EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS


iPad is Like Zune

Posted in Apple, Europe, Microsoft at 6:50 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Amnesty bin
From fimoculous

Summary: iPad — like Zune — might not reach the European Union (EU), possibly due to lukewarm reception and lack of appeal, not trademarks

MICROSOFT’S Zune was such a massive failure that it never made it into most European nations (almost none). Microsoft tries to “contain” the losses and keep the experiments running in just a few countries. Well, after the disappointing launch of the Apple iPad [1, 2, 3, 4] is turns out that Apple too may be getting cold feet and might not be release the iPad in the EU. They blame trademarks.

EXPENSIVE GADGET MAKER Apple is probably already regretting its daft name for its giant Ipod Touch, but it is looking like it will have a devil of a time using the Ipad name in the EU.

Let’s remember that Apple is a company that relies on a niche. Apple only sells products in few countries that are wealthy, but in the majority of the world, Apple is not even an option which is why GNU/Linux market share is higher overall. Here is Ballmer’s slide from last year:

Ballmer's slide on Macs and GNU/Linux
Steve Ballmer’s presentation slide
from 2009 shows GNU/Linux as bigger than Apple on the desktop

In addition to the above news, the FSF has just announced that over 5,000 people signed the “Defective by Design” iPad petition.

The first 5,000 names have been printed on a four-foot tall “tablet” and shipped to Cupertino. Defective by Design will send a new tablet for every 5,000 signatures.

The full press release is reproduced below.

Defective by Design delivers iPad anti-DRM petition with 5,000 signatures to Jobs — more coming

BOSTON, Massachusetts, USA — Thursday, February 4, 2010 — The Free
Software Foundation’s (FSF) Defective by Design campaign against
Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) delivered its “iPad is iBad for
Freedom” petition to Apple CEO Steve Jobs today, demanding that he
drop DRM on all Apple devices.

The petition was launched at http://defectivebydesign.org/ipad to coincide with the iPad debut event in San Francisco.
Within 24 hours, over 5,000 people had signed the petition.

The petition is still accepting signatures, but the first 5,000 names
have been printed on a four-foot tall “tablet” and shipped to
Cupertino. Defective by Design will send a new tablet for every 5,000
signatures, so supporters can still add their voices at

Photos of the tablet being delivered are at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/apple-ipad-drm-petition-mailed.

In a cover letter to Jobs, Defective by Design said, “5,000 people in
24 hours took time out of their day to call you out on this, and
demand change. There is still time for you to do the right thing in
the next 60 days, before the iPad actually goes on sale. You can drop
the DRM from the device and the App Store, and actually embrace the
ideals you claim to stand for — creativity, freedom, and
individuality.” The full text of the letter is online at

About the Free Software Foundation

The Free Software Foundation, founded in 1985, is dedicated to promoting
computer users’ right to use, study, copy, modify, and redistribute computer
programs. The FSF promotes the development and use of free (as in freedom)
software — particularly the GNU operating system and its GNU/Linux variants –
and free documentation for free software. The FSF also helps to spread
awareness of the ethical and political issues of freedom in the use of
software, and its Web sites, located at fsf.org and gnu.org, are an important
source of information about GNU/Linux. Donations to support the FSF’s work can
be made at http://donate.fsf.org. Its headquarters are in Boston, MA, USA.

Media Contacts

John Sullivan
Operations Manager
Free Software Foundation
+1 (617) 542 5942

Holmes Wilson
Campaigns Manager
Free Software Foundation
+1 (617) 542 5942

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one


  1. your_friend said,

    February 7, 2010 at 12:20 pm


    It is amusing that Apple is once again collecting arrows in the back as Microsoft’s pioneer. iPhone, iTouch and iPad are all exactly what Bill Gates said the world should have when MIT tried to deliver a $100 laptop for educational purposes. He sneered at OLPC’s “tiny screen” and said that phones that talk to larger screens should be used instead in the developing world. He strangely thought that TVs and other large screens were common or desirable because his brain is entrenched in the broadcast past and his business model depends on that kind of centralized power. It is no surprise that Gates and Apple demand the complete lack of software freedom found in all of the Apple hype products, nor is is a surprise that the form factor would evolve. GNU/Linux users have enjoyed the benefits of this form factor for a decade or so and there are countless commercial devices that exploit GNU/Linux on it. The irony is that Gate’s vision for ruling the developing world’s computing future is largely confined to a wealthy world niche. The developing world can not afford all of the taxes and restrictions non free software dumps on computing. They will inevitably be drawn to free software and hardware makers that cater to this will be the winners, not Microsoft or Apple.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Do not forget Surface. According to CNET, it was Gates’ insistence that kept it from dying before launch (Robbie Bach knew it would fail) and I suspect he also had something to do with the concept, which hardly even appeals to the super-rich.

    Another disastrous prediction from Gates was the SPOT Watch.

    More recent examples here.

    your_friend Reply:

    The surface is more of a marketing and hype generation tool than a product. Of course the idea is obvious, has been done before and it is even desirable when done with the user in control. Microsoft has tried to deploy these things where people will see them, casinos, hotel lobbies, airports and other high profile places. They are fitted with bluetooth and are used to track customers, but that has not apparently been enough to justify their costs and unreliability which a partner once called, “so Microsofty.” Microsoft claims to ahve invented every they copy from others and use displays like this to convince gullible people that Microsoft is a technology company. As the “Evangelism is War” slide show put it, “It’s not about the customer, it’s not about the tech, it’s about Microsoft.” Microsoft wants people to talk about them not nifty tables.

    iPad, on the other hand, is where Apple would like their products to go. The form factor is essentially a $40 picture frame that they will sell for $400. The the customer then faces a long line of restriction forced tie in sales and subscriptions. Both iPhone and iPod are successful precursors to this and both of them run off the same cheap hardware that should be available in free software form but is not.

    Gates greedily dreamed of forcing the iPad/iPhone/iPod model onto the developing world as he realized the days of two thousand dollar computers were numbered. It was from that perspective that he lambasted the more appropriate OLPC a $100 laptop with cooperative networking, low power consumption for off grid use, and software that can be modified to do what the user wants. Free software cuts middle men like Microsoft out of the picture. Restrictions are designed to draw revenue that no one should have to pay and the developing world can not afford.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Some moments ago I found the first article in months that actually mentioned Surface. It’s about it coming to Australia a long time after its debut in the US; only one publication found it worth covering.

    I have some decent posts coming tomorrow. Microsoft crumbles, so let’s keep up Free software advocacy.

  2. Chips B. Malroy said,

    February 7, 2010 at 6:44 pm


    Quote: “Let’s remember that Apple is a company that relies on a niche. Apple only sells products in few countries that are wealthy, but in the majority of the world, Apple is not even an option which is why GNU/Linux market share is higher overall.”
    Both Ballmer and Gates come out with statements they are not supposed to, but in Ballmers case its an graph even. After paying sites like Net Apps to skew and spread the lies, the truth came out.

    Apple is a niche, because of the price. And on many things they cooperate with MS. In fact during the Antitrust case, MS bought 25% stake of Apple non-voting stock. Not sure MS ever sold that stake either. But I think there is a point where we might see more competition between Apple and MS soon. Apple likes the high prices, make no mistake about that. It will do nothing that it thinks will cannibalize its premo market above $1000 laptops in the USA. The problem for Apple, is as prices still drop on regular OEM laptops, Apple is starting to sell a few less, but not that many. Also, Apple would like to expand its market. The Ipad being one of those efforts. And here lies the problem, by next Xmas season, Arm will be out here in the USA, most likely. ARM may further the race to the bottom for Intel based OEM PC’s. While this spells trouble for MS, its also a problem for Apple, as Apple will also need to come out with cheaper computers than they already have. or reduce prices. Say a $700 to $800 Mac Laptop instead of an $999 one? And you see where this is going? It would mean Apple would do about the same thing in the USA to this market
    that they did to MS in the plus $1000 laptop market.

    It will not be the end for MS, but it could be a far less profitable MS by just this years end.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Microsoft already has debt. Friends of mine are not sure how profitable it really is.

    your_friend Reply:

    That graph is far too optimistic. We should not conclude that Mr. Balmer’s graph is true simply because it contradicts other things Microsoft has said in the past. Liars at Microsoft contradict themselves regularly. It is likely that the graph underestimates both Apple and GNU/Linux. They do this by using the same selective and fraudulent statistics they used for Zune and Vista/Windows 7 marketshare. When complaining about “piracy” Microsoft sockpuppet BSA claims 41% of software on PCs is “pirated” but the graph above looks more like 25 to 30%. From what I’ve seen in people’s homes over the last ten years, the real unlicensed figure is likely more than 50% in the US and higher world wide. In the last ten years, a large portion of that unlicensed number has moved to free software rather than fool around with Microsoft and all the malware it brings, especially when it comes under the table. When talking to investors, Microsoft says that 90% of the world’s desktops use Windows and are paying the Microsoft tax. When buying new laws to protect their monopoly, Microsoft cries about “piracy” and says that no one is giving them any money. When talking about GNU/Linux, they will always say “no more than 2% of the market”. Their internal emails showed “comp-hot” regions of the world where free software was widely used. The success of free software in places like Brazil is unquestionable and it’s doing better than Microsoft will tell you everywhere.

What Else is New

  1. Links 20/3/2018: GStreamer 1.14.0, Freespire 3.0, Endless OS 3.3.13

    Links for the day

  2. BIO, MDMA and PhRMA Are Pushing the PTAB-Hostile STRONGER Patents Act While IAM and Patently-O Continue to Bash PTAB

    The patent microcosm, which compares the Board to the above (crude analogy from Judge Rader and other patent extremists), is still trying to kill inter partes reviews (IPRs), in effect overlooking its own hypocrisy on the matter (they don’t want patent justice, they just want to metaphorically ‘shoot down’ the judges)

  3. 35 U.S.C. § 101 is Still Effectively Tackling Software Patents in the US, But Patent Law Firms Lie/Distort to 'Sell' These Anyway

    The assertion that software patents are still worth pursuing in 2018 is based on carefully-constructed spin which mis-frames several court decisions and underplays/downplays/ignores pretty much everything that does not suit the narrative

  4. Battistelli's EPO Became Extremely Reliant on China for Distraction and on Endless Supply of Applications (Supply Which Doesn't Exist)

    Discussion about the EPO granting machine (or patent-printing machine) and figures the way EPO management would rather the public won't ever see them; the concept that China means redemption for this patent system is as laughable as always

  5. The US International Trade Commission (USITC) Against Comcast, Courtesy of the Intellectual Ventures-Connected Rovi

    The USITC/ITC, which mostly serves to impose embargoes (sometimes in shocking defiance of PTAB decisions), is being invoked by a firm connected to the world’s largest patent troll, Intellectual Ventures

  6. Tinder/Match Group Uses Software Patents to Sue a Rival, Obviously Choosing to Sue in Texas

    Software patents are being used for leverage, but only those which were likely granted before Alice and only in courts at districts somewhere around Texas

  7. Links 19/3/2018: Linux 4.16 RC6, Atom 1.25, antiX 17.1, GNU Mcron 1.1

    Links for the day

  8. From PTAB Bashing to Federal Circuit (CAFC) Bashing: How the Patent 'Industry' Sells Software Patents

    The latest tactics of the patent microcosm are just about as distasteful as last month's (or last year's), with focus shifting to the courts and few broadly-misinterpreted patent cases (mainly Finjan, Berkheimer, and Aatrix)

  9. Patent Maximalists Keep Coming Up With New Terms and Buzzwords to Bypass the Practical Ban on Software Patents

    The fightback against Section 101 and the US Supreme Court (notably Alice) seems to concentrate on old and new buzzwords, such as "Software as a Medical Device" ("SaMD") or "Fourth Industrial Revolution" ("4IR"), which the EPO recently paid European media to spread and promote

  10. News About Patents is Often Just Advertisements Composed Directly or Indirectly by Companies That Sell Patents and Patent Services

    Infomercials are still dominant among news about patents, in effect drowning out the signal (real journalism) and instead pushing agenda that is detached from reality, pertinent facts, objective assessment, public interest and so on

  11. Blocks and Paywalls Won't Protect the Patent Trolls' Lobby From Scrutiny/Fact-Checking

    Joff Wild and Benoît Battistelli have much in common, including patent maximalism and chronic resistance to facts (or fact-checking)

  12. China Has Become Very Aggressive With Patents

    China now targets other Asian countries/firms -- more so than Western firms -- with patent lawsuits; we expect this to get worse in years to come

  13. UPC/Battistelli Booster IAM Blames Brexit Rather Than EPO Abuses

    While the EPO is collapsing due to mismanagement the boosters of Team Battistelli would rather deflect and speak about Brexit, which is itself partly motivated by such mismanagement

  14. European Commission Again Urged to Tackle Abuses at the European Patent Office (EPO)

    Rina Ronja Kari is the latest MEP attempting to compel the Commission to actually do something about the EPO other than turning a blind eye

  15. Links 18/3/2018: Wine 3.4, Wine-Staging 3.4, KDE Connect 1.8 for Android

    Links for the day

  16. TXED Courts Are Causing Businesses to Leave the District, Notably For Fear That Having Any Operations Based There is a Legal Liability

    A discussion about the infamous abundance of patent cases in the Eastern District of Texas (TXED/EDTX) and what this will mean for businesses that have branches or any form of operations there (making them subjected to lawsuits in that district even after TC Heartland)

  17. PTAB Hatred is So Intense Among the Patent 'Industry' That Even Scammers Are Hailed as Champions If They Target PTAB

    The patent microcosm is so eager to stop the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that it's supporting sham deals (or "scams") and exploits/distorts the voice of the new USPTO Director to come up with PTAB-hostile catchphrases

  18. The Patent 'Industry' is Increasingly Mocking CAFC and Its Judges Because It Doesn't Like the Decisions

    Judgmental patent maximalists are still respecting high courts only when it suits them; whenever the outcome is not desirable they're willing to attack the legitimacy of the courts and the competence of judges, even resorting to racist ad hominem attacks if necessary

  19. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Carries on Enforcing § 101, Invalidating Software Patents and Upsetting the Patent 'Industry' in the Process

    A quick report on where PTAB stands at the moment, some time ahead of the Oil States decision (soon to come from the US Supreme Court)

  20. Luxembourg Can Become a Hub of Patent Trolls If the EPO Carries on With Its 'Reforms', Even Without the UPC

    With or without the Unified Patent Court (UPC), which is the wet dream of patent trolls and their legal representatives, the EPO's terrible policies have landed a lot of low-quality patents on the hands of patent trolls (many of which operate through city-states that exist for tax evasion -- a fiscal environment ripe for shells)

  21. The Patent 'Printing Machine' of the EPO Will Spawn Many Lawsuits and Extortions (Threats of Lawsuits), in Effect Taxing Europe

    The money-obsessed, money-printing patent office, where the assembly line mentality has been adopted and patent-printing management is in charge, is devaluing or diluting the pool of European Patents, more so with restrictions (monetary barriers) to challenging bad patents

  22. Links 17/3/2018: Varnish 6, Wine 3.4

    Links for the day

  23. Deleted EPO Tweets and Promotion of Software Patents Amid Complaints About Abuse and Demise of Patent Quality

    Another ordinary day at the EPO with repressions of workforce, promotion of patents that aren't even allowed, and Team UPC failing to get its act together

  24. Guest Post: Suspected “Whitewashing” Operations by Željko Topić in Croatia

    Articles about EPO Vice-President Željko Topić are disappearing and sources indicate that it’s a result of yet more SLAPP from him

  25. Monumental Effort to Highlight Decline in Quality of European Patents (a Quarter of Examiners Sign Petition in Spite of Fear), Yet Barely Any Press Coverage

    he media in Europe continues to be largely apathetic towards the EPO crisis, instead relaying a bunch of press releases and doctored figures from the EPO; only blogs that closely follow EPO scandals bothered mentioning the new petition

  26. Careful Not to Conflate UPC Critics With AfD or Anti-EU Elements

    The tyrannical Unified Patent Court (UPC) is being spun as something that only fascists would oppose after the right-wing, anti-EU politicians in Germany express strong opposition to it

  27. Links 15/3/2018: Qt Creator 4.6 RC, Microsoft Openwashing

    Links for the day

  28. PTAB Continues to Increase Capacity Ahead of Oil States; Patent Maximalists Utterly Upset

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) sees the number of filings up to an almost all-time high and efforts to undermine PTAB are failing pretty badly -- a trend which will be further cemented quite soon when the US Supreme Court (quite likely) backs the processes of PTAB

  29. Patent Maximalists Are Still Trying to Create a Patent Bubble in India

    Litigation maximalists and patent zealots continue to taunt India, looking for an opportunity to sue over just about anything including abstract ideas because that's what they derive income from

  30. EPO Staff Has Just Warned the National Delegates That EPO's Decline (in Terms of Patent Quality and Staff Welfare) Would Be Beneficial to Patent Trolls

    The staff of the EPO increasingly recognises the grave dangers of low-quality patents -- an issue we've written about (also in relation to the EPO) for many years


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time


Recent Posts