (OSI) Privacy Fiasco in Detail: The OSI Does Not Respect Anybody's Privacy
The surveillance mafia that bans dissent or key people (even co-founders) with dissenting views
Gemini Links 31/03/2025: More X-Filesposting and Dreaming in Emacs
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, March 30, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, March 30, 2025