Its probably just a stupid decision to hard code the Microsoft Operating System tag as they only expected to include those but now Ubuntu is popular and they are supporting it , they have probably forgotten about their hard coded program. Or maybe it is too hard to change the coding until the next revision.
Roy Schestowitz
2009-05-13 12:02:23
Indeed. But that would be as tactless as a restaurant putting beverages under the "Coca Cola drinks:" heading.
Doug
2009-05-13 12:04:07
> Its probably just a stupid decision to hard code the Microsoft Operating System tag
I doubt it's a mistake, given the history of MS and its relentless attempt to totally own mindshare. Similarly with Microsoft 'open source' and them turning up at Open Source conferences to 'explain' what 'open source' should be :)
Google results 1 - 10 of about 385,000 for "microsoft open source"
zelrik
2009-05-13 13:54:15
I think you guys think too hard. It might just be Dell being fucking idiots, which wouldnt surprise me at all. By the way there are much better OEM's for Linux as shown here : http://wiki.club-ubuntu.org/index.php/Category:Linux_Computers
"poor working environments, including discrimination and inequality, excessive workloads, low job control and job insecurity pose a risk to mental health"
Who needs RAs (layoffs, which have been rebranded as "buyouts" like pink slips are generous "gifts") when workers can have their butts kicked every day and WARN Act reporting thresholds are never approached?
Someone should ask Linus Torvalds or his boss (Linux Foundation) if they deem slop, which nobody audits, trustworthy enough to add to every computer out there running the Linux kernel
Using imbeciles who lie to cops and then dox cops (and already have arrest record and court documents wherein they admit being stoned in front of the cops)
We're entering bizarre times when layoffs are said to be "down" (according to the regime that suffered a 'bloodbath' in the election) because companies quit using the term "layoffs"
Comments
Kitkat
2009-05-13 11:53:31
Roy Schestowitz
2009-05-13 12:02:23
Doug
2009-05-13 12:04:07
I doubt it's a mistake, given the history of MS and its relentless attempt to totally own mindshare. Similarly with Microsoft 'open source' and them turning up at Open Source conferences to 'explain' what 'open source' should be :)
Google results 1 - 10 of about 385,000 for "microsoft open source"
zelrik
2009-05-13 13:54:15
Roy Schestowitz
2009-05-13 14:10:35
Gentoo User
2009-05-13 16:23:14
Heh, quite the opposite actually. Obviously.
XfX
2009-05-27 12:40:23