EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

04.21.09

Tomboy is Afraid of Gnote, Its Mono-free Sibling

Posted in Debian, GNOME, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Mono, Novell, Patents, TomTom, Ubuntu at 5:58 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Nomo

Summary: Tomboy does not fancy Gnote; Jo Shields keeps promoting Mono in Debian and Ubuntu

IN PREVIOUS POSTS which mentioned Gnote [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] it was shown and pointed out that there might be a future for GNOME without Mono, which is a patent trap exploited by Microsoft and Novell. We were not really expecting the developer of Tomboy to draw attention to Gnote, but he just did:

A Note about Gnote

Some people have started asking about Gnote, Hubert Figuiere’s line-for-line port of Tomboy to C++. Our stance on Gnote is that it is counterproductive to maintain identical software in two languages. It will be harmful to the community, especially as these two apps inevitably diverge. It will result in duplication of effort, duplication of bugs, and a lot of wasted time for those who are trying to add value to the user experience.

Tomboy is not going away, and it will continue to be developed on the extremely productive Mono/GTK# language platform. Anyone thinking about distributing Gnote should consider the impact on users and their data. When we develop, we should always be asking ourselves, “is this adding value for our users?”

The answer is, “definitely.”

After the TomTom row, it is abundantly clear that Microsoft seeks to resolve its serious problems by suing (or ‘settling’) over patents where its de facto standards — such as FAT or .NET — are used. Only a “box of monos” (pun intended) would consider Mono to be a Good Idea™.

As a team, the Debian Mono Group (which is these days a joint Debian/Ubuntu effort) have helped to reduce our footprint by a good few meg in the Jaunty cycle, as part of the Mono 2.0 transition. And now I have a proposal which I’m going to make to the Desktop team at Ubuntu Developer Summit in May, which will save six precious megabytes.

The problem is not just technical; it’s not about bloat, either. It is an issue of programmer control (by Microsoft) and legal control (by Microsoft). Moments ago we shared a news report confirming that Windows XP being sold for less than $15. Microsoft is hurting financially because of GNU/Linux and it is actively looking for ways to tax GNU/Linux, thereby elevating the price of its #1 competition. Mono is one such convenient route.

“I saw that internally inside Microsoft many times when I was told to stay away from supporting Mono in public. They reserve the right to sue”

Robert Scoble, former Microsoft evangelist

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

29 Comments

  1. Will said,

    April 21, 2009 at 6:36 am

    Gravatar

    Sounds like the solution is simple enough. We just, to use wording that I’m sure Novell’s master would approve of, “cut off Tomboy’s air supply”. And then do the same thing to each and every similar app that springs up.

    I’ve heard that Mono(nucleosis) can take quite a while to go away, but with proper treatment, I’m sure it can be dealt with.

    Here’s an idea: Why not maintain a listing of all currently known Linux programs infected with Mono somewhere on the newly reformatted site. In the same area, you might link to resources (such as how to go about getting and developing/compiling source code, language tutorials (both Mono and C++ or other good replacement languages),etc.) to give both seasoned and new developers an idea on how/where to start if they want to help cure GNU/Linux of this virus.

  2. Will said,

    April 21, 2009 at 6:44 am

    Gravatar

    Just to be clear, what I mean by “cut off the air supply” here is get enough developers on board to overtake the Mono apps’ development, leaving those programs in the dust and constantly playing catchup. At the same time, it would be good if the more popular distros would begin including the non-Mono apps by default instead of the Mono ones as soon as the non-Mono apps reach roughly feature parity. Over time, the Mono apps will hopefully be relegated to just another duplicate program in the repositories that most people never install.

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    April 21, 2009 at 9:23 am

    Gravatar

    I’ve just made a start.

    aeshna23 Reply:

    It’s a great start!

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I can’t afford to spend much time on it right now. Others can help out by entering replacements with their URLs.

    Will Reply:

    That’s ok. It’s a good seed of a start; it will grow with time.

    Nice job on the site reformat, by the way. It makes the site’s mission more accessible to newcomers while making the site’s content more accessible to returning readers.

  4. seller_liar said,

    April 21, 2009 at 12:04 pm

    Gravatar

    Hey

    Put a quote of day in home page too .Like bill gates about patents in early 90s.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I’d need some MediaWiki module for that,

    David Gerard Reply:

    The random selection extension works well. There’s also extensions for random pages, random text and random includes.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Thanks. Got it.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    There are no installation instructions in this page. I put the code in /extensions and then added include(“./extensions/RandomSelection.php”) to LocalSettings, but it then spews out PHP errors.

    David Gerard Reply:

    Sounds like MediaWiki *cough* Like a great big extension candy store …

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I prefer not to rely on extensions because of upgrades. I’ll get someone to rotate quotes manually. Now, where did I put that pigeon? :-)

  5. Needs Sunlight said,

    April 21, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    Gravatar

    Zim and Knotes are also more useful alternatives. I’m not sure why Tomboy exists at all given the better, pre-existing alternatives except maybe as a vector for mono.

    http://zim-wiki.org/

    http://pim.kde.org/components/knotes.php

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Added.

  6. Andrey said,

    April 22, 2009 at 8:20 am

    Gravatar

    A good idea would be create a Ubuntu distro completaly free of mono and with mononono installed by default.

  7. Roy Schestowitz said,

    April 22, 2009 at 8:34 am

    Gravatar

    That’s a good idea. FWIW, BLAG is removing all of Mono as a matter of principle.

  8. Bob said,

    April 23, 2009 at 4:30 am

    Gravatar

    The problem is not just technical; it’s not about bloat, either. It is an issue of programmer control (by Microsoft) and legal control (by Microsoft).

    Please teach me once again, how does Microsoft control the programmer when a programmer uses Mono? What sort of legal control is imposed when programmers make use of Mono?

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Mono still strives to be compatible with .NET.

    Bob Reply:

    You’re assuming that I know what you know. Your response does nothing to improve my understanding of how Microsoft gains any control over a programmer when the programmer makes use of Mono. What does Mono striving for .Net compatibility have to do with anything?

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Microsoft decides where .NET goes next and Mono merely follows this decision from Microsoft/.NET (including extensions that have software patents).

    Bob Reply:

    Microsoft decides where .NET goes next and Mono merely follows this decision from Microsoft/.NET (including extensions that have software patents).

    I’d appreciate it if you’d write your sentences so that they are easier to comprehend. I would appreciate the following form. I hope I have conveyed your expression accurately.

    Microsoft decides where .NET goes next when they decide to publish a new version of the .NET specifications. Mono would strive to implement the updated .NET specifications. Mono would also strive to include .NET extensions that are covered by Microsoft controlled patents.

    I still don’t understand how Microsoft controls the programmer that chooses to use Mono, so please write in simple English, a step by step account of what would happen to Tomboy (for example) now that it making use of Mono. Example:
    Microsoft publishes .Net specification
    Microsoft publishes extensions to the .Net specification that are also covered by patents that they control
    Novell implements the .Net specification in the form of Mono
    Tomboy developers make use of Mono
    Now what???
    Feel free to include other premises that are relevant to helping me understand how Microsoft will control a programmer that uses Mono.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I thought I had explained it in simple terms. Microsoft does not control the program which is written in Mono, but it has impact on where Mono goes next*, because it mimics .NET.

    ___
    * Even if it’s the courtroom (where vendors can end up).

    Bob Reply:

    I thought I had explained it in simple terms.

    You wrote a single complex sentence. This sentence didn’t state enough propositions that will guide me conclude to the assertion: Microsoft controls the programmers that use Mono.

    You assert that Microsoft controls where Mono goes next because of the fact that it mimics “.NET”. So what about the web, does the W3C control the web because it publishes various web standards?

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    This sentence didn’t state enough propositions that will guide me conclude to the assertion: Microsoft controls the programmers that use Mono.

    This was not my assertion.

    So what about the web, does the W3C control the web because it publishes various web standards?

    It controls how sites get coded because Web browser developers follow W3C.

    Bob Reply:

    The problem is not just technical; it’s not about bloat, either. It is an issue of programmer control (by Microsoft) and legal control (by Microsoft).

    So what is this? Are you not asserting that Microsoft controls programmers that use Mono?

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    “That write”, not “that use”.

    At least one of the Mono developers/maintainers is on Microsoft’s payroll (CJ).

    Justin Reply:

    Here let me finish that up for you.

    Microsoft publishes .Net specification
    Microsoft publishes extensions to the .Net specification that are also covered by patents that they control
    Novell implements the .Net specification in the form of Mono
    Tomboy developers make use of Mono

    *Microsoft revokes the right to redistribute the Mono runtime because it uses technology founded by Microsoft, users of SuSE are exempt.
    *Someone states that .NET is an open standard of ECMA.
    *Microsoft asserts ECMA RAND license clause. “Okay, you can have Mono but you must pay a fee to us in order to use it.”
    *Someone states that’s not true.
    *Per ECMA’s guidelines, Microsoft asserts that it has given fair chance to the Mono developers to pay licensing fee. It send a case and desist order to the Makers of Mono in regards to redistribution to non-Novell vendors.
    *Somebody at Redhat pulls the plug on Mono in Fedora.
    *Somebody at Canonical pulls the plug on Mono in Ubuntu.
    *Others follow suit.
    *The community is dived over the issue of Mono. Novell’s people argue the rest of the community. Useless flames ensue.
    *Microsoft points out to the world how useless GNU/Linux is because all their developer’s do is bitch and complain.

    Does that clear it up for you?

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Yes, that’s about what I envisioned. There are many signs in Microsoft’s internal communication (Comes trial) that we covered. There are also public statements, e.g.:

    “There is a substantive effort in open source to bring such an implementation of .Net to market, known as Mono and being driven by Novell, and one of the attributes of the agreement we made with Novell is that the intellectual property associated with that is available to Novell customers.”

    Bob Muglia, Microsoft President

What Else is New


  1. Links 5/6/2020: LibreELEC (Leia) 9.2.3, Rust 1.44.0, and Hamburg's Pivot to Free/Libre Software

    Links for the day



  2. This Article About GitHub Takeover Never Appeared (Likely Spiked by Microsoft and Its Friends Inside the Media)

    And later they wonder why people distrust so much of the media (where paying advertisers set the agenda/tone)



  3. Raw: How Microsoft and/or the EPO Killed an Important EPO Story About Their SLAPP Against Techrights and Others

    Spiking a story about spiked stories about corruption



  4. The Linux Foundation 'Bootcamp' -- Badly Timed and Badly Named in June 2020 -- Only Uses Linus Torvalds Like a 'Prop' (for Legitimacy) While Promoting Militarised Monopolies

    Sometimes a picture says a lot more than words, especially in light of political events in the US and a certain Chinese anniversary we cannot name (Microsoft censors mentions of it)



  5. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, June 04, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, June 04, 2020



  6. The Gates Press (GatesGate) -- Part II: When Media That You Bribe Calls All Your Critics 'Conspiracy Theorists' (to Keep Them Silenced, Marginalised)

    The assault on the media by Bill Gates is a subject not often explored by the media (maybe because a lot of it is already bribed by him); but we're beginning to gather new and important evidence that explains how critics are muzzled (even fired) and critical pieces spiked, never to see the light of day anywhere



  7. GitHub is Not Sharing But 'Theft' by Microsoft

    Microsoft buying GitHub does not demonstrate that Microsoft loves Open Source (GitHub is not Open Source and may never be) but that it loves monopoly and coercion (what GitHub is all about and why it must be rejected)



  8. The Huge Damage (Except for Patent Lawyers' Bottom Line) Caused by Fake European Patents

    The European Patent Office (EPO) keeps granting fake patents that cause a lot of real harm (examiners are pressured to play along and participate in this unlawful agenda); nobody is happy except those who profit from needless, frivolous lawsuits



  9. Red Hat/IBM Got 'Tired' of RMS. Is It Getting 'Tired' of GPL/Copyleft Too?

    After contributing to the cancellation of Richard Stallman (RMS) based on some falsehoods perpetuated in the media we're seeing the sort of thing one might expect from IBM (more so now that it totally controls Fedora and RHEL)



  10. Links 4/6/2020: Proton 5.0-8 Release Candidate, GNU Linux-libre 5.7

    Links for the day



  11. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, June 03, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, June 03, 2020



  12. Social Engineering of Free Software, Based on Corporate Criteria

    What "professional" nowadays means in the context of coding and honest assessment of technical work



  13. Weakening GNU/Linux by Disempowering Its Leaders and Founders, Replacing Them With Microsoft Employees and GNU/Linux-Hostile Moles

    The coup to remove (or remove power from) Stallman and Torvalds, the GNU and Linux founders respectively, is followed by outsourcing of their work to Microsoft’s newly-acquired monopoly (GitHub) and appointment of Microsoft workers or Microsoft-friendly people, shoehorning them into top roles under the disingenuous guise of "professionalism"



  14. Sword Group Violates Its Own Commitment by Working for the EPO

    The European Patent Office (EPO) keeps outsourcing its work to outside contractors (for-profit private entities) to the tune of hundreds of millions if not billions — all this without any oversight



  15. In 2020 Canonical No Longer Fights for Freedom

    Freedom requires a GNU/Linux distro other than Ubuntu, which seems unwilling or unable/incapable of speaking about and promoting the ideals of GNU/Linux



  16. We Need to Use the F Word (Freedom) to Promote Adoption of GNU/Linux

    "People get the government their behavior deserves. People deserve better than that." -Richard Stallman



  17. People Who Want to Explore GNU/Linux With Ubuntu See This Today

    "Wait, am I in a GNU/Linux blog or another Windows blog," a visitor might think... or, is Microsoft 'taking over' messaging at Canonical? (Same with code)



  18. Links 4/6/2020: Septor 2020.3, Nextcloud and Blender 2.83

    Links for the day



  19. Hey, Where's Red Hat (IBM)?

    Red Hat is conspicuously silent at these critical times (in its home country); Must be too busy hailing and cashing in on Trump's military (state) while dishing out shallow and self-contradictory diversity PR/fluff…



  20. Microsoft's Latest Vapourware About Supercomputers

    Microsoft has spent almost two decades dropping supercomputers vapourware on the media, but those misinformation dumps always turn out to be 100% hot air, no substance



  21. 2020: A Time for Resolutions or Revolutions?

    There are nonviolent means by which the current system can be corrected; we need to convince peers and relatives to change the way they behave and not cooperate with unjust elements of the system



  22. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, June 02, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, June 02, 2020



  23. The Gates Press (GatesGate) -- Part I: Lost the Job After Writing an Article Critical of Bill Gates for Attacking Some Actual, Legitimate Charities (Because They Had Spread GNU/Linux)

    The sociopaths from the fake 'charity' of Bill Gates would go to great lengths to squash criticism and also to eliminate critics; this series tells the story of some of those personally affected



  24. Don't Fall for the Spin, Microsoft is Laying Off Workers and It's Not Just Because of the Pandemic





  25. All They Want is Litigation, Not Innovation

    It's getting difficult to ignore or to overlook the fact that the 'litigation lobby' (the likes of Team UPC and today's EPO management, guided by groups like the Licensing Executives Society International) doesn't care about innovation and is in fact looking to profit by crushing innovation



  26. Reminder: Microsoft Profits From Crushing Protesters for Donald Trump

    Don't lose sight of the fact that what's going on in the United States right now is very profitable to Microsoft



  27. No, GNU/Linux Isn't at 3% and Windows Isn't at Over 90%, Either

    This ludicrous idea that "Linux" (however one defines it) enjoys just 3% of the "market" is false and it should be treated as laughable spin (it is being widely promoted this week, often by Microsoft boosters looking to make charts where Windows stays at above 90% and Vista 10 is 'gaining'... at the expense of Windows)



  28. Links 3/6/2020: Devuan Beowulf 3.0.0 and Tails 4.7 Released

    Links for the day



  29. Links 2/6/2020: New Firefox Release (77), Debian-based MX Linux 19.2, KDevelop 5.5.2, GNU/Linux Growth on Desktops/Laptops

    Links for the day



  30. Techrights Can Figure Out Source Protection/Anonymisation Whilst Operating Very Transparently

    We're still quite radically transparent whilst at the same time enjoying 100% source protection record; we're also improving the software we use to publish more quickly and efficiently


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts