03.22.21
Gemini version available ♊︎EPO and Microsoft Collude to Break the Law — The ‘Smoking Gun’: Hard Evidence That the EPO Has Been Lying About GDPR Compliance
What the EPO says:
Summary: The EPO’s Annual Reports of the Board of Auditors help show that the cronies of Benoît Battistelli have been lying all along about GDPR compliance; António Campinos is, as expected, just another one of those Battistelli cronies, in effect passing EPO funds into a gambling black hole and overseas violators of everybody’s privacy
We have managed to track down copies of the “audit reports” which allegedly confirm a close alignment between the EPO’s data protection framework and the GDPR.
As far as we have been able to work out, the “audit reports” that the EPO refers to in its data protection “puff pieces” are the annual reports of the supposedly independent Board of Auditors (warning: epo.org link). One of these “independent” auditors is Battistelli’s old crony from the INPI, Frederic Angermann.
” One of these “independent” auditors is Battistelli’s old crony from the INPI, Frederic Angermann.”Anyway, the annual audit report is usually issued as Administrative Council document no. 20 at the end of April or beginning of May each year.
So for 2020, the document is numbered CA/20/20 [PDF].
For 2019 it is CA/20/19 [PDF] and for 2018, the reference number is CA/20/18 [PDF].
“From this it can be seen that the the annual reports of the Board of Auditors just parrot the party line of EPO management…”We’ve made local copies as we want this to last and remain unchanged, just in case something mischievous was to happen at the EPO’s end. As happened in the past…
The documents are publicly available via the official webpage of the Council (warning: epo.org link) and can be found using the search keyword “auditors”.
The first mention of GDPR is in the 2018 audit report, CA/20/18, on page 6 of 81:
42) As of 25 May 2018, a new, uniform General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on data privacy will apply across the European Union (EU) to all organisations collecting and/or processing data from EU residents.
43) On July 2017, the President issued a task force with a mandate to assess the potential impact of this new EU GDPR on the EPO’s current data protection guidelines.
44) It is noted that the EPO’s current data protection guidelines are relatively closely in line with the new GDPR.
However, an action plan is in place to address the potential impact of the GDPR on the EPO.
The 2019 audit report, CA/20/19, contains the following statement:
259) The new European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has been in force since 25 May 2018. Even though the EU regulations do not directly apply to the EPO as an international organisation, basic principles have been implemented, as European citizens’ data is processed at the EPO.
It then goes on to talk about a the implementation of a “data protection register to record all the processing operations carried out on personal data” which can be accessed by EPO employees on the EPO intranet. It is not accessible to external data subjects but external parties can make a data subject access request “thus ensuring the right to information”. This is followed by a recommendation that data protection register needs to be updated and to be completed in order to ensure that all relevant information is available.
The report then states that the EPO’s IT department, referred to as IM (= Information Management) is “only involved in the GDPR analysis on a high-level basis” and that IM does not prepare the necessary implementation, such as deletion concepts.
This section of the report concludes with a recommendation to include IM much more in the GDPR evaluation “to ensure that technical and organisational measures are addressed adequately. Additionally technical solutions need to be evaluated.”
The 2020 audit report, CA/20/20, contains a section entitled “Analysis of implementation of GDPR requirements in the HR area” on page 7 of 89.
According to this:
41. Since the Office, as an international organisation that does not fall under the EU regulations, is not subject to the General Data Privacy Regulation (hereinafter: “GDPR”), the internal “Guidelines for the protection of personal data” were developed and introduced by the Office with the latest revision in 2014. The abovementioned guidelines are very close to the requirements of the GDPR and Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 and as such are to be implemented and followed by the Office.
There are two short paragraphs explaining that “audit procedures were carried out in respect of the adherence of the Office to the requirements of the above-mentioned guidelines within the HR area” and that the audit “resulted in a number of recommendations”, such as the need to update the Data Protection Registry and to define retention and deletion periods and actions for events such as retirement and leaving the Office.
“There hasn’t actually been any independent audit of the EPO’s data protection framework to determine the level of GDPR compliance.”Additionally, it recommends that “the awareness of the responsibilities of controllers in terms of data protection topics should be raised, and regular training sessions should be held for the HR department, as well as for other departments working with the personal data, to inform them about critical areas in the data protection process.”
From this it can be seen that the the annual reports of the Board of Auditors just parrot the party line of EPO management according to which “the EPO’s current data protection guidelines are relatively closely in line with the new GDPR” (CA/20/18) and “the internal ‘Guidelines for the protection of personal data’ [which] were developed and introduced by the Office with the latest revision in 2014 … are very close to the requirements of the GDPR and Regulation (EU) 2018/1725″ (CA/20/20).
There hasn’t actually been any independent audit of the EPO’s data protection framework to determine the level of GDPR compliance.
All that we have are bald assertions of GDPR compliance by EPO management which have been rubber-stamped by the auditors without further ado.
“All that we have are bald assertions of GDPR compliance by EPO management which have been rubber-stamped by the auditors without further ado.”Given that EPO management claimed at the time of adoption of the EPO’s internal “Guidelines for the protection of personal data” in 2014 that they were closed aligned to the earlier EU Regulation (EC) 45/2001, it remains to be explained how these same Guidelines could now manage to be compliant with the GDPR which was not adopted by the EU until 2016 and entered into force in 2018.
Of course it’s complete nonsense but as long as nobody actually goes to the trouble of carrying out an independent audit who’s going to notice anything? █
ᶃ Gemini Space
This post is also available in 
Content is available under CC-BY-SA