A QUICK glance at yesterday's news was particularly interesting. With a $100,000,000 budget dedicated solely to the purpose, Microsoft has begun not only a media blitz for Bing but it also attacked and trolled Google. Pro-Microsoft blogs were full of it and Walt Mossberg, an old buddy Bill Gates, had a good time with Steve Ballmer who used the podium to promote Bing. But this post is not about the Slog against Google; rather, it is about ASUS joining an anti-Linux marketing campaign.
“Anti-Linux ads will pay ASUS the equivalent of kickbacks for using Windows.”With profit down 94% after joining hands with Microsoft, ASUS could truly use some fast cash. Anti-Linux ads will pay ASUS the equivalent of kickbacks for using Windows. This further reduction in price through marketing means that even negative pricing for Windows becomes possible. What ASUS is doing right now is an issue we wrote about a fortnight ago because it resembles old tactics. They have a new banner that they market. Microsoft used to do this in servers under the slogan "Get the Facts" and now it's brought to the desktop under the slogan "it's better with Windows."
We are well aware of how huge GNU/Linux became on servers. In September 2008 Steve Ballmer said that “forty percent of servers run Windows, 60 percent run Linux.” Microsoft, unlike IDC/Gartner, does not rely on the lies it pays IDC/Gartner to spread publicly. Microsoft instructs (commissions/bribes) IDC to conduct 'studies' the way which favours and glorifies Microsoft. Even by these bogus measures, Windows Server revenue is down 29 percent at the moment. Mary-Jo Foley wrote about it yesterday. Add this to an overall alarmingly-sharp decline of 32% in earnings at Microsoft. They can't be happy
The decline of Microsoft's earnings was notably attributed to the rise of GNU/Linux through a new form factor, the sub-notebook (or Netbookââ¢). As GreyGeek put it yesterday:
not even Microsoft or Ballmer believe their own PR FUD. Ballmer puts Linux's desktop marketshare greater than Mac's, which is supposed to be 10% http://www.osnews.com/story/21035/Ballmer_Linux_Bi gger_Competitor_than_Apple
I don't believe that the desktop Linux market share is barely 1%. I think it is a lot higher. I have no good data to share; I base my assessment on experience and knowing the industry. There is something else that is even more persuasive, and that is how Microsoft behaves. If Linux is so insignificant, why do they pay so much attention to it? Like this new ASUS/Windows Eee PC "It's Better With Windows" ad campaign...
[...]
It's a direct shot at Linux, so I guess that little bitty one percent is a bigger one percent than it's given credit for. Some have questioned if these ads are legitimate, and claim they are satire or a hoax. ASUS links to them, so they're for real.
ASUSTEK HAS JOINED Microsoft in launching a marketing campaign to get netbook users to use Windows rather than dodgy old Linux.
[...]
The difference, we assume, is that Microsoft has money to spend on promoting its products.
Microsoft and Asus have launched a marketing campaign to encourage netbook users to use Windows rather than Linux.
Regardless of the thoughts form the anti-Linux and pro-Linux camps, it appears from the Asus (.co.uk) site that there is a Windows based Eee PC, no where does it say that Asus is replacing the Linux version with Windows (or at least I didn't see it).
Asustek Computer joined other NAS (network attached storage) device makers such as QNAP and Acer by showing off a new NAS that uses Intel's low-power, inexpensive Atom N270 microprocessor.
[...]
EeeNAS has a Linux OS.
Comments
Needs Sunlight
2009-05-30 13:51:53
http://www.fool.com/portfolios/rulemaker/2000/rulemaker000217.htm
That was 10 years ago when it was at its economic prime. Oh. Wait. It ran a loss ($18 billion) even back then
http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=230106 http://etheridge.ca/articles/economist-options.html
and the business model could be seen to be non-viable to the point that Gates bailed from his position as CEO.
Roy Schestowitz
2009-05-30 13:54:49
Needs Sunlight
2009-05-30 13:46:57
It would only be necessary if that trading is no longer profitable. We all know where the company is going. With that in mind, who's a big enough chump nowadays to buy MS stock? What the sale of debt looks like is a venture into the junk bond business.
The ringleaders have already hired in expert book cookers:
http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/03/did-the-enron-of-norway-pull-a-fast-one-on-microsoft-more-details-about-the-mess-at-fast-search-transfer/
http://www.computeruser.com/articles/daily/8,6,1,0225,02.html
Roy Schestowitz
2009-05-30 13:51:30