01.09.09

Why Apple Supports OOXML

Posted in Apple, ISO, Microsoft, Open XML, OpenDocument at 5:59 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

IN response to this previous post about ODF support in AbiWord, one reader wrote: “iWork 09 have no support yet! shame on Apple!”

Although I’ve responded to this personally, I also sought points of interest in an old Microsoft-Apple engagement, which is similar to that of Microsoft-Corel and Microsoft-Novell, both being cases of companies that sold out to Microsoft and supported OOXML [1, 2].

“Steve Jobs essentially promotes duopoly with Microsoft on the desktop.”We’re deep-linking to a YouTube video here. Watch Steve Jobs saying (back in 1997) that “Apple plus Microsoft equals 100% of the desktop computer market. And so, whatever Apple and Microsoft agree to do, it’s a standard.”

The head of the Open Source Initiative sort of accused Novell of helping Microsoft create "Monopoly 2.0" (or duopoly), so the video above tickles a nerve. Steve Jobs essentially promotes duopoly with Microsoft on the desktop. He also ignores the existence of GNU/Linux (Apple always ignores it, to this date) and other operating systems from that time.

There was a similar incident where browser duopoly got promote by Jobs, who pretended that only Safari and Internet Explorer would exist. Apple also pushed Safari installations, slipping them by the back door (iTunes), just like malware writers typically do. In both cases, Mozilla complained publicly.

Apple’s treatment of OOXML is a subject that we covered before [1, 2] and there was a note about ODF as well. Microsoft actually cited Apple (repeatedly even) as “supporter of OOXML.”

Bob Sutor has meanwhile put ISO in the trashcan for being coprruptible. He totally ignores its existence. ODF, which is maintained by OASIS, will soon have this “ODF Congres” meeting in Utrecht (The Netherlands). ODF is where the world is going.

ISO Sold Out to ECMA

“ISO is dead for software standards. Do you need an official funeral?”

Benjamin Henrion, FFII

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

13 Comments

  1. Oh nevermind said,

    January 9, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    Gravatar

    TextEdit, the default (and free) text editor on Mac OS X can open and save ODT files…and has been able to do that since 10.4. Good thing you guys do research!

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 9, 2009 at 5:50 pm

    Gravatar

    You obviously didn’t follow the references in this post (5th from the end, anchor: “note about ODF as well”). I was referring specifically to TextEdit.

  3. mok said,

    January 10, 2009 at 7:11 pm

    Gravatar

    Hate to say it, but (in reference to your comment about not following links), a link (like a citation) should make sense in its context, and there was no reason to believe that your link made any sense there as being a comment on TextEdit and ODF. That’s the kind of statement that undermines your premise in the article. Based on the TE/ODF link, it seems that your beef is with Pages, not with Apple. Yo, that undermines your whole article. In other words, based on academic standards (I’m a prof…), you used a lousy embedded citation to hide what you meant to say. And that makes you an untrustworthy source. Sorry to call it that way, but that’s how you come across.

    Now, to rephrase the argument, you’re mad that Apple supports OOXML without coming out as publicly for ODF. Okay, I can understand that. But, why can’t they support both? When Apple has cared to support more than one standard, they have done so. When they have cared to not commit, they have done so. And when they have leapt ahead, they have done so. This ODF/OOXML thing comes down to them not committing yet, nothing more. Again, that’s not what you said, and that, again, makes you a non-trustworthy source in this discussion.

    If you’d care to rephrase what you wrote above to acknowledge that Apple and ODF are in good standing (as your link to yourself indicates), then I’m sure we’d all appreciate it. Thanks.

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 10, 2009 at 7:18 pm

    Gravatar

    Apple added ODF at a very late stage. It was helping Microsoft push OOXML forward. I was there. I watched it on a daily basis. I know what I saw at the time.

    Apple’s ODF support is still rudimentary (i.e. lacking) and there is hardly any public endorsement of it. In fact, people had to almost squeeze out this news from Apple (re: ODF in Leopard).

  5. Nick said,

    January 11, 2009 at 9:11 am

    Gravatar

    So much malice from one person. I’m sorry for the author of this piece because life must be painful for him having to live with his own anger, ill will, and hatred. These are what the Buddhists call “destructive emotions” – and I guess they have a point: the author can’t harm Steve Jobs, but he can give himself dyspepsia.

    So Apple’s technical representatives didn’t vote against Microsoft’s new (fake) “open” format. It’s a shame, but I’m hardly surprised. Apple had to do a deal with MS to get MS Office on the Mac, because without Office they’d have been sunk. (Of course, that was (and is) a very profitable deal for MS, so they didn’t mind throwing Apple a lifeline. It certainly wasn’t because Microsoft executives are, as Mr Paul Thurrott has asserted when referring to this agreement, “compassionate”.)

    Of course, having made the agreement, Apple has circumscribed its freedom of manoeuvre. It can’t very well take Office with one hand and campaign against it with the other. (And these XML formats will be at the heart of Office going forward.) Anyone with two brain cells to rub together could see that. Apple likes to tweak Microsoft’s tail – their amusing adverts, and the underlying tension in the Gates/Jobs interview by Mossberg are a reminder of that – but one supposes Apple can only go so far.

    Would ODF support be nice in Pages/Numbers? Sure, I’d love to see it – although I should imagine putting it there would be a lot of work and Apple would certainly have other, more pressing, uses for developer time. If the format takes off, as with any luck it should, users will be looking to open and edit these documents (and with something more sophisticated than TextEdit), so they’ll have to add support.

    Never mind, in the meantime, there’s oo.org (and now IBM’s Symphony). I know – not nice, lightweight Objective-C programs – not even individual programs at all – but one great humungous mess, horrible C++ bloatware. And there’s a fascinating story (also involving MS, Sun, and a few machinations) for those few readers of this page who might prefer history to ranting and raving, too:

    http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/category/java/

    But, as I say, for Mac users who need/want to read/write ODF documents there is, at present, oo.org. It’s not a nice program, but needs must … So, if you were worrying about us, Don’t. We’re OK, calm down. :-)

    Technically, the Apple reps should’ve voted against – which would also make it the right thing to do morally. “Politically”, they weren’t not in a position to. End of story. Get over yourself already.

  6. Kittens said,

    February 3, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    Gravatar

    Nick: “So much malice from one person. I’m sorry for the author of this piece because life must be painful for him having to live with his own anger, ill will, and hatred.”
    I hate people like you that assume that just because someone feels strongly against something and speaks about it, that it consumes their entire life. people assume that I am absolutely obsessed with making game life a living hell because I write critical reviews about online games, but when it gets down to the grind, I love doing what I do. I love giving people something to read and I like seeing that people read it all the way through. whether or not you admit it, you just made someone happy by writing such a long reply.

    -Tangent

  7. Roy Schestowitz said,

    February 3, 2009 at 5:22 pm

    Gravatar

    I wrote what I felt was correct based on what I know.

  8. Kittens said,

    February 3, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    Gravatar

    I wasn’t talking to you, roy, I was commenting on nick’s assinine assumptions

  9. Roy Schestowitz said,

    February 3, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    Gravatar

    Yes, I know. My response was to him (belated though).

  10. Kittens said,

    February 3, 2009 at 10:04 pm

    Gravatar

    :)
    better late than never, good job Roy.
    I like a man who can speak out his own word. word man…word…

  11. Roy Schestowitz said,

    February 3, 2009 at 10:49 pm

    Gravatar

    This page was cited by a big Mac site, so the comments were written with faith/emotion (devotion to Apple), possibly with little attention to facts.

  12. Jose_X said,

    February 4, 2009 at 7:58 am

    Gravatar

    >> So Apple’s technical representatives didn’t vote against Microsoft’s new (fake) “open” format. It’s a shame, but I’m hardly surprised. Apple had to do a deal with MS to get MS Office on the Mac, because without Office they’d have been sunk.

    True or not, the “they’d have been sunk” is an assumption on your part. Those were old comments from Jobs that Roy linked. Though I don’t know the context, it appears Jobs was incorrect in his predictions; thus, even if Jobs thought at one point in time that he needed MSOffice on the Mac, as you appear to think he did, it might not be too surprising if he would have been wrong in that prediction as well.

    I’ll note that you did not address the point Roy made of Jobs comments over Apple and Microsoft determining what becomes a standard for the market. Roy suggests Apple has colluded with Microsoft.

    If you follow this site, you’ll see that Apple is not a fan of openness. Roy at least offers support for the case point he is making, rather than simply assume as you have without providing supporting evidence.

    What you present appears to have been so done with intent to get Apple off the hook, but, even if true, it would confirm Microsoft’s tremendous leverage, which has other implications for both Microsoft and Apple, given their close working relationship.

  13. Jose_X said,

    February 4, 2009 at 8:41 am

    Gravatar

    >> Hate to say it, but (in reference to your comment about not following links), a link (like a citation) should make sense in its context, and there was no reason to believe that your link made any sense there as being a comment on TextEdit and ODF.

    There is no reason for that to have been specified. In the current article, only “iWork09″ is mentioned. The commenter mentioning Text Edit apparently assumed Roy said something he had not. Even without any other links, Roy simply did not say or imply any other program besides iWork09 today would be lacking ODF support (and I’m not sure even the iWork09 lack of support was implied by Roy). In particular, one of the links in this piece certainly suggested that Roy was aware that such support might exist somewhere today.

    FWIW, I have not followed all the links either, but then I’m not criticizing Roy.

    >> That’s the kind of statement that undermines your premise in the article.

    Since you appear to have been incorrect in your judgment, does this mean your entire comment is undermined? How much of it is undermined? Surely, at least Roy is off the hook, right?

    BTW, what premise are you talking about.. that Apple supports OOXML or that Apple colluded with Microsoft (or “sold out” to them) or something else?

    >> Based on the TE/ODF link, it seems that your beef is with Pages, not with Apple. Yo, that undermines your whole article. In other words, based on academic standards (I’m a prof…)

    Can’t tell which link you are talking about, but I think this article is fine.

    Apple has supported OOXML and, if we are to judge Jobs by his comments, has done so perhaps with intent to help stifle competition.

    I see nothing in your comment, “prof”, to contradict this. In fact, I see nothing in your comment that would support the notion that Roy’s piece is flawed in any material way.

    >> you used a lousy embedded citation to hide what you meant to say. And that makes you an untrustworthy source. Sorry to call it that way, but that’s how you come across.

    You have ignored what he did say. You have also assumed he was trying to say something else, yet you did not even quote him.

    Given you’ve shown nothing yourself, I don’t see that “lousy embedded citation” point.

    What was that about someone being untrustworthy? [I mean, if we go by the "academic standards" you mentioned.]

    >> But, why can’t they support both? When Apple has cared to support more than one standard, they have done so. When they have cared to not commit, they have done so. And when they have leapt ahead, they have done so. This ODF/OOXML thing comes down to them not committing yet, nothing more.

    This doesn’t contradict anything Roy said. It’s true I have not followed all the links, but you have provided no evidence to at least point me in the right direction.

    In fact, what you are saying is perfectly consistent with the view that Apple and Microsoft have colluded to stifle competition whenever it suited their interests.

    And what you have alleged about Roy appears to be incorrect or at least presumptuous.

    What was that about being untrustworthy?

    >> Again, that’s not what you said, and that, again, makes you a non-trustworthy source in this discussion.

    I’m thinking that maybe you and I read different postings.

    >> If you’d care to rephrase what you wrote above to acknowledge that Apple and ODF are in good standing (as your link to yourself indicates), then I’m sure we’d all appreciate it. Thanks.

    Not sure ODF and Apple are in “good standing”. You haven’t shown this.

    I also don’t see what that has to do with what Roy did say or, if the “good standing” bit were true, how this would contradict Roy’s piece.

    *****

    There are many people that come here and bad-mouth boycottnovell or Roy without shame. The problem is that while they sometimes have points, many times they don’t nearly have as strong a point as they seem to suggest, and when that is the case (or when they are outright incorrect), they will usually fail to quote very much if anything at all.

    It’s easy to bad-mouth an essay or a person, but where is your evidence or case?

    Please quote or else readers might think you are just talking garbage.

    See the “niece” comment here http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/11/ms-maintaining-gap-vs-linux/#comment-58349

    PS: What does “prof” mean? ..professor? ..professional astroturfer? What exactly?

What Else is New


  1. The Oligarchs' Parties Will Never Choose the Side of Software Freedom Because Free Software Cannot Bribe Officials

    The tough reality is that next week's (or this coming week's, depending on what Sunday counts as) inauguration ceremony is partly symbolic as all the same and important issues remain largely untouched, for corporations control almost everything of significance



  2. COVID-19 Has Actually Helped Software Freedom Due to Financial and 'Spare Time' Factors

    Developers and users are increasingly exploring what the Free software world has to offer; this is actually measurable and it contradicts claims to the contrary



  3. Future Plans and Using Videos to Complement Text

    Remarks on recent and impending site changes; We are not replacing text with video, we're just trying to enhance the presentation a bit, especially where visuals help make a point or where browsing through Web sites (or leaks) is more suitable than static, linear presentation



  4. InteLeaks – Part XVIII: Intel Does Not Know How to Properly Do Research and It Seems Apparent Unscientific Methods Are Used to Justify Poor Documentation

    There appears to be a severe crisis at Intel; they cannot recruit scientists (or those whom they recruited are walking away) and as a result the company produces bad products with poor documentation (or highly defective chipsets that top-notch marketing cannot compensate for); in this video we walk through some examples of how studies are being conducted (as already noted in Part XVII)



  5. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part III: The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Seems More Like a Victim of Destabilisation Campaigns

    The Free Software Foundation (FSF), which turns 36 later this year, is looking to raise money that helps support the GNU Project, soon 38 years old and likely the most important Free software project to exist (ever)



  6. Links 17/1/2021: EasyOS on Raspberry Pi and GNU libsigsegv 2.13

    Links for the day



  7. InteLeaks – Part XVII: The High Cost of Microsoft Windows Users in GNU/Linux Development Teams

    A look inside Intel explains what holds back the technical team, which bemoans the lesser technical people getting in the way and not even using the product that they are writing about



  8. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, January 16, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, January 16, 2021



  9. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part II: Why Bradley Kuhn Left the Free Software Foundation (FSF)

    The founder of the FSF is still at the FSF (albeit not publicly) and the person who lobbied to oust him has basically been 'banished' by the founder



  10. Links 16/1/2021: LibreOffice 7.1 Release Candidate, Zeroshell 3.9.5, FreeBSD Report, and GhostBSD 21.01.15

    Links for the day



  11. Free Speech on the Web Not Respected by Companies That Used to Support Software Freedom

    Mozilla does not have to make its Web browser about politics; it can just make an excellent piece of software that is neutral about the Web pages that it renders, based on the user's personal preferences



  12. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part I: We Are Under Attack by Corporations and Their Salaried Facilitators

    The corporate takeover (taking over the Commons, produced by volunteers who are motivated by altruism) is a subject we must speak about and somehow tackle; this series will highlight uncomfortable or difficult truths



  13. InteLeaks – Part XVI: Intel Cannot Do Command Line, Even When It's Vastly Simpler and More Suitable for Development

    The Developer eXperience (DX) team at Intel seems to be full of Microsoft drones instead of developers and/or mildly technical people; this has not only harmed the quality of documentation but also upset staff, alienating people who actually understand what developers need (more than buzzwords like "DX")



  14. IRC Proceedings: Friday, January 15, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, January 15, 2021



  15. Links 15/1/2021: KaOS 2021.01, Whisker Menu 2.5.2, Istio 1.8.2

    Links for the day



  16. InteLeaks – Part XV: Intel is Blind to Blind and Colour-Blind People

    Intel does not seem to grasp very basic concepts associated with accessibility; nevertheless, Intel shamelessly tries painting itself as "woke" and a "justice warrior" (policing speech while overlooking much-needed practical work)



  17. Links 15/1/2021: GStreamer 1.18.3 and Proton 5.13-5

    Links for the day



  18. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, January 14, 2021

    IRC logs for Thursday, January 14, 2021



  19. Links 14/1/2021: Wine 6.0, Debian 11 Freeze, and Alpine Linux 3.13

    Links for the day



  20. Patent Propaganda and UPC Jingoism Instead of Actual News

    Today's so-called 'news' about the EPO (Europe's second-largest institution) and the failed UPC is nothing short of shameless propaganda



  21. Links 14/1/2021: Season of KDE 2021 Selection, Mesa 21.0.0-RC1, Tor Browser 10.0.8

    Links for the day



  22. InteLeaks – Part XIV: Technical Incompetence and Incoherence Leading to Alienation and Brain Drain

    The idea that Intel "loves Linux" or "supports Linux" is somewhat of a sham; one needs only to consider what Intel insiders are saying about that, having witnessed it firsthand



  23. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, January 13, 2021

    IRC logs for Wednesday, January 13, 2021



  24. Links 13/1/2021: $150 RISC-V Computer With GNU/Linux, Intel Replaces CEO Again, and New Fedora 34 Plans

    Links for the day



  25. Unitary Patent is Dead and Lies About the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Aren't Ending

    Not "Russian agents" but concerned European citizens are beginning to see the truth behind the Unified Patent Court, which the 'media' has wrongly called "Unitary Patent Court" three times in 2 days



  26. InteLeaks – Part XIII: GNU/Linux Documentation From People Who Never Even Use GNU/Linux

    Inside Intel there's a whole bunch of embarrassing secrets about the Developer/Development eXperience ("DX") team; no wonder documentation efforts have been lacking and far too much time wasted putting such documentation together



  27. Links 13/1/2021: Mozilla VPN, NeoChat 1.0.1 and Sci-Hub Under Attack

    Links for the day



  28. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 12, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, January 12, 2021



  29. GNOME Foundation is Still Participating in the Attack on Richard Stallman

    GNOME's supposed 'representatives' (close-knit friends with Microsoft connections) continue to attack RMS (Richard Stallman), the founder of GNU (the G in GNOME) and the Free Software Movement



  30. Links 12/1/2021: GTK 4.0.1 Released, Jailbroken iPhone 7 Running Ubuntu

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts