--Horacio Gutierrez, Microsoft Vice President
AS NOTED two posts ago, Microsoft is -- in essence -- paying the wages of a lot of Novell developers. What is the return on this Microsoft investment? Microsoft is neither a charity nor a promoter of GNU/Linux.
“What is the return on this Microsoft investment? Microsoft is neither a charity nor a promoter of GNU/Linux.”Users may not notice this, but working behind the scenes are some people whose obligation seems to be infection of every distribution with the equivalent of Microsoft's FAT. Whether deliberately or not, they put GNU/Linux distributions in a sensitive position. There are now attempts to push the Novell(Microsoft)-sponsored Banshee right into the heart of Ubuntu, as the default media player. What next? Windows DRM? This is problematic for reasons we've been through before.
Mono advancers are kindly asked to refrain from personal attacks which they have been spreading around the Web because they can't defend Mono (the technical arguments) and they still refuse the address the trivial TomTom question. ⬆
Comments
Jonas
2009-04-29 15:02:18
Two posts ago you mention that HP will sell SUSE Linux preinstalled and somehow this translates into "paying the wages of a lot of Novell developers"?
Tortured logic.
Roy Schestowitz
2009-04-29 15:23:14
There was an argument ("AS NOTED two posts ago...") because Microsoft essentially paid Novell $100,000,000 in the summer. Novell is in very bad financial shape, so Microsoft is floating it.
Scroll down in that post. It's further down.
Jonas
2009-04-29 16:26:30
More tortured logic.
Gentoo User
2009-04-29 16:36:40
Roy Schestowitz
2009-04-29 16:55:17
NotZed
2009-04-29 22:14:32
Novell sold some patent licenses to M$ 'cause they needed some cash, and Novell licensed some back through on-going fees that are tied to sales of suse and an on-going 'tax' on it.
Gentoo User
2009-04-29 16:44:19
Another opinion being passed as fact because you know people are not going to bother to go back 10 or 20 posts to try and validate your claims.
By the way, you might want to head over to reactivated.net. Daniel Drake (the Gentoo kernel lead) has a series of blog posts about a successful OLPC deployment to rural schools in in South America. Maybe that's more noteworthy than your tortured prevarications about Microsoft that accomplish and contribute absolutely nothing.
Jonas
2009-05-01 01:55:40
So Novell had some goods that Microsoft wanted to buy (a patent license) and Microsoft then paid for said goods.
That in Western countries is called "the free market".
That is very different from "Microsoft-funded media player".
For that to be the case, Microsoft would like the good (the media player) to be created and they would hire Novell to do this work. You would think that they would pay an *extra* sum for that work regardless of the previous payment.
Or perhaps you believe that Novell is some sort of charity that should just throw in some free work as a thank you note?
Of course this "media player" funded by Microsoft actually *predates* the Novell/Microsoft agreement, according to:
http://developer.novell.com/wiki/index.php/Sonance
Version 0.1 was released in February of 2005 (it used to be called Sonance before they renamed it to Banshee).
In this world you inhabit, you probably believe that Microsoft signed a secret pact 20 months before their official agreement with Novell. You would think that if Microsoft was behind this, that they would demand that their funded effort was built on say, Winforms or WPF or some other Microsoft API, but not Gtk#.
You guys remind me of Mel Gibson in "Conspiracy".
No wait. More like the anchor on SkyNews that sees a terrorist on every doner kebab.
Will
2009-04-29 14:15:20
To go back to the Mono discussion from earlier (replacing mono apps with safe apps), I think Gnome Do might become a problem over time. It's a neat program, especially the more recent versions, from what I hear. I admit that I also use it, though I'm still on the much older version in Hardy's repos. It is a great program for both enhancing usability and adding a little Mac-style slickness to the Linux desktop. But it is still mono based, and there isn't anything out there trying to replace it yet. The longer any of these mono apps grow, the more mature and "feature rich" (if I may borrow a term from a certain you-probably-know-who) they will become and the harder it will become to displace them. As far as I know, none of these mono apps are really fundamentally necessary for Linux's usability, but it would still be a shame to have nice features and functionality (even if it's just eye-candy or trivial stuff) temporarily yanked away if MS gets trigger happy again.
oiaohm
2009-04-29 23:09:12
People scream about eclipse and other major Java programs due to there heavy resources consume. Mono is no different both Java and Mono are JIT they have the same issues on performance and ram. Mono followers have learnt no lessons from Java.
Mono threatens to poison Linux means to operate on low ram systems. Thinking the lions share of the Linux Desktop is in that section these moves are not great.
Yes native code might be large on disk. The important but here. Native code more can be freed from memory than the same program build by a JIT.
Mono people also avoid ever having to compare exactly the same program built native and JIT. Lead developer of mono uses excuses that particular optimizations on AOT are used by nobody even when it false. Mono design team is flawed from the project lead.
Mono is detracting focus away from very important items.
Gcc lacks link time optimization that can reduce native program size and ram usage massively. Mono depends on parts built by Gcc so is also depending on this bloat.
Mono AOT building is even worse bloated than Gcc. Hopefully llvm work with Mono might see it become something useful.
All distributions and projects really need to show Mono the door and say come back when you have a native complier that works and turn there focus to Gcc. Without gcc working right they have nothing working right.
Gcc issues are the biggest bug bear in the Linux world. The problem start at Linux kernel and move up. The preprocessor of Gcc does not support types so Linux kernel developers use there own.
We have a huge rolling disaster zone and we have people selling snake oil(mono) to fix the issues. Only one problem the snake oil is laced with slow acting poison that at this stage does not look that important.
What is 1 meg more of non free able memory to operate as .net applications can add as JIT. Its 1 meg more to the min requirement of the Distribution slowly sneaking it out of low ram systems.
Final result will be Linux losing long term in the lower end of the market to something like Reactos than can operate in 24 megs of ram.
By the way windows is self poisoning themselves as well we don't need to be idiots and copy reason why Windows 7 cannot operate well on a 1 G ram netbook net surfing to get it to operate well you have to upgrade the ram to 2G. Now stupid argument is that 2G only cost 24 dollars with arm devices that are aiming at cost 200 dollars or less you are spending a large block of money just to run Windows.
Bottom end needs low specs so they can deliver low price. Windows is failing here. We again don't need to be stupid most of the desktop market is moving to the low end this is where our focus should.
Mono should be kick to the curb so hard its not funny to make them wake up the times of expanding computer specs is over. The computer spec depression is here everyone needs to tighten there belts.
That Linux can be run faster under workloads than Windows really should not happen. It just shows how bad some of the Windows Internals are. Complier used to build windows is a better complier for optimization than gcc.
An enginerd
2009-04-30 06:41:10
max stirner
2009-04-30 07:38:57
ushimitsudoki
2009-04-30 08:10:39
"And if Microsoft had not increased its SUSE Linux coupon deal by another $US100 million and put in $US25 million for the quarter, Novell would have had no profit to show at all. All that it recorded was a drop of 36.5 percent in profits to $US10.7 million."
The idea being that the only profits that Novell is showing are due to the voucher deal. Or, to be less dramatic: if it were not for the voucher deal, Novell would be losing money big time (because I'm sure they spread the loss/profits around).
When I read the Varghese article it raised the question in my mind that - assuming the statement is correct - how exactly is Novell *not* going to be a simple cat's-paw of Microsoft, if they depend on Microsoft to be profitable?
I don't think it is unrealistic to worry that Novell is a willing and enthusiastic Microsoft collaborator (they proudly state so on many web sites), and furthermore I don't think it is unrealistic to worry that Microsoft seeks to undermine Linux (to whatever degree they are able).
So, then, I don't think it is unrealistic to oppose Novell and by extension any efforts they introduce into the ecosystem, especially those that are specifically designed to assist with the spread of Microsoft technologies.
Furthermore, arguments like "the GPL will protect us" and "other companies present patent problems as well" and pretending like they absolve Microsoft/Mono/Moonlight, strikes me as arguing that a prison has bars and there are many offenders inside, so don't concern yourself with that specific prisoner that is seeking parole into your community.
Ynynymys
2009-04-30 22:47:57
FlavioC
2009-05-01 00:13:04
Roy Schestowitz
2009-05-01 00:18:04
Kevin Dean
2009-05-04 18:12:08
Additionally, Ubuntu (Canonical) already ships Banshee in the repos, so if Microsoft were interested in suing companies that ship Banshee, they'd already have grounds to do it.
It's sort of amazing to me that as Microsoft is putting out less and less FUD since Gates resigned, Linux users are picking up the slack to keep the FUD marketplace flooded.
"It infests your IP!" is a Microsoft strategy, employed because in the past, they had no technical arguements for their software. I think it's VERY telling that it's now being used here.
Roy Schestowitz
2009-05-04 18:46:08
You are wrong. Microsoft is suing Linux now (TomTom), it signs patent deals where it claims Linux infringements, it sends lobbyists to poison FOSS panels, it commissions hostile 'studies', etc.
If you think that Microsoft's FUD has declined, then you were not paying enough attention.