Bonum Certa Men Certa

Formalities Officers Team Managers at the European Patent Office Consider Stepping Down

Video download link | md5sum 6e979641b3a369005c2fcfed8ef8db1e No Way to Run the EPO Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 4.0



Summary: Formalities Officers Team Managers at Europe's second-largest institution face a growing list of issues; some are even "considering stepping down," according to internal documents

THE Central Staff Committee (CSC) of the EPO recently expressed and sent its concerns to Vice-President DG1, noting that Team Managers (TMs) in Formalities Officers teams are "considering stepping down."



The CSC speaks of "an ever-growing list" of issues, as noted in the video above, which later deals with the latest ridiculous fluff from the EPO's Web site, treating a deal with Peru (warning: epo.org link) like it's a big accomplishment (Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos have both visited past colonies of Europe in an effort to seem popular). Peru is of no strategic importance to the EPO, except -- maybe -- raw materials Campinos wants to plunder for corporations with a thirst for patents ("national resources"). The 'young' Campinos should ask his dad first. The EPO's site moreover resorts to greenwashing tactics, pretending that patents somehow save the planet (warning: epo.org link) when in practice they only impede access to technology by litigious means. Maybe the EPO's management wrongly assumes that it managed a bunch of fools. As we'll see in the next article, insulting the intelligence of staff is a self-harming move.

Here is the full letter from the CSC:

Reference: sc22053cl Date: 04/05/2022

European Patent Office | 80298 MUNICH | GERMANY

Mr Steve Rowan Vice-President DG 1

By email

OPEN LETTER

Formalities Officers Team Managers; meetings

Dear Mr Vice-President, Dear Steve,

Staff representation (SR) has organised many meetings with the formalities officer’s (FO) teams since October 2021. During these meetings, we realised that FO Team Managers (TM) had specific feedback they needed to express. With this in mind, we organised two meetings with TMs in The Hague and Munich, shortly before and after the re-organisation of 1 April 2022. We would like to share with you the feedback collected, which causes us great concerns about the potential impact on engagement of staff, some TMs even considering stepping down.

The following topics have emerged from our conversations:

Lack of consultation and support from higher management Before the reorganisation of 1st of April, the TMs were neither consulted, nor could they prepare their staff for the change. TMs have not been consulted on the future units they would be in charge of, neither on capacities nor on other needs. Organisation of capacity and expertise is still not in place. The TMs heavily rely on ancient personal networks. At the same time, some TM’s now have cross-site teams and although the situation is unprecedented, no guidance has been offered on how to handle a hybrid team and make cohesion a reality. The very low managerial time budget seems to not make much sense under these circumstances either.

One role, two categories

Under DG2, FO colleagues appointed as TMs were promoted to Job Group 5 as Head of Section (HOS) with 100% managerial tasks. After the 2018 reorganisation, their job description was suddenly changed to include 20% of production, and the manager role was given ad personam




for this category of TM’s only. Since then, newly appointed TMs remain in Job Group 6, their term has a duration of three years renewable. A low monthly functional allowance is granted but the time budget that initially comprised 80% production / 20% management has been further increased to 70% production / 30% management. This distinction is visible in the EPO telephone book too, where Job Group 6 TMs are shown as “PA admemp patent FO” like every other FO while the Job Group 5 TMs are shown as Heads of a Section.

We believe that creating two distinct categories of TMs performing identical tasks contributes to the feeling of discrimination. There is no obvious justification for this inequality of treatment since the job is the same, only one category is given more time to complete the same task. This situation creates resentment and distrust in management. The dispirited TMs feel that this job is no longer part of a real career with concrete opportunities but merely an extra task. Could it be that one day they will be asked to go back to a 100% FO job? They underline that this is not what they applied for and they are very desperate about the lack of perspectives. Staff representation is currently looking into the discriminatory aspect of the situation.

Teleworking Consistent with general feedback from staff, TMs report screen fatigue and a feeling of isolation. The duty of care fell back on them during the pandemic and this situation appears to last. The permanent situation of teleworking the EPO is aiming at entails that a lot of time be invested in contacting team members individually to maintain inclusion and cohesion in the group. Some TMs fear the sense of belonging will be lost. Working virtually does not allow contacts in person or corridor talks. Conflicts and misunderstanding arise easier when the human touch is missing.

Centralised group for Receiving Office and PCT Chapter II The pilot that has already been existing for more than 18 months has been extended again, and without any clear reason why this structure has not by now been officialised. The uncertainty and instability this situation induces is not acknowledged. These circumstances do not offer an efficient and reliable framework and do not allow TMs or FOs to make plans.

Lack of support structure and platform of expression for Patent Administration (PA) staff and TMs

TMs from the pre-2018 era deplore the suppression of DG2. Under that structure, they felt PA was an entity that was clearly defined and was given a voice. They felt valued. They were offered the tools to do their job properly and were consulted about changes in their area. Thorough training was offered (e.g. cursus at Erasmus university), real means were




invested. DG2 gave them the feeling of respect and recognition. They consider it all lost now. A TM told us she did not recognise the job anymore. She ended up disliking the role she previously took pride in. She said that luckily retirement was coming soon for her, giving the relief she longed for. This feeling of resignation is neither desirable for the colleagues nor for the Office.

In February 2022 we were to meet you about several topics related to Job groups 5&6 staff. This meeting was cancelled and has not been rescheduled since.

Further to the meetings with TMs, we have even more points on an ever-growing list. The CSC would therefore appreciate meeting you at your earliest convenience.

Yours sincerely,

Alain Dumont Chairman of the Central Staff Committee


Will it take a month to respond to this letter? Talent is trickling away in the meantime and there's industrial action still ongoing while the "f**king president" (his own words) is shouting and cursing.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Writing and Coding Isn't Always Enough
Last year we had to assume a role we didn't have before: litigants
Autumn Has Come
Autumn should be exciting in all sorts of ways; it'll also mark our anniversary
IBM Has Taken Control of GNOME
Don't expect a successor to be found any time soon
 
“Sideloading” Never Killed Anybody
There are many online discussions this week about the misnomer "sideloading"
Slopwatch: Google News as FUD Vector Against Linux and Plagiarism Enhancer, Serial Slopper (SS) Uses LLMs to Googlebomb "Linux"
Slop destroys the Web not just by screwing with search engines and helping plagiarists. It's also responsible for de facto DDoS attacks...
Links 01/09/2025: "Attacks on Science" and China's "Soft Power" Grows
Links for the day
Links 01/09/2025: Fresh Backlash Against Slop and "Norway’s Electricity Crisis is About to Hit Britain"
Links for the day
Links 01/09/2025: Catching Up (Mostly via Deutsche Welle), "Windows TCO" Effect in UK
Links for the day
Gemini Links 01/09/2025: Linguistic Barriers and "Web 1.0 Hosting"
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, August 31, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, August 31, 2025
The UEFI 9/11 - Part IV - External Interference
They all seem to be playing a role in crushing Software Freedom and self-determination for users
Links 31/08/2025: Baggage Claim Scams, an Insurrectionist’s War on Culture, and a Sudden Robotics Hype
Links for the day
Gemini Links 31/08/2025: Reviewing Netsurf and Slightly Less Historic Ada Design
Links for the day
Links 31/08/2025: Google Gmail Data Breach and LF Puff Pieces for Pay
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, August 30, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, August 30, 2025
This is What Google News Has Become
Moments ago
The Slopfarm WebProNews Has Turned Google News Into a Laughing Stock Full of Plagiarism by Slop
If Google News dies of neglect, that's one thing. It's starting to seem like active neglect by Google is a form of participation.
Do What is Moral, as What's Legal Isn't Always Moral
Do what's objectively moral, no matter the costs and the risks
Slopwatch: Google News Assisting Plagiarism and Anti-Linux FUD, Serial Slopper Rips Off Linux-Centric Journalists
This makes the Web a much worse place and lessens the incentive to do journalism
Links 30/08/2025: NVIDIA Fakes Results to Hide a Bubble Already in Implosion Phase, Data Breaches Galore, Important Win for Workers' Union in Canada
Links for the day
Representing and Speaking for Animals
If I ever choose to take this matter to tribunal with animals-centric NGOs on my side, it'll get some press coverage for sure
The UEFI 9/11 - Part II - Campaign of Censorship and Defamation Against Critics
In dictatorships, humour serves an important role. It's tragic.
In Kazakhstan, Yandex Estimated to be 20 Times Bigger Than Microsoft
Bing is measured as down this month
Shutterstock Not Enough? The Register MS Uses Slop Images in Articles (Seemingly More and More Over Time)
Cost-saving trajectory amid office shutdown?
Gemini Links 30/08/2025: Games, PostmarketOS, and Slop
Links for the day
Links 30/08/2025: Imgur Uproar and Many Ukraine Updates (Mediazona Reports Over 200,000 Russians Died for Putin)
Links for the day
How Not to Build Software
code forges that need a Web browser perhaps fill some 'niche' demand
GAFAM and "MATA"
The use of dark humour there hopefully helps illuminate what a lot of "modern" technology became like and how it interacts with human civilisation (to what ends and whose gain)
Birds Are Not "Pests and Vermin", Privacy is Not a Crime, and GNU/Linux is Not 'Hacking Platform'
I could not help but think of Free software analogies
The Sites Should Be Very Fast Again
That issue is now resolved
Flying in 2025
worse than ever before
Activists, Including Technical Activists, Need Not Pursue Affirmation
Techrights doesn't play or participate in a "popularity contest"
The UEFI 9/11 - Part III - Chaos is Scheduled to Happen Second Thursday of September (No Matter What the Microsofters Tell You)
The clock is ticking
Downplaying the Impact of "UEFI 9/11" is a Losing Strategy
we won't publish much whilst on holiday
Government Sites Should Run Free Software
Not proprietary bloatware with buzzwords
LLM Slopfarms Take No Breaks
When people run sites by bots they don't need to worry about "breaks"
GNOME Having a Meltdown Again
Thanks and farewell to Steven Deobald
Gemini Links 30/08/2025: Low Tech and Hunchbin 1.0.6
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, August 29, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, August 29, 2025