Bonum Certa Men Certa

European Patent Office (EPO) Faked "Revenue Expansion" by Granting Loads of Invalid, Illegal Patents; Staff Still Wants to Know Where That Money Went

posted by Roy Schestowitz on May 09, 2025

https://suepo.org/_files_media/ck_uploads/documents/retirement_measures_0659381_083212.jpg

The EPO isn't meant to hoard money (it's the law!) or gamble with money, but today's EPO breaks the law with impunity and the money 'vanishes'

Earlier this week the union of EPO staff (almost 7,000 workers) spoke about "Education allowance deductions from school invoices"; the short story is, once again staff feels "short-changed". "Deductions for school year 2024/2025," they argue, merit a challenge, maybe collective action and even legal action. To quote:

Dear colleagues,

If you have received the education allowance for the current school year (2024/2025), you probably have had deductions on the reimbursement on costs attributed to school trips that were however not specified as such in the school invoice.

If you’re in this case and you have received further information from the school on the real costs of the school trips that differ from the initial estimations made by the Office, you may want to request to HR the reimbursement of the difference.

Should you get a negative answer, please contact us at [redacted].

Please be aware that this applies to any type of deductions you might have seen on the amount of the allowance.

Do not hesitate to contact us at [redacted] if you have any questions.

It may not seem like a huge deal, however it's part of a pattern, as we covered in: Staff Union of the EPO (SUEPO) in The Hague Taking Action to Rectify Cuts to Families of Workers | EPO Discriminates Against Families of Its Own Workers, the Union Explains Legal Basis Upon Which It's Likely Illegal and Must be Challenged

The EPO harms whole families.

No wonder under Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos the EPO cannot recruit smart people and can barely even retain any. Salaries and working conditions continue to deteriorate. New staff is treated as disposable. Old staff gets disposed of. The management isn't qualified for the job, but it boils down to nepotism and bribery (buying elections).

Many have had enough with this abuse (e.g. being bullied into granting European software patents - i.e. patents which are both illegal and undesirable) and want to leave, even retire early.

Oh, retire early you say?

Well, that's a bit tricky.

The Central Staff Committee has circulated a new communication which seems to suggest further hardships:

Dear Colleagues,

The financial situation of the EPO continues to be excellent and the Office recently celebrated again that the "[r]evenue expansion bolsters operating result”. However, the Office continues to steer the Actuarial Study 2025 with over-conservative layers of assumptions and targets to impact staff benefits.

The actuarial valuations made by the Actuarial Advisory Group (AAG) can serve as a basis for justifying proposals for changing employment conditions. Their mandate for 2025 explicitly mentions that “recommendations are expected on […] actuarial reduction factors applicable in case of early retirement”. These factors are defined in Article 8 of the Pension Regulations adopted by the Administrative Council and clearly relate to employment conditions.

The previous Actuarial Study took place in 2023. At the time, the administration had notified the staff representation in February 2023 of the dates of the meetings with the actuaries and the first meeting took place in the beginning of May 2023.

In the GCC meeting of 6 May 2025, the administration explained that for this year, the first meeting with the actuaries will be on 2 June 2025. This is beyond the deadline of 31 May 2025 for colleagues to inform the Administration of their intention to retire as of 1 December 2025 in order to escape any potential change to retirement conditions as of 1 January 2026.

We asked explicitly the administration: “Can you confirm that no change to early retirement factors will be implemented as of 1 January 2026?”. The answer from Principal Directorate 4.3 was: “We are not in a position to give a response”.

Under these conditions, we advise colleagues already contemplating going on early retirement to send an email to their line manager and the Human Resources Department in order to get more information.

If more and more veteran workers leave, examination at the EPO will be even worse and hence compliance rates will be low. Many fake patents will be granted, giving a false sense of accomplishment (the EPO is selling monopolies; it does not produce anything!) while those who pay the price are the general public. It's a hidden tax on everything!

Here's the full publication dated yesterday:

Zentraler Personalausschuss
Central Staff Committee
Le Comité Central du Personnel

Munich, 08-05-2025
sc25029cp

Early retirement factors
“We are not in a position to give a response”

Dear Colleagues,

The financial situation of the EPO continues to be excellent and the Office recently celebrated again that the “[r]evenue expansion bolsters operating result”1. However, the Office continues to steer the Actuarial Study 2025 with over-conservative layers of assumptions and targets to impact staff benefits.

In his reply dated 10 April to our letter of 7 March, Mr Campinos explained that the Actuarial Advisory Group (AAG) does not have a mandate to propose changes to employment conditions, such as adjusting the retirement age, or to identify a funding gap. Indeed, it is up to the President of the Office to propose such changes to the Administrative Council after the consultation process.

However, the actuarial valuations made by the AAG can serve as a basis for justifying proposals for changing employment conditions and the mandate of the AAG for 2025 explicitly mentions that “recommendations are expected on […] actuarial reduction factors applicable in case of early retirement”. These factors are defined in Article 8 of the Pension Regulations adopted by the Administrative Council and clearly relate to employment conditions.

The previous Actuarial Study took place in 2023. At the time, the administration had notified the staff representation in February 2023 of the dates of the meetings with the actuaries and the first meeting took place in the beginning of May 2023.

In the GCC meeting of 6 May 2025, the administration explained that for this year, the first meeting with the actuaries will be on 2 June 2025. This is beyond the deadline of 31 May 2025 for colleagues to inform the Administration of their intention to retire as of 1 December 2025 in order to escape any potential change to retirement conditions as of 1 January 2026.

We asked explicitly the administration: “Can you confirm that no change to early retirement factors will be implemented as of 1 January 2026?”. The answer from Principal Directorate 4.3 was: “We are not in a position to give a response”.

______________________

1 “Financial status report December 2024”, News item of 17-04-2025


Under these conditions, we advise colleagues already contemplating going on early retirement to send the email below to their line manager and the Human Resources Department: [...]

If so many people leave, resulting in an exodus of knowledge and skills, maybe the EPO will make up excuses to illegally outsource more workflows to machines without consulting anyone.

This is the price of Europe (and the EU) turning a blind eye to its own corruption. If Europe's "exports" become European monopolies (in Europe) for Chinese and American companies, then what the heck does Europe stand to gain? Only about 30% of the EPO's patents are for EU entities/people.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

More Microsoft-Red Hat Cross-Pollination as the Company Loses a Managing Director
some people move from Microsoft to Red Hat and some do the opposite
Cloudflare Gives Us All Another Reason to Boycott Cloudflare
If Cloudflare wants to use its vast surveillance network (which is what it does as a CDN) to foist paywalls and maybe something worse (like DRM on top), then Cloudflare should be more widely rejected as a company
The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Has Un-cancelled the Best People, Just in Time for the Big 4-0
Mr. Oliva should have been there all along (since 2019)
Most "Modern" Technology Makes You Slower and Dumber
Because proprietary software makes you worse off
"What Comes After Free Software?" Wrongly Insinuates We've Reached the Goal (Prison is Not the Goal)
The oil tycoons use similar tactics against environmentalists, giving them fake "wins"
Making More Work Space
I learned the hard way that less is more in circumstances where more means distraction
MAHA is a Lie, Public Officials Never Valued Citizens' Health (They Still Value Private Businesses, Their Sponsors)
Reject demagogues
 
Science is Under Attack
Oligarchy prefers a dumbed-down population
Someone Expiring Certificates on the Day of the 9/11 Attacks is Not Someone I Would Want Controlling My PC (or Deciding What's Authorised for Booting)
"social justice warriors"
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Has Reportedly Failed People With Wrong Advice
At the moment the SRA has a PR blunder
The Man Suing Brett Wilson LLP and Gervase de Wilde (5RB)
Now he's probably using the (almost) 200,000 pounds he's supposed to receive to sue Brett Wilson LLP and former colleagues/partners
Slopwatch: A World Wide Web That's Rotting for Companies That Won't Even Exist in a Few Years
some of the junk Google News is promoting
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, September 23, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, September 23, 2025
Links 24/09/2025: Qt Creator 18 Beta, Microsoft Cannot Bail Out "ChatGPT" Anymore, China and US Intensify Censorship
Links for the day
Gemini Links 24/09/2025: Gemlogs and Politics
Links for the day
Links 23/09/2025: Japan Limits Uses of Skinnerboxes ('Smartphones') With Toxic "Apps", Fentanylware (TikTok) Tapped by "MAGAts"
Links for the day
Brett Wilson LLP Has Just Been Sued (by Their Own Clients!)
Vladimir and Alla Yanpolsky sued Brett Wilson LLP in BL-2025-001167 at the end of last week
The Complaint About Brett Wilson LLP - Part II - UK SLAPPs for Americans, SLAPPs for Profit
Brett Wilson LLP has a track record of this kind
Mayday: Optus emergency calling crisis
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 23/09/2025: Massive Data Breach, Slop Versus Productivity, and Vista 11 Update Breaks Things Again
Links for the day
Code of Censorship
Extortion is peace
Free Software Foundation (FSF) Has a New Press Kit for the Weekend After Next Weekend (40th Anniversary)
miles better than social [sic] media [sic] quips, moderated by narcissists and oil tycoons.
Microsoft Had Two Waves of Mass Layoffs This Month (That We Know of) and It'll Get Worse for Microsoft Soon
Will the axe fall again by month's end?
Gemini Links 23/09/2025: Happy Equinox, Photronic Arts, and Perception Cognition
Links for the day
Lessons We've Learned After 17 Years of American Hosting
GAFAM is "all-in" with the "Trump agenda"
Back to Normal Now, We Plan to Do More In-Depth Series (or Multi-part Stories)
Articles (or series thereof) that contain philosophy are important to us
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, September 22, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, September 22, 2025
Microsoft Media is Panicking Amid Mass Layoffs Every Month, H-1B Fees, and "Seattle’s Tech Scene in Trouble"
In "late stage Microsoft", copyleft becomes proprietary
The Next Wave of IBM/Red Hat Layoffs Being Discussed Already
Red Hat is sort of disappearing the way Tivoli did
New Techrights Turns 2
Today starts the third year of the SSG-based Techrights
What Scares Them the Most is Independent News Sites That They Cannot Control and Censor
Wikileaks was a good example of this
If You Don't Control Your Online Platform, Then Someone Else is Controlling You
be (or become) independent
Oracle Started This Year With Slop. Then It Stopped.
Passing fads are like this
Distros That Run on PCs Made 20 Years Ago and Don't Use Systemd
Betas for now
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Has a Policy on Racism and Sexism
In then future we'll show the misogyny and racial slurs
The Complaint About Brett Wilson LLP - Part I - Abusing British Women on Behalf of American Men Who Abuse American Women
Transparency is important to us, so we've decided to make this series
Slopwatch: Google News and the Evident Slopfarm Infestation
This is what people get about Linux when they query Google for Linux
Links 22/09/2025: Murdochs Might Join Fentanylware (TikTok) 'Investors' (Masters), United Kingdom Recognises Palestinian Statehood
Links for the day
Gemini Links 22/09/2025: Esperanto Music History and Apps For Android
Links for the day
Links 22/09/2025: More American 'Censorship' (Retaliation for Journalism), Cheeto "Might Be Losing His Race Against Time"
Links for the day
The Blob Slop
Give me more words, give me some text
The 50-Pound Note Experiment and the "War on Cash"
Britain is actually seeing a rebound in cash payments, and it's not a temporary phenomenon
Slopwatch: Blaming the Victims for Microsoft's Failures and Plagiarising Phoronix
That's what Google has been reduced to: slop and slopfarms
Links 22/09/2025: Breaches, Windows TCO, and Arrests
Links for the day
Gemini Links 22/09/2025: Rabbit Hole and DeGoogling Fairphone
Links for the day
Links 22/09/2025: Russian War Planes Invade NATO Airspace While Dihydroxyacetone Man Escalates Attack on Free Speech Because of Critics
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, September 21, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, September 21, 2025