Bonum Certa Men Certa
EPO_2019_Archive | GNOME_Foundation

Intel leaks

In 2021 we began publishing insider material from Intel, exposing some of the rot and the deception/distortion of public record.

  • InteLeaks: An Introduction
  • InteLeaks – Part I: In the Insides of Intel…
  • InteLeaks – Part II: The GNU Linux Developer Experience at Intel Under Siege
  • InteLeaks – Part III: Intel Treats Linux Like Linux is Just Microsoft Windows
  • InteLeaks – Part IV: At Intel, Developer Experience (or ‘Developer eXperience’ and DX) Means Lots of Microsoft, Surveillance and Proprietary Software
  • InteLeaks – Part V: Intel Misinformation Being Spread by ZDNet
  • InteLeaks – Part VI: A Deeper Dive Into the Technical Incompetence at Intel
  • Why We Do ‘InteLeaks’ (and a Call For Further Input/Contributions)
  • InteLeaks – Part VII: Intel Does Not Understand GNU/Linux and It Employs People Who Never Used It (to Actually Write About It)
  • InteLeaks – Part VIII: Microsoft and Its Facilitators Destroying Intel From the Inside
  • InteLeaks – Part IX: Vapourware at Intel and Assessments With Conflict of Interest
  • InteLeaks – Part X: Replacing Free Software With Microsoft, Turning One-Minute Processes Into Days Long
  • InteLeaks – Part XI: Accountability Issues and Disdain for Views/Opinions of Actual GNU/Linux Users/Developers/Communities
  • InteLeaks – Part XII: Intel Isn’t Interested in Improving and Instead It’s Shooting the Messengers Who Highlight Areas for Improvement
  • InteLeaks – Part XIII: GNU/Linux Documentation From People Who Never Even Use GNU/Linux
  • InteLeaks – Part XIV: Technical Incompetence and Incoherence Leading to Alienation and Brain Drain
  • InteLeaks – Part XV: Intel is Blind to Blind and Colour-Blind People
  • InteLeaks – Part XVI: Intel Cannot Do Command Line, Even When It's Vastly Simpler and More Suitable for Development
  • InteLeaks – Part XVII: The High Cost of Microsoft Windows Users in GNU/Linux Development Teams
  • InteLeaks – Part XVIII: Intel Does Not Know How to Properly Do Research and It Seems Apparent Unscientific Methods Are Used to Justify Poor Documentation
  • InteLeaks – Part XIX: Intel’s Web ‘Experts’ Seen as Microsoft Champions Dealing With the Platform Microsoft is Looking to Destroy
  • InteLeaks – Part XX: Redacted (for Names Only) Release of Intel File About Developer eXperience (DX) Meddling in GNU/Linux
  • InteLeaks – Part XXI: Intel Seeking Advice From a Bunch of Clowns (Harbor ‘Research’)
  • InteLeaks – Part XXII: Bubbles and Buzzwords, No Substance at Intel’s Internet of Things (IoT) Group (IOTG)
  • InteLeaks – Part XXIII: Intel Paying for Bogus ‘Research’ ‘Insights’ Which Merely Seek to Justify Outsourcing to Microsoft and Imposing Microsoft’s Proprietary Software on Free Software Developers
  • InteLeaks – Part XXIV: Love for Microsoft, Not for Free Software or Whatever Replaces Microsoft
  • InteLeaks – Part XXV: Intel’s Brain Drain Leads to Unusual Measures
  • InteLeaks – Part XXVI: Harbor Research is Horrible 'Research', Lacking Actual Technical Background
  • InteLeaks – Part XXVII: ‘Pulling a Nokia’ on Intel (Outsourcing to Microsoft)
  • InteLeaks – Part XXVIII: Intel Served Report From Microsoft Boosters, Who Provide No Actual Evidence and No Science to Back Their Supposed ‘Findings’
  • InteLeaks – Part XXIX: Harbor Research Did Not Produce a Study But an Elaborate Hoax for Intel, Suggesting Microsoft Partnership and Outsourcing Based on Zero Evidence and No Solid Rationale
  • InteLeaks – Part XXX: Harbor Research's Pseudo-scientific 'Research' for Intel, Bizarrely Suggesting a Microsoft Partnership for a Domain Largely Controlled or Dominated by Linux
  • We Need More Documents Leaked to Know Intel (From the) Inside