Bonum Certa Men Certa

Dictatorship Formalised: Python Software Foundation Violates Its Very Own Code Of Conduct (COC) or Code Of Censorship

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Dec 07, 2024,
updated Dec 07, 2024

Incoming Python Software Foundation Executive Director, Deb Nicholson, allegedly uses COCs to get ahead while violating COCs

THE people who keep defaming the founder of Free software (among other charismatic and highly qualified people) are being (mis)placed at positions of power and high authority - i.e. the same thing we see at the Linux Foundation, OIN, etc. Cui bono? Those "darlings" of oligarchs typically don't earn their positions owing to accomplishment/s but mere utility. They're easier to control from up above, they can be ousted easily, so they're more obedient and usually immoral. They're paranoid (imposter syndrome), so they attack anyone they perceive to be a potential "rival", even if such "rivalry" is merely perceived (a hallmark of insecurity).

"I don’t know," a reader told us, as "I haven’t been Catching up on stuff, but I did see something recently that came across my feed about the director of the Python [Software] Foundation, throwing around the Code Of Conduct [COC] to cancel and there was a gentleman who says that she violated the code of conduct herself."

"Not sure if you were already reported on this," but [this thing] says:

Fiduciary and CoC violations by the Executive Director of PSF

Fiduciary and CoC violations by the Executive Director of PSF

David Mertz, Corrupter of Youth

October 4, 2024

I wrote the following letter to the Python Software Foundation recently. It can be found as well at https://gnosis.cx/publish/ED-CoC-complaint . Interested readers might also enjoy Tim Peters' account of his own banishment at https://tim-one.github.io/psf/ban.

I believe my note speaks for itself. I had reported here and elsewhere details of ongoing and unfolding events previously.


DATE: 2024-10-01

TO: Python Software Foundation Code of Conduct Work Group ( conduct-wg@python.org); Python Software Foundation Board of Directors ( psf-board@python.org)

FROM: David Mertz, Ph.D., Emeritus Fellow of the PSF

The PSF (hereafter “Foundation”) Executive Director, Deb Nicholson, has behaved in a manner that is unprofessional, motivated by personal animosity, in violation of Foundation bylaws, and that violated her fiduciary obligations as an employee and officer of the Foundation.

As preface I will note that I believe that “sunshine is the best disinfectant.” Therefore, I generally anticipate publication of this letter in public fora. I will not, of course, publish any replies—should I receive them—without express permission of their senders.

As recipients of this note will be aware, I have had numerous volunteer roles within the Foundation, dating back to 2008. I had, in fact, been the longest continuously serving volunteer with the Foundation prior to the actions of Ms. Nicholson, discussed below.

During the Foundation election of 2024, concluding on 2024-07-17, I opposed the bylaws change entitled “Allow for removal of Fellows by a Board vote in response to Code of Conduct violations, removing the need for a vote of the membership.” I expressed my reasons for opposition, wholly professionally, on a PSF owned mailing list, and on its Discourse discussion board.

During the course of this discussion, shortly before election results were announced, I wrote a letter requesting conversion to Emeritus status on 2024-07-15. In that note, I expressed discontent with both the motivations for this bylaws amendment and with the manipulation of the discussion by moderators on the Discourse site (including actively changing the words of posts opposing the motion so as to alter their meaning).

At that point, my only remaining volunteer role with the Foundation was that of co-chair of the Trademarks Work Group, which role I had performed continuously for over 15 years. I was (or am) nominally co-chair of the Scientific Python Work Group, but that committee has been quiescent, and may or may not have been dissolved by the Board (no motion supports this, but one Director stated to me personally that they believed it to be so).

Shortly after conclusion of the PSF election of 2024, Ms. Nicholson wrote me with the below text, after first removing my email from the mailing list associated with the Trademarks WG, and probably changing the access credentials to administer that list. She in no way communicated to me any concerns she might have had prior to taking these incautious actions.

Delivered-To: david.mertz@gmail.com
Return-Path: <deb.nicholson@pyfound.org>
From: Deb Nicholson <deb@python.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 11:22:02 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAPDYKMH-j1gGV+VyTREmOEKW+SJRTGZggyb6FeOV=ZTOfiGJg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Your role on the PSF Trademark Working Group
To: mertz@gnosis.cx, David Mertz <david.mertz@gmail.com>

Hello David,
Myself and many other community members have read your recent writing that you distrust the PSF and that you believe that the organization needs replacing. I don't think that this attitude is compatible with the responsibility of serving on a PSF Board-delegated working group that responds to community members about sensitive matters on behalf of the Foundation and acting as a representative of the Foundation.
I want to thank you for your many, many years of service on the Trademark Working Group, but sadly, at this point I need to ask for your resignation. If you would like to discuss this with me, I am available for that, https://calendly.com/deb-psf/30min
Sincerely,
Deb Nicholson

To be clear on the matter, at no point in any communication had I, nor have I since, stated in any forum (nor in any private communication), that I would fail to follow my own fiduciary duties in enforcing the Foundation trademarks, as I had done diligently for more than 15 years. My intention to do so had not changed; if I had felt it would, I would have resigned my position on that Work Group. In actuality, I continue to intellectually and morally support the enforcement of Foundation trademarks.

I absolutely did not, in fact, resign, but was summarily removed by Ms. Nicholson. Because this action was taken without a Board vote, her action explicitly violates the Foundation’s bylaws. I fully recognize that it is within the power of the Board to remove any Work Group member, at any time, for any reason or with no reason. However, even a retroactive vote to perform this action would not create a legal or ethical justification for Ms. Nicholson’s 2024-07-19 violating action.

The violation is not simply a circumvention of the Foundation’s bylaws, but is, in fact, an ethical and legal lapse of her duties as an officer of a United States nonprofit corporation. Specifically, while I am not an attorney, I am a subject matter expert in trademark law, in the United States and, to a lesser extent, internationally. The work I had volunteered over the last 15 years has saved the Foundation tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars that it would have otherwise had to spend in legal fees. Ms. Nicholson’s action will similarly needlessly cost the Foundation tens or hundred of thousands of dollars for counsel to perform these duties, which I have been excluded from entirely out of spite.

I do not have current plans to take legal action against Ms. Nicholson or the Foundation, but I was a member in good standing of the Foundation at the time she took the referenced action, and her fiduciary violation directly affected me as such a member (as well as negatively impacting all other members). Officers of nonprofits have been penalized under law for lesser unethical behavior.


It is my belief that the following would be a correct remediation of this professional and ethical lapse by Ms. Nicholson. Should it be taken, I will be satisfied to let the matter lie. I probably (but not absolutely), do not wish to resume my role as co-chair of the Trademarks Work Group, at this point.

Yours, David Mertz

"It took a while for me to find it again because it was buried," we got told. "I am not surprised that Deb violated the code of conduct..."

We'll come back to this another day. It goes even deeper and it is connected to the attacks on the FSF among other groups/collectives. As always, be sure to "follow the money" and don't focus on (or obsesses over) gender because it's a distraction if not bait.

Microsoft can censor the above post, so we've reproduced it in full just in case.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Australia: Windows Fell to All-Time Low, Even Lower Than iOS
There's a good reason why next week there will be so many Microsoft layoffs
 
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, June 28, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, June 28, 2025
The "News" You Saw About Canonical is Misleading, It Made Only 18 Million Dollars Last Year and Barely Paid Any Taxes
Lies are the norm these days...
Pushing Wayland Using Straw Man Arguments
phoronix.com has long promoted the talking point of "Wayland people" (for at least a decade already)
Slopwatch: Linuxsecurity, WebProNews, and Google News Boosting Slopfarms as 'News'
People who don't recognise the slopfarms and don't know which sites are fake would struggle to understand what's really going on
Links 28/06/2025: Hardware/GPU Wars, GAFAM Throws Money (Borrowed Cash) at Hopeless Slop Pipe Dream
Links for the day
Gemini Links 28/06/2025: Shellshock and Network UPS Tools
Links for the day
Links 28/06/2025: The Age of Integrity and FreeBSD Foundation Added John Baldwin as Board Member
Links for the day
Fedora 44
IBM now does to Fedora what it did to RHEL
Microsoft Already Shaved Off Costs Anywhere It Could. It Was Not Enough.
Office and Windows aren't "selling" (licences) like they used to
Scheduled Maintenance Next Week
Our community is alive and well
BetaNews: We're Publishing LLM Slop About LLM Slop
Beta version of a slopfarm?
3-Month Updates on Our Complaint to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)
In short, the complaint remains open, updated, and is advancing
IBM Red States Hat (Project 2025): Our "New Thing" Replaces This "Old Thing"
The new replaces the old. That's how IBM frames it.
Start X
Just because something is old does not mean it is bad
Slopwatch: Linuxsecurity, Google News Slopfarms, and Linux Journal (LJ)
Today we take a quick look at 3 slopfarms
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, June 27, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, June 27, 2025
Links 28/06/2025: "CC Signals" Virtue-Signals to Slop Ponzi Schemes, North Korea Aims for Tourism
Links for the day
Links 27/06/2025: International Tensions and Contentions Over Plagiarism Perfumed as "Hey Hi" and "Fair Use"
Links for the day
Gemini Links 27/06/2025: Poetry and Censorship by Social Control Media Centralisation
Links for the day
Links 27/06/2025: Journalists Under Fire and Microsoft Has Serious Slop Problems
Links for the day
X is Dying, But Not XServer/X11. Twitter X.com is Dying.
People or businesses or government officials (and departments) that still rely on Social Control Media are playing Russian Roulette with their future online
Wayland is About Less Choice, About Removing Choices, It's Not About Freedom
IBM insists that it cares about "diversity"
Keeping Things Accessible
Gemini Protocol seems to be growing
Escaping Colonialism (or 'Hegemony') Requires Abandoning GAFAM, Microsoft in Particular
Europe is already in the process of abandoning Microsoft
Microsoft Will Shut Down More Studios This Week, Its Media Operatives Will Tell Lies About the Magnitude of the Shutdowns and Layoffs (They Always Do)
Many people who get counted as "workforce" are "temps" or similar
Not Much Better Than LLM Slop: Linux Foundation-Funded 'News' Site Writes Linux Foundation 'News', Composed by Linux Foundation Operative, Quoting Linux Foundation Staff
...they get paid (sponsored) to produce this spam. Then they call it "journalism".
What Linux Foundation 'Research' is: Paid Marketing
What is Linux Foundation 'Research'?
Annual Southern California Linux Expo (SCALE 22x) 'Bought' by Microsoft and Microsoft Exceeded Sponsorship Limits by Giving Double the Maximum Permitted Amount
When people get bribed they tend to forget how to utter a simple word: "No."
No, IBM Does Not Care About People With Disabilities
"Aktion T4" did not seem to bother Watson
Microsoft's Financial Problems Mean Shutdowns, Not Just Mass Layoffs
If the original rumour is true, then expect almost 30,000 Microsoft workers to be let go this year
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, June 26, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, June 26, 2025
The Netherlands: GNU/Linux Measured at All-Time High
Are any Dutch cities going to announce dumping Microsoft?
Gemini Links 27/06/2025: "Interstitial Existence" and Autocorrect
Links for the day