Intellectual Monopoly Roundup: Comedy or Farce?
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2009-06-17 16:31:03 UTC
- Modified: 2009-06-17 16:31:03 UTC
Summary: News about patents -- where does it end?
●
A unique person with a unique common sense in the EP
It’s not just about the profits of the pharmaceutical industry. The proposed alternative to pharmaceutical patents starts from the fact that the big pharmaceutical companies officially admit they only spend 15% of their revenues on research, to suggest that the governments could take 20% of what they currently spend on drugs (which is a lot of money!) and allocate it to pharmaceutical research, with the results free to anyone. However, the Pirate Party is the only political party to have asserted that all kind of patents have to be abolished, not only the pharmaceutical patents and the software patents!
●
Interview with Pirate Party Leader: 'These are Crucial Freedoms'
In the same way, the Pirate Party opposes patents -- especially in software, but also in other areas.
"All patents, at their base, are innovation inhibitors," he maintains. "Patents delayed the industrial revolution by thirty years. They delayed the advent of the North American avionics industry by another thirty years, until the first world war broke out, and the US government confiscated the patents. It delayed radio for five years." Today, he suggests, advances in electric cars and eco-friendly infrastructure are similarly blocked by patents.
●
The Fight of His Life
Call him Dr. No. Locked in a bitter dispute over how he can use the fruits of his research, Bob Shafer is asking the same question the courts are now grappling with: Just what can be patented, anyway?
●
Get Your Hands Out of my Genes!
Our genes might be practically open to discovery, there's very little physically I can do to prevent you from acquiring my genes and unraveling my genetic code. But that doesn't mean it wouldn't be disturbing or unethical if you did this. The knowledge you could get about me, and use against me, is just too potentially disruptive to decide that we are not somehow each custodians, and maybe even more properly guardians, of our individual genetic data.
At the same time, the genome we share cannot be cordoned off. To the degree that our genetic information is mostly the same, we should all have access to it. No one should be able to claim that if we want to peek around, learn some more, and do some studies on this common genetic code, we somehow have to pay for this. Our "common genetic heritage" is, I argue, an actual commons like the sky, sunlight, or international waters. We should treat it as such.
●
US Green Patents vs. Global Climate Commons
Guess which wins?
Last night the House voted overwhelmingly to establish new U.S. policy that will oppose any global climate change treaty that weakens the IP rights of American "green technology."
Staggering. Sickening. Suicidal. (Via Against Monopoly.)
●
Intellectual “Property” Versus Real Property
Intellectual “property” (IP) is a sleeper issue. It seems uncontroversial: Someone invents or writes something and therefore owns it. What could be plainer? But IP contains the power to destroy liberty.
IP isn’t merely about rock bands preventing kids from sharing MP3s over the Internet. (See “Weird Al” Yankovic’s musical commentary, “Don’t Download This Song,” here.) It’s about crusty incumbent firms trying to preserve market share by stifling competition, domestically and in the developing world.
●
It's Not About Being First... It's About Market Adoption
We've discussed the difference between "invention" (doing something new) and "innovation" (finding a new successful market) before, and it's resulted in some long and occasionally contentious discussions. Fred Wilson put up a post recently where he looked at a series of product "success" stories, and tried to figure out what was the key to success. In each one, he noted that the product enabled people to do stuff in a different way -- but one of the key findings, was that they all had something else in common: being drop dead simple, leading to much greater adoption
●
Judge tosses Nintendo Wii patent suit
Since the launch of the Wii, Nintendo has been the subject of no fewer than 15 patent-related lawsuits. While many of those suits are still winding their way through the courts, Nintendo on Thursday issued a statement touting victory over Guardian Media Technologies in one of the more recent patent suits.
Recent Techrights' Posts
- Why We'll Continue Covering EPO Abuses (Other Patent Offices as Well, as the Need Arises) for Many Years to Come
- We're basically becoming Russia
- Central Staff Committee of the EPO Opposes Abuses Against EPO Staff, Challenging SuccessFactors Stunts
- Europe became institutionally colonised
- Gemini Links 22/05/2025: "Conspirituality" and Visiting One's Old University
- Links for the day
- Microsoft Killed the Term "Open Source" (by Bribing/Taking Over OSI, 'Linux' Foundation Etc.) and Now It Needs to Kill the Brand Linux (Because Windows Just Won't Run!)
- Why else would Microsoft falsely describe Windows as "Linux" and "Open Source"?
- Slopwatch: Liars for Microsoft, Plagiarism, and IBM Red Hat Markets Slop as "AI"
- Today was a bad day news-wise
- Slopwatch: Slopfarms 'Think' Redis is "Linux" (RedisRaider)
- Today we'll keep it short and to the point again
-
- My New Desk Arrangement (and More Breaks From the Keyboard)
- all in all yesterday I devoted 4-5 hours to redoing and shuffling stuff
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, May 21, 2025
- IRC logs for Wednesday, May 21, 2025
- Bigots and Lunatics Who Attack Microsoft Critics, Projecting Their Own Bigotry by Accusing Others of Imaginary Things (Which They're Innocent Of)
- "In psychology, projection refers to assigning your negative traits or unwanted emotions to others without being aware you’re doing it."
- "The Appeals Committee [at the EPO] Unanimously Stated a Formal Flaw in the Consultation of the General Consultative Committee (GCC) on the Reform"
- It's a truly horrifying situation
- Links 21/05/2025: Climate Problems and Ceasefires No Longer Foreseen
- Links for the day
- Gemini Links 21/05/2025: "Shrimps of Doom" and "ASCII-graphs"
- Links for the day
- Links 21/05/2025: GitHub Becoming Slop, MElon as a Drug Addict Considered National Security Risk
- Links for the day
- IBM Has Allegedly Just Sacked Mr. McKinsey (McK), Clay Cowan, Its Fourth CMO in a Few Years
- To insiders he represented the company that's killing IBM or advising IBM on how to self-destruct
- Gemini Links 21/05/2025: Trips, 4D Golf, and Writing Software
- Links for the day
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, May 20, 2025
- IRC logs for Tuesday, May 20, 2025
- Links 20/05/2025: Biden's Cancer, GDPR Changes, and UK Defamation Cases (or SLAPPs) Fail Again
- Links for the day
- Microsofters Targeting the Wife of the Critic of Microsoft
- false claims and loaded statement
- Links 20/05/2025: "Bankrupt 23andMe Just Sold Off All Your DNA Data" and "Free Speech Warriors" MIA
- Links for the day
- Microsoft a Top Sponsor at Red Hat Summit (IBM Selling Proprietary Spyware and Back Doors in a "Red" Trench Coat)
- They both work for Microsoft
- Openwashing of Windows, Back Doors, Persistent Surveillance, Keyloggers, Screen Loggers, DRM and So On
- WSL is not "Linux", it's Windows
- New 'Interview' With - or Talk Coverage of - Richard Stallman in the European Union
- automated English translation
- IBM Mass Redundancies Likely This Coming Thursday
- We're not in a position to judge if that's true or false
- Gemini Links 20/05/2025: LLM Scraper Bots in Gopher and "Starmer and the Somewheres"
- Links for the day
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Monday, May 19, 2025
- IRC logs for Monday, May 19, 2025
Comments
Jose_X
2009-06-17 21:54:13
Patents can be very anticompetitive (through the use of proxies) if they get into the wrong hands. The lottery winner prefers a symbiotic relationship where the target company lives to prosper and they get a cut all the way. But, for a quick sure payoff, they may instead sell out to a proxy working on behalf of larger competitor(s), who then might try for an injunction or for very high royalties (or for some other high price.. or to bribe management to sell out...) since the entity(-ies) behind the proxy benefits more in various ways that reduce competition and can very unfairly punish the target (and consumers).
All of this is enabled by patent laws that give too much market distorting power to too few.
Roy Schestowitz
2009-06-17 22:04:44
twitter
2009-06-18 03:48:47