03.08.09

Conficker is Alive, Windows Vista is Critically Vulnerable and Microsoft Office Likewise

Posted in Microsoft, Office Suites, Security, Vista, Vista 7, Windows at 10:01 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Magaphone
Patchy Tuesdays always get you down

Summary: New evidence for the lingering pattern of vulnerability, arrogance, and lack of responsibility at Microsoft

Conficker has been a colossal PR problem for Microsoft and security headache to its customers. For the uninitiated, here are some previous posts that we wrote about Conficker:

Microsoft would rather pretend that Conficker is history, but it’s far from history. In fact, new variants of it are now appearing and Symantec has issued warnings. For the latest details, see:

i. Conficker Worm Strikes Back With New Variant

The Conficker/Downadup worm managed to slither onto millions of PCs worldwide at its height, but after it initially infected a computer it only really acted to spread itself, and didn’t cause further harm. Until now.

Symantec reports today that it has found a new variant of the virulent worm that will identify antivirus software or security analysis tools running on the infected PC, and attempt to shut down those programs. This is a strong signal that the worm’s mysterious creators haven’t abandoned their creation in the face of worldwide attention, as some in the industry have theorized, but may still have plans to make a buck off their work.

ii. Conficker gets upgraded with defenses

Researchers at Symantec have discovered what could be a significant development in the ongoing Conficker worm saga: a new module that is being pushed out to some infected systems.

In a couple of ways, the new component is designed to harden infected machines against an industry consortium that is actively trying to contain the prolific worm. For one, the update targets antivirus software and security analysis tools to prevent them from removing the malware. Not only does it try to disable anti-malware titles, it also goes after programs such as Wireshark and regmon.

It gets worse. The illusion that Windows Vista can be secured is long dead, so no update or upgrade can redeem the user from becoming a zombie (even Vista 7 is open to hijackers [1, 2, 3], long before release). It’s the same old routine now that Windows Vista is discovered to be suffering from another “critical” flaw (or set thereof) which has not been patched yet.

March’s Patch Tuesday will see yet another critical fix for Microsoft’s flagship operating systems.

Users of Microsoft Office will be left vulnerable for at least another month:

Vole said that it will not be fixing a critical Excel vulnerability, which allows attackers to launch malicious code remotely on users’ computers via an infected Excel spreadsheet file.

From IDG:

Microsoft Corp. today said it will deliver three security updates on Tuesday, one of them ranked as “critical,” but will not fix an Excel flaw that attackers are now exploiting.

All three updates spelled out in today’s notice will tackle vulnerabilities in Windows, but as is its practice, Microsoft did not drill any deeper than to specify which versions will be affected.

As usual, Microsoft is hiding the real scale and the real number of vulnerabilities. InformationWeek wrote about this also.

“Our products just aren’t engineered for security.”

Brian Valentine, top Windows executive

“It is no exaggeration to say that the national security is also implicated by the efforts of hackers to break into computing networks. Computers, including many running Windows operating systems, are used throughout the United States Department of Defense and by the armed forces of the United States in Afghanistan and elsewhere.”

Jim Allchin, top Windows executive

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

18 Comments

  1. Jose_X said,

    March 8, 2009 at 11:41 am

    Gravatar

    “Not engineered for security” is why you have a zillion variants of bugs around. Do they “patch” one hole by moving it around to a different hiding place?

    I’m guessing their situation is horrible, but can you actually patch Windows against all the bugs at once, or will the different patches undue work done in other patches as these holes are moved around?

    [I think the answer is that the above is true for some holes but not all. When you don't engineer for security, you have to crudely keep redefining names and numbers to keep the malware guessing.]

  2. pcolon said,

    March 8, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    Gravatar

    @Jose_X: It’s sounds like the old “Whack-a-mole” game.

  3. David Gerard said,

    March 8, 2009 at 5:12 pm

    Gravatar

    The Iceland MCP story has three Slashdot firehose links – 1, 2, 3 – please vote up!

  4. Needs Sunlight said,

    March 9, 2009 at 4:35 am

    Gravatar

    One word: racketeering

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sup_01_18_10_I_20_96.html

  5. Dave said,

    March 9, 2009 at 8:01 am

    Gravatar

    Wow, unbeleivable what an idiot you are Roy.
    You can’t even read the simplest of security advisories.

    The vunerability used by Conficker is NOT a critical vunerability for Vista.
    It is only critical for windows XP !!!!

    This blog is really a disgrace full of disinformation and lies !!!

  6. Dave said,

    March 9, 2009 at 8:03 am

    Gravatar

    And not to mention of course that the vunerability used by the Conficker worm has already been patched last year.

  7. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 9, 2009 at 8:07 am

    Gravatar

    The dunce here is you, Dave.

    If you had read this post carefully, then you would realise that you are mixing together two completely isolated parts of it (Vista vulnerability and Conficker).

  8. David Gerard said,

    March 9, 2009 at 8:08 am

    Gravatar

    A patch was released, but unfortunately people don’t trust Microsoft patches any more because they accidentally break things way too often. (Not to mention deliberately sabotaging people’s machines with Windows Genuine Advantage and suchlike.)

    So people actually have to go through and check the machines. I had to do this at work (we have some Windows boxes for proprietary software that’s a required part of our production chain; we’re not happy about this). Ridiculously tedious.

    Furthermore, the patch last year only patches the Internet transmission vector for Conficker – it doesn’t actually disable the memory stick or CD vector (the autoplay problem).

    [And may I say also how much autoplay sucks. I have a 500GB drive full of ripped CDs in FLAC - I plug it into a Windows XP box and it pauses for a minute while it tries to work out how to autoplay the thing. WHAT.]

  9. Caitlin said,

    March 31, 2009 at 11:53 pm

    Gravatar

    Quite honestly, I thought it was some kind of scam for a cruel April Fools joke, but when I saw that it said in I believe, a CNN article “IF YOU RECEIVED AN UPDATE FROM MICROSOFT FOR SECURITY UPDATES, YOU SHOULD BE FINE”

    I immediately checked my Windows Update, and Lo and behold, the update was there.

    NOT INSTALLED.

    It’s now installing at 55% complete.

  10. Clump said,

    April 1, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    Gravatar

    If your computer is and has been set to automatically update then your computer itself is OK. Then you only have to worry about the systems out there holding your personal information!

    You’d think only a small percent of people wouldn’t have this patch already, but it seems about 30% of Windows users haven’t patched. North Americans will weather it better than Asians as most North American systems are patched while the big numbers of no-patch are in Asia, S. America etc.

    David Gerard Reply:

    Problem: Microsoft sends through too many patches that either (a) accidentally break things or (b) deliberately break things (WGA, which they just tried sending through again recently).

    So people just don’t trust Microsoft patches.

    Yggdrasil Reply:

    No, that is an overblown fear that some people have, but like many fears it’s irrational. Given the enormous number of Windows machines in place, problems due to updates are relatively small, though no software is perfect.

    I specifically remember trying to update a Ubuntu distro to 8.10. After it finished the machine rebooted, only to halt on the next boot complaining that it could not locate some file. Had I been using this machine for anything important, I would have been royally screwed. Updates “can” break installs or software on ANY OS. That’s the nature of computer software. Problems with Windows will always seem worse since there are more Windows machines in use.

    Try upgrading your Amiga 500 to OS 3.1, which includes having to replace a ROM chip, then find out your favorite game won’t work. Computers are complex machines. To assume you will never have problems using some other OS or hardware platform is purely delusional.

    For the record, in 12 years of using Windows machines, I have never had any update or security patch cause any serious problems. That includes the machines owned by my parents and sister. At the very worst, I might have had to update an older piece of software for some odd reason, but again…. that’s normal.

    David Gerard Reply:

    However, Microsoft really does deliberately send through patches designed to disable machines. At least when Ubuntu fucks up (and as an Ubuntu user, I am entirely too aware of how good they are at this) it’s not with deliberate malicious intent.

  11. Roy Schestowitz said,

    April 1, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    Gravatar

    People conveniently forget sometimes that this serious flaw was not supposed to exist in the first place.

    Gentoo User Reply:

    This wasn’t suppose to exist, either. But it does.

  12. jocaferro said,

    April 1, 2009 at 8:42 pm

    Gravatar

    March patch – MS09-006:
    “This security update resolves several privately reported vulnerabilities in the Windows kernel. The most serious vulnerability could allow remote code execution if a user viewed a specially crafted EMF or WMF image file from an affected system.”

    Yes, several (privately) vulnerabilities. Where?
    Windows kernel!
    2000, XP, 2003 Server, Vista.
    An unpatched Windows computer is a serious problem since the moment everyone knows about it. In the MS/Windows world this situation can take months even years until all computers become patched!
    How long MS (privately) know about this problem?
    Or, how long MS (privately) know about many problems without caring for a patch?

  13. jocaferro said,

    April 1, 2009 at 8:44 pm

    Gravatar

    ooopppss, sorry
    “2000, XP, 2003 Server, Vista.”
    – and 2008 Server too!

  14. Roy Schestowitz said,

    April 1, 2009 at 8:46 pm

    Gravatar

    Patches arrive when attacks commence.

What Else is New


  1. End-to-End Encryption and Facebook Cannot Coexist

    Projects that promise us privacy but take money (and sometimes staff) from Facebook and Google are sending or beaming the wrong signal



  2. Twitter is Hiding Techrights and Partly Shadowbans Yours Truly

    Based on many systematic (and reproducible) tests, Twitter has taken up yet another notch its covert censorship regime, which optimises — based on some vague criteria — what people can see and cannot see



  3. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, January 27, 2021

    IRC logs for Wednesday, January 27, 2021



  4. Links 28/1/2021: Stable Kernels and Sudo Bugfixes

    Links for the day



  5. Showing Solidarity With FSFE Survivors

    What does justice look like?



  6. IBM is Throwing Away Red Hat's 'de Facto Standard' Status in Servers, Wrongly Assuming People Can't (or Won't) Go Elsewhere

    This new video is over half an hour long and it’s a discussion of IBM’s self-harming (shot-in-the-foot) move, which it already seems to regret



  7. Why 6 Screens and 6 Virtual Desktops

    An explanation of how I use computers and how I distribute tasks (across screens and across virtual desktops)



  8. Red Hat Developer Network Promoting Microsoft's Proprietary Software, Sometimes by Mass-Mailing People

    Red Hat is doing a disservice to people who subscribe to E-mail newsletters; those people are almost never into Microsoft's proprietary software, which they want to get away from



  9. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 26, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, January 26, 2021



  10. Links 26/1/2021: Mozilla Firefox 85.0, Tails 4.15, Zentyal Server 7.0, GNOME 40 Alpha

    Links for the day



  11. Instead of Making Access to COVID-19 Solutions Easier Bill Gates Has Made It Harder (Patent Profits)

    Counterproductively — and at a great cost to human civilisation — Bill Gates has once again put profits and monopoly ahead of global goals such as collective health



  12. We Need More Documents Leaked to Know Intel (From the) Inside

    We invite more leaks from the belly of the beast "chipzilla", seeing that it is becoming a drone of Microsoft again, yearning for the "Wintel" days instead of moving on to a world dominated by GNU/Linux and Free/libre software



  13. Why GNU/Linux Users (and the Public at Large) Should Support Leaking/Whistleblowing Sites (Including Wikileaks)

    To demonstrate the value of "scientific journalism" (a term apparently coined by Wikileaks) we take a look at Red Hat's response to embarrassing leaks (demonstrating what a scam their certification and examination programmes really are)



  14. EPO President António Campinos is Still Not Listening, According to Internal EPO Documents

    Increasingly arrogant and unaccountable management of Europe's second-largest institution (EPO) has left staff disillusioned but still defiant; there's clearly unsuitable or unfit-for-purpose management at the EPO, self-selecting based on nepotism/loyalty so as to cover up abuses



  15. Why You Should Give Falkon (the Web Browser) a Chance on GNU/Linux, BSD, or Windows

    In this crazy new world where advertisers are the real customers and Web users ("audiences") have been reduced to mere products we need a browser that isn't controlled by a company; try Falkon



  16. Kluwer Patent Spin and Distortion of Facts (Regarding UPC and More)

    Kluwer Patent Blog disgraces the firm that puts its name on it; instead of sticking to facts they're distorting the facts and the sole/principal goal is to manipulate/mislead the public and public servants



  17. Links 26/1/2021: 4MLinux 35.1, GParted 1.2, Gnuastro 0.14

    Links for the day



  18. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 25, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, January 25, 2021



  19. It's Wrong to Assume Red Hat Competes With Microsoft

    The community ought to stop pretending that one monopoly seeks to replace another despite close partnerships (some would say "collusion") between the two



  20. EPO Staff Representation Complains That EPO Management Exploits Pandemic and 'House Arrests' to Overwork Staff, Lower Quality

    The EPO keeps breaking its promises to workers; not only are key employees seeing their net salary cut (inflation factored in) but pensioners too are being robbed and in the meantime the total time spent on work is increasing



  21. Fake News is Not a 'Wing' Thing

    The two-party corporate-led system (and media) would have us obsess/bicker about accuracy of news based on some binary/dual system of blind loyalty rather than underlying facts and priorities



  22. Links 25/1/2021: Huawei on GNU/Linux, NuTyX 20.12.1, Whisker Menu 2.5.3, Lutris 0.5.8.3, Linux 5.11 RC5

    Links for the day



  23. Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) in ZDNet is the Norm

    ZDNet continues to emit lots of garbage 'journalism', in effect Microsoft PR and what's known as "black PR" for Linux; just like Bleeping Computer, which ZDNet hired this writer from, there's no adherence to facts, just smears and innuendo



  24. Truth Tellers Aren't an Enemy of Free Software

    There's a perpetual attack on people who speak out against actors and corporations in positions of great power, however subtle and indirect those attacks may seem on the surface (they don't wish to be held accountable for defaming activists)



  25. The Linux Foundation, With Over 124 Million Dollars in Annual Revenue, is in Trouble Because of the Pandemic, So It's Trying to Reinvent Itself as Training and Certifications Outfit

    With mountains of cash and a Public Relations (PR) or marketing business model the so-called 'Linux' Foundation became reliant on travel, lodging, booths and speeches on sale; COVID-19 is a great risk to that business model



  26. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 24, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 24, 2021



  27. Our Move Further Away From the World Wide Web, the Browser Monopolies, HTTP, and HTML

    The World Wide Web (WWW) is going down a bad path and a clearly regressive direction; the solution isn't going 'retro' but exploring more sophisticated systems which are robust to censorship (localised or globalised) and downtime (related to censorship) while reducing surveillance by leveraging encryption at the endpoints



  28. Important Issues Not Entertained in the Community, Especially Critics of the Status Quo

    here's corporate infiltration inside communities (for oligarchy hunts volunteer, unpaid labour) and those who speak about that as a threat to our cause and objectives are painted as misguided outcasts who must be ignored



  29. Internet Origins of the Mob

    Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock



  30. When Proprietary Software Users Dictate the Freedom-Leaning Communities

    Fedora doesn't care about software freedom and its steward (or parent company) is sometimes imposing proprietary software on staff; they've quit caring


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts