Amid talks about Red Hat's role in the Linux kernel, there is further discussion about Novell, AppArmor and whether they can gain acceptance from the kernel hackers.

SELinux offers strict but sometimes difficult-to-manage security. Will a simpler approach, championed by SUSE, make it into the mainstream kernel?

Novell has got Greg Kroah Hartmann doing some excellent work at the core of the Linux world, but some others just muddy the waters. One of Justin Steinman's tactless statements was a whine about Red Hat's lack of contribution to Linux (it's truly quite a saga). No wonder. Controversial, poorly-researched statements come from this direction quite often. Marketing people often miss the technical details completely.

Will the news mentioned above enable Novell to boast more contributions (if this ever materialises)? Some fairly knowledgeable people already doubt it.

After all I read about AppArmor and SELinux even Novell's comparison of the two systems doesn't help giving me a better opinion about AppArmor. The information shown there isn't what I had expected, they're repeating themselves to fill the page and the point about SELinux' low adoption rate is a joke. Just like Novell's distros AppArmor is targeted at the normal user.

Remember that some Novell/SUSE developers are being exposed to Microsoft code (visibility), so involvement in mainstream packages such as the kernel might be considered a grey area by some. Remember what SCO alleged several years ago.