What People Must Understand About the Open Source Initiative (OSI)
We'll soon resume our series. Let's recite some facts about the Open Source Initiative (OSI):
- Both of its founders are no longer involved
- One co-founder repeatedly said (in public) that the OSI had lost its way
- OSI existed (after some years) to "replace" the original message of Free software
- OSI did not pioneer or coin the term "Open Source"
- OSI is fronting for its sponsors, e.g. Microsoft and GitHub, i.e. proprietary software
- OSI is paid by Microsoft and GitHub to whitewashing licence violations in Open Source (using terms like "Deep Dive" and "AI")
- OSI does not operate in compliance with its own rules and bylaws; even elections are a farce
- OSI is likely not the real guardian of the Open Source Definition (OSD), as the person behind the OSD helped confirm as recently as months ago
- OSI defamed me, tried to deplatform me, and censored me (those who did this are at the highest level at the OSI and occasionally did so in public)
- People close to the OSI confirm that there are witch-hunts against any form of dissent, including dissent from OSI co-founders
- The OSI can lose its status or its licence to operate (per se)
- The OSI is being investigated for privacy violations
- The OSI colluded with Microsoft-sponsored front groups to publicly defame people such as Richard Stallman and Eben Moglen
- OSI leadership is abusing Wikipedia
- Only about 2.5% of the OSI's budget comes from members; the OSI is basically an instrument of large corporations; it speaks for and lobbies for them
- If the OSI goes under, there will not be any immediate vacuum; the OSD hasn't been enforced for ages by the OSI; au contraire - some people in the OSI sought to profit from openwashing, i.e. helping actors (like clients of theirs) run afoul of the OSD
There's lots more. Stay tuned. █