"But Stallman is Scaring Away Women..."
Say people who:
- Treat women like objects
- Appoint women as subordinates and fire them
- Make crude "jokes" about coding for sex
- Rig processes to promote girlfriends (nepotism)
Yesterday I saw a crude joke in some anti-RMS site (I think that site is called "Reddit" or something). It said there's no documented example of RMS having a relationship with an adult woman - a statement so utterly absurd and so easy to debunk (even by just searching for Web for less than a minute).
Earlier today we highlighted the sheer double standards. How have we come to the point where people who mistreat women in the most obscene (sometimes illegal) ways tell us that RMS, who supports women's right, is the real impediment to absorption of females in STEM (which are already scarce, it is not a Free software issue*).
Such dishonest projections (projection tactics) needs to be called out and refuted. The malicious tongues in the above anti-RMS site are using innuendo to try to insinuate someone is a pedophile while the reality is, this narrative distracts from Jeffrey Epstein and Bill, who transmits viruses.
Maybe the GAFAM boosters need to spend more time explaining their tacit support for sex trafficking. █
____
* As it was put informally earlier today in IRC: "When people get something from deb/rpm/other (flatpak, snap, yum, dnf, apt, apt-get etc.) they make many assumptions, inc. that the channel with the repo is secure, the packager can be trusted, the developer/s can be trusted, and the compiler, modules etc. are not malicious. This is NOT unique/different from ProprietaryCrap issues. Same issues, but ...... hidden; The MSM likes to pretend ONLY Free; MSM = funded to issue GAFAM propaganda"