EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

08.10.08

Stand Up Against Silverlight, Microsoft’s Anti-competitive Weapon

Posted in Antitrust, Europe, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Mono, Novell, Windows at 5:15 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Microsoft’s abuse (exploitation) of the Olympics is something that was covered here before [1, 2, 3, 4]. It’s a timely subject now that GNU/Linux users actively complain. The same old arguments and explanations need not be repeated, but here are some bits of interest for those who wish pursue or address this fiasco, which could be just the beginning of more. Even the Microsoft-obedient New York Times covered this problem:

Olympics Online, With a Hook

[...]

But for many industry executives who compete with Microsoft, the world’s largest software company, the Silverlight strategy recalls a federal antitrust case in which Microsoft was found guilty of using its market muscle to stifle competition from the Web.

Well, Microsoft’s CEO considers GNU/Linux to be the #1 competitor, which he has already excluded from the European championship. As Groklaw has made very clear, Moonlight is out of the question and it’s proof that Mono is “The Road To Hell”. Sadly enough, people like de Icaza and companies like Novell stand in the way of regulators. They help Microsoft.

“If a broadcaster that affects you uses Silverlight, you should protest.”Formal complaints by industry giants have already been filed to tackle this and more such complaints continue to come.

Silverlight is about The Microsoft Web and antitrust lawsuits are in progress. Don’t forget what Gates did to Netscape, very much deliberately and against the law. Video evidence is still up there for people to view and the clips are fortunately available as Ogg Theora, not Silverlight.

If a broadcaster that affects you uses Silverlight, you should protest. The authorities are rarely responsive, however, with a few exceptions. The likes of Rob Enderle poison their minds, so resistance is seen as extreme to those unaware of the long history of systematic abuse. Diplomats are an easy target.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

15 Comments

  1. DS said,

    August 10, 2008 at 12:28 pm

    Gravatar

    I think the linux community needs to create something tangible that consumers can use. Instead of complaining if the community can do better to promote applications developed by them or in this case work together on making moonlight happen, it seems better use of energy.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    August 10, 2008 at 12:32 pm

    Gravatar

    Moonlight is a patent trap, RIA is not needed for video and shall an RIA be needed, JavaFX is GPL-ed.

  3. Victor Soliz said,

    August 10, 2008 at 4:06 pm

    Gravatar

    We already got something better, thanks.

    Oh, and moonlight does not even work for the olympics, you’d see a lot of publicity about how MS’ little trick to make the olympics require silverlight is fine because of moonlight, but moonlight can’t play the olympics, though it will be a fine way to catch corrupt reporters, I guess.

  4. larry said,

    August 10, 2008 at 4:45 pm

    Gravatar

    Do you freetard really have to bitch this loud? Heck, write your own LinuxLight, LinuxLash, LinuxFx or Linux-friggin-whatever so that you can provide a compelling alternative to SilverLight and might actually get used. M$ is not preventing you from doing that FFS. If you cannot, then drop the bitching please. This world could use less crying babies.

  5. Ziggyfish said,

    August 10, 2008 at 8:50 pm

    Gravatar

    larry, look up software patients, then look at what patients are claimed in SilverLight and that will answer your question.

  6. macamba said,

    August 11, 2008 at 7:56 am

    Gravatar

    Bloody Whiners.

  7. Victor Soliz said,

    August 11, 2008 at 8:29 am

    Gravatar

    larry, macamba, it seems you are the ones bitching. We already have a lot free alternatives to this nonsense, here’s a little secret: The web is better without these things, as in much better, accessibility comes to mind, portability comes to mind. Etc, etc, etc.

  8. Roy Schestowitz said,

    August 11, 2008 at 8:34 am

    Gravatar

    Yeah, just like we were ‘whining’ about the BBC denying taxpayers who use GNU/Linux from watching shows they’ve already paid for.

    BBC is the just like NBC. Just prepend the “MS” to it (MSNBC).

    Is it the BBC that pissed off Linux users in the UK, only to later propose some second-class alternative (as if GNU/Linux is for second-class citizens)?

    The same BBC whose technical chief left and is now facing anti-trust claims?

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/08/kangaroo_extension/

    The BBC that cannot even keep its data safe?

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4481621.ece

    The same BBC whose technical (media) department, the one that tell you about GNU/Linux, is headed by a Microsoft executive?

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/jul/15/bbc.digitalmedia?gusrc=rss&feed=media

    The same BBC that passed lots of money to Microsoft for nothing?

    http://www.defectivebydesign.org/blog/iPlayerProtestReport

    The same BBC that lied about DRM, got grilled by the parliament and could not justify the huge expenses and snubbing taxpayers who upgraded to GNU/Linux, Microsoft’s #1 rival (according to Microsoft’s CEO))?

    http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2008/01/10/bbc-director-general-grilled-by-mps-on-iplayer/

    The same BBC that overspent £36m?

    http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/technology/s/1051855_bbc_website_36m_overspend?rss=yes?rss=yes

    The same BBC that became Microsoft’s advertising department (at taxpayers’ expense)?

    http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2008/05/bbc-has-drunk-its-brain.html

    The same BBC that lets Bill Gates publish his own promotional dross as though he’s a journalist, at taxpayers’ expense?

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/14/bill_gates_bbc_secrets/

    The same BBC that rewrites history about Microsoft, glorifies an already-convicted Gates, and markets spyware (Vista) at taxpayers’ expense?

    http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37411

    The same BBC that lies to GNU/Linux users to get them off its back?

    http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2008/04/has-bbc-duped-us-over-iplayer.html

    The same BBC that behaves no better than the Chinese government and does not cover major protests?

    http://www.defectivebydesign.org/iPlayerProtest

    The same BBC that actually invited Microsoft over for visits?

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2008/07/remoulding_microsoft_for_the_w.html

    Someone ought to look into NBC and the whole situation around Silverlight. The European Commission already does that.

  9. spartan2276 said,

    August 12, 2008 at 6:52 am

    Gravatar

    Wow, this is fucking hopeless, it does not matter what we do in the end we get shafted left and right. Mark my words they will hi-jack the web, they’ve already started working on destroying apache/php from the inside out.

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    August 12, 2008 at 7:04 am

    Gravatar

    They are too frail (especially on the Web) to achieve this goal. That’s why they need Yahoo and some other things.

    You’re being pessimistic. Awareness is probably key.

  11. spartan2276 said,

    August 12, 2008 at 7:39 am

    Gravatar

    Dude I hope you are right because, I will hate to have to go back to using windows on my PC. I rather not use at all. Also they are trying to use XAML for the web which uses the WPF/E framework and this is how they want to take down HTML. So even though they don’t have Yahoo they do have a backup plan and if entities such as NBC keep doing their bidding then how do we stand a chance?

  12. alex said,

    August 12, 2008 at 8:00 am

    Gravatar

    It’s not whining to highlight abuse and unfairness. But the person (DS) is right that applications are the only way to win. Trouble is every proprietary player sees the Microsoft strategy of locking people into their control as the best commercial strategy to making lots of money which is at odds with the simpler aims of Free Software authors (as opposed to the Linux community who are specifically OS kernel producers) which are to produce good software that has a use.

  13. Roy Schestowitz said,

    August 12, 2008 at 8:26 am

    Gravatar

    spartan2276,

    There is more than one investigation into this in Europe. The States also expressed concerns (specially about XAML) and brought scrutiny when the oversight of Microsoft expired. Now, hopefully Apache will be smart and Microsoft less potent over time. That whole “Midori” and “7″ vapourware seems like too little, too late. Don’t let this demoralise you and by all means say “no” to Silverlight.

  14. cortada-flash-js said,

    September 12, 2008 at 10:32 pm

    Gravatar

    ok larry the paytard, what you must understand is that there are better alternatives already.

  15. Iceman said,

    December 23, 2008 at 11:17 am

    Gravatar

    There are paid bloggers out there to discredit all sorts of things. Do you think that Microsoft can afford to pay people such as “Larry” and “Macamba” to write a few nasty words to discredit this article? Pay the naysayers no heed, for it is quite possible that they are being paid to take the wind out of our sails. Just more phony PR designed to keep the masses stupid. Keep up the great work and thanks for sharing all this information.

What Else is New


  1. Links 20/11/2017: Why GNU/Linux is Better Than Windows, Another Linus Torvalds Rant

    Links for the day



  2. “US Inventor” is a “Bucket of Deplorables” Not Worthy of Media Coverage

    Jan Wolfe of Reuters treats a fringe group called “US Inventor” as though it's a conservative voice rather than a bunch of patent extremists pretending to be inventors



  3. Team Battistelli's Attacks on the EPO Boards of Appeal Predate the Illegal Sanctions Against a Judge

    A walk back along memory lane reveals that Battistelli has, all along, suppressed and marginalised DG3 members, in order to cement total control over the entire Organisation, not just the Office



  4. PTAB is Safe, the Patent Extremists Just Try to Scandalise It Out of Sheer Desperation

    The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), which gave powers to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) through inter partes reviews (IPRs), has no imminent threats, not potent ones anyway



  5. Update on the EPO's Crackdown on the Boards of Appeal

    Demand of 35% increases from the boards serves to show that Battistelli now does to the 'independent' judges what he already did to examiners at the Office



  6. The Lobbyists Are Trying to Subvert US Law in Favour of Patent Predators

    Mingorance, Kappos, Underweiser and other lobbyists for the software patents agenda (paid by firms like Microsoft and IBM) keep trying to undo progress, notably the bans on software patents



  7. Patent Trolls Based in East Texas Are Affected Very Critically by TC Heartland

    The latest situation in Texas (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in particular), which according to new analyses is the target of legal scrutiny for the 'loopholes' it provided to patent trolls in search of easy legal battles



  8. Alice Remains a Strong Precedential Decision and the Media Has Turned Against Software Patents

    The momentum against the scourge of software patents and the desperation among patent 'professionals' (people who don't create/develop/invent) is growing



  9. Harm Still Caused by Granted Software Patents

    A roundup of recent (past week's) announcements, including legal actions, contingent upon software patents in an age when software patents bear no real legitimacy



  10. Links 18/11/2017: Raspberry Digital Signage 10, New Nano

    Links for the day



  11. 23,000 Posts

    23,000 blog posts milestone reached in 11 years



  12. BlackBerry Cannot Sell Phones and Apple Looks Like the Next BlackBerry (a Pile of Patents)

    The lifecycle of mobile giants seems to typically end in patent shakedown, as Apple loses its business to Android just like Nokia and BlackBerry lost it to Apple



  13. EFF and CCIA Use Docket Navigator and Lex Machina to Identify 'Stupid Patents' (Usually Software Patents That Are Not Valid)

    In spite of threats and lawsuits from bogus 'inventors' whom they criticise, EFF staff continues the battle against patents that should never have been granted at all



  14. The Australian Productivity Commission Shows the Correct Approach to Setting Patent Laws and Scope

    Australia views patents on software as undesirable and acts accordingly, making nobody angry except a bunch of law firms that profited from litigation and patent maximalism



  15. EPO 'Business' From the United States Has Nosedived and UPC is on Its Death Throes

    Benoît Battistelli and Elodie Bergot further accelerate the ultimate demise of the EPO (getting rid of experienced and thus 'expensive' staff), for which there is no replacement because there is a monopoly (which means Europe will suffer severely)



  16. Links 17/11/2017: KDE Applications 17.12, Akademy 2018 Plans

    Links for the day



  17. Today's EPO and Team UPC Do Not Work for Europe But Actively Work Against Europe

    The tough reality that some Europeans actively work to undermine science and technology in Europe because they personally profit from it and how this relates to the Unitary Patent (UPC), which is still aggressively lobbied for, sometimes by bribing/manipulating the media, academia, and public servants



  18. Links 16/11/2017: WordPress 4.9 and GhostBSD 11.1 Released

    Links for the day



  19. The Staff Union of the EPO (SUEPO) is Rightly Upset If Not Shocked at What Battistelli and Bergot Are Doing to the Office

    The EPO's dictatorial management is destroying everything that's left (of value) at the Office while corrupting academia and censoring discussion by threatening those who publish comments (gagging its own staff even when that staff posts anonymously)



  20. EPO Continues to Disobey the Law on Software Patents in Europe

    Using the same old euphemisms, e.g. "computer-implemented inventions" (or "CII"), the EPO continues to grant patents which are clearly and strictly out of scope



  21. Links 16/11/2017: Tails 3.3, Deepin 15.5 Beta

    Links for the day



  22. Benoît Battistelli and Elodie Bergot Have Just Ensured That EPO Will Get Even More Corrupt

    Revolving door-type tactics will become more widespread at the EPO now that the management (Battistelli and his cronies) hires for low cost rather than skills/quality and minimises staff retention; this is yet another reason to dread anything like the UPC, which prioritises litigation over examination



  23. Australia is Banning Software Patents and Shelston IP is Complaining as Usual

    The Australian Productivity Commission, which defies copyright and patent bullies, is finally having policies put in place that better serve the interests of Australians, but the legal 'industry' is unhappy (as expected)



  24. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Defended by Technology Giants, by Small Companies, by US Congress and by Judges, So Why Does USPTO Make It Less Accessible?

    In spite of the popularity of PTAB and the growing need/demand for it, the US patent system is apparently determined to help it discriminate against poor petitioners (who probably need PTAB the most)



  25. Declines in Patent Quality at the EPO and 'Independent' Judges Can No Longer Say a Thing

    The EPO's troubling race to the bottom (of patent quality) concerns the staff examiners and the judges, but they cannot speak about it without facing rather severe consequences



  26. The EPO is Now Corrupting Academia, Wasting Stakeholders' Money Lying to Stakeholders About the Unitary Patent (UPC)

    The Unified Patent Court/Unitary Patent (UPC) is a dying project and the EPO, seeing that it is going nowhere fast, has resorted to new tactics and these tactics cost a lot of money (at the expense of those who are being lied to)



  27. Links 15/11/2017: Fedora 27 Released, Linux Mint Has New Betas

    Links for the day



  28. Patents Roundup: Packet Intelligence, B.E. Technology, Violin, and Square

    The latest stories and warnings about software patents in the United States



  29. Decline of Skills Level of Staff Like Examiners and Impartiality (Independence) of Judges at the EPO Should Cause Concern, Alarm

    Access to justice is severely compromised at the EPO as staff is led to rely on deficient tools for determining novelty while judges are kept out of the way or ill-chosen for an agenda other than justice



  30. Links 14/11/2017: GNU/Linux at Samsung, Firefox 57 Quantum

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts