EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

06.03.09

Ubuntu Users Plead to Keep Novell’s Banshee Out (and Other Miscellaneous Mono News)

Posted in GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Mono, Novell, Red Hat, Ubuntu at 4:00 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Pleading hands

Summary: Progress on the argument for GNU/Linux without Mono as a dependency

IT IS no secret that Mono boosters are trying to put Novell's Banshee deep inside the most used GNU/Linux distribution. Putting aside vocal people like Jo Shields (“directhex“), who is currently busy attacking messengers that oppose Mono, there are actual users of Ubuntu out there and they do not want the bloat of Mono. To quote a small portion from an ongoing discussion:

Banshee replacing Rhytmbox on the other hand, not so much.

However, it does seem to use 3-10x more memory than RB which is very troubling (60-300MB compared to RBs fairly consistent 25MB),

Please, Please think of those of us who only have 512 Mb of ram in a laptop, or even those with less.

Red Hat is already removing its dependency on Mono. Here is Rahul commenting on the inclusion of Gnote:

A while back when I saw Hub announcing Gnote on April first, it just seemed like one of those jokes but with a predictable weekly release schedule, this application has now improved in leaps and bounds. One of the great things of being involved in Fedora is that you can watch applications and technologies grow from a nascent immature but promising state to something that everybody is in awe about.

Hubert points out, “we are no longer on a weekly release schedule. I’m trying to work on other stuff too :-) but it is steadily going forward.”

This is good news for Gnote, which is stealing capturing Tomboy’s thunder and delivering it without Mono, which also means a lot less bloat.

The Tomboy team is worried about Gnote and its key developer, Sandy Armstrong (he too works for Novell), takes the fight to social networks along with colleagues. According to this new article from Ars Techica, a key plug-in for Tomboy was being developed as part of Novell’s Hack Week.

l developer Brad Taylor created Snowy in his free time as an experiment. It matured recently when Tomboy developer Sandy Armstrong teamed up with Taylor during one of Novell’s Hack Weeks in an effort to accelerate progress on the project.

Doesn’t Novell want to accelerate the project called Gnote? And if not, why? Does everything have to use Mono, whose copyrights are Novell’s and other rights (not just leadership in direction) are Microsoft's?

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

12 Comments

  1. Dan O'Brian said,

    June 3, 2009 at 6:24 pm

    Gravatar

    You have a number of factual inaccuracies in this post:

    1. Tomboy is NOT a Novell-sponsored project

    Sandy Armstrong, while a Novell employee, does not get paid by Novell to hack on it afaict. As a recent post of yours pointed out, his job at Novell is doing a11y for Mono.

    He also only recently even became a Novell employee (you blogged about that too a year or so ago). The reason I mention this is that obviously this means that Sandy Armstrong has been maintaining Tomboy since long before he ever joined Novell.

    Novell also did not start the Tomboy project. If you read up on the history of Tomboy, it was started by a GNOME developer named Alex Gravely who has never worked for Novell afaict.

    So, given this “enlightening” information, why should Novell care at all about GNote? They don’t seem to care enough one way or the other about note-taking apps, so why should they all of a sudden be sponsoring GNote?

    2. Snowy is also not a Novell project – had you bothered to read the Ars Technica article you refer to in this very article, you would have noticed that the developers are working on Snowy “in their spare time” (btw, you even quoted the relevant paragraph).

    Do you just not fully grasp the english language? Or are you purposely spreading misinformation to rile up your mindless drone army so that they go out to various other forums to repeat your lies as a means of hurting these fine developers’ reputations?

    You seriously need to learn to do research before you go off spreading this misinformation.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    You’re attacking a straw man. I know Tomboy is Sandy’s hobby and I did not say it was sponsored by Novell. But well done creating straw men. You will have to try harder.

    Dan O'Brian Reply:

    My point is that you are attacking Novell over projects that Novell isn’t even involved in.

    That’s disingenuous.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Novell owns Mono.

    K Reply:

    Mono is free software. I thought you of all people should have known that.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Free software and software patents are not compatible. And there are other issues.

  2. eet said,

    June 5, 2009 at 6:51 am

    Gravatar

    Roy’s answers here are pure gems of feigned idiocy. He impossibly can be THAT stupid. Software patents don’t make Novell the owner of an open and free framework (Mono) and doesn’t make free and open software that is created by that framework Novell-owned.

    So Roy’s trying to mislead his mono-hating fans on purpose – as usual. Well, whatever floats your boat, Roy-boy – just remind me to slap you for dishonoring the Linux community if you ever cross my way on a conference.

  3. Ed Landaveri said,

    June 6, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    Gravatar

    Owned or not by Novell. Mono is pushed by Novell the only one who signed a patent agreement with Microsoft as well as Novell employees one of each is Miguel de Icaza.

    The agreement gives “protection” to Novell from being sued by Microsoft and Novell only. Mono is “gratis” but open only to Novell for the patent agreement Microsoft and Novell boast about.

    Is denouncing the fact a dishonor to the Linux community? NOT AT ALL! but to recognized and support an open enemy of the community to saw mined fields among us and to boast that we showed up to this and that Linux Conference. Maybe they showed up as infiltrated paid agents that Microsoft always send on its fight against freedom.

    The fact that Novell signed and agreement with Microsoft is the reason that Novell employees pushed mono to other distributions. Time will come when Microsoft will stand up to claim it’s right to those crappy technologies that will give Microsoft the perfect weapon to destroy us. And Novell happily ever after ’cause they’re the one who have “protection”. Big mouthed people only resort to personal attack when they have no valid points to support their points.

    You might attack this site, demonize whoever opposes Microsoft/Novell evil doings but the truth can’t be hidden for too long.
    People all over the world are aware of it and the peoples demand freedom not digital colonialism.

    123 Reply:

    You say that there will be a time when Microsoft will claim its right to Mono in the future. What right does Microsoft have over Mono? I’d like to learn how it has any right over Mono if it didn’t contribute and code to the Mono project.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Read this.

  4. akshunj said,

    June 7, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    Gravatar

    (SIGH) I keep reading these articles about the new big bad Novell. And you “GNU/Linux” users *do* seem to need a big bad every year or so. When Novell was throwing down against SCO, they were the plucky darling of our community. But now that they cooperate with Microsoft they are suddenly in league with Satan? Wow… Last I checked, Novell was a CORPORATION not a charity or non-profit…

    I think everyone needs to take a breath and remember that one of the chief principles of open source is freedom of choice. And that means that some of us might choose to support a company like Novell that is working to ensure that Linux users have a path towards interoperability with Microsoft formats. As an avid Linux user and supporter for over seven years, I’m no fan of Microsoft’s business practices. But I truly believe there needs to be a framework for cooperation in a computing world where Microsoft, for good or for ill, wrote all the standards. And just when you think things are opening up, companies like Netflix adopt Silverlight. (And even if they were using Flash, it is only by Adobe’s goodwill that Linux has a functioning plugin.) My point is that as a Linux user, I am TIRED TO DEATH of the free software GNU/Linux fundamentalists preaching purist doctrine. Back in the real-world, Linux is still only 1% of the computing world and the MAJORITY of us are not ready to bury out heads in the sand and ignore anything that doesn’t meet the RMS free software standard. Guys, you need to know when to accept some compromises. And when you present inaccuracies and WILD exaggerations (digital colonialism?! WTF?!) to support your position, the rants start to sound like those of the religious right in America. Fundamentalism in any form will rot any movement from the inside out simply because the only people you want to listen to are yourselves.

    On a sidenote, I LOATHE software patents like any other rational open source fan. Whether or not Mono apps like Banshee go into Ubuntu will have ZERO effect on their existence, however. If you hate software patents (as I do), email your ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE!!! Get your friends and family to do the same! The issue is URGENT and IMPORTANT to the future of open computing, but it is our framework for thinking and talking about intellectual “property” that keeps us from changing things, not the big bad Microsoft or Novell. Microsoft defends itself from just as many patent lawsuits as it initiates. Hope this sparks some constructive dialog.

    Peace.
    –Akshun J

  5. Brad Jensen said,

    June 8, 2009 at 6:28 am

    Gravatar

    I would LOVE to see someone re-write the latest Banshee in another programming language. I have tried almost every music/media player on Ubuntu and Banshee is by far a lot more professional and feature-full than any of the other media players.

What Else is New


  1. Links 13/12/2018: IRS Migration, GNOME 3.31.3 Released

    Links for the day



  2. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions Still Uncontroversial Unless One Asks the Patent Maximalists

    Contrary to what the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has claimed, PTAB is liked by companies that actually create things and opposition to PTAB comes from power brokers of the Koch brothers, law firms, and trolls (including those who foolishly repeat them)



  3. Latest Talk From IBM’s Manny Schecter Shows That IBM Hasn't Changed and After the Red Hat Takeover It'll Continue to Promote Software Patents

    IBM's hardheaded attitude and patent aggression unaffected by its strategic acquisition of a company that at least claimed to oppose software patents (whilst at the same time pursuing them)



  4. The European Patent Troll Wants as Much Litigation as Possible

    Patent quality is a concept no longer recognisable at the European Patent Office; all that the management understands is speed and PACE, which it conflates with quality in order to register as much cash as possible before the whole thing comes crashing down (bubbles always implode at the end)



  5. António Campinos Turns His 'Boss' Into His Lapdog, Just Like Battistelli and Kongstad

    The European Patent Organisation expects us to believe that Josef Kratochvíl will keep the Office honest while his predecessor, the German who failed to do anything about Battistelli's abuses, becomes officially subservient to António Campinos



  6. Links 12/12/2018: Mesa 18.3.1 Released, CNCF Takes Control of etcd

    Links for the day



  7. EPO Trust, Leadership and Commitment

    "Trust, leadership and commitment" is the latest publication from EPO insiders, who in the absence of free speech and freedom of association for the union/representation are an essential spotlight on EPO abuses



  8. Links 11/12/2018: Tails 3.11, New Firefox, FreeBSD 12.0

    Links for the day



  9. Number of Filings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Highest in Almost Two Years

    Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs), which [cref 113718 typically invalidate software patents by citing 35 U.S.C. § 101], are withstanding negative rhetoric and hostility from Iancu



  10. With 'Brexit' in a Lot of Headlines Team UPC Takes the Unitary Patent Lies up a Notch

    Misinformation continues to run like water; people are expected to believe that the UPC, an inherently EU-centric construct, can magically come to fruition in the UK (or in Europe as a whole)



  11. The EPO Not Only Abandoned the EPC But Also the Biotech Directive

    Last week's decision (T1063/18, EPO Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.04) shows that there's still a long way to go before the Office and the Organisation as a whole fulfil their obligation to those who birthed the Organisation in the first placeLast week's decision (T1063/18, EPO Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.04) shows that there's still a long way to go before the Office and the Organisation as a whole fulfil their obligation to those who birthed the Organisation in the first place



  12. Patents on Abstract Things and on Life (or Patents Which Threaten Lives) Merely Threaten the Very Legitimacy of Patent Offices, Including EPO

    Patent Hubris and maximalism pose a threat or a major risk to the very system that they claim to be championing; by reducing the barrier to entry (i.e. introducing low-quality or socially detrimental patents) they merely embolden ardent critics who demand patent systems as a whole be abolished; the EPO is nowadays a leading example of it



  13. Links 10/12/2018: Linux 4.20 RC6 and Git 2.20

    Links for the day



  14. US Courts Make the United States' Patent System Sane Again

    35 U.S.C. § 101 (Section 101), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and other factors are making the patent system in the US a lot more sane



  15. Today's USPTO Grants a Lot of Fake Patents, Software Patents That Courts Would Invalidate

    The 35 U.S.C. § 101 effect is very much real; patents on abstract/nonphysical ideas get invalidated en masse (in courts/PTAB) and Director Andrei Iancu refuses to pay attention as if he's above the law and court rulings don't apply to him



  16. A Month After Microsoft Claimed Patent 'Truce' Its Patent Trolls Keep Attacking Microsoft's Rivals

    Microsoft's legal department relies on its vultures (to whom it passes money and patents) to sue its rivals; but other than that, Microsoft is a wonderful company!



  17. Good News: US Supreme Court Rejects Efforts to Revisit Alice, Most Software Patents to Remain Worthless

    35 U.S.C. § 101 will likely remain in tact for a long time to come; courts have come to grips with the status quo, as even the Federal Circuit approves the large majority of invalidations by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) panels, initiated by inter partes reviews (IPRs)



  18. Florian Müller's Article About SEPs and the EPO

    Report from the court in Munich, where the EPO is based



  19. EPO Vice-President Željko Topić in New Article About Corruption in Croatia

    The Croatian newspaper 7Dnevno has an outline of what Željko Topić has done in Croatia and in the EPO in Munich; it argues that this seriously erodes Croatia's national brand/identity



  20. The Quality of European Patents Continues to Deteriorate Under António Campinos and Software Patents Are Advocated Every Day

    The EPC in the European Patent Office and 35 U.S.C. § 101 in the USPTO annul most if not all software patents; under António Campinos, however, software patents are being granted in Europe and the USPTO exploits similar tricks



  21. Team UPC is Still Spreading False Rumours in an Effort to Trick Politicians and Pressure Judges

    Abuses at the European Patent Office, political turmoil and an obvious legislative coup by a self-serving occupation that produces nothing have already doomed the Unitary Patent or Unified Patent Court (UPC); so now we deal with complete fabrications from Team UPC as they're struggling to make something out of nothing, anonymously smearing opposition to the UPC and anonymously making stuff up



  22. Patents on Life and Patents That Kill the Poor Would Only Delegitimise the European Patent Office

    After Mayo, Myriad and other SCOTUS cases (the basis of 35 U.S.C. § 101) the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is reluctant to grant patents on life; the European Patent Office (EPO), however, goes in the opposite direction, even in defiance of the European Patent Convention



  23. EPO 'Untapped Potential'

    "Campinos is diligently looking for ways to further increase the Office’s output without increasing the number of examiners," says the EPO-FLIER team



  24. Links 9/12/2018: New Linux Stable Releases (Notably Linux 4.19.8), RC Coming, and Unifont 11.0.03

    Links for the day



  25. Links 8/12/2018: Mesa 18.3.0, Mageia 7 Beta, WordPress 5.0

    Links for the day



  26. The European Patent Organisation is Like a Private Club and Roland Grossenbacher is Back in It

    In the absence of Benoît Battistelli quality control at the EPO is still not effective; patents are being granted like the sole goal is to increase so-called 'production' (or profit), appeals are being subjected to threats from Office management, and external courts (courts that assess patents outside the jurisdiction of the Office/Organisation) are being targeted with a long-sought replacement like the Unified Patent Court, or UPC (Unitary Patent)



  27. Links 7/12/2018: GNU Guix, GuixSD 0.16.0, GCC 7.4, PHP 7.3.0 Released

    Links for the day



  28. The Federal Circuit's Decision on Ancora Technologies v HTC America is the Rare Exception, Not the Norm

    Even though the PTAB does not automatically reject every patent when 35 U.S.C. § 101 gets invoked we're supposed to think that somehow things are changing in favour of patent maximalists; but all they do is obsess over something old (as old as a month ago) and hardly controversial



  29. The European Patent Office Remains a Lawless Place Where Judges Are Afraid of the Banker in Chief

    With the former banker Campinos replacing the politician Battistelli and seeking to have far more powers it would be insane for the German Constitutional Court to ever allow anything remotely like the UPC; sites that are sponsored by Team UPC, however, try to influence outcomes, pushing patent maximalism and diminishing the role of patent judges



  30. Many of the Same People Are Still in Charge of the European Patent Office Even Though They Broke the Law

    "EPO’s art collection honoured with award," the EPO writes, choosing to distract from what actually goes on at the Office and has never been properly dealt with


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts