EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

01.09.09

Why Apple Supports OOXML

Posted in Apple, ISO, Microsoft, Open XML, OpenDocument at 5:59 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

IN response to this previous post about ODF support in AbiWord, one reader wrote: “iWork 09 have no support yet! shame on Apple!”

Although I’ve responded to this personally, I also sought points of interest in an old Microsoft-Apple engagement, which is similar to that of Microsoft-Corel and Microsoft-Novell, both being cases of companies that sold out to Microsoft and supported OOXML [1, 2].

“Steve Jobs essentially promotes duopoly with Microsoft on the desktop.”We’re deep-linking to a YouTube video here. Watch Steve Jobs saying (back in 1997) that “Apple plus Microsoft equals 100% of the desktop computer market. And so, whatever Apple and Microsoft agree to do, it’s a standard.”

The head of the Open Source Initiative sort of accused Novell of helping Microsoft create "Monopoly 2.0" (or duopoly), so the video above tickles a nerve. Steve Jobs essentially promotes duopoly with Microsoft on the desktop. He also ignores the existence of GNU/Linux (Apple always ignores it, to this date) and other operating systems from that time.

There was a similar incident where browser duopoly got promote by Jobs, who pretended that only Safari and Internet Explorer would exist. Apple also pushed Safari installations, slipping them by the back door (iTunes), just like malware writers typically do. In both cases, Mozilla complained publicly.

Apple’s treatment of OOXML is a subject that we covered before [1, 2] and there was a note about ODF as well. Microsoft actually cited Apple (repeatedly even) as “supporter of OOXML.”

Bob Sutor has meanwhile put ISO in the trashcan for being coprruptible. He totally ignores its existence. ODF, which is maintained by OASIS, will soon have this “ODF Congres” meeting in Utrecht (The Netherlands). ODF is where the world is going.

ISO Sold Out to ECMA

“ISO is dead for software standards. Do you need an official funeral?”

Benjamin Henrion, FFII

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

13 Comments

  1. Oh nevermind said,

    January 9, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    Gravatar

    TextEdit, the default (and free) text editor on Mac OS X can open and save ODT files…and has been able to do that since 10.4. Good thing you guys do research!

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 9, 2009 at 5:50 pm

    Gravatar

    You obviously didn’t follow the references in this post (5th from the end, anchor: “note about ODF as well”). I was referring specifically to TextEdit.

  3. mok said,

    January 10, 2009 at 7:11 pm

    Gravatar

    Hate to say it, but (in reference to your comment about not following links), a link (like a citation) should make sense in its context, and there was no reason to believe that your link made any sense there as being a comment on TextEdit and ODF. That’s the kind of statement that undermines your premise in the article. Based on the TE/ODF link, it seems that your beef is with Pages, not with Apple. Yo, that undermines your whole article. In other words, based on academic standards (I’m a prof…), you used a lousy embedded citation to hide what you meant to say. And that makes you an untrustworthy source. Sorry to call it that way, but that’s how you come across.

    Now, to rephrase the argument, you’re mad that Apple supports OOXML without coming out as publicly for ODF. Okay, I can understand that. But, why can’t they support both? When Apple has cared to support more than one standard, they have done so. When they have cared to not commit, they have done so. And when they have leapt ahead, they have done so. This ODF/OOXML thing comes down to them not committing yet, nothing more. Again, that’s not what you said, and that, again, makes you a non-trustworthy source in this discussion.

    If you’d care to rephrase what you wrote above to acknowledge that Apple and ODF are in good standing (as your link to yourself indicates), then I’m sure we’d all appreciate it. Thanks.

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 10, 2009 at 7:18 pm

    Gravatar

    Apple added ODF at a very late stage. It was helping Microsoft push OOXML forward. I was there. I watched it on a daily basis. I know what I saw at the time.

    Apple’s ODF support is still rudimentary (i.e. lacking) and there is hardly any public endorsement of it. In fact, people had to almost squeeze out this news from Apple (re: ODF in Leopard).

