We've shared information [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15] and a video about this before. It's not so easy to find ithis because it's kept fairly secret until shortly after it's ready for signing and too late for people to learn about and protest against.
To maximise awareness and encourage action against these intellectual monopolies, here are the rest of the videos we could find, starting with those that are more decent (some are less accurate). ⬆
If the election is run by platforms that have back doors "baked-in" and if the communications are overseen by GAFAM, you would not have to be a "nutty MAGAt" to dispute the outcome
"It means a situation in which somebody accuses someone else of a fault which the accuser shares, and therefore is an example of psychological projection, or hypocrisy. Use of the expression to discredit or deflect a claim of wrongdoing by attacking the originator of the claim for their own similar behaviour (rather than acknowledging the guilt of both) is the tu quoque logical fallacy."
