Bonum Certa Men Certa

Frans Pop suicide and Ubuntu grievances

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Apr 30, 2024,
updated Apr 30, 2024

[Article 2 years old]

Reprinted with permission from disguised.work.

Looking through the Debian email archives, we quickly find a long list of messages from Frans Pop expressing grievances with Ubuntu, Canonical and Mark Shuttleworth.

Original link

To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:12:58 +0200

On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Meike Reichle wrote: > The Debian project has decided to adopt a new policy of time-based > development freezes for future releases, on a two-year cycle.
Disappointing to see such an announcement without any prior discussion on d-project, d-devel or d-vote. Some explanation of how and by who this decision was reached would be appreciated.
So from now on we release "when it's time" instead of "when it's ready"? RC bugs are no longer relevant?
Cheers, FJP

Original link

To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:28:43 +0200

On Thursday 30 July 2009, Marc Haber wrote: > I don't think that we shouldn't time our releases according to what > Mark Shuttleworth says. We are not Ubuntu's slave even if they try > hard to make it look like that. > > Our 18-to-24-month release cycle was a nice vehicle to stay > asynchronous with Ubuntu, which _I_ consider a desireable feature to > prevent Debian from perishing. We are not only major supplier to > Ubuntu, we have our end customers ourselves. I'd prefer that it stayed > that way.
+1

Original link

To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:10:45 +0200

On Thursday 30 July 2009, Teemu Likonen wrote: > Debian > ======
- The completely voluntary nature of the project does not really lend itself to hard timelines. If it turns out on the planned date of the freeze that there are still major issues open, we need to be flexible enough to delay the freeze.
Both the Etch and Lenny releases did clearly show this, and the success of both releases (Etch more than Lenny IMO) is largely thanks to flexible starts of the incremental freeze stages.
Given Debian's release history it is IMO wishful thinking to expect to be able to freeze on a set date. There is simply no way you can direct anybody to work on specific issues *now* because the freeze is coming.

Original link

To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:42:54 +0200

On Friday 31 July 2009, Steve Langasek wrote: > I don't believe the kind of coarse synchronization that's been proposed > for the releases would make Debian<->Ubuntu crossgrades significantly > easier. Most of the local changes that Ubuntu has today would still > apply, and there are rebuilt binaries that share version numbers, > introducing all kinds of fun possibilities.
<paranoid> Right. So Ubuntu can put its paid developers to work to create a tested upgrade path from Debian to Ubuntu and Ubuntu can go off with its publicity budget and promote itself with that "feature".
How "fun". I see zero benefit for Debian there. </paranoid>

Original link

To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian redesign
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:03:07 +0200

On Thursday 30 July 2009, Margarita Manterola wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Cyril Brulebois<kibi@debian.org> wrote: > > We discussed that quite extensively with Guido during last dinner, > > and I totally share his opinion. Sounds like a very well performed > > marketing campaign. Again: thanks, Agnieszka. > > One that will make a statement that women in Debian should always wear > deep cleavages, and men in Debian have sex with their laptops. > Nice...
IMHO you're seriously overreacting here. The posters as I see them do not "make the statements" that you read into them, that is entirely your interpretation of them. Not everything that is sensual is discriminatory.
Cheers, FJP

From debian-private (leaked) gossip network

Subject: Re: bag of retirements
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:23:46 +0000
From: Mark Shuttleworth <mark@ubuntu.com>
To: Debian Private <debian-private@lists.debian.org>

Gunnar Wolf wrote: > I recognize that seeing so many people part ways with Debian might be > somewhat demotivating to us all. However, for all practical purposes, > those who have retired have in fact stopped all their engagement to > Debian a long time ago - Years, usually. > We have a policy that most memberships in Ubuntu expire unless the user chooses to renew them. It means the list of participants isn't as impressive, but it's more real. Generally, we also have a fast-track re-enablement mechanism.
Mark

Original link

To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Closed lists as maintainers
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:05:35 +0100

On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I believe this configuration is unacceptable, but would like to check > that there is a consensus on this before pressing the matter with the > GRUB maintainers.
I agree, but it's hardly a new issue. For grub it's been this way for years and there've been complaints and discussions about it many, many times.
Cheers, FJP

Original link

To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: debian-private declassification team (looking for one)
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 18:35:49 +0200

On Saturday 22 May 2010, martin f krafft wrote: > How about making archive chunks available e.g. at monthly periods > and telling people they have 2 months to voice objections before the > stuff is simply disclosed. Those people who don't want their stuff > disclosed are the ones that should be doing the work, no?
That won't work.
Various people have already indicated (either in individual posts, or with a blanket statement) that some or all of their posts should not be declassified.
It also does not allow for people who are no longer DDs: they would not be able to object to declassification.

Original link

To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: debian-private declassification team (looking for one)
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:46:02 +0200

On Friday 25 June 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I'm not sure I understand against *what* exactly you're arguing; nor it > is clear to me whether you are proposing a different course of action > than the status quo. > > The vote is there and we cannot change the past [...]
I would welcome a new GR to rescind the previous one and revert d-private to what it's always been: private. That way we can stop worrying about the whole issue and we will no longer run the risk of making things public that their authors do not want to be made public.
Cheers, FJP

Original link

To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Problems with NM Front Desk
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 21:56:59 +0200

On Tuesday 06 July 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I can't speak for the NM team, but if he was asked to go through DM > first (and that's what I understood), I could understand that his NM > application got removed for now.
This is the thing I'm having some problem with in the discussion so far.
Is it actually OK for FD to "demand" that candidates go through DM before applying for DD, or as part of the NM process?
As I remember it, DM was primarily intended as an alternative *end point* for those contributors who are not interested in going through the full NM procedure and are happy with both the facilities and limitations that DM offers. From his mails Manuel clearly intended to go for DD.
Sure, in a lot of cases getting DM first can help to be more productive sooner. But shouldn't that remain the choice of the candidate him/herself?
I can see loads of cases where going straight for DD is much more logical: - contributors who's primairy interest is not packaging - contributors who already have a very solid history of contributions - contributors who work mainly on team-maintained packages and thus only need commit access to the team source repos while leaving the uploads to other team members - contributors who have a good relationship with the current maintainer of a package or sponsors and thus see no need for upload rights
In Manuel's case I personally would say that getting DM status on the route to DD *does* seem to make sense, but still IMO that should be *his* option. In past discussions we have explicitly stressed that it should be possible to tailor the NM process to the ambitions and background of individual candidates, in discussion between the candidate and FD and/or assigned AM.
Have the FD and NM-team (silently?) inflated DM beyond what was originally intended? I would personally be against listing DM on the website as a required or even desired stage to go through for NM, as some have suggested; it should of course be listed as an option.
I agree with others that the main problem in this particular case seems to have been a communications failure. But IMO refusing or declining to go through DM should by itself never be a reason to reject a candidate. I don't think it was in this case; the escalated communication has probably contributed. However, the FD and DAM have a very strong responsibility when it comes to trying to avoid such failures given that new candidates probably will not be familiar with all options and terminology.
Cheers, FJP

From debian-private (leaked) gossip network

Subject: Resignation
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:41:18 +0200
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
To: debian-private@lists.debian.org

It's time to say goodbye. I don't want to say too much about it, except that I've been planning this for a long time.
Participating in Debian has been great.
For personal reasons I will be revoking my GPG key. However, it is not compromised and the validity of this mail can still be verified using my public key from current keyring packages.
My resignation means that the following three packages will need a new maintainer: - debtree - debmirror - qcontrol (tbm?)
It also means the following tasks will need a successor: - editor and release manager for the Installation Guide - daily D-I builds for s390 - Dutch translator for website and various debconf/program translations
All mails I ever sent to d-private (and mails quoting them) shall remain private.
So long, FJP

From debian-private (leaked) gossip network

Subject: Death of Frans Pop
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 11:47:34 +0100
From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
To: debian-private@lists.debian.org

Hi all,
I have bad news to share with people, I'm afraid. This morning, I've just received an email from the parents of Frans Pop telling me that he died yesterday.
"Yesterday morning our son Frans Pop has died. He took his own life, in a well-considered, courageous, and considerate manner. During the last years his main concern was his work for Debian. I would like to ask you to inform those members of the Debian community who knew him well."
I promised them that I would pass on the news, so here it is. Frans worked hard in Debian for a number of years, and I know that all of those people who worked with him will feel a great loss today. We've lost a good colleague and good friend. I, for one, will miss him greatly.
-- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com You raise the blade, you make the change... You re-arrange me 'til I'm sane...

From debian-private (leaked) gossip network

Subject: Re: Death of Frans Pop
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:39:21 +0100
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
To: debian-private@lists.debian.org

On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:52:33PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> writes: > > "Yesterday morning our son Frans Pop has died. He took his own life, > > in a well-considered, courageous, and considerate manner. During the > > last years his main concern was his work for Debian. I would like to > > ask you to inform those members of the Debian community who knew him > > well." > > Does that imply he took his own life *because* of Debian, which was "his > main concern"?
This is probably the wrong thread for linguistics, but that phrase would normally just indicate that Debian was his main interest. In http://oxforddictionaries.com/view/entry/m_en_gb0169810 under "noun", this would be sense 2 rather than sense 1.
-- Colin Watson [cjwatson@debian.org]

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

The Register MS is Still Being Paid to Participate in the "AI" Ponzi Scheme Which Will Crash the Economy
The Register MS is hoping to get lucky by tricking people into a scam
Evidence Contradicting Microsoft's Non-Denying Denials and Expectation of Many Layoffs Soon
"Microsoft has had this constant drip of layoffs for months."
At Least 3 Richard Stallman Talks in Europe Confirmed So Far, Next Week in Rome There's Another
Dr. Stallman has not announced this yet
 
Microsoft's Non-Denying Denial About XBox's Death is Already Being Shattered to Pieces
Like Microsoft's 'open' 'hey hi', heralding meaningless non-committing agreements with AMD is little more than vapourware
Slopwatch: UbuntuPIT Joins the Slopfarms Club
Slopfarms gonna slop
Links 07/10/2025: Privacy at Risk, GAFAM Remains Off the Hook
Links for the day
Gemini Links 07/10/2025: Modern Retro Console Idea and Batch vs Bash
Links for the day
Links 07/10/2025: International Criminal Court (ICC) Convicts Ali Kushayb; Moroccan Imprisoned for 'Offensive' Shirt
Links for the day
Links 07/10/2025: EU' Chat Control is Back, US Cracks Down on Democracy
Links for the day
Techrights Pursues Justice and Truth Because, Without Those, Society Descends Into Chaos
most people reject dogma and pseudoscience
Upcoming Talks by Richard Stallman in Helsinki, Göteborg, and Rome
Join with him and share the software
Something Bad is Happening in the Open Source Initiative (OSI)
The latest OSI blog post is from a Microsoft operative and a few weeks ago the Executive Director left
TLS 1.3 Dominates Geminispace (99% of Known Capsules)
it's nowadays safe to assume almost every capsule can handle TLS 1.3
Why soylentnews.org Has Been Having Technical Difficulties Lately
The network has been going up and down quite a lot this past week
A Statement Against Violence
The facts are on our side
They've Run Out of Things to Rebrand or Label as "AI"
The next few years will be interesting because if Microsoft lays off tens of thousands of workers each year, there won't be much left except mountains of debt and dying brands
Richard Stallman Confirms His Talk in Göteborg This Coming Friday
"The hosts say that the list will not be given to the state"
Most of the "Linux" Results This Morning in Google News Are LLM Slop From the Same Slopfarm, Plagiarising Phoronix
The main question is, does Google even care at this point?
Gemini Links 07/10/2025: Civil War and "Goodbye Web"
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, October 06, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, October 06, 2025
The "AI Revolution" is Going Very Well, Right?
money that does not exist and alleged potential that is pure fiction
Links 06/10/2025: Scam Altman Himself Admits He Runs a Scam Based on a Bubble, US Administration Adopts “War From Within” Narrative to Crush Opposition/Dissent
Links for the day
Slopwatch: Fake Ubuntu 'Articles' and Google News Helps People Who Plagiarise Phoronix Using LLMs
Michael Larabel can't possibly be happy about that
6,000 Pages/Articles a Year
Today in one month from now the site turns 19
When Things Become So Ubiquitous That They're Almost Nameless
The notion or the concept of software freedom isn't tied to any particular brand or project, so it should still resonate
IDG Seems to Have Abandoned Sandra Henry Stocker's UNIX/Linux Column
Unless we hear otherwise or see some update/s, this may mark another death blow from IDG
Gemini Links 06/10/2025: Winter Nights and "Virtue Signaling"
Links for the day
Links 06/10/2025: Scientific Awards and Typhoon Matmo
Links for the day
IP Kat Gone Bonkers, Pushing Slop in Patents (Likely Illegal, With Severe Consequences)
AstraZenecaKat: "Last time, this Kat covered some practical steps on how to ensure client confidentiality when using AI tools (IPKat)."
Links 06/10/2025: Grokipedia as Malicious Slop, US 'Martial Law' a "New Normal"
Links for the day
Fake Economics and Clown Computing Circuses
who's gonna pay for these scams?
Nobel Prize in Economics Does Not Exist, It's Propaganda From Sveriges Riksbank
"It is that time of the year when it is important to remind people that there are no Nobel Prizes for professional wrestling, astrology, or economics"
Rust is Eating Linux
That's a recipe for problems
Cindy Cohn (Executive Director of EFF) is a Millionaire, Earned Almost $30,000 Per Month Before Departing While the EFF Lost Money
EFF is "Big Business"
Non-Denying Denial From Microsoft (Again) Regarding the End of XBox Consoles
It's kind of hilarious that even the site chosen by Microsoft to relay its BS, based on past loyalty, isn't quite buying it
Bringing Back Lost Articles From the 1990s: Microsoft Products Leave Door Open to NSA
Nothing has changed since then
When the Slop Bubble Pops People Will Say Richard Stallman Was Right (Again)
What was once known as Computer Science turned into "IT"
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, October 05, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, October 05, 2025
Links 06/10/2025: Science, Hardware, and Andrej Babis Making a Comeback
Links for the day
Links 05/10/2025: Slow News Day and Wondering About the Canada Post Walkout
Links for the day
Gemini Links 05/10/2025: Telnet Debugging and The Programmer’s Brain
Links for the day
More Than "Just a Rumour": XBox Seems to Have Just Died
At this point, why would any studio out there target or partner with XBox?
How to Tell Your Community, Project or Company is Being Infiltrated by Saboteurs
How to identify nefarious social engineering
The Fortieth Birthday of the FSF Made Us Extremely Happy
It feels like the 'hacker community' is regrouping to discuss things and prepare for the next Big Challenge
Chat Control 2 Them, Not 2 U
Follow the advice of Dr. Patrick Breyer
Mozilla: Throw Away Your "Old" PC and Enable "Digital Rights Management (DRM)"
This is heading in a bad direction
Controlling Our Computing for Another Forty Years
40 years of freedom
Motivational Small Place to Run Large Sites
We deem this scenery motivational and inspiring
Techrights' Text Version (Daily Bulletin) Turns Five This Month
our plain-text bulletins are turning 5 this month
We'll Continue Covering the Moribund OSI and Other Dysfunctional if Not Hostile Institutions
Stefano Maffulli's departure is due to his defection and due to him failing the mission in pursuit of money (his salary)
Microsoft XBox is Dying as More Retailers Stop Stocking It and Massive Layoffs Planned Again
Microsoft is circling down the drain
Links 05/10/2025: Lufthansa Layoffs (4,000) and More Spotify Woes (Aside From Massive Debt)
Links for the day
The Free Software Foundation's Livestream Has Ended, Video/s Might be Online Next
I've asked whether they'll upload video of some of the event; I still wait for an answer
The Register MS Does Not Know the Difference Between Microsoft GitHub and GitLab
At the time of writing (October 5) the article from "Thu 2 Oct 2025" remains uncorrected
Linux and the Freedom Paradox
Linux is losing freedom if some external actors who only use Microsoft tools for development wrest control
"Bullshit Generators" (What RMS Calls LLMs) and Fake Images Already Target the FSF
Why does Google News promote fake articles about the FSF while omitting all the real ones?
Software Patents as a Bubble
Don't invest resources in hype; if you detect a bubble, run away from it
Links 05/10/2025: Political Leftovers, Climate Change, and Security Incidents
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, October 04, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, October 04, 2025