EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.02.09

Novell Committed to Microsoft Technologies, But Not so Much to Free Desktop (RadeonHD)

Posted in GNU/Linux, Hardware, Microsoft, Mono, Novell, Red Hat at 2:56 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Summary: Novell lays off Luc Verhaegen (of the RadeonHD driver team), thus putting the whole project in jeopardy

Novell’s .NET focus is a sensitive subject that we’ve recently covered in [1, 2]. In short, there are signs which suggest that Novell is deemphasising core parts of the OpenSUSE project while investing resources in projects that put more Microsoft technologies inside GNU/Linux, which is wrong.

As another sign that something is amiss, Novell is letting some of its most important Linux projects drift away. At the beginning of the year we wrote about problems with the RadeonHD project, which had almost been passed to Red Hat. Now that there are layoffs affecting about 20% of OpenSUSE’s staff [1, 2], the RadeonHD driver is being negatively impacted and it’s at very serious risk because of AMD’s response (details to come shortly). The RadeonHD team has just lost its key developer Luc Verhaegen, as revealed by Michael over at Phoronix.

Luc Verhaegen has been let go from Novell. As was publicly announced this morning in the form of a Git commit, Luc Verhaegen is no longer working for Novell. While he was one of the few X developers working on OpenSuSE and also responsible for the VIA Unichrome driver, Novell decide to eliminate him. Due to limited access now to ATI hardware, it’s unlikely that we will see any future work from him in the RadeonHD driver.

Since Red Hat is in favour xf86-video-ati it is possible that the RadeonHD driver will die (developers must gain access to hardware and documentation with NDAs). Novell is definitely not helping much anymore.

Microsoft (MSFT) is hovering at about $15.xx and Novell (NOVL) is almost down to $2.xx in today’s trading. They are two companies in very serious trouble, so priorities are changing.

Many people agree that Novell needs to get rid of Microsoft and ensure its own future survival, not Microsoft’s. At the moment, Novell is employing many people (or sponsoring projects) that are polluting all GNU/Linux distributions using Microsoft’s co-called ‘IP’, which as the TomTom case teaches, must be avoided. Considering the fact that Microsoft is suing companies for FAT (despite promises not to sue), where is the trust?

Sam Dean wrote about Novell’s poor results [1, 2, 3]. Here is the core of the suggestions:

Novell’s relationship with Microsoft is unusual in the sense that the company is reliant on Microsoft to assist with Linux-related deals, but is not unique in terms of Microsoft’s standard business practices. Huge companies like Dell and Intel–and many more–have been reliant on Microsoft for years in helping to get big deals, co-marketing, and much more. It’s very much the Microsoft way to join forces with strategic technology partners, including infusing cash into marketing efforts from other tech companies. However, Dell and Intel have huge, diversifed lines of proprietary technologies delivering consistent cash flows.

I agree with Larry Dignan and Matt Asay that Novell can’t afford to be so reliant on Microsoft going forward. Novell reported Linux invoicing down 42 percent at $23 million.

[...]

Novell’s best course of action is to become less reliant on Microsoft with its Linux business, and to steady its dependency on erratic striking of new deals. This isn’t a good economy for new deals.

It’s not surprising that Novell lacks a clear direction because Novell is dependent on Microsoft, so it must suck up to Ballmer in exchange for vouchers and other opportunities. This means that Novell becomes a reflection of Microsoft’s interests. From a Microsoft competitor it has turned into an ally.

Don’t help Novell elevate itself because doing so strengthens Microsoft by: 1) legitimising software patents; 2) making GNU/Linux more Microsoft dependent; 3) subverting standards (de facto or otherwise) and 4) making GNU/Linux more expensive and thus less competitive.

Say No to Novell

“…Microsoft wished to promote SCO and its pending lawsuit against IBM and the Linux operating system. But Microsoft did not want to be seen as attacking IBM or Linux.”

Larry Goldfarb, Baystar, key investor in SCO

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

14 Comments

  1. David said,

    March 2, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    Gravatar

    Hello, my name is David Siegel, and I am the founder and maintainer of GNOME Do. GNOME Do is not financed by Novell or Microsoft — please correct the inaccuracy in your article.

    Thank you,
    David

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 2, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    Gravatar

    It was a quote, not a statement that I made, and I suspected it was fallacious but wasn’t sure. I’ll remove that quote.

  3. JohnD said,

    March 2, 2009 at 6:46 pm

    Gravatar

    So you post things that you think might be false? What’s the point?
    While we’re at it, what’s the point of this site? According to your posts Novell is doomed and nothing can save it now. So do you feel the need to drive more nails in the coffin? Pour salt in the wounds?

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 2, 2009 at 6:53 pm

    Gravatar

    So you post things that you think might be false? What’s the point?

    I didn’t know that it was wrong. Shamar makes good comments in LT, so I thought he was right. It is actually true that the Mono part which GNOME Do depends on is funded by Microsoft/Novell.

    Mono dependency is a dangerous thing.

  5. JohnD said,

    March 2, 2009 at 7:08 pm

    Gravatar

    But in the above post you state that you “suspected” it was false. So you either thought the post may have been incorrect, or you didn’t.
    Pick one.

  6. JohnD said,

    March 2, 2009 at 7:33 pm

    Gravatar

    Also there’s this link:
    http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/07/09/05/1328225.shtml
    Perhaps this is why Novell is cutting development? Would it make sense for a cash strapped company to duplicate development efforts of the hardware manufacturer?
    If you really want to make points that stick – you need to research both sides of the story.

  7. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 2, 2009 at 7:56 pm

    Gravatar

    There’s more news coming from AMD (maybe tonight). It’s not good.

  8. Dan O'Brian said,

    March 2, 2009 at 8:11 pm

    Gravatar

    Just the other week you wanted to kick Novell out of the Linux community, now that they are pulling out of developing some things, you attack them for what you wanted them to do the other week?

    They just can’t make you happy even if they take your advice, huh?

  9. JohnD said,

    March 3, 2009 at 11:01 am

    Gravatar

    I agree Dan.
    AMD has some self inflicted wounds and the economy is not helping. I find it interesting that you hammer on Novell’s sliding stock price and workforce cuts even though every other company out there (even ones in far better shape ie MS) are doing the same thing.

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 3, 2009 at 11:08 am

    Gravatar

    Novell CFO: “We incurred 8 million of restructuring charges in the first quarter most of which represented a continuation of our 2008 restructuring activities and we expect to incur 5 million to 7 million of charges in the second quarter. We are still evaluating what additional charges we may incur in the second half of fiscal 2009. Total headcount at the end of the quarter was approximately 3900, down from approximately 4000 in the prior quarter. [...] We are still evaluating what additional charges we may incur in the second half of fiscal 2009. [...] This quarter’s cash flow included a $25 million payment from Microsoft for the first tranche of our extended agreement.”

    http://seekingalpha.com/article/123039-novell-inc-f1q09-qtr-end-01-31-09-earnings-call-transcript?source=yahoo&page=8

    Novell depends on Microsoft and there are layoffs coming. If you don’t know why the Microsoft dependency is bad, then you have not been paying attention.

  11. JohnD said,

    March 3, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    Gravatar

    Novell depends on all of it’s customers and I have been paying attention.
    “For the quarter, Novell reported net revenue of $215 million.”
    The little tidbit you left out – the MS payment was a little more than 10% of it’s total revenue for the quarter – by extension just under 90% of it’s money came from someplace else.
    You are so focused on finding all the potential bad things about Novell that you’re missing the biggest opportunity. MS is most likely using the deal to try to screw the community, but by doing so they’ve left themselves open. MS has money and mind share right now due to it’s monopoly. The only way you can change the money and mind share is by eroding it’s market share. The only way to do that is to get people to switch to something else. You can use the Novell/MS deal like sledgehammer, not against Novell, but against MS.
    Tomtom is FUD plain and simple, and sadly it will work given the stupidity of most corporate managers. I’ll bet that MS will offer to settle out of court in the interest of saving money (but really trying to gain the appearance of victory)- or they will drag it out forever. Either way the damage will be done. If you use Novell products (at least in part) you take away the MS bite. For example: Use SLES and mono to serve up content for applications to non-sled clients? That would make for one interesting legal argument wouldn’t it?

  12. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 3, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    Gravatar

    How much do you know about, e.g. Mono and patents?

  13. JohnD said,

    March 3, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    Gravatar

    I would ask you this, if Novell is just an MS shill these days – why is there still a pending lawsuit between them?
    http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=20041115070558892#ref00
    How much I know or don’t know is not at issue here. What’s at issue is how to help Linux succeed in the market.
    Novell is the only big name company with a long term rep that’s truly supporting Linux from stem to stern. They’ve dumped Windows and Office from as many machines as they can, and documented how they did it along with issues and solutions for the whole world to see. Novell realizes that if there are no popular applications running on Linux – they will fail. It happened to Netware, OS/2, etc. MS will sing that song long and loud. Mono can be used as a stepping stone to be used against MS. Once the issue of patents and Linux infringement on MS IP is put to rest – then the community can write software to convert from Mono to something else. You slam both sides and divide the community at the same time. That’s the fast track to a MS win.

  14. bill said,

    March 4, 2009 at 9:02 am

    Gravatar

    “Roy Schestowitz said,
    March 2, 2009 at 5:57 pm
    It was a quote, not a statement that I made, and I suspected it was fallacious but wasn’t sure. I’ll remove that quote.”

    I think this statement says it all – you’re a shill, truth doesn’t matter nor does journalistic integrety. You have an opinion and you will write whatever you want to support that opinion.

    Have you ever considered what would happen to Linux if your wish for Novell to fail actually happened – who would pick up the developmental and financial support it provides? Maybe it’s not Novell you wish to fail but Linux and Novell is the crack in the dyke you’ve decided to exploit so that you could fracture the community and and weaken Linux’s ongoing development.

What Else is New


  1. Links 23/9/2019: Ulauncher 5.3, ClonOS 19.09, ReactOS 0.4.12 Released

    Links for the day



  2. Time to Send a Thank GNU to Richard Stallman

    In case Stallman's resignation marks the beginning of something even better (from Stallman himself) people are encouraged to send messages of solidarity



  3. Department of War and IBM Among Top Clients of Richard Stallman's Alleged Ouster

    Richard Stallman (RMS) is down but not out; if we pick up the pieces and chronicle the media campaign that led to his resignation we find a leaker to the media who chose a dishonest site funded by a close friend of Bill Gates



  4. The Unspeakable Problem is Big Proprietary Corporations Taking Over Free Software While Telling Their Opponents They're Racist and Sexist (Intolerant)

    Thin-skinned people are being weaponised against opposition to one's views, just like blasphemy law is brought up to defend fiction/lies and censor/self-censor one's critics (because truth is sometimes "offensive")



  5. OSI Did Not Guard the Open Source Brand; Now Its Own Name, Open Source Initiative, is Being 'Diluted' and “Open Source” is Almost Meaningless

    The term or the brand “Open Source” is becoming worthless because those who use it typically engage in production of proprietary software falsely marketed as “Open Source” (that's what openwashing is inherently about)



  6. Microsoft is Not an Open Source Authority But an Opponent of Open Source

    Various outlets that are closely connected to Microsoft are trying to convince us that Microsoft is now 'king' of Open Source; nothing could be further from the truth however



  7. Links 22/9/2019: KMyMoney 5.0.7, Lennart's Latest Plan

    Links for the day



  8. Summits of Open Bear Traps: The Open Core Summit and Other 'Open' Events That Actually Attack Software Freedom

    Conferences that call themselves "open" something are sometimes nothing but an attack on openness (not to mention freedom) and promotion of FUD about Free/Open Source software (FOSS); there's an ample set of examples to that effect



  9. Openwashing Report: 'Open Source' Without Any or Most of the Benefits

    The cheapening of the term "Open Source" continues; sooner or later everything out there will be called "open" irrespective of what it really is



  10. Patent Extremism is Not Normal and Not an Innocent Mindset

    Reflection upon the sad state of the European patent system and how media turns a blind eye to it; worldwide, in general, the discussion about patents is being warped by the litigation giants, whose sole goal is to maximise the number of lawsuits/shakedowns (personal gain)



  11. Links 22/9/2019: LLVM 9.0.0 and FreeBSD 12.1 Beta

    Links for the day



  12. Links 21/9/2019: Plasma 5.17 Beta in Kubuntu, Cockpit 203

    Links for the day



  13. IBM Cannot Become a True Friend of Free Software Because of Its Current Patent Policy

    IBM needs to quit bullying people/companies with software patents; that would help towards appeasement of IBM critics and sceptics



  14. When Patent 'Professionals' Sound Like Children Who Learned to Parrot Some Intentionally-Misleading Buzzwords, Myths and Lies

    With buzzwords like "AI" and misleading terms like "IP" the litigation zealots are trying to convince themselves (and the public) that software is a physical thing and a "property" which needs "protecting" from "theft"; it doesn't seem to bother these people that copyright law already covers software



  15. The European Parliament Needs to Become More Outspoken About EPO Abuses

    There are few encouraging signs in Europe right now because the EPO's disregard for patent law (striving to just grant as many patents as possible) earned it much-needed backlash from the European Parliament



  16. Links 19/9/2019: German Federal Ministry of the Interior Wants FOSS, Top Snaps Named

    Links for the day



  17. Buying the Voices of 'Linux' People to Repeat Microsoft's Talking Points While Removing Our Icons and Leaders (Calling Them Sexist)

    The dirty games leveraged by several companies including Microsoft target charismatic people who are essential for morale and leadership; these tactics aren't particularly novel



  18. When the EPO Sees Itself as Above European Law, Grants Patents in Defiance of the EPC (Its Founding Document) and Violates Staff's Labour Rights/Protections (International Law)

    The absurd state of affairs at the EPO has reached the point where laws at every level are being violated and even judges are being threatened or vainly ignored; the EU is belatedly trying to tackle these issues, which have actually cost its credibility a great deal and threaten the perception of Rule of Law at multiple levels



  19. Links 19/9/2019: Samba 4.11.0 and Kubernetes 1.16

    Links for the day



  20. Update on Koch v EPO: Internal Appeals Committee (IAC) Composition Still Likely Illegal

    An important EPO case, concerning a dismissed staff representative, shows what ILO-AT and the EPO's Internal Appeals Committee boil down to



  21. Links 18/9/2019: Fedora Linux 31 Beta, PCLinuxOS 2019.09 Update

    Links for the day



  22. Links 17/9/2019: CentOS 7.7 and Funtoo Linux 1.4 Released

    Links for the day



  23. EPO is Not European

    Internationalists and patent trolls are those who stand to benefit from the 'globalisation' of low-quality and law-breaking patents such as patents on algorithms, nature and life itself; the EPO isn't equipped to serve its original goals anymore



  24. The EPO's Central Staff Committee and SUEPO (Staff Union) Respond to “Fascist Bills” Supported by EPO President António Campinos

    Raw material pertaining to the latest Campinos "scandal"; what Campinos said, what the Central Staff Committee (CSC) said, and what SUEPO said



  25. Storm Brewing in the European Patent Office After a Hot Summer

    Things aren't rosy in EPOnia (to say the least); in fact, things have been getting a lot worse lately, but the public wouldn't know judging by what media tells the public (almost nothing)



  26. Why I Once Called for Richard Stallman to Step Down

    Guest post from the developer who recently authored "Getting Stallman Wrong Means Getting The 21st Century Wrong"



  27. As Richard Stallman Resigns Let's Consider Why GNU/Linux Without Stallman and Torvalds Would be a Victory to Microsoft

    Stallman has been ejected after a lot of intentionally misleading press coverage; this is a dark day for Software Freedom



  28. Links 16/9/2019: GNU Linux-libre 5.3, GNU World Order 13×38, Vista 10 Breaks Itself Again

    Links for the day



  29. Links 16/9/2019: Qt Quick on Vulkan, Metal, and Direct3D; BlackWeb 1.2 Reviewed

    Links for the day



  30. Richard Stallman's Controversial Views Are Nothing New and They Distract From Bill Gates' Vastly Worse Role

    It's easier to attack Richard Stallman (RMS) using politics (than using his views on software) and media focus on Stallman's personal views on sexuality bears some resemblance to the push against Linus Torvalds, which leans largely on the false perception that he is sexist, rude and intolerant


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts