Bonum Certa Men Certa

Software Patents Are a Dying Breed of Patents Except in China (and Maybe EPO)

Shen (SIPO), Lutz, Battistelli, and Lamy at the end of 2016 in Saint-Germain-en-Laye

SIPO Lamy and Battistelli

Summary: The patent maximalists would like us to believe otherwise, but software patents are generally going away; even if they get granted by patent offices (to fake 'production' or game the numbers) the courts typically reject these

WHILE the EPO emulates China on human rights (or lack thereof) it also emulates China on patent maximalism, openly promoting software patents while the USPTO gradually moves away from these.



It's important to recognise that with the exception of China and the EPO (we don't say Europe because pertinent national patent offices across the European continent don't apply) IP5 is not so interested in software patents.

There's a new interview at Managing IP, a patent maximalists' site. "Karry Lai talks with Michael Ding, ABB’s head of IP operations for Asia, the Middle East and Africa, about trends in software patents and trade secret protection in China," says the summary. "From IP [sic] assets generation, extraction to risk mitigation, Michael Ding works with an IP team of more than 10 people to ensure that IP rights at ABB are well protected." [sic]

Karry Lai, who is based in Hong Kong, published this behind a paywall, so we cannot see what's said about software patents (the headline is "ABB’s Asia IP head on software patents and trade secrets"). We routinely emphasise that China is just about the only country that allows software patents these days (without even hiding that it's about algorithms). The EPO still tries to mask this using buzzwords, maintaining some thinly-veiled perception of compliance with the law.

"The EPO still tries to mask this using buzzwords, maintaining some thinly-veiled perception of compliance with the law."Software patents in Australia, as this new post serves to reveal (cross-posted elsewhere, e.g. Lexology), are also going away. Australia too has become rather intolerant of software patents, even before applying or taking into full effect recommendations from the Productivity Commission (it opposes software patents). Look below the somewhat misleading headline from the patent microcosm in Australia (Sam Mickan and Mattia Pagani from Davies Collison Cave). The court rejected software patents; not just once:

In Encompass Corporation Pty Ltd v InfoTrack Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 421, Justice Perram of the Federal Court of Australia found two innovation patents to be invalid for not involving a manner of manufacture, thus failing the Australian test for patentable subject matter.

[...]

Justice Perram, when considering the issue of patentability, acknowledged that the implementation by a computer of the combination of steps of the invention constitutes a new use of the computer, capable of enhancing the experience of a user. However, what the inventions failed to do, in his Honour's view, was to cause an improvement in the computer itself.

Justice Perram noted that, in principle, any software could be said to cause an improvement in a computer, because without it, the computer would not be able to perform a certain task. The requisite improvement however was considered to be one that provides the computer with some new ability, previously unattainable. A case in point of the necessary improvement was IBM's software for drawing curves without using floating point arithmetic.

[...]

This judgment by a single judge of the Federal Court represents a strict interpretation of the principles established by the Full Federal Court in Research Affiliates and RPL Central. It will be interesting to see whether the same strict interpretation is maintained on appeal.

This case demonstrates that it may be beneficial to link a discussion of innovative step (or inventive step) to that of a technical contribution (e.g., new functionality in a computer) despite the Australian requirements for inventive/innovative step and manner of manufacture being formally separate.

On this note, following a recommendation by the Productivity Commission in its Inquiry Report on IP Arrangements that "IP Australia should reform its patent filing processes to require applicants to identify the technical features of the invention in the set of claims", there has been a public consultation by IP Australia, in which three options were put forward to improve the information available to Examiners when assessing inventive step. You can read more about that public consultation here. In response to that consultation, IP Australia has indicated that they propose to adopt a requirement that Examiners assess technical features through the inventive step requirements, and that this change will be implemented through changes to the Patent Manual of Practice and Procedure.


The above words, terms like "innovative step" (or "inventive step") as well as "technical contribution," are commonly (mis)used at the EPO. At the end, however, it's for national courts to decide (there's no UPC) and experience suggests they're not particularly friendly towards such patents.

We look forward to the day the world as a whole can leave software patents behind, putting them deep inside the ashtray of "bad ideas we've abandoned."

Recent Techrights' Posts

Many Articles About Layoffs Are Still Fake, Still LLM Slop, Even About IBM Layoffs
No wonder tech and tech journalism are getting so much worse
Slappification: Using More SLAPP to Cover Up SLAPP and Chaining SLAPPs (From Microsoft) in a Failed Bid to Censor Techrights
How low can a person with a law degree stoop?
 
Gemini Links 22/03/2025: INTERPOL, DDoS by "Hey Hi" Hype, and RSS/Feed Readers
Links for the day
Links 22/03/2025: Alzheimer Research and Mega-breaches in the US
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, March 21, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, March 21, 2025
Gemini Links 21/03/2025: Leasehold, LOTI, and Project Managers
Links for the day
Links 21/03/2025: Energy Facilities Under Fire (or on Fire), EU "Solidarity with Ukraine" and First Console
Links for the day
Links 21/03/2025: "IBM cuts Thousands" and Outlook Outage Again (Microsoft Looks for Excuses)
Links for the day
Gemini Links 21/03/2025: "Happy Spring" and Leaving "The Enterprise"
Links for the day
Speak More About the GNU Manifesto (40 Years Old This Month), It Helps Remind People That GNU/Linux Was Started by Richard Stallman and the Ultimate Goal is Freedom
We generally encourage people to speak about Software Freedom
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, March 20, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, March 20, 2025
Hidden from coroners and the public: tech industry cultural contagion
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Richard Stallman on Patents
uploaded a day ago by Aleksandar Popovic
What Happened to the Open Source Initiative (OSI) Elections: Leaking Information of Members (Even in 2025)
More nonsense about Hey Hi (AI), which OSI has been openwashing on Microsoft's payroll
Recommended New Article From Dr. Andy Farnell and Some Site Miscellany
Andy says he and his daughter successfully avoid GAFAM
Links 20/03/2025: Executions in China and Crackdowns on Science in the US
Links for the day
Gemini Links 20/03/2025: Ubuntu Shafting Common Sense and Blocking of Bots of the Net
Links for the day
Links 20/03/2025: IBM Layoffs (Thousands Reportedly Laid Off) and Lots More Corruption in the White House
Links for the day
Techrights Will Never Capitulate to Threats From Microsofters
Set aside violence against women and all sorts of other things; it's not about personal issues
The Microsoft-Led Open Source Initiative (OSI) is Hurting, It'll Try to Hurt Its Critics and Exposers Now
The OSI's chief meanwhile issues a bunch of meaningless waffle, a sort of "damage control" or "face-saving" platitudes
Apple is Still an Enemy of Open Standards and Software Freedom
Apple did not get any more benign
Gemini Links 20/03/2025: Wanting the Future Back and "Society That Lost Focus"
Links for the day
Fake Articles About GNOME
betanews again
Richard Stallman's Personal Site Says He's Looking for More Opportunities to Speak in Europe
He does not charge people for the talk
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, March 19, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, March 19, 2025
Debian Pregnancy Cluster, when I stopped using IRC
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Mass Layoffs at IBM Confirmed
Thousands believed to have been laid off