12.14.09

Microsoft Violates Copyright Law (Corrected)

Posted in Asia, GNU/Linux, GPL, Kernel, Law, Microsoft, Vista 7, Windows at 9:07 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

[Was: "Microsoft Violates the GNU GPL for Third Time in 2009"; see comments for correction]

“There’s free software and then there’s open source… there is this thing called the GPL, which we disagree with.”

Bill Gates, April 2008

Summary: Microsoft is said to be breaking the law again, not just mimicking another Web site but also misappropriating someone else’s code

Microsoft has just done it for the third time (at least) this year. It violated the very same licence it had been mocking for ages. Earlier today we mentioned the circumstances under which Microsoft got sued in China for copyright infringement. Windows 98, 2000, 2003 and Windows XP are banned as a result and it is a Vista 7 tool that was caught violating the GPL [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], which incidentally means that Microsoft violates copyright law all over the place, even in Linux [1, 2, 3].

The latest alleged violation has the victim offer sufficiently compelling proof to make it quite certain. We wrote about the offending service at the beginning of the month and as one reader of ours puts it:

This is the second code issue in as many months with Microsoft being alleged to have infringed on the GPL with code in their software. As usual it doesn’t take long for the “Microsoft blames” statements to arrive and in this instance it was in the form of blaming 3rd party developers for the “dodgy” code. The question I had at the time was, if Microsoft don’t have control of their own code (in that they were not aware) what else lurks inside their products which we may not be aware of.

Even Windows sites are covering this scandal and a reader wrote to us saying: “you might add a list including Sendo, SendIT, etc and going on back to Stac Electronics.”

Microsoft does not mind the law when it competes.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

This post is also available in Gemini over at:

gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2009/12/14/microsoft-cn-violates-gnu-gpl/

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

11 Comments

  1. dyfet said,

    December 14, 2009 at 10:09 pm

    Gravatar

    Indeed, what other code might there be lurking in their codebases that have been fraudulently appropriated, whether from freedom or even other proprietary sources. They do have a known and documented history of doing this.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 15, 2009 at 6:32 am

    Gravatar

    Hmmmmmm… it seems like the cited source is incorrect. I can’t find evidence that the code was GPL licensed.

    dyfet Reply:

    I had wondered that also as I did not see anything that said plurk was GNU GPL licensed code. But again, as noted, they have a history of commercial infringement, whether of proprietary of free. The wider adoption of metadata rich and, as in the case here I gather, client-side scripting languages, will continue to make it easier to reveal their crimes.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Well, I’ll correct the title either way.

    dyfet Reply:

    Yeah, it does invalidate the headline, but certainly not the relevance of the story. I imagine because people were talking about showing and comparing code, maybe someone assumed this somehow. Commercial copyright infringement is commercial copyright infringement regardless of the license of the code involved.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    The JavaScript wasn’t obfuscated. I wonder if the back end too was a ripoff.

  3. Goblin said,

    December 15, 2009 at 6:42 pm

    Gravatar

    Sorry Roy if my article was not clear.

    I quote “This is the second code issue in as many months….” and then go on to say that one was a GPL violation with: “Microsoft being alleged to have infringed on the GPL with code in their software”

    I assumed it was clear that the issue of yesterday was wholly different to the previous one (a GPL violation) and thats why the title of the article asks the question of “stealing”

    I used the term “code issue” to incorporate both, because theft or violation or GPL they both are code issues.

    Regards
    Goblin,

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    “Theft” is the wrong word to use here. Copying is not theft, it can be an infringement though.

    “Theft” implies the original is vanished, not duplicated.

  4. Goblin said,

    December 15, 2009 at 8:29 pm

    Gravatar

    I’ll agree with you, as per definition under the theft act:

    “To dishonestly appropriate properly belonging to the other with the intention to permanently deprive the other of it”

    However for want of a better word, infringement for me is far too general and can mean a multitude of things….”passing of as ones” own would be better, but far too long….

    “Fraudulent use”? or Piracy? ;)

    Having said that (and taking it off topic slightly) there is a common phrase of “identity theft” which appears to be accepted by many and since you can’t “steal” an identity….the quest goes on (at least until the theft act wording is changing)

    My suggestion:

    “To dishonestly appropriate property either physical or intellectual belonging to the other, either with the intention to permanently deprive the other of it or by taking such property by means of duplication with the intention of assuming ownership, gain or otherwise not in accordance of the others wishes.”

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Information can actually be pirated, as this video demonstrates.

    your_friend Reply:

    Microsoft is stealing and it is right to call what they do theft. They are not simply making a copy to get work done or even to sell in the normal sense. Their war against sharing and software freedom makes them a special kind of criminal. They take code with no intention of sharing it and they have every intentions of destroying everything connected to the code’s creators. If Microsoft had their way, no one would be able to share or commercialize any code or media but Microsoft. Their attacks on GNU/Linux and other competitors are as pure and malicious an act of theft as any.

    Sharing books, software, music and other things with your neighbor is not theft. That is a charity that has been the basis of libraries and learning throughout human history. Depriving your neighbor of the ability to share is a terrible crime which has at its root the theft of all of your neighbor’s property and the destruction of freedom in general.

What Else is New


  1. OpenSUSE Hates Your Freedom, But It Loves the Proprietary Software Reseller That Is the True 'Master' of OpenSUSE

    OpenSUSE is inclusive of Microsoft and other companies that attack human rights and [cref 141916 enable nationalists]; but apparently what bothers OpenSUSE very, very much is the people who started the operating system SUSE is selling



  2. Links 12/4/2021: Lagrange 1.3.2, Linux 5.12 RC7

    Links for the day



  3. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, April 11, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, April 11, 2021



  4. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 14: The Notorious Revolving Door

    The Benoît Battistelli-António Campinos shuffle left some people in the EPO’s upper management better off; they’re being rewarded for complicity, so there’s no incentive to do the right thing but to do the wrong thing



  5. Links 11/4/2021: GnuPG 2.3.0, Linux 5.13 Additions

    Links for the day



  6. All EPO Articles Are Available Over Gemini Protocol

    For lighter and more privacy-preserving access to Techrights use the Gemini capsule instead of the Web site



  7. Judge and JURI

    The Committee on Legal Affairs, a.k.a JURI, meets the EPO tomorrow (in 24 hours); will abuses by António Campinos and Benoît Battistelli be brought up?



  8. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 13: The Failed Promise of a “Good Governance” Guru…

    Before becoming an absent-minded Vice-President of António Campinos Christoph Ernst was posing as the very opposite of what he would become



  9. Gemini Gateways for IPFS

    The World Wide Web is fine for a lot of things, but for controversial publications and publications that invoke the 'wrath' of corporations/states/plutocracy we must look beyond the traditional protocols, choosing decentralised means and self-hosted means of publication (instead or at the very least in conjunction)



  10. Challenging Times for EPO Management

    A discussion of the status quo at Europe's second-largest (but scarcely-understood) institution, subjected to a JURI hearing tomorrow afternoon



  11. “The Fighters of Freedom”

    Some anime fans have made this video about recent events



  12. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, April 10, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, April 10, 2021



  13. [Meme] Bundestagate Series Spoiler

    The chain of command/s at the EPO typically leads to major tragedy



  14. Breaking News: Campinos to Appear Before the Legals Affairs Committee of the European Parliament on Monday 12 April

    "Some MEPs have been briefed about ongoing governance deficits at the EPO, in particular the lack of GDPR compliance and the sell-out of "digital sovereignty" to Microsoft, but it remains to be seen whether or not they will dare to bring these issues up during the hearing."



  15. Pro-FSF Petition (“An Open Letter in Support of Richard Matthew Stallman Being Reinstated by the Free Software Foundation”) Tops 6,200 Signatures

    Monopolies and their media, along with their NGOs, have spoken and incited based on falsehoods; people now respond so the hate letter has a real crisis



  16. Links 10/4/2021: osbuild 28, KDE Frameworks 5.81.0

    Links for the day



  17. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 12: A Worthy Successor to His Mentor?

    We examine the role of Christoph Ernst in EPO management, both in the Benoît Battistelli era and the António Campinos era (plenty to hide)



  18. USPTO for Monopolies, Keeping GNU/Linux in the Dark

    Growing evidence of gross discrimination against GNU/Linux (or Free software, even BSD/UNIX) users at the USPTO is too hard to ignore; some people out there challenge the Office over this travesty



  19. Accessibility and Availability First

    To make Techrights more widely accessible and more difficult to block/censor we've been making further changes, including self-hosting where possible



  20. Self-Hosting Videos With Free Formats and Animated Previews, Watermarks/Logos and Translucency

    We examine the power of video editing with ffmpeg, chained with command-line scripting and HTML5 features



  21. Links 10/4/2021: Linux on M1, Wine 6.6, ClamAV 0.103.2

    Links for the day



  22. Lunduke: On Mob Justice in the Tech Industry

    A new video from the former Microsofter who fears the phenomenon that’s adopted by companies like IBM



  23. IRC Proceedings: Friday, April 09, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, April 09, 2021



  24. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag — Appendix (Benoît Battistelli's Vichy Syndrome): Georges Henri Léon Battistelli and Charles Robert Battistelli

    Local copies with evidence of or something concrete about Benoît Battistelli’s connection to unsavoury — and by today’s standards outright fascistic — politics



  25. IBM Doubles Down on Masters Being an Acceptable Word in the Context of Technology

    3 days after this post which disproves IBM's stance or shows its double standards it once again says “Masters” in its official blog (won’t that offend and alienate some people as they insist?)



  26. Hate Letter Against Richard Matthew Stallman (RMS) Backfired So Spectacularly That Signers Asked to Revoke Their Own Signatures and the List Was Then Frozen Permanently (Updated)

    "An open letter in support of Richard Matthew Stallman being reinstated by the Free Software Foundation" tops 6,100 signatures (graph generated just moments ago)



  27. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 11: The BMJV's Tweedledee: Dr Christoph Ernst

    The right-hand man of António Campinos plays a role similar to that of Herr Lutz before him



  28. Links 9/4/2021: Tanglet 1.6.0 and HPVM 1.0

    Links for the day



  29. The Libel Against Richard Stallman Did Not Age Well

    Almost 2 years down the line libel about the founder of the FSF remains online, uncorrected (in sites funded by Microsoft and IBM)



  30. The Letter in Support of the FSF and Richard Stallman is Backed by the International Community, Not American Monopolies and Nationalistic Elements

    Free software is for everybody to use, internationally, it is not the asset of a bunch of current and old monopolists (connected to the US military) that also control the media; the nature of the signatures says that out loud


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts