The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: giving money to gnome



aj@dungeon.inka.de (Andreas Jellinghaus)  wrote on 20.11.97 in <19971120002245.00417@dungeon.inka.de>:

> On Wed 19 Nov 1997, Tim Sailer wrote:
> > Yes, but AJ saying that he will stop being a Debian developer if we don't
> > contribute the money collected to KDE instead of gnome....  According
> > to our own guidelines, we have an obligation to support the *free*
> > programs first.
>
> what i want to say is :
> postings like express a very negative point of view (sounds for some
> people like "kde is the devil himself, and we will sponsor gnome !"),
> and it makes people angry, and it makes me angry.

I'm sorry, but it's you and Paul that post the very negative views - and  
yes, you do get people angry like that. Sure worked with me.

The longer I read this thread, the more I feel insulted by the people  
posting for the kde side of things.

> the point is not giving the money to gnome (although it should be given
> to freeqt IMO, or specialised to build a gtk->qt layer). the point is
> how bruce is threading people. he could have said the same thing without
> makeing people angry.

He sure didn't make me angry. You and Paul did.

> his posts are IMO absolutely unnecessary negative, and he makes kde

His posts aren't half as negative as yours.

> people and also me angry. i don't like this : working for debian should
> be fun. maybe it can be fun again, unless bruce insist on continue to
> use every possibility to say something against kde.

As far as I am concerned, kde isn't even remotely a part of what makes  
Debian fun. Not only did they chose a non-free library (and, from what I  
hear, aren't really interested in doing anything about it), kde promoters  
don't seem to be the most agreeable people.

I'm fast getting to intensively dislike that project.

> look at my position : there were big postings against kde before.
> and i had some fights with kde people myself. but finaly i got a
> compromisse, and could cooperate with them.
>
> and some days later they look strange at me, show me a posting of my
> project leader (so they think, he also speaks for me) which makes them
> angry, and makes me look silly.
>
> would you think, taht everything is ok ? i don't.

No, I don't either. I don't think it's right for them to get angry about  
that. As for you looking silly because of this posting, I don't know why  
that should be the case.

> i do not leave in a haste. but if i don't see a chance for things to
> change... there are so many things i could do that are fun. i enjoyed
> working for debian, and i can find something new if things keep this
> way.

>From my point of view, things will stay that way until the kde side  
becomes more reasonable, because that's where the mistakes keep being  
made.


MfG Kai


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-private-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .