Bonum Certa Men Certa

EPO Salaries Reduced: EPO's “Sustainability” Clause "Cuts the Average Overall Adjustment for Staff by –41,8%."

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Dec 09, 2024

Salary adjustment for 2024 as of 1 January 2025: A

THIS week we shall focus [1, 2] on the EPO. Almost 15 years ago the coup (French term) had begun with the Frenchman Benoît Battistelli, who in 2018 left in charge his longtime French friend António Campinos. They've both been culling the EPO, strip-mining and raiding what's left of it (and especially its past reputation) for some quick cash. Unlike their friend and political ally Michel Barnier, they seem to face no consequences for anything they do, however controversial if not seriously illegal. Aside from European software patents - i.e. patents which are both illegal and undesirable - the EPO grants loads of patents (probably hundreds of thousands so far) that no patent-centric courts would honour except fake ones (and yes, they've worked hard to ensure fake courts exist too).

What does this all mean for staff? More money? Will they share the crime's loot? Nope. The examiners in particular are just being used by the oligarchs' enablers, i.e. people like Battistelli and Campinos, two highly corrupt officials who basically bought their position/role (bribery). This isn't Moscow we're talking about, albeit sometimes it seems apparent that the political systems work similarly. Officials in Brussels have become a participating component in it, so Brussels lacks an incentive to actually tackle the corruption (i.e. to hold itself accountable). Kluwer Patent Blog is still run by the likes of Brian Cordery (Bristows), so they cannot stop promoting the fake 'courts', as does IP Kat (also Bristows-inflicted, it never stopped).

The Central Staff Committee (CSC) still has the guts to talk about EPO affairs, unlike the blogs above (they're basically compromised and increasingly part of the problem because they're controlled by "the industry", i.e. patent maximalists and litigation profiteers, not scholars).

This is what the CSC said a week ago about cuts to salaries (as costs grow rapidly across Europe):

Zentraler Personalausschuss
Central Staff Committee
Le Comité Central du Personnel

Munich, 02.12.2024
sc24067cp

Salary adjustment for 2024 as of 1 January 2025
A “sustainability” cut

Back in 2019, Mr Campinos mandated Oliver Wyman and Mercer to perform a Financial Study which wrongly predicted deflation and long-term global recession. The bundle of financial measures voted in 2020 to cover the alleged financial gap comprised the revision of the salary adjustment procedure with the introduction of the “sustainability” clause capping the overall growth in salary mass at Eurozone inflation + 0,2%. Despite a unanimous opinion of the Appeals Committee considering the “sustainability” clause to be flawed, Mr Campinos persists in applying it. For 2024, the clause dramatically cuts the average overall adjustment for staff by –41,8%1.

Costs of living and parallelism with salaries of civil servants…
Historically, the EPO salary adjustment procedure stems from the one used in the Coordinated Organisations (COO) and is based on two principles:

First, the costs of living updates are made by starting with national inflation (HICP) in Belgium to which are applied the power of purchase parities (PPPs) calculated by the International Service for Remuneration and Pensions (ISRP) for each place of employment. This ensures equality of purchasing power among sites.

Second, the parallelism with the evolution of salaries of civil servants in eight reference countries represented by a specific indicator calculated by deflating their salaries and reflecting the trend in real terms.

…abolished by the “sustainability clause”
Since the first mandate of Mr Campinos, the EPO is on a “sustainability” campaign to justify the deterioration of working conditions. Mr Campinos introduced in 2020 a “sustainability” clause capping the overall growth in salary mass at Eurozone inflation (at 2,5% on 1 July 2024) + 0,2%. This year, the clause cuts the salary adjustments as follows:

How the 'sustainability' clause cuts? Underlying methodology After sustainability clause; Munich or Berlin, The Hague, Vienna, Brussels

______

1 CA/85/24, par. 19: "The percentage difference between the weighted average salary adjustment of +4,6% and the cap of +2,7%, is approximately 41,8%. This means that a reduction of 41,8% must be applied to the adjustment of each salary scale calculated using the underlying methodology"


The overall adjustment for staff is cut by –41,8%. This situation is unique among International Organisations. After 5 years of introduction of the “sustainability” clause at the EPO, none of them considers this clause as an example to follow and to be included in their own salary adjustment procedure.

On the breach of the principle of equal treatment
Colleagues in the same salary group and step are entitled to equal pay, regardless of where they are employed. What is meant by equal pay is expressed by the coefficients of purchasing power parity (PPPs) listed in CA/85/24, Table 6 calculated and recommended by ISRP and are to be followed according to Article 64(6) ServRegs. The basic salary of a colleague in JG 6 at the end of their career amounts to the value according to grade 9, step 5 (G9-5) in the salary table for the respective place of employment. The G9-5 salary in Austria according to Table 4 amounts to EUR 9.124,73. The equal pay in the Netherlands is to be derived according to the PPPs in Table 6, which are 1,0448 for (AT) and 1,1044 (NL). It follows that the G9-5 salary in the Netherlands should amount to EUR 9.124,73 / 1,0448 * 1,1044 ≈ EUR 9.777,12. However, the amount listed for the G9-5 salary in the Netherlands according to Table 2 is EUR 9.508,45. This is EUR 171,74 less than the due amount according to equal pay. This significant discrepancy is not caused by rounding errors, but it is a severe breach of the principle of equal treatment.

On the breach of the parallelism with salaries of civil servants
Since 2021, the specific indicator had an index value below 100 (for 2021: 99,1 for 2022: 96,1 for 2023: 98,3) reflecting that during these years, on average, the reference countries did not increase the salaries of their civil servants to the levels of inflation observed.

However, for 2024, the specific indicator is 102.6 showing that the respective governments opted for a catch-up. The main driver is the very positive net salary evolution for civil servants in Germany (+5.3% in March 2024), the Netherlands (+8.5% in July 20242) and United Kingdom. However, the EPO “sustainability” clause capping the overall growth of salary mass at Eurozone inflation + 0,2% abolishes the positive effect of the indicator and the parallelism is not followed.

On the redistribution “pool”
The Advisory Group of Remuneration noted (CA/85/24, par. 50) that the percentage of the calculated salary adjustment for each EPO host country not used to adjust the salary scales is to be carried forward to a redistribution pool. The precise percentages cannot be found in the documents submit- ted to staff and the Council. The administration persistently refused to communicate them in the statutory meetings and only provided them from the tip of the lips at the end of the consultation in the GCC meeting of 19 November 2024. They are as follows:

EPO ducks: Munich/Berlin, The Hague,, Vienna, Brussels

The administration was reluctant to explain how the percentages would be used for future adjustments or for the payment of a lump-sum at the end of application of the present salary adjustment procedure.

____

2 https://nltimes.nl/2024/03/30/salary-increase-85-percent-plus-50-euros-per-month-civil-servants


Conclusion
On 7 June 2024, the Appeals Committee delivered a unanimous opinion considering that the “sustainability” clause violated the principle of purchasing power parity. In the Communiqués of 13 June 2024 and 29 October 2024, Mr Campinos asserted his decision not to follow the recommendation and to continue to apply the “sustainability” clause for future adjustments. As a result, the “sustainability” clause is applied for the year 2024 and has a detrimental impact on staff.

However, the Communiqué of 26 November 2024 on the results of the salary adjustment 2024 attempts to hide this fact by omitting to present relevant information for staff: the calculation of the salary adjustments before application of the “sustainability” clause, the percentages which are cut and put in the redistribution of the pool, as well as the massive savings made by the Office on liabilities. Our requests for more detailed information were not satisfied.

EPO staff works well for the organisation and deserve proper salary adjustments. They also deserve respect of our internal justice system and transparency.

With these sorts of "salary adjustments" (de facto reductions), how is the EPO expecting to attract the talented scientists or poach them from academia? The way things are going, the EPO has no actual plan to have suitably qualified new examiners, only obedient drones who grant many invalid patents, some of which might be judged - at some point in the future - by invalid (unconstitutional) kangaroo courts.

The EPO is nowadays an existential threat to the EU.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Video: University in Peru Honours Richard Stallman
Tomorrow, January 20, Richard Stallman speaks in France
FOSDEM is Called "FOSDEM" Because of Richard Stallman (RMS)
The overlap there seems timely; yesterday RMS spoke in French-speaking (in part) Switzerland where questions in French were accepted
January 20: Richard Stallman Talk in Europe
evening time in Europe, around midday in the United States and Canada
 
Links 19/01/2025: TikTok (Fentanylware) Now Banned in the US, Convicted Felon Talks to Fentanylware CEO and Pooh-Tin About Undoing the Ban Despite the Supreme Court Unanimously Upholding It
Links for the day
FTC Realises Microsoft Buying Fake 'Clients' to Fake "Revenue" (Microsoft 'Buying' Services and Products From Itself!)
Ponzi scheme
Total Lock-down Ambitions - Part III - The Web Browser as DRM Pusher
A lot of "streaming" stuff is DRM
IBM Termination Story and Information From Microsoft About Mass Layoffs
In 2 weeks of 2025 Microsoft already had 2 waves of layoffs
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, January 18, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, January 18, 2025
Links 18/01/2025: Restoring the Great Wall of China and Economic Expansion in China
Links for the day
Guardian Digital (linuxsecurity.com) is Spamming the Web With Microsoft's Promotional LLM Slop About UEFI 'Secure' Boot (Which is Against Real Security)
This is an attack on honest journalism
Links 18/01/2025: TikTok's Endgame, "Car Freedom", and Spying in Cars 'Fines' GM (Settlement)
Links for the day
Links 18/01/2025: Apple Getting Out of Hey Hi (AI) Slop (Too Much Misinformation), Chaffbots/Chatbots Try to Settle Copyright Infringement Lawsuits
Links for the day
What Fake News Sites Are Doing to GNU/Linux
The LLM slop about Linux serves two purposes
Links 18/01/2025: Microsofters Upset at Microsoft's Ridiculous Rebrands (Excuse for Massive Price Hikes), Chaffbot Company ('Open'AI) Faces More Lawsuits
Links for the day
Gemini Links 18/01/2025: Surge in Illnesses, ctags, and Gemsync
Links for the day
Slopwatch: Too Lazy to Write Real Articles, Offloading to Chatbots Instead (LLM Slop About "Linux")
The Web was already full of garbage before the LLM frenzy. Now it's even worse.
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, January 17, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, January 17, 2025
RMS 'Inauguration' in Montpellier (Government Administration) on January 20th
Happy hacking
Even Technical Articles and HowTos From UNIXMen Nowadays Seem to be LLM Slop
We've just permanently removed the RSS feed of UNIXMen
The FSF's 2024 End-of-Year Fundraiser Succeeds: Over $400k to Support Software Freedom
That's worth bringing up again because the SFC is trying to 'crash' this achievement of the FSF
[Meme] Fentanylware (TikTok) Banned in the United States, Next Up European Union (EU)
And the United Kingdom (UK)
President Biden is Right, "Free Press is Crumbling" and the United States Exports Its Media-Hostile Culture to Other Continents
perhaps Biden should pay closer attention to how Donald Trump-inspired Americans take their battles to other continents
Links 17/01/2025: TikTok Banned by the United Stated (SCOTUS Rejects Appeal)
Links for the day
Software Freedom Conservancy Inc (SFC) Makes It Obvious It's Just a Copycat Trying to Exploit or Leech Off the FSF's (and GNU's) Work
They swim next to the rich people (who "match")
Links 17/01/2025: Fentanylware (TikTok) Herds Its (Drug) Users Into Even More Harmful "Apps"
Links for the day
Guardian Digital, Inc (linuxsecurity.com) Uses Microsoft-Controlled Front Groups and LLM Slop in Order to Spread Microsoft-Directed Anti-Linux FUD
Microsoft garbage likely produced by Microsoft LLMs, spewing out Microsoft FUD
Likely Fake 'Article' About Linux Mint 22.1
BetaNews fired up its plagiarism machine (LLM)
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, January 16, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, January 16, 2025