Bonum Certa Men Certa

Dictatorship Formalised: Python Software Foundation Violates Its Very Own Code Of Conduct (COC) or Code Of Censorship

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Dec 07, 2024,
updated Dec 07, 2024

Incoming Python Software Foundation Executive Director, Deb Nicholson, allegedly uses COCs to get ahead while violating COCs

THE people who keep defaming the founder of Free software (among other charismatic and highly qualified people) are being (mis)placed at positions of power and high authority - i.e. the same thing we see at the Linux Foundation, OIN, etc. Cui bono? Those "darlings" of oligarchs typically don't earn their positions owing to accomplishment/s but mere utility. They're easier to control from up above, they can be ousted easily, so they're more obedient and usually immoral. They're paranoid (imposter syndrome), so they attack anyone they perceive to be a potential "rival", even if such "rivalry" is merely perceived (a hallmark of insecurity).

"I don’t know," a reader told us, as "I haven’t been Catching up on stuff, but I did see something recently that came across my feed about the director of the Python [Software] Foundation, throwing around the Code Of Conduct [COC] to cancel and there was a gentleman who says that she violated the code of conduct herself."

"Not sure if you were already reported on this," but [this thing] says:

Fiduciary and CoC violations by the Executive Director of PSF

Fiduciary and CoC violations by the Executive Director of PSF

David Mertz, Corrupter of Youth

October 4, 2024

I wrote the following letter to the Python Software Foundation recently. It can be found as well at https://gnosis.cx/publish/ED-CoC-complaint . Interested readers might also enjoy Tim Peters' account of his own banishment at https://tim-one.github.io/psf/ban.

I believe my note speaks for itself. I had reported here and elsewhere details of ongoing and unfolding events previously.


DATE: 2024-10-01

TO: Python Software Foundation Code of Conduct Work Group ( conduct-wg@python.org); Python Software Foundation Board of Directors ( psf-board@python.org)

FROM: David Mertz, Ph.D., Emeritus Fellow of the PSF

The PSF (hereafter “Foundation”) Executive Director, Deb Nicholson, has behaved in a manner that is unprofessional, motivated by personal animosity, in violation of Foundation bylaws, and that violated her fiduciary obligations as an employee and officer of the Foundation.

As preface I will note that I believe that “sunshine is the best disinfectant.” Therefore, I generally anticipate publication of this letter in public fora. I will not, of course, publish any replies—should I receive them—without express permission of their senders.

As recipients of this note will be aware, I have had numerous volunteer roles within the Foundation, dating back to 2008. I had, in fact, been the longest continuously serving volunteer with the Foundation prior to the actions of Ms. Nicholson, discussed below.

During the Foundation election of 2024, concluding on 2024-07-17, I opposed the bylaws change entitled “Allow for removal of Fellows by a Board vote in response to Code of Conduct violations, removing the need for a vote of the membership.” I expressed my reasons for opposition, wholly professionally, on a PSF owned mailing list, and on its Discourse discussion board.

During the course of this discussion, shortly before election results were announced, I wrote a letter requesting conversion to Emeritus status on 2024-07-15. In that note, I expressed discontent with both the motivations for this bylaws amendment and with the manipulation of the discussion by moderators on the Discourse site (including actively changing the words of posts opposing the motion so as to alter their meaning).

At that point, my only remaining volunteer role with the Foundation was that of co-chair of the Trademarks Work Group, which role I had performed continuously for over 15 years. I was (or am) nominally co-chair of the Scientific Python Work Group, but that committee has been quiescent, and may or may not have been dissolved by the Board (no motion supports this, but one Director stated to me personally that they believed it to be so).

Shortly after conclusion of the PSF election of 2024, Ms. Nicholson wrote me with the below text, after first removing my email from the mailing list associated with the Trademarks WG, and probably changing the access credentials to administer that list. She in no way communicated to me any concerns she might have had prior to taking these incautious actions.

Delivered-To: david.mertz@gmail.com
Return-Path: <deb.nicholson@pyfound.org>
From: Deb Nicholson <deb@python.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 11:22:02 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAPDYKMH-j1gGV+VyTREmOEKW+SJRTGZggyb6FeOV=ZTOfiGJg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Your role on the PSF Trademark Working Group
To: mertz@gnosis.cx, David Mertz <david.mertz@gmail.com>

Hello David,
Myself and many other community members have read your recent writing that you distrust the PSF and that you believe that the organization needs replacing. I don't think that this attitude is compatible with the responsibility of serving on a PSF Board-delegated working group that responds to community members about sensitive matters on behalf of the Foundation and acting as a representative of the Foundation.
I want to thank you for your many, many years of service on the Trademark Working Group, but sadly, at this point I need to ask for your resignation. If you would like to discuss this with me, I am available for that, https://calendly.com/deb-psf/30min
Sincerely,
Deb Nicholson

To be clear on the matter, at no point in any communication had I, nor have I since, stated in any forum (nor in any private communication), that I would fail to follow my own fiduciary duties in enforcing the Foundation trademarks, as I had done diligently for more than 15 years. My intention to do so had not changed; if I had felt it would, I would have resigned my position on that Work Group. In actuality, I continue to intellectually and morally support the enforcement of Foundation trademarks.

I absolutely did not, in fact, resign, but was summarily removed by Ms. Nicholson. Because this action was taken without a Board vote, her action explicitly violates the Foundation’s bylaws. I fully recognize that it is within the power of the Board to remove any Work Group member, at any time, for any reason or with no reason. However, even a retroactive vote to perform this action would not create a legal or ethical justification for Ms. Nicholson’s 2024-07-19 violating action.

The violation is not simply a circumvention of the Foundation’s bylaws, but is, in fact, an ethical and legal lapse of her duties as an officer of a United States nonprofit corporation. Specifically, while I am not an attorney, I am a subject matter expert in trademark law, in the United States and, to a lesser extent, internationally. The work I had volunteered over the last 15 years has saved the Foundation tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars that it would have otherwise had to spend in legal fees. Ms. Nicholson’s action will similarly needlessly cost the Foundation tens or hundred of thousands of dollars for counsel to perform these duties, which I have been excluded from entirely out of spite.

I do not have current plans to take legal action against Ms. Nicholson or the Foundation, but I was a member in good standing of the Foundation at the time she took the referenced action, and her fiduciary violation directly affected me as such a member (as well as negatively impacting all other members). Officers of nonprofits have been penalized under law for lesser unethical behavior.


It is my belief that the following would be a correct remediation of this professional and ethical lapse by Ms. Nicholson. Should it be taken, I will be satisfied to let the matter lie. I probably (but not absolutely), do not wish to resume my role as co-chair of the Trademarks Work Group, at this point.

Yours, David Mertz

"It took a while for me to find it again because it was buried," we got told. "I am not surprised that Deb violated the code of conduct..."

We'll come back to this another day. It goes even deeper and it is connected to the attacks on the FSF among other groups/collectives. As always, be sure to "follow the money" and don't focus on (or obsesses over) gender because it's a distraction if not bait.

Microsoft can censor the above post, so we've reproduced it in full just in case.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Extortion is a Crime, Even If You're Based in Another Continent and Work for Microsoft
reported to British authorities
 
Links 06/06/2025: Microsoft XBox Bracing For More Mass Layoffs, Climate Disaster, Fake 'Money' Tokens From US President
Links for the day
Gemini Links 06/06/2025: Vanishing Cultures and MElon Implosion
Links for the day
We're in 6/6 Now, Almost Halfway in 2025
2025 was probably the best year for us
South Americans Are Saying Goodbye to Microsoft
We're hardly even "Cherry-Picking" or conveniently singling out one South American nation
Abuse Inside the Polish Patent Office (UPRP) - Part III: Data Protection Failures, Just Like at the European Patent Office (EPO)
Just less than a decade ago we showed that the EPO had illegally shared staff data with third parties
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, June 05, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, June 05, 2025
Pushing Microsoft's Proprietary Trash/Trap as "Open" and "Linux" (Windows is 'Linux' Now?)
Maybe it's time to just stop saying "FOSS". The people who use that term are promoting Microsoft.
Slopwatch: Comparing Linux to Vermin, Attacking BSD With LLM Slop, and Helping Microsoft Demonise Linux/OpenBSD/SSH Over Weak User Passwords
Microsoft must be laughing its arse off, seeing how a bunch of Serial Sloppers (no skills, no comprehension, no integrity, no creativity) and slopfarms use Microsoft LLM to flood the Web with anti-Linux FUD
Links 05/06/2025: US Poised for Another $2.4 Trillion to Debt, Cops Want GAFAM Kill Switches
Links for the day
Links 05/06/2025: First US Spacewalk 60 Years Ago, GNU Octave 10.2.0 is Out
Links for the day
Scandinavia Saying Goodbye to Microsoft
The Danes have had enough of Microsoft
GNU/Linux Measured at 6% in Bangladesh, According to statCounter
Windows isn't growing, it's going away
Nat Friedman Had Left Microsoft GitHub Exactly One Week Before Matthew Garrett Sent His First SLAPP (Which Was an Empty Threat, He Was Abusing the Legal System of Another Continent to Terrorise Critics Who Had Just Unearthed Major Microsoft Scandals)
And it was likely talked about by his lawyers around the exact same time Nat Friedman was packing up
Gemini Links 05/06/2025: Loop Earplugs Review and ANS Forth
Links for the day
Armenian Adoption of GNU/Linux
Russian influence in Armenian must be worrying to Microsoft
Abuse Inside the Polish Patent Office (UPRP) - Part II: Turning a Once-Respected Patent Office Into a Circus and Laughing Stock
It's not legal, but administrators who don't care about the law and don't fear the law would just go ahead and turn things to junk
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, June 04, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, June 04, 2025
Slopwatch: Mindless Slop Pieces, Fake Images and Text, Linux FUD on the Cheap
spewed out by Microsoft-controlled LLMs
Links 04/06/2025: Workers' Strikes, Sudan Exodus
Links for the day
Links 04/06/2025: Linux Foundation PR Spam and Lee Jae-myung Wins Election
Links for the day
Gemini Links 04/06/2025: Future Leaders of the World and Platforming Jordan Peterson
Links for the day
Links 04/06/2025: WSL Backfiring on Microsoft and "Disney, Microsoft Announce Massive Layoffs"
Links for the day
Our Case is a Very Easy Win, the SLAPPs From Microsofters Were a Grave Error, and Censoring Information Won't Work (It'll Only Ever Backfire)
Censoring is what people do when they lose the argument
Say the Truth, the Rest Will Follow
There's no guarantee that writing the truth will result in an audience (or readership), but over time - in the long run - people generally gravitate towards what they know or feel to be crude truth, not just what's comforting (albeit false or self-deluding, usually groupthink dictated from above)
How to Expose High-Level Corruption Without Getting in (Too Much) Trouble
Democracy depends on free press and freedom of the press depends on being able to safely publish (and keep available) material that bad people don't want to be known to anybody
In-Depth EPO Coverage at Techrights Turns Eleven
11 years is a very long time
Windows Measured Below 10% in Afghanistan, GNU/Linux Gaining a Lot
about 80% are Android (Linux) users, compared to only about 10% for Windows
Poland's Political Predicament and Social Control Media
Democracy and fake "tech" don't mix well; the latter tends to interfere with the former and that's why we get more "Putins" out there
EPO: Taking Away From the Staff to Give More to the Rich
The Central Staff Committee (CSC) wrote to EPO staff earlier this week
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, June 03, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, June 03, 2025
Abuse Inside the Polish Patent Office (UPRP) - Part I: It's a Lot Like the EPO
we can commence a series soon
Gemini Links 04/06/2025: Inescapable Questions and Quitting All "Oligarch Tech"
Links for the day