Bonum Certa Men Certa

European Patent Office (EPO) Faked "Revenue Expansion" by Granting Loads of Invalid, Illegal Patents; Staff Still Wants to Know Where That Money Went

posted by Roy Schestowitz on May 09, 2025

https://suepo.org/_files_media/ck_uploads/documents/retirement_measures_0659381_083212.jpg

The EPO isn't meant to hoard money (it's the law!) or gamble with money, but today's EPO breaks the law with impunity and the money 'vanishes'

Earlier this week the union of EPO staff (almost 7,000 workers) spoke about "Education allowance deductions from school invoices"; the short story is, once again staff feels "short-changed". "Deductions for school year 2024/2025," they argue, merit a challenge, maybe collective action and even legal action. To quote:

Dear colleagues,

If you have received the education allowance for the current school year (2024/2025), you probably have had deductions on the reimbursement on costs attributed to school trips that were however not specified as such in the school invoice.

If you’re in this case and you have received further information from the school on the real costs of the school trips that differ from the initial estimations made by the Office, you may want to request to HR the reimbursement of the difference.

Should you get a negative answer, please contact us at [redacted].

Please be aware that this applies to any type of deductions you might have seen on the amount of the allowance.

Do not hesitate to contact us at [redacted] if you have any questions.

It may not seem like a huge deal, however it's part of a pattern, as we covered in: Staff Union of the EPO (SUEPO) in The Hague Taking Action to Rectify Cuts to Families of Workers | EPO Discriminates Against Families of Its Own Workers, the Union Explains Legal Basis Upon Which It's Likely Illegal and Must be Challenged

The EPO harms whole families.

No wonder under Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos the EPO cannot recruit smart people and can barely even retain any. Salaries and working conditions continue to deteriorate. New staff is treated as disposable. Old staff gets disposed of. The management isn't qualified for the job, but it boils down to nepotism and bribery (buying elections).

Many have had enough with this abuse (e.g. being bullied into granting European software patents - i.e. patents which are both illegal and undesirable) and want to leave, even retire early.

Oh, retire early you say?

Well, that's a bit tricky.

The Central Staff Committee has circulated a new communication which seems to suggest further hardships:

Dear Colleagues,

The financial situation of the EPO continues to be excellent and the Office recently celebrated again that the "[r]evenue expansion bolsters operating result”. However, the Office continues to steer the Actuarial Study 2025 with over-conservative layers of assumptions and targets to impact staff benefits.

The actuarial valuations made by the Actuarial Advisory Group (AAG) can serve as a basis for justifying proposals for changing employment conditions. Their mandate for 2025 explicitly mentions that “recommendations are expected on […] actuarial reduction factors applicable in case of early retirement”. These factors are defined in Article 8 of the Pension Regulations adopted by the Administrative Council and clearly relate to employment conditions.

The previous Actuarial Study took place in 2023. At the time, the administration had notified the staff representation in February 2023 of the dates of the meetings with the actuaries and the first meeting took place in the beginning of May 2023.

In the GCC meeting of 6 May 2025, the administration explained that for this year, the first meeting with the actuaries will be on 2 June 2025. This is beyond the deadline of 31 May 2025 for colleagues to inform the Administration of their intention to retire as of 1 December 2025 in order to escape any potential change to retirement conditions as of 1 January 2026.

We asked explicitly the administration: “Can you confirm that no change to early retirement factors will be implemented as of 1 January 2026?”. The answer from Principal Directorate 4.3 was: “We are not in a position to give a response”.

Under these conditions, we advise colleagues already contemplating going on early retirement to send an email to their line manager and the Human Resources Department in order to get more information.

If more and more veteran workers leave, examination at the EPO will be even worse and hence compliance rates will be low. Many fake patents will be granted, giving a false sense of accomplishment (the EPO is selling monopolies; it does not produce anything!) while those who pay the price are the general public. It's a hidden tax on everything!

Here's the full publication dated yesterday:

Zentraler Personalausschuss
Central Staff Committee
Le Comité Central du Personnel

Munich, 08-05-2025
sc25029cp

Early retirement factors
“We are not in a position to give a response”

Dear Colleagues,

The financial situation of the EPO continues to be excellent and the Office recently celebrated again that the “[r]evenue expansion bolsters operating result”1. However, the Office continues to steer the Actuarial Study 2025 with over-conservative layers of assumptions and targets to impact staff benefits.

In his reply dated 10 April to our letter of 7 March, Mr Campinos explained that the Actuarial Advisory Group (AAG) does not have a mandate to propose changes to employment conditions, such as adjusting the retirement age, or to identify a funding gap. Indeed, it is up to the President of the Office to propose such changes to the Administrative Council after the consultation process.

However, the actuarial valuations made by the AAG can serve as a basis for justifying proposals for changing employment conditions and the mandate of the AAG for 2025 explicitly mentions that “recommendations are expected on […] actuarial reduction factors applicable in case of early retirement”. These factors are defined in Article 8 of the Pension Regulations adopted by the Administrative Council and clearly relate to employment conditions.

The previous Actuarial Study took place in 2023. At the time, the administration had notified the staff representation in February 2023 of the dates of the meetings with the actuaries and the first meeting took place in the beginning of May 2023.

In the GCC meeting of 6 May 2025, the administration explained that for this year, the first meeting with the actuaries will be on 2 June 2025. This is beyond the deadline of 31 May 2025 for colleagues to inform the Administration of their intention to retire as of 1 December 2025 in order to escape any potential change to retirement conditions as of 1 January 2026.

We asked explicitly the administration: “Can you confirm that no change to early retirement factors will be implemented as of 1 January 2026?”. The answer from Principal Directorate 4.3 was: “We are not in a position to give a response”.

______________________

1 “Financial status report December 2024”, News item of 17-04-2025


Under these conditions, we advise colleagues already contemplating going on early retirement to send the email below to their line manager and the Human Resources Department: [...]

If so many people leave, resulting in an exodus of knowledge and skills, maybe the EPO will make up excuses to illegally outsource more workflows to machines without consulting anyone.

This is the price of Europe (and the EU) turning a blind eye to its own corruption. If Europe's "exports" become European monopolies (in Europe) for Chinese and American companies, then what the heck does Europe stand to gain? Only about 30% of the EPO's patents are for EU entities/people.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Representing and Speaking for Animals
If I ever choose to take this matter to tribunal with animals-centric NGOs on my side, it'll get some press coverage for sure
The UEFI 9/11 - Part II - Campaign of Censorship and Defamation Against Critics
In dictatorships, humour serves an important role. It's tragic.
How Not to Build Software
code forges that need a Web browser perhaps fill some 'niche' demand
GAFAM and "MATA"
The use of dark humour there hopefully helps illuminate what a lot of "modern" technology became like and how it interacts with human civilisation (to what ends and whose gain)
Flying in 2025
worse than ever before
The UEFI 9/11 - Part III - Chaos is Scheduled to Happen Second Thursday of September (No Matter What the Microsofters Tell You)
The clock is ticking
Downplaying the Impact of "UEFI 9/11" is a Losing Strategy
we won't publish much whilst on holiday
 
This is What Google News Has Become
Moments ago
The Slopfarm WebProNews Has Turned Google News Into a Laughing Stock Full of Plagiarism by Slop
If Google News dies of neglect, that's one thing. It's starting to seem like active neglect by Google is a form of participation.
Do What is Moral, as What's Legal Isn't Always Moral
Do what's objectively moral, no matter the costs and the risks
Slopwatch: Google News Assisting Plagiarism and Anti-Linux FUD, Serial Slopper Rips Off Linux-Centric Journalists
This makes the Web a much worse place and lessens the incentive to do journalism
Links 30/08/2025: NVIDIA Fakes Results to Hide a Bubble Already in Implosion Phase, Data Breaches Galore, Important Win for Workers' Union in Canada
Links for the day
In Kazakhstan, Yandex Estimated to be 20 Times Bigger Than Microsoft
Bing is measured as down this month
Shutterstock Not Enough? The Register MS Uses Slop Images in Articles (Seemingly More and More Over Time)
Cost-saving trajectory amid office shutdown?
Gemini Links 30/08/2025: Games, PostmarketOS, and Slop
Links for the day
Links 30/08/2025: Imgur Uproar and Many Ukraine Updates (Mediazona Reports Over 200,000 Russians Died for Putin)
Links for the day
Birds Are Not "Pests and Vermin", Privacy is Not a Crime, and GNU/Linux is Not 'Hacking Platform'
I could not help but think of Free software analogies
The Sites Should Be Very Fast Again
That issue is now resolved
Activists, Including Technical Activists, Need Not Pursue Affirmation
Techrights doesn't play or participate in a "popularity contest"
Government Sites Should Run Free Software
Not proprietary bloatware with buzzwords
LLM Slopfarms Take No Breaks
When people run sites by bots they don't need to worry about "breaks"
GNOME Having a Meltdown Again
Thanks and farewell to Steven Deobald
Gemini Links 30/08/2025: Low Tech and Hunchbin 1.0.6
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, August 29, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, August 29, 2025
Financiers and Sponsors of the Slop Hype (Pyramid Scheme Waiting to End, Bubble That Will Inevitably Implode)
It's also burning the planet
Slopwatch: Fake Articles About "Linux", Google Helps Ponzi Schemes and Slopfarms in Google News
Slopfarms are a real pain
Gemini Links 29/08/2025: Retiring at 62 and URL Filtering HTTP(S) Proxy on Qubes OS
Links for the day
Links 29/08/2025: Lisa Cook Sues Convicted Felon and Backdoor Mandate in UK Resisted
Links for the day
Links 29/08/2025: Arti 1.5.0, War on Public Health (CDC), and Slop 'Bros' Made to Pay for Their Mass Plagiarism
Links for the day
No, 4Chan is Not Fighting for You by Lawyering Up Against Ofcom (UK)
Don't mistake proto-fascists for people who "fight for you". They don't.
In Many Places in the World Vista 11 "Market Share" is Going Down, Not Up
In some countries Windows is already down to third place or lower
More Microsoft-Connected Layoffs, at Least Third Time This Month! (Also Another Death on Campus)
Microsoft as a "gaming" company is where studios, projects, games, and even developers come to die
Slopwatch: Fake Articles About "Linux", Slop Images in VentureBeat, Linux Foundation Spam Made With LLM Slop and Slop Images
The only relief or upside - if any exists - is that the pace of slop was down a bit this week
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, August 28, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, August 28, 2025
Gemini Links 29/08/2025: Poems, Games, and Java 25 Performance
Links for the day