The company of marketeer has begun its
next round of deception. It is no coincidence that this comes as soon as clients prepare for the next generation of servers and desktops (software-wise).
Lately there has been a HUGE push by Certified Microsoft Professionals and their companies to call clients and warn them of the dangers of open source. This week I received calls from 4 different customers that they were warned that they are dangerously insecure because they run Open Source Operating systems or Software because 'anyone can read the code and hack you with ease' they are being told. Other colleagues in the area also have noticed this about 3 Microsoft Partners or so they claim have been going out of their way to strike fear of OSS in companies that respond with 'yes we use Open source or Linux' when the sales call comes in.
The beast from Redmond is gearing up towards delivery of more disinformation than ever encountered before. It's bracing itself for destruction of perceptions which accompany the term "Open Source". According to Mary Jo-Foley, Microsoft has been preparing yet another
self-commissioned anti-Linux study. On top of that, Frost & Sullivan were recently used to conduct outrageous
TCO studies. And yet, the press fails to mention who is behind the studies whose 'conclusions' it helps propagate.
Microsoft's grip on public information and the media is nothing to sneeze at. Just have a look at the
leaked Holloween Documents to get a quick reminder. That of course is the company which Novell, a so-called Linux advocate, chooses to do business with. Whilst Novell
removes its anti-Windows Web site components, Microsoft fuels its anti-Linux fire and added aggression to its sales pitch. Clearly, "know your enemy" is a little tidbit which Novell
absolutely must begin to digest and act upon.
In other news, LWN speaks of the
division that's formed in the Linux community, as well as the possible defection of developers who were invited to depart from Novell. Google and Canonical are named as examples.
To complete this quick roundup, I would also briefly mention Susan Heystee, the newly-appointed
babysitter for this controversial deal. Shane has read the article more carefully and concluded that "
they are going to customers jointly, in here she says that IP issues aren't that important to customers that she has talked to. Plus, they admittedly have no plan - after 'months' of working out a deal and now they go to customers and are pitching them what exactly? Vague concepts like 'interoperability', 'virtualization' and 'patent protection'". This aligns perfectly well with the confusing 'virtues' that Novell waves in the eyes of European businesses, to whom patents are
not even valid. All in all, this creates a great deal of noise and confusion. Wake up, Novell. You help destroy your source while returning to your proprietary roots.
