Bonum Certa Men Certa

European Patent Office (EPO) Faked "Revenue Expansion" by Granting Loads of Invalid, Illegal Patents; Staff Still Wants to Know Where That Money Went

posted by Roy Schestowitz on May 09, 2025

https://suepo.org/_files_media/ck_uploads/documents/retirement_measures_0659381_083212.jpg

The EPO isn't meant to hoard money (it's the law!) or gamble with money, but today's EPO breaks the law with impunity and the money 'vanishes'

Earlier this week the union of EPO staff (almost 7,000 workers) spoke about "Education allowance deductions from school invoices"; the short story is, once again staff feels "short-changed". "Deductions for school year 2024/2025," they argue, merit a challenge, maybe collective action and even legal action. To quote:

Dear colleagues,

If you have received the education allowance for the current school year (2024/2025), you probably have had deductions on the reimbursement on costs attributed to school trips that were however not specified as such in the school invoice.

If you’re in this case and you have received further information from the school on the real costs of the school trips that differ from the initial estimations made by the Office, you may want to request to HR the reimbursement of the difference.

Should you get a negative answer, please contact us at [redacted].

Please be aware that this applies to any type of deductions you might have seen on the amount of the allowance.

Do not hesitate to contact us at [redacted] if you have any questions.

It may not seem like a huge deal, however it's part of a pattern, as we covered in: Staff Union of the EPO (SUEPO) in The Hague Taking Action to Rectify Cuts to Families of Workers | EPO Discriminates Against Families of Its Own Workers, the Union Explains Legal Basis Upon Which It's Likely Illegal and Must be Challenged

The EPO harms whole families.

No wonder under Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos the EPO cannot recruit smart people and can barely even retain any. Salaries and working conditions continue to deteriorate. New staff is treated as disposable. Old staff gets disposed of. The management isn't qualified for the job, but it boils down to nepotism and bribery (buying elections).

Many have had enough with this abuse (e.g. being bullied into granting European software patents - i.e. patents which are both illegal and undesirable) and want to leave, even retire early.

Oh, retire early you say?

Well, that's a bit tricky.

The Central Staff Committee has circulated a new communication which seems to suggest further hardships:

Dear Colleagues,

The financial situation of the EPO continues to be excellent and the Office recently celebrated again that the "[r]evenue expansion bolsters operating result”. However, the Office continues to steer the Actuarial Study 2025 with over-conservative layers of assumptions and targets to impact staff benefits.

The actuarial valuations made by the Actuarial Advisory Group (AAG) can serve as a basis for justifying proposals for changing employment conditions. Their mandate for 2025 explicitly mentions that “recommendations are expected on […] actuarial reduction factors applicable in case of early retirement”. These factors are defined in Article 8 of the Pension Regulations adopted by the Administrative Council and clearly relate to employment conditions.

The previous Actuarial Study took place in 2023. At the time, the administration had notified the staff representation in February 2023 of the dates of the meetings with the actuaries and the first meeting took place in the beginning of May 2023.

In the GCC meeting of 6 May 2025, the administration explained that for this year, the first meeting with the actuaries will be on 2 June 2025. This is beyond the deadline of 31 May 2025 for colleagues to inform the Administration of their intention to retire as of 1 December 2025 in order to escape any potential change to retirement conditions as of 1 January 2026.

We asked explicitly the administration: “Can you confirm that no change to early retirement factors will be implemented as of 1 January 2026?”. The answer from Principal Directorate 4.3 was: “We are not in a position to give a response”.

Under these conditions, we advise colleagues already contemplating going on early retirement to send an email to their line manager and the Human Resources Department in order to get more information.

If more and more veteran workers leave, examination at the EPO will be even worse and hence compliance rates will be low. Many fake patents will be granted, giving a false sense of accomplishment (the EPO is selling monopolies; it does not produce anything!) while those who pay the price are the general public. It's a hidden tax on everything!

Here's the full publication dated yesterday:

Zentraler Personalausschuss
Central Staff Committee
Le Comité Central du Personnel

Munich, 08-05-2025
sc25029cp

Early retirement factors
“We are not in a position to give a response”

Dear Colleagues,

The financial situation of the EPO continues to be excellent and the Office recently celebrated again that the “[r]evenue expansion bolsters operating result”1. However, the Office continues to steer the Actuarial Study 2025 with over-conservative layers of assumptions and targets to impact staff benefits.

In his reply dated 10 April to our letter of 7 March, Mr Campinos explained that the Actuarial Advisory Group (AAG) does not have a mandate to propose changes to employment conditions, such as adjusting the retirement age, or to identify a funding gap. Indeed, it is up to the President of the Office to propose such changes to the Administrative Council after the consultation process.

However, the actuarial valuations made by the AAG can serve as a basis for justifying proposals for changing employment conditions and the mandate of the AAG for 2025 explicitly mentions that “recommendations are expected on […] actuarial reduction factors applicable in case of early retirement”. These factors are defined in Article 8 of the Pension Regulations adopted by the Administrative Council and clearly relate to employment conditions.

The previous Actuarial Study took place in 2023. At the time, the administration had notified the staff representation in February 2023 of the dates of the meetings with the actuaries and the first meeting took place in the beginning of May 2023.

In the GCC meeting of 6 May 2025, the administration explained that for this year, the first meeting with the actuaries will be on 2 June 2025. This is beyond the deadline of 31 May 2025 for colleagues to inform the Administration of their intention to retire as of 1 December 2025 in order to escape any potential change to retirement conditions as of 1 January 2026.

We asked explicitly the administration: “Can you confirm that no change to early retirement factors will be implemented as of 1 January 2026?”. The answer from Principal Directorate 4.3 was: “We are not in a position to give a response”.

______________________

1 “Financial status report December 2024”, News item of 17-04-2025


Under these conditions, we advise colleagues already contemplating going on early retirement to send the email below to their line manager and the Human Resources Department: [...]

If so many people leave, resulting in an exodus of knowledge and skills, maybe the EPO will make up excuses to illegally outsource more workflows to machines without consulting anyone.

This is the price of Europe (and the EU) turning a blind eye to its own corruption. If Europe's "exports" become European monopolies (in Europe) for Chinese and American companies, then what the heck does Europe stand to gain? Only about 30% of the EPO's patents are for EU entities/people.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

From Do Your Own Research to Do Your Own Search
The Web is full of garbage; search engines amplify this garbage
More People Moving to Geminispace?
at age 6+ Gemini Protocol seems to have gained some maturity and it seems like more people use it
Permutation in LLMs Does, Inevitably, Change Meanings and Therefore LLMs Cannot Properly Rephrase or Summarise Texts
LLMs lack actual grasp or comprehension of what they spew out
Links 23/06/2025: Many Security Breaches, Population Declines
Links for the day
Gemini Links 23/06/2025: "America at the Crossroads" and OpenWRT Surgery
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, June 22, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, June 22, 2025
Pure Dove
Different means different, and sometimes those who "deviate" from "the norm" have a point
Censorship is a Sign of Weakness Which Invites More Censorship Attempts
revolutionaries don't succumb to pressure from bullies
Why It's Unlikely That LLM Slop Will Dominate the Web in the Long Run
Slopfarms will eventually perish (they have no actual value) and "survivors" on the Web will be sites that never depended on search engines and social control media
At What Point Does Outsourcing Constitute Malpractice?
Brett Wilson LLP's new staff page is misleading
GNU/Linux in Argentina Now Measured Near 5%
Like in central Europe, they must be seeing an increasingly hostile US
BetaNews is Fake News, Composed by LLM Slop
nothing in BetaNews is written by humans anymore
Links 22/06/2025: Giving Up on Smartphones and 'Jaws' at 50
Links for the day
Gemini Links 22/06/2025: Furniture Construction and Bubble for Comments
Links for the day
Links 22/06/2025: Windows TCO Tales and YouTube Getting More Hostile to Users
Links for the day
The FSF Board and FSF Beard
So the FSF's Board has grown
Law Firms Facing the Consequences for Patently Abusive Litigation on Behalf of Microsoft Employees Who Got Arrested for Strangulation and Had Done Even Worse Things
Having spent 1.5 years bullying me with patronising letters on behalf of Microsofters, last week they got served a massive bill and, in effect, lost the Hearing
New Report From the EPO's Staff Representatives in The Hague (LSCTH) Reveals Many Unsolved Issues
Local Staff Committee The Hague (LSCTH) wrote to staff just before the weekend
LLMs Breaking Everything
Computing and the Net became a playground for scammers and "bros", like people who "invented" fake currencies and also try to tell us that LLMs spewing out things will have some real value
Links 22/06/2025: More Slop Lawsuits (Copyrights) and "America’s Oligarch Problem"
Links for the day
Gemini Links 22/06/2025: Gigantic Toolchest and Annoying Bots
Links for the day
The Calling
Persist and persevere, justice will come your way
So Far Every BetaNews 'Article' is LLM Slop, So BetaNews is Officially Just a Slopfarm
They just don't seem to value what they have
IBM Rumour: Mass Layoffs (RAs) Lists Being Made for Consulting, With Effect in July 2025
Bogus companies with no viable products and no world-leading (in their field) staff are doomed to perish
Links 21/06/2025: Data Breach With 16 Billion Passwords, Dutch Government Recommends Children Under 15 Stay off TikTok and Instagram
Links for the day
Gemini Links 21/06/2025: Notes about Typst (and LaTeX) and Opos
Links for the day
Microsoft's Competition Tactics: Sabotage GNU/Linux Installs, Block Chrome
Edge is dying
1989: Free Software as "Open" Software (OSI Didn't Coin "Open Source", It Also Predates Linux)
"One man's fight for Free software"
The Microsoft OOXML Modus Operandi: Throw 1,000 Pages of Other People's Work for a Judge to Read Ahead of a One-Hour Meeting
No time to discuss this - that's the point
Formalities Officers (FOs) at the EPO Are in Trouble, Reveals Internal Report
We already know, based on an HR pattern we saw at IBM and elsewhere, that reallocating roles can be prerequisite for dismissal and those who do so expect many to resign anyway
The Web is Slop and FUD, Let's Go to Gemini Protocol
Lupa sees self-signed capsules at 92.4%
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, June 20, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, June 20, 2025
Links 21/06/2025: Phone Bans for Concerts, Tensions in Taiwan Strait
Links for the day
Gemini Links 21/06/2025: Spoilers, Public Yggdrasil Node, Changes to AuraGem Search
Links for the day