  5. Nick said,

    January 11, 2009 at 9:11 am

    Gravatar

    So much malice from one person. I’m sorry for the author of this piece because life must be painful for him having to live with his own anger, ill will, and hatred. These are what the Buddhists call “destructive emotions” – and I guess they have a point: the author can’t harm Steve Jobs, but he can give himself dyspepsia.

    So Apple’s technical representatives didn’t vote against Microsoft’s new (fake) “open” format. It’s a shame, but I’m hardly surprised. Apple had to do a deal with MS to get MS Office on the Mac, because without Office they’d have been sunk. (Of course, that was (and is) a very profitable deal for MS, so they didn’t mind throwing Apple a lifeline. It certainly wasn’t because Microsoft executives are, as Mr Paul Thurrott has asserted when referring to this agreement, “compassionate”.)

    Of course, having made the agreement, Apple has circumscribed its freedom of manoeuvre. It can’t very well take Office with one hand and campaign against it with the other. (And these XML formats will be at the heart of Office going forward.) Anyone with two brain cells to rub together could see that. Apple likes to tweak Microsoft’s tail – their amusing adverts, and the underlying tension in the Gates/Jobs interview by Mossberg are a reminder of that – but one supposes Apple can only go so far.

    Would ODF support be nice in Pages/Numbers? Sure, I’d love to see it – although I should imagine putting it there would be a lot of work and Apple would certainly have other, more pressing, uses for developer time. If the format takes off, as with any luck it should, users will be looking to open and edit these documents (and with something more sophisticated than TextEdit), so they’ll have to add support.

    Never mind, in the meantime, there’s oo.org (and now IBM’s Symphony). I know – not nice, lightweight Objective-C programs – not even individual programs at all – but one great humungous mess, horrible C++ bloatware. And there’s a fascinating story (also involving MS, Sun, and a few machinations) for those few readers of this page who might prefer history to ranting and raving, too:

    http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/category/java/

    But, as I say, for Mac users who need/want to read/write ODF documents there is, at present, oo.org. It’s not a nice program, but needs must … So, if you were worrying about us, Don’t. We’re OK, calm down. :-)

    Technically, the Apple reps should’ve voted against – which would also make it the right thing to do morally. “Politically”, they weren’t not in a position to. End of story. Get over yourself already.

  6. Kittens said,

    February 3, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    Gravatar

    Nick: “So much malice from one person. I’m sorry for the author of this piece because life must be painful for him having to live with his own anger, ill will, and hatred.”
    I hate people like you that assume that just because someone feels strongly against something and speaks about it, that it consumes their entire life. people assume that I am absolutely obsessed with making game life a living hell because I write critical reviews about online games, but when it gets down to the grind, I love doing what I do. I love giving people something to read and I like seeing that people read it all the way through. whether or not you admit it, you just made someone happy by writing such a long reply.

    -Tangent

  7. Roy Schestowitz said,

    February 3, 2009 at 5:22 pm

    Gravatar

    I wrote what I felt was correct based on what I know.

  8. Kittens said,

    February 3, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    Gravatar

    I wasn’t talking to you, roy, I was commenting on nick’s assinine assumptions

  9. Roy Schestowitz said,

    February 3, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    Gravatar

    Yes, I know. My response was to him (belated though).

  10. Kittens said,

    February 3, 2009 at 10:04 pm

    Gravatar

    :)
    better late than never, good job Roy.
    I like a man who can speak out his own word. word man…word…

  11. Roy Schestowitz said,

    February 3, 2009 at 10:49 pm

    Gravatar

    This page was cited by a big Mac site, so the comments were written with faith/emotion (devotion to Apple), possibly with little attention to facts.

  12. Jose_X said,

    February 4, 2009 at 7:58 am

    Gravatar

    >> So Apple’s technical representatives didn’t vote against Microsoft’s new (fake) “open” format. It’s a shame, but I’m hardly surprised. Apple had to do a deal with MS to get MS Office on the Mac, because without Office they’d have been sunk.

    True or not, the “they’d have been sunk” is an assumption on your part. Those were old comments from Jobs that Roy linked. Though I don’t know the context, it appears Jobs was incorrect in his predictions; thus, even if Jobs thought at one point in time that he needed MSOffice on the Mac, as you appear to think he did, it might not be too surprising if he would have been wrong in that prediction as well.

    I’ll note that you did not address the point Roy made of Jobs comments over Apple and Microsoft determining what becomes a standard for the market. Roy suggests Apple has colluded with Microsoft.

    If you follow this site, you’ll see that Apple is not a fan of openness. Roy at least offers support for the case point he is making, rather than simply assume as you have without providing supporting evidence.

    What you present appears to have been so done with intent to get Apple off the hook, but, even if true, it would confirm Microsoft’s tremendous leverage, which has other implications for both Microsoft and Apple, given their close working relationship.

  13. Jose_X said,

    February 4, 2009 at 8:41 am

    Gravatar

    >> Hate to say it, but (in reference to your comment about not following links), a link (like a citation) should make sense in its context, and there was no reason to believe that your link made any sense there as being a comment on TextEdit and ODF.

    There is no reason for that to have been specified. In the current article, only “iWork09″ is mentioned. The commenter mentioning Text Edit apparently assumed Roy said something he had not. Even without any other links, Roy simply did not say or imply any other program besides iWork09 today would be lacking ODF support (and I’m not sure even the iWork09 lack of support was implied by Roy). In particular, one of the links in this piece certainly suggested that Roy was aware that such support might exist somewhere today.

    FWIW, I have not followed all the links either, but then I’m not criticizing Roy.

    >> That’s the kind of statement that undermines your premise in the article.

    Since you appear to have been incorrect in your judgment, does this mean your entire comment is undermined? How much of it is undermined? Surely, at least Roy is off the hook, right?

    BTW, what premise are you talking about.. that Apple supports OOXML or that Apple colluded with Microsoft (or “sold out” to them) or something else?

    >> Based on the TE/ODF link, it seems that your beef is with Pages, not with Apple. Yo, that undermines your whole article. In other words, based on academic standards (I’m a prof…)

    Can’t tell which link you are talking about, but I think this article is fine.

    Apple has supported OOXML and, if we are to judge Jobs by his comments, has done so perhaps with intent to help stifle competition.

    I see nothing in your comment, “prof”, to contradict this. In fact, I see nothing in your comment that would support the notion that Roy’s piece is flawed in any material way.

    >> you used a lousy embedded citation to hide what you meant to say. And that makes you an untrustworthy source. Sorry to call it that way, but that’s how you come across.

    You have ignored what he did say. You have also assumed he was trying to say something else, yet you did not even quote him.

    Given you’ve shown nothing yourself, I don’t see that “lousy embedded citation” point.

    What was that about someone being untrustworthy? [I mean, if we go by the "academic standards" you mentioned.]

    >> But, why can’t they support both? When Apple has cared to support more than one standard, they have done so. When they have cared to not commit, they have done so. And when they have leapt ahead, they have done so. This ODF/OOXML thing comes down to them not committing yet, nothing more.

    This doesn’t contradict anything Roy said. It’s true I have not followed all the links, but you have provided no evidence to at least point me in the right direction.

    In fact, what you are saying is perfectly consistent with the view that Apple and Microsoft have colluded to stifle competition whenever it suited their interests.

    And what you have alleged about Roy appears to be incorrect or at least presumptuous.

    What was that about being untrustworthy?

    >> Again, that’s not what you said, and that, again, makes you a non-trustworthy source in this discussion.

    I’m thinking that maybe you and I read different postings.

    >> If you’d care to rephrase what you wrote above to acknowledge that Apple and ODF are in good standing (as your link to yourself indicates), then I’m sure we’d all appreciate it. Thanks.

    Not sure ODF and Apple are in “good standing”. You haven’t shown this.

    I also don’t see what that has to do with what Roy did say or, if the “good standing” bit were true, how this would contradict Roy’s piece.

    *****

    There are many people that come here and bad-mouth boycottnovell or Roy without shame. The problem is that while they sometimes have points, many times they don’t nearly have as strong a point as they seem to suggest, and when that is the case (or when they are outright incorrect), they will usually fail to quote very much if anything at all.

    It’s easy to bad-mouth an essay or a person, but where is your evidence or case?

    Please quote or else readers might think you are just talking garbage.

    See the “niece” comment here http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/11/ms-maintaining-gap-vs-linux/#comment-58349

    PS: What does “prof” mean? ..professor? ..professional astroturfer? What exactly?

What Else is New


  1. The Sad State of GNU/Linux News Sites

    The ‘media coup’ of corporate giants (that claim to be 'friends') means that history of GNU/Linux is being distorted and lied about; it also explains prevalent lies such as "Microsoft loves Linux" and denial of GNU/Free software



  2. EPO President Along With Bristows, Managing IP and Other Team UPC Boosters Are Lobbying for Software Patents in Clear and Direct Violation of the EPC

    A calm interpretation of the latest wave of lobbying from litigation professionals, i.e. people who profit when there are lots of patent disputes and even expensive lawsuits which may be totally frivolous (for example, based upon fake patents that aren't EPC-compliant)



  3. Links 15/9/2019: Radeon ROCm 2.7.2, KDE Frameworks 5.62.0, PineTime and Bison 3.4.2

    Links for the day



  4. Illegal/Invalid Patents (IPs) Have Become the 'Norm' in Europe

    Normalisation of invalid patents (granted by the EPO in defiance of the EPC) is a serious problem, but patent law firms continue to exploit that while this whole 'patent bubble' lasts (apparently the number of applications will continue to decrease because the perceived value of European Patents diminishes)



  5. Patent Maximalists, Orbiting the European Patent Office, Work to 'Globalise' a System of Monopolies on Everything

    Monopolies on just about everything are being granted in defiance of the EPC and there are those looking to make this violation ‘unitary’, even worldwide if not just EU-wide



  6. Unitary Patent (UPC) Promotion by Team Battistelli 'Metastasising' in Private Law Firms

    The EPO's Albert Keyack (Team Battistelli) is now in Team UPC as Vice President of Kilburn & Strode LLP; he already fills the media with lies about the UPC, as one can expect



  7. Microsoft Targets GNU/Linux Advocates With Phony Charm Offensives and Fake 'Love'

    The ways Microsoft depresses GNU/Linux advocacy and discourages enthusiasm for Software Freedom is not hard to see; it's worth considering and understanding some of these tactics (mostly assimilation-centric and love-themed), which can otherwise go unnoticed



  8. Proprietary Software Giants Tell Open Source 'Communities' That Proprietary Software Giants Are 'Friends'

    The openwashing services of the so-called 'Linux' Foundation are working; companies that are inherently against Open Source are being called "Open" and some people are willing to swallow this bait (so-called 'compromise' which is actually surrender to proprietary software regimes)



  9. Microsoft Pays the Linux Foundation for Academy Software Foundation, Which the Linux Foundation is Outsourcing to Microsoft

    Microsoft has just bought some more seats and more control over Free/Open Source software; all it had to do was shell out some 'slush funds'



  10. Links 14/9/2019: SUSE CaaS Platform, Huawei Laptops With GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  11. Links 13/9/2019: Catfish 1.4.10, GNOME Firmware 3.34.0 Release

    Links for the day



  12. Links 12/9/2019: GNU/Linux at Huawei, GNOME 3.34 Released

    Links for the day



  13. Links 12/9/2019: Manjaro 18.1 and KaOS 2019.09 Releases

    Links for the day



  14. EPO: Give Us Low-Quality Patent Applications, Patent Trolls Have Use for Those

    What good is the EPC when the EPO feels free to ignore it and nobody holds the EPO accountable for it? At the moment we're living in a post-EPC Europe where the only thing that counts is co-called 'products' (i.e. quantity, not quality).



  15. Coverage for Sponsors: What the Linux Foundation Does is Indistinguishable From Marketing Agencies' Functions

    The marketing agency that controls the name "Linux" is hardly showing any interest in technology or in journalism; it's just buying media coverage for sponsors and this is what it boils down to for the most part (at great expense)



  16. Watch Out, Linus Torvalds: Microsoft Bought Tons of Git Repositories and Now It Goes After Linux

    Microsoft reminds us how E.E.E. tactics work; Microsoft is just hijacking its competition and misleading the market (claiming the competition to be its own, having "extended" it Microsoft's way with proprietary code)



  17. Links 11/9/2019: Acer in LVFS, RawTherapee 5.7 and Qt 5.12.5 Released

    Links for the day



  18. Linux Foundation Inc. Buys Press About Itself and Media Coverage for Sponsors

    Sponsoring so-called ‘news’ sites is bad enough; it is even worse when such media then covers you and your sponsors, such as Snyk (a Linux Foundation sponsor/member, fancier word for client)



  19. Links 11/9/2019: Django 3.0 Alpha, Sunsetting Python 2

    Links for the day



  20. Web Site Called Linux.com Still Exists Only or Mostly to Promote Anti-Linux Firms and Openwashing

    As the Linux Foundation transitions into the Public Relations (PR) industry/domain we should accept if not expect Linux.com to become an extension of PR business models; the old Linux.com is long gone (all staff fired)



  21. Links 10/9/2019: Krita 4.2.6, Ubuntu 19.10 to Boot Faster

    Links for the day



  22. What the Linux Foundation's Jim Zemlin Really Thinks of Desktop/Laptop GNU/Linux

    Interesting words from Ken Starks resonate well with what we nowadays see in the so-called 'Linux' Foundation, whose dedication to Linux is like that of a circus to a monkeys' sideshow



  23. Links 10/9/2019: Kate Planning and GnuCash 3.7

    Links for the day



  24. The Sad Truth That Linux Foundation Staff is Against GPL/Copyleft and Sometimes Against Linux (Unless It's Run Under Vista 10)

    The Linux Foundation works for whoever pays the Linux Foundation and sadly that usually means companies that aren’t dedicated to Linux, to Software Freedom or even to simple truths and to the Rule of Law



  25. Microsoft Uses the Word “Linux” to Promote Privacy-Infringing Proprietary Software and Spread FUD

    The discussion about “Linux” is being saturated if not replaced by misinformation and marketing of Linux’s competition — owing largely to googlebombing tactics that the Linux Foundation participates in rather than tackle



  26. Patent Charlatans and Frauds Are Doing a Disservice to Europe and to Europe's Patent System

    Tax evasion and UPC lies aren’t going to help the integrity of the patent system; au contraire — those are becoming an existential threat to the system being exploited by law firms (and accountants)



  27. The European Patent Convention (“EPC”) Does Not Allow Patenting of Life Itself

    Unless the underlying rules are respected and Europe's largest patent office actually follows the laws it's governed by, Europe's patent system won't promote innovation; the European Patent Office's decision on Alexion (patent application 3124029 rejected) is good news



  28. European Patent Office's Cooperation and Collaboration With Patent Trolls Instead of Science and Technology

    EPO staff ought to be alarmed by the Office choosing to work with litigation and shakedown 'societies' rather than actual scientists, who may or may not choose patents as part of their strategy



  29. Links 9/9/2019: KStars v3.3.6 and LXLE 18.04.3 Released

    Links for the day



  30. Casual Bribery by Bill Gates Helps Control the Media and Spread Microsoft Lies (Such as “Microsoft Loves Linux”)

    Microsoft's notion of "love" redefines the concept of a corporation and it's reducible to intentional lies that enable a silent, gradual takeover of the competition


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts