No, IAM, UPC Did Not “Spring Back to Life”
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2017-02-05 12:15:16 UTC
- Modified: 2017-02-05 12:15:16 UTC
Reference: Alternative facts
Summary: IAM 'magazine' misleads its readers and does a disservice to a potentially large audience with alternative facts about the Unified Patent Court (UPC) -- a theoretical system which is stuck in a likely perpetual limbo
THE just-released issue of the magazine (behind paywall) called "IAM" (3 words that are lies, "intellectual", "asset", and "management" -- all in relation to mere ideas!) puts forth a wild leap of faith by Joff Wild. The headline is
"The UPC springs back to life" and it says
in the except that "The Unified Patent Court received an unexpected boost in November 2016, when the UK government committed to ratifying the agreement despite Brexit."
Our rebuttal at the time explained why it made no sense. It was a 7-part series:
Lucy Neville-Rolfe has
since then left her job and Dr. Luke McDonagh, who criticised what she had said at the time, will speak about the subject on February 8
th (this coming Wednesday), based on this
new page and a
tweet about
his book. "Book launch for 'European #Patent law & the UPC' by @DrLukeMcDonagh @CityUniLondon," it says.
It's rather ironic that Britain, renowned for a large 'industry' of lawyers, was what most likely killed the UPC. Team UPC will likely attempt to redraw it, not withdraw it.
⬆