Bonum Certa Men Certa

Corporate Bullies Disguised as Well-Meaning Activists, Equipped With Libel and Social Control Media Accounts

They say they care, but the only thing they truly care about is their paymaster and their salary



Summary: Bullies (or Internet trolls with a corporate badge that lends them credibility) have a habit or a hobby of destroying the careers of people rightly or wrongly perceived to be an obstruction/barrier to their employer's financial agenda

ONLY SEVERAL weeks ago we wrote about Salesforce that "[r]eaders must recall that this is the company whose head staff was pushing not only to oust [Richard] Stallman but everyone who supported Stallman as well (collective assassination)," taking note of someone who according to our job survey earns somewhere between €£80,000 per annum to a lot more; a new job opening here in Greater Manchester says "€£500 - €£600 per day". Alex Oliva was next in the 'firing line'. I've long objected to separating workers from their paymasters when they express their views on matters directly related to their job. If a technical person writes something about politics, then fine, it would be unfair to hold the employer accountable for it (the person isn't a politician after all but a technician or similar). But when you have some troll from Salesforce defaming Stallman repeatedly, and Salesforce has something to gain from demonisation of Stallman, then yes, it kind of matters.



"If a technical person writes something about politics, then fine, it would be unfair to hold the employer accountable for it (the person isn't a politician after all but a technician or similar)."It matters even more and it's worse because of money that Salesforce was moving around Stallman at the same time. A widely circulated and controversial storm of tweets (maybe over a hundred of them) said that not only should the FSF kick Stallman out but also kick out (from the FSF) everyone who still supported Stallman. Imagine the audacity. The person who said that wasn't some 'low-level' employee but a high-level person. Ironically, Salesforce was also a top sponsor of CopyleftConf, along with Google and Microsoft. Copyleft is one of Stallman's babies; so while pushing to remove Stallman and everyone who thinks like him Salesforce was also interjecting itself into a conference on copyleft. Copyleft-hostile companies funded the event, almost exclusively, and the person who set up the event... is now the GM of the OSI, i.e. the only salaried member of staff at the OSI. Something doesn't pass the smell test, does it? It's almost like a conspiracy by GPL violators and haters to weaken enforcers and make infringement acceptable. As today's OSI mostly boosts Microsoft's proprietary GitHub, which is GPL-hostile, one can draw and then connect dots.

Salesforce said nothing about Stallman in its capacity as a company (formal); even Red Hat was careful in the wording (it did mention "diverse"), as was the FSFE. A female worker did all the slandering, defaming Stallman repeatedly using faked 'evidence' that incited many people and gave momentum to the hashtags. Of course this female worker used "chauvinism" as a weapon, so to defend Stallman would instantaneously be seen as chauvinistic. Even if women who actually know Stallman (e.g. as a colleague) defended him at the time.

"We understand that this is a difficult subject to a lot of people because it's often conflated with right-wing politics."As we noted before in our Linux Foundation collection (chronologically sorted), Linus Torvalds is now bossed by several Microsoft employees, almost all of whom are female (perhaps all, 3 in total), so to moan about Microsoft would be risky; we've already seen what Sharp and other trolls did to him using the veil of "tolerance" (even half a decade ago). To misuse causes like this can actively harm those causes, especially if the underlying motivation has nothing to do with those causes. It can be an indirection.

There are similar examples in the EPO wiki (sorted both chronologically and by topic/theme, plus concise introduction at the top). The gist is, the EPO loves hiding its crimes and corruption behind the cover of "diversity" and then it can accuse people who ask hard questions of "abuse" or "harassment".

Speech policeWe understand that this is a difficult subject to a lot of people because it's often conflated with right-wing politics. People who are new to this topic quickly find a compelling reason (or many reasons) to distrust those who speak about the modus operandi, not the organisations/executives who leverage these methods, even though evidence can be extensive with no lack of examples of misconduct. We recently showed several from Debian. We need to spend some time organising these examples in a wiki page (where the titles alone give a gist for content of pertinent items/examples).

Last month Sharp's sidekick, who attempted several times (in vain) to 'cancel' Torvalds, entered our IRC channel with bad intentions. He's still lurking there, perhaps looking for a trigger event, having already demonised yours truly by attributing to me a position I do not hold (and never held). These are troublemakers and provocateurs; this one describes himself as "social justice warrior" (complete with a flair that says so in Reddit) and he receives his salary from Google.

"People start with false claims and then start an uproar (over their manufactured falsehood/s), in turn directing this uproar to employers (to force a resignation if not a humiliating firing)."Considering the nature of articles we've been publishing lately, it's understandable that there will be attempts to shoot the messengers and harm the site's credibility (e.g. by falsely claiming that it defends rapists). We're no encyclopedia, we have nowhere near the budget of CommonDreams (or the corporate media, typically owned and controlled by selfish oligarchs), as we're just a small group of volunteers with limited time and zero corporate strings.

This whole 'cancel culture' thing (Twitter's 'business model', where the above troll demonised us last month) is why I no longer engage in Twitter. For a number of weeks the above troll kept messaging me with entrapments (loaded questions in Twitter); since I no longer participate in Twitter, as a matter of policy, he then came to our main IRC channel. The motivation and the methods remain largely the same. People start with false claims and then start an uproar (over their manufactured falsehood/s), in turn directing this uproar to employers (to force a resignation if not a humiliating firing).

Recent Techrights' Posts

[Meme] One Person, Singular Pronoun
Abusing people into abusing the English language is very poor diplomacy
New Article From Richard Stallman Explains Why He Says He and She for Unknown Person (Not 'They')
"Nowadays I use gender-neutral singular pronouns for a person whose gender I don't know"
 
Gemini Not Deflated Yet (Soon Turning 5!)
Gemini numbers still moving up, the protocol will turn five next summer
Links 30/11/2023: Belated End of Henry Kissinger and 'Popular Science' Shuts Online Magazine
Links for the day
Site Priorities and Upcoming Improvements
pages are served very fast
Ending Software Patents in Recent Years (Software Freedom Fighters MIA)
not a resolved issue
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, November 29, 2023
IRC logs for Wednesday, November 29, 2023
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news
Links 30/11/2023: Rushing Patent Cases With Shorter Trial Scheme (STS), Sanctions Not Working
Links for the day
Links 30/11/2023: Google Purging Many Accounts and Content (to Save Money), Finland Fully Seals Border With Russia
Links for the day
Lookout, It's Outlook
Outlook is all about the sharing!
Updated A Month Ago: Richard Stallman on Software Patents as Obstacles to Software Development
very recent update
The 'Smart' Attack on Power Grid Neutrality (or the Wet Dream of Tiered Pricing for Power, Essentially Punishing Poorer Households for Exercising Freedom Like Richer Households)
The dishonest marketing people tell us the age of disservice and discrimination is all about "smart" and "Hey Hi" (AI) as in algorithms akin to traffic-shaping in the context of network neutrality
Links 29/11/2023: VMware Layoffs and Too Many Microsofters Going Inside Google
Links for the day
Is BlueMail a Client of ZDNet Now?
Let's examine what BlueMail does to promote itself
Just What LINUX.COM Needed After Over a Month of Inactivity: SPAM SPAM SPAM (Linux Brand as a Spamfarm)
It's not even about Linux
Microsoft “Discriminated Based on Sexuality”
Relevant, as they love lecturing us on "diversity" and "inclusion"...
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, November 28, 2023
IRC logs for Tuesday, November 28, 2023
Media Cannot Tell the Difference Between Microsoft and Iran
a platform with back doors
Links 28/11/2023: New Zealand's Big Tobacco Pivot and Google Mass-Deleting Accounts
Links for the day
Justice is Still the Main Goal
The skulduggery seems to implicate not only Microsoft
OpenBSD Says That Even on Linux, Wayland Still Has a Number of Rough Edges (But IBM Wants to Make X Extinct)
IBM tries to impose unready software on users
[Teaser] Next Week's Part in the Series About Anti-Free Software Militants
an effort to 'cancel' us and spy on us
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news
Permacomputing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Professor Eben Moglen on How Social Control Media Metabolises Humans and Constraints Freedom of Thought
Nothing of value would be lost if all these data-harvesting giants (profiling people) vanished overnight
IRC Proceedings: Monday, November 27, 2023
IRC logs for Monday, November 27, 2023
When Microsoft Blocks Your Access to Free Software
"Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches." [Chicago Sun-Times]
Techrights Statement on 'Cancel Culture' Going Out of Control
relates to a discussion we had in IRC last night
Stuff People Write About Linux
revisionist pieces
Links 28/11/2023: Rosy Crow 1.4.3 and Google Drive Data Loss
Links for the day