EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

07.20.08

Microsoft: Its Party’s Over

Posted in Deception, Finance, Microsoft at 6:17 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

At reader’s request: Microsoft’s financial disappointment

It almost feels like covering an old story, so herein we mention only a few new developments and reference the rest at the bottom.

As many have realised before the week ended, Microsoft is not in a good shape. It’s nothing like it used to be, but Microsoft goes out of its way to keep up appearances, even using aggression. Perceptual momentum is essential for growth through customer obedience and investor confidence.

“Ask what it is not telling you. It has plenty to conceal.”Just as predicted, Microsoft emhasised revenue, which the massive acquisitions make rather meaningless (buying revenue is easy at the expense of savings). Those who have read this site for a while might not be surprised, but the Microsoft-owned press can be hugely self-serving, i.e. deceiving. Contradictions to it can be painted black… like a black sheep that Big Lies make possible.

Microsoft shares fell sharply, just as they did in the previous quarter when profits fell and Microsoft was no longer able to pretend and conceal its pains. This marked the beginning of a stage where we are likely to see Microsoft’s estimates and forecasts lowered and then potentially missed again and again. Recall the fact that Microsoft lowered its projection in the last quarter (and missed them again).

When looking at the financial results, do not ask what Microsoft wants to show you and get journalists blinded by. Ask what it is not telling you. It has plenty to conceal. Being a large company, it can do a lot of division- and bucket-shuffling to impress investors. Here is just one old example: Microsoft Hides Its Mobile and Business Apps Divisions

The company is folding its two worst-performing divisions — Microsoft Business Solutions (its business applications unit) and its Mobile and Embedded units — into the Microsoft Business Division and Microsoft Home and Entertainment units, respectively.

For details about Microsoft’s financial game, see some of the many previous posts (listed at the very bottom).

Let’s take a quick look at some of the realistic (in-depth, as opposed to ‘Microsoft parroting’) press coverage that Microsoft received at the end of the week.

The Bad

From CNN:

Shares of Microsoft Corp. dropped more than 6% in after-hours trading after the software giant posted a fiscal fourth-quarter profit that fell short of Wall Street’s estimates as it forecast lower-than-expected revenue for the following quarter.

According to an analyst quoted by The Street, Microsoft is “not doing well on the earnings front.”

Karen Finerman said that Microsoft was “a little disappointing,” and that she does not “love two quarters in a row of them being lower.”

Adami said that Microsoft’s major problem is that it does not tell what is going on. He said that it must “communicate with the Street better.”

[...]

Najarian said that Microsoft was “not doing well on the earnings front,” and “don’t buy this name thinking you’re going to get a monster pop.”

Buying lots and lots of companies (wasting money) for increase in revenue and employees just makes the company clumsy and overweight. John Dvorak opines that the strategy of the company as a whole is misguided and hubris-driven.

The secondary message, which we’ve all heard for some time now, is that the business model for the software giant is a dead end, if not over already

[...]

To make matters worse, the company is now making itself look more desperate over the new toy in the sandbox called Yahoo Inc.

We wrote about the Microsoft-Icahn duo before. They are now visibly united as they carry on with their planned proxy war. It does not help Microsoft in any way because it makes it look bad, never mind the distraction it causes.

In the latest salvo in the proxy fight for control of Yahoo, the company is urging shareholders to beware of the “odd couple” — Microsoft and the corporate raider Carl C. Icahn — who are locked in a “marriage of convenience” but have no clear plan for what they would do if they took control of the board.

Yahoo is now also using its Web space to attack Microsoft and Icahn, apart from describing the latter as a corporate agitator. It’s not good for business.

The Sad

Even the Microsoft-associated financial Web site, Motley Fool, comes off with the headline: “Whither Microsoft?”

But the bears have a response or two ready. “Microsoft is currently too big to expand significantly above where they currently are,” says all-star Fool simultaneouslee. “Also, with Bill Gates no longer involved in Microsoft and the more eccentric Steve Ballmer running the show on his own, not as many investors will be inspired by Steve Ballmer’s visions for Microsoft as they were Gates.”

[...]

OK, so Microsoft is on sale right now — but perhaps with good reason. The company is facing unprecedented obstacles on every side.

In some ‘mainstream press’ articles, the economy as a whole takes the blame (Microsoft too tried to use that as an excuse). Examples:

It may run deeper than this. Consider some new observations, as follows.

The Online Unit does badly:

Shares in Microsoft were trading down 6.3% in after-hours trading at $25.78, after closing up 0.95% to 27.52.

Microsoft said earlier that its online services business lost $488 million, on sales of $838 million. In the year-earlier period, the online services business lost $210 million.

The entertainment unit too has some serious trouble ahead. Relative sales of XBox 360 fell sharply in the month of June and the company seems unlikely to recover, even with considerable discounts. The XBox division/unit has lost about $7 billion since 2001 and other products like the Zune seem to be approaching death.

I wonder why Steve Ballmer freaks out at the thought of losing the search and advertising wars to Google (Nasdaq: GOOG), but not at handing the game-console crown to Nintendo (OTC BB: NTDOY.PK) or the music market to Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL). How is it worth throwing billions after a major rival, only to scare away the engineering talent that makes (made?) Yahoo! great? In the second case, well, let’s just throw more bad money after that Zune abomination and hope the Xbox saves the day.

On the Microsoft Office division:

The Microsoft Office division numbers were a disappointment. Operating earnings there only grew a disappointing 12% for the period. The company’s online division posted an increase in revenue to $838 million from $677 million a year ago. However, losses for that division doubled to $488 million from $210 million, as management spent heavily on data centers and new employees to ramp up ad sales.

“Fear, uncertainty and doubt” are blamed also:

Citigroup analyst Brent Thill wrote Friday that the stock’s low price-to-earnings multiple reflects investors’ fear, uncertainty and doubt: fear that the product cycle will never deliver margin expansion, uncertainty that Microsoft will ever do a deal with Yahoo! and doubt that further online investments will pay off.

Lastly, The Ugly

As the links at the bottom will show, there’s a lot in Microsoft’s past about financial irregularity and misconduct as well. And fresh from the news:

Former manager gets 22 months in prison, fines for embezzling

[...]

Gudmundson was responsible for managing Microsoft’s domain names from 2000 to 2004.

Remember what Robert Bach, a Microsoft Vice President, did last year while escaping investigation or punishment.

And wait! Watch this newly-disclosed gem (Microsoft’s mortgage issue) from a source that is close to Microsoft:

In another surprise disclosure, Microsoft said its investments include mortgage-backed securities but they’re mostly “prime” mortgages and the portfolio is not directly exposed to the sub-prime meltdown:

“While we own certain mortgage and asset-backed fixed-income securities, our portfolio as of June 30, 2008, does not contain direct exposure to subprime mortgages or structured vehicles that derive their value from sub-prime collateral. The majority of the mortgage-backed securities are collateralized by prime residential mortgages and carry a 100% principal and interest guarantee, primarily from Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and Government National Mortgage Association. The remainder of the mortgage position is collateralized by high quality international prime residential mortgage loans.”

For more information, see our previous posts which are filled with many informative references handpicked from the press.

Criticism, if any, should be directed at the sources, not the messengers. The truth will come out one day.

“Sadly, many of these brilliant people have been blinded by the stock price and unable to see that Microsoft is also the key architect of the greatest financial pyramid scheme this century.

“It is not uncommon for participants in pyramid schemes to lose their emotional bearings. My close friends who work at Microsoft are particularly upset over my work and it is possible that even Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer do not realize the implications of their financial practices.”

Bill Parish

“Microsoft has clearly entered a phase of self destructive behavior that began with the “tissue paper campaign” in 1995. This report will document this campaign for the first time.”

Bill Parish

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

16 Comments

  1. Robert Millan said,

    July 20, 2008 at 4:37 pm

    Gravatar

    So where are the expenses of the “OOXML war campaign” accounted? They surely belong in the Office division, I hope they didn’t miss it ;-)

  2. Jim said,

    July 20, 2008 at 6:38 pm

    Gravatar

    I suspect a lot of this has to do with the economic times. Most businesses are having trouble meeting their projections right now. Yet I read that Microsoft has been selling 20 million copies of Vista per month for the last year and a half.

    I hope Microsoft’s outlooks improve, it’s one of the few competitive American businesses left.

  3. Jim Powers said,

    July 20, 2008 at 8:13 pm

    Gravatar

    It is true that there is somewhat of an economic downturn here in the states (i.e. we are heading into a recession), but the impact of that impending recession is not uniform: Intel recently announced rather impressive profits. Now, perhaps those profits are to some degree ill-gotten as Roy is likely to point out, but then it appears that Intel is better at finding the right opportunities to “grease” than Microsoft. Perhaps they need a better quality criminal. ;-)

  4. IGnatius T Foobar said,

    July 20, 2008 at 11:06 pm

    Gravatar

    Microsoft has been raping and pillaging the industry for decades. In the end, though, we reap what we sow. May they go down in flames as soon as possible.

  5. Stephane Rodriguez said,

    July 21, 2008 at 3:38 am

    Gravatar

    “It is true that there is somewhat of an economic downturn here in the states (i.e. we are heading into a recession)”

    You must not be talking about anything remotely related to the financial industry, because the opposite is true. Behind the “downturn” media blitz, financials institutions and virtually every single actor of the inter-bank network (hedge funds, …) are making more money than ever.

    The cynical thing about it is that they are doing it by speculating ten times more than a year before in commodity markets therefore at the expense of the so-called real economy, therefore citizens. And here this applies to every single “free-trade” place in the world, not just the US.

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    July 21, 2008 at 4:04 am

    Gravatar

    In a conversation I had at lunch the other day, the situation was described a bit differently. The weakening of the dollar (possession of oil in Euros partly ‘to blame’ here) led to quite a deficit.

    Large sums of money are still quietly centralised in the financial sector (loans affects not only citizens but the government too), which belittles Microsoft by leaps and bounds. Greed and ego suffer from the decline of the dollar, so the burden is being passed downstream. Sadly enough, this kills and already-shriveling middle class and now leads to people losing their homes. Does your media cover the tent cities crisis?

  7. anonymous coward said,

    July 21, 2008 at 6:30 am

    Gravatar

    I masturbated while reading this article. I long for the downfall of Microsoft’s little corrupt mafia. Fuck them and the aliens who work for them.

  8. Stephane Rodriguez said,

    July 21, 2008 at 8:15 am

    Gravatar

    “The weakening of the dollar (possession of oil in Euros partly ‘to blame’ here) led to quite a deficit.”

    The reality is that the Brent curve and the FOREX EUR/USD curve are moving in parallel since at least 2007 and in same strength. This is, for me, evidence of market manipulation (eg. Exxon/Total and others asking hedge funds to change currency rates proportionally as Brent goes up, and vice versa).

  9. Stephane Rodriguez said,

    July 21, 2008 at 8:18 am

    Gravatar

    “ow leads to people losing their homes. Does your media cover the tent cities crisis? ”

    No, not here in France since nobody buys a house with a variable rate. The subprime problem is entirely a US thing, and I think it’s because americans have grown arrogant over years, with a mindset : we’ll buy now at any rate, and worry later how to pay for it. I guess this is also a consequence of PR propaganda.

    But, while the subprime crisis, only touches the US, the commodity market crisis is a completely different animal.

  10. Bob Robertson said,

    July 21, 2008 at 9:19 am

    Gravatar

    To inject a little economics into the discussion, “sub-prime” has nothing to do with the rate of interest. It means making the loan to someone with a “less than optimal” credit record or otherwise likelyhood of paying off the loan.

    The US.Fed.gov has been pushing, through their mortgage insurance and direct money “corporations” Fannie-May and Freddy-Mac, the illusion that lenders could make these risky loans “safely”.

    Put the blame directly where it belongs: Political interference in the housing market.

    The result was a bubble, a “false boom”, where prices were inflated without the real assets to back them up. Just like the stock bubble 8 years ago.

    The only thing which will let this bubble burst quickly so that people can reallocate their money rationally would be to get the US.fed.gov out of the way entirely and let the house of cards fall where it may.

    But no, they will fiddle and interfere, throw huge quantities of ever more worthless fiat money at the “problem”, and we’ll have to suffer through this for years instead of months, coming out far poorer than we went in.

  11. Bob Robertson said,

    July 21, 2008 at 9:29 am

    Gravatar

    Here’s an article on the issue, in case anyone is interested.

    http://mises.org/story/3053

  12. Roy Schestowitz said,

    July 21, 2008 at 9:34 am

    Gravatar

    Thanks, I like Mises.

    Wherever the blame belongs, investments (VCs) in what falls under “open source’ (subjective) reached an all-time high and maintained this for two consecutive quarters, so there’s hope for change.

  13. Alex C. said,

    July 21, 2008 at 11:52 am

    Gravatar

    Microsoft is having trouble for several reasons.
    1. Vista wasn’t the success it was supposed to be.
    The OS offered little over XP but requires double the system resources, with a revamped interface that hasn’t been embraced by joe avg.
    2. Office 2007 wasn’t the success it was supposed to be.
    The office suite offered little over office 2003, the new interface turned off many ‘power’ users.
    3. Economy issues are forcing businesses to hold on to older computers,.
    MS WIndows is pre-installed on almost every new computer. Office is included as a two month demo. No new computers, no new license revenue.
    4. Gates leaving M
    Love him or hate him, Bill Gates is a major force. Ballmer is an unknown for many and an aggressive jerk to others. This makes MS seem less stable because of Gates departure.

    5. Competition from Apple and Free Software
    Free software is becoming more mainstream. Many businesses are seeing the advantages of OSS. Especially on the server side (file/mail/print). Apple has a powerful marketing machine and offers more “ooh-ahh that’s shiny” then Microsoft.

    This is why I see MS as having trouble.

    Cheers,

    Alex C.

  14. Nick said,

    July 22, 2008 at 2:10 pm

    Gravatar

    Quote from above: “I hope Microsoft’s outlooks improve, it’s one of the few competitive American businesses left. ”

    Microsoft is only surpassed by GW Bush as far as making the USA look bad on the world stage.

    I won’t miss Microsoft when it is gone.

  15. Rufus Polson said,

    July 23, 2008 at 11:44 am

    Gravatar

    Mr. Robertson is right in a sense, but in political terms utterly misleading. To read his post, it seems as if the poor private sector businesses are taking a fall because of those awful government people interfering where they’re not wanted. The reality is the reverse–all the government interventions that helped create the current financial crisis, along with, on the flip side, all of the failures of government regulation that equally helped create it, were assiduously lobbied for, indeed bought and paid for, by private sector financial interests.
    The problem is not interference with business by government. The problem is interference in government by business. American businesspeople decided decades ago now that they could make more money by financial manipulation than by productive endeavours, and have spent the intervening time getting government to let them take more risks and use taxpayers’ money to guarantee that they won’t have to actually deal with the downside of those risks. It’s an old game: Privatize profit, socialize cost/risk. But the impetus comes from the private sector, not the government; the power and influence that need reining in is private, not public.

  16. Shocky said,

    July 24, 2008 at 12:16 pm

    Gravatar

    You made my day with this article. I’m happy to see them reaping what they’ve sowed. I don’t expect to ever see M$ disappear. I just want to see them humbled like IBM of old, forced to actually start innovating and stop bullying/bribing/stealing/libeling/etc.

    And hopefully Intel will be next in line, for their crimes against AMD. Despite their making some contributions to FOSS and being less evil than M$, it would be better for everyone to have the chip industry returned to a fair and competitive market.

What Else is New


  1. Links 16/9/2019: Qt Quick on Vulkan, Metal, and Direct3D; BlackWeb 1.2 Reviewed

    Links for the day



  2. Richard Stallman's Controversial Views Are Nothing New and They Distract From Bill Gates' Vastly Worse Role

    It's easier to attack Richard Stallman (RMS) using politics (than using his views on software) and media focus on Stallman's personal views on sexuality bears some resemblance to the push against Linus Torvalds, which leans largely on the false perception that he is sexist, rude and intolerant



  3. Links 16/9/2019: Linux 5.3, EasyOS Releases, Media Backlash Against RMS

    Links for the day



  4. Openwashing Report on Open Networking Foundation (ONF): When Open Source Means Collaboration Among Giant Spying Companies

    Massive telecommunications oligopolies (telecoms) are being described as ethical and responsible by means of openwashing; they even have their own front groups for that obscene mischaracterisation and ONF is one of those



  5. 'Open Source' You Cannot Run Without Renting or 'Licensing' Windows From Microsoft

    When so-called ‘open source’ programs strictly require Vista 10 (or similar) to run, how open are they really and does that not redefine the nature of Open Source while betraying everything Free/libre software stands for?



  6. All About Control: Microsoft is Not Open Source But an Open Source Censor/Spy and GitHub/LinkedIn/Skype Are Its Proprietary Censorship/Surveillance Tools

    All the big companies which Microsoft bought in recent years are proprietary software and all of the company’s big products remain proprietary software; all that “Open Source” is to Microsoft is “something to control and censor“



  7. The Sad State of GNU/Linux News Sites

    The ‘media coup’ of corporate giants (that claim to be 'friends') means that history of GNU/Linux is being distorted and lied about; it also explains prevalent lies such as "Microsoft loves Linux" and denial of GNU/Free software



  8. EPO President Along With Bristows, Managing IP and Other Team UPC Boosters Are Lobbying for Software Patents in Clear and Direct Violation of the EPC

    A calm interpretation of the latest wave of lobbying from litigation professionals, i.e. people who profit when there are lots of patent disputes and even expensive lawsuits which may be totally frivolous (for example, based upon fake patents that aren't EPC-compliant)



  9. Links 15/9/2019: Radeon ROCm 2.7.2, KDE Frameworks 5.62.0, PineTime and Bison 3.4.2

    Links for the day



  10. Illegal/Invalid Patents (IPs) Have Become the 'Norm' in Europe

    Normalisation of invalid patents (granted by the EPO in defiance of the EPC) is a serious problem, but patent law firms continue to exploit that while this whole 'patent bubble' lasts (apparently the number of applications will continue to decrease because the perceived value of European Patents diminishes)



  11. Patent Maximalists, Orbiting the European Patent Office, Work to 'Globalise' a System of Monopolies on Everything

    Monopolies on just about everything are being granted in defiance of the EPC and there are those looking to make this violation ‘unitary’, even worldwide if not just EU-wide



  12. Unitary Patent (UPC) Promotion by Team Battistelli 'Metastasising' in Private Law Firms

    The EPO's Albert Keyack (Team Battistelli) is now in Team UPC as Vice President of Kilburn & Strode LLP; he already fills the media with lies about the UPC, as one can expect



  13. Microsoft Targets GNU/Linux Advocates With Phony Charm Offensives and Fake 'Love'

    The ways Microsoft depresses GNU/Linux advocacy and discourages enthusiasm for Software Freedom is not hard to see; it's worth considering and understanding some of these tactics (mostly assimilation-centric and love-themed), which can otherwise go unnoticed



  14. Proprietary Software Giants Tell Open Source 'Communities' That Proprietary Software Giants Are 'Friends'

    The openwashing services of the so-called 'Linux' Foundation are working; companies that are inherently against Open Source are being called "Open" and some people are willing to swallow this bait (so-called 'compromise' which is actually surrender to proprietary software regimes)



  15. Microsoft Pays the Linux Foundation for Academy Software Foundation, Which the Linux Foundation is Outsourcing to Microsoft

    Microsoft has just bought some more seats and more control over Free/Open Source software; all it had to do was shell out some 'slush funds'



  16. Links 14/9/2019: SUSE CaaS Platform, Huawei Laptops With GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  17. Links 13/9/2019: Catfish 1.4.10, GNOME Firmware 3.34.0 Release

    Links for the day



  18. Links 12/9/2019: GNU/Linux at Huawei, GNOME 3.34 Released

    Links for the day



  19. Links 12/9/2019: Manjaro 18.1 and KaOS 2019.09 Releases

    Links for the day



  20. EPO: Give Us Low-Quality Patent Applications, Patent Trolls Have Use for Those

    What good is the EPC when the EPO feels free to ignore it and nobody holds the EPO accountable for it? At the moment we're living in a post-EPC Europe where the only thing that counts is co-called 'products' (i.e. quantity, not quality).



  21. Coverage for Sponsors: What the Linux Foundation Does is Indistinguishable From Marketing Agencies' Functions

    The marketing agency that controls the name "Linux" is hardly showing any interest in technology or in journalism; it's just buying media coverage for sponsors and this is what it boils down to for the most part (at great expense)



  22. Watch Out, Linus Torvalds: Microsoft Bought Tons of Git Repositories and Now It Goes After Linux

    Microsoft reminds us how E.E.E. tactics work; Microsoft is just hijacking its competition and misleading the market (claiming the competition to be its own, having "extended" it Microsoft's way with proprietary code)



  23. Links 11/9/2019: Acer in LVFS, RawTherapee 5.7 and Qt 5.12.5 Released

    Links for the day



  24. Linux Foundation Inc. Buys Press About Itself and Media Coverage for Sponsors

    Sponsoring so-called ‘news’ sites is bad enough; it is even worse when such media then covers you and your sponsors, such as Snyk (a Linux Foundation sponsor/member, fancier word for client)



  25. Links 11/9/2019: Django 3.0 Alpha, Sunsetting Python 2

    Links for the day



  26. Web Site Called Linux.com Still Exists Only or Mostly to Promote Anti-Linux Firms and Openwashing

    As the Linux Foundation transitions into the Public Relations (PR) industry/domain we should accept if not expect Linux.com to become an extension of PR business models; the old Linux.com is long gone (all staff fired)



  27. Links 10/9/2019: Krita 4.2.6, Ubuntu 19.10 to Boot Faster

    Links for the day



  28. What the Linux Foundation's Jim Zemlin Really Thinks of Desktop/Laptop GNU/Linux

    Interesting words from Ken Starks resonate well with what we nowadays see in the so-called 'Linux' Foundation, whose dedication to Linux is like that of a circus to a monkeys' sideshow



  29. Links 10/9/2019: Kate Planning and GnuCash 3.7

    Links for the day



  30. The Sad Truth That Linux Foundation Staff is Against GPL/Copyleft and Sometimes Against Linux (Unless It's Run Under Vista 10)

    The Linux Foundation works for whoever pays the Linux Foundation and sadly that usually means companies that aren’t dedicated to Linux, to Software Freedom or even to simple truths and to the Rule of Law


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts