EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

02.07.10

iPad is Like Zune

Posted in Apple, Europe, Microsoft at 6:50 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Amnesty bin
From fimoculous

Summary: iPad — like Zune — might not reach the European Union (EU), possibly due to lukewarm reception and lack of appeal, not trademarks

MICROSOFT’S Zune was such a massive failure that it never made it into most European nations (almost none). Microsoft tries to “contain” the losses and keep the experiments running in just a few countries. Well, after the disappointing launch of the Apple iPad [1, 2, 3, 4] is turns out that Apple too may be getting cold feet and might not be release the iPad in the EU. They blame trademarks.

EXPENSIVE GADGET MAKER Apple is probably already regretting its daft name for its giant Ipod Touch, but it is looking like it will have a devil of a time using the Ipad name in the EU.

Let’s remember that Apple is a company that relies on a niche. Apple only sells products in few countries that are wealthy, but in the majority of the world, Apple is not even an option which is why GNU/Linux market share is higher overall. Here is Ballmer’s slide from last year:

Ballmer's slide on Macs and GNU/Linux
Steve Ballmer’s presentation slide
from 2009 shows GNU/Linux as bigger than Apple on the desktop

In addition to the above news, the FSF has just announced that over 5,000 people signed the “Defective by Design” iPad petition.

The first 5,000 names have been printed on a four-foot tall “tablet” and shipped to Cupertino. Defective by Design will send a new tablet for every 5,000 signatures.

The full press release is reproduced below.


Defective by Design delivers iPad anti-DRM petition with 5,000 signatures to Jobs — more coming

BOSTON, Massachusetts, USA — Thursday, February 4, 2010 — The Free
Software Foundation’s (FSF) Defective by Design campaign against
Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) delivered its “iPad is iBad for
Freedom” petition to Apple CEO Steve Jobs today, demanding that he
drop DRM on all Apple devices.

The petition was launched at http://defectivebydesign.org/ipad to coincide with the iPad debut event in San Francisco.
Within 24 hours, over 5,000 people had signed the petition.

The petition is still accepting signatures, but the first 5,000 names
have been printed on a four-foot tall “tablet” and shipped to
Cupertino. Defective by Design will send a new tablet for every 5,000
signatures, so supporters can still add their voices at
http://defectivebydesign.org/ipad.

Photos of the tablet being delivered are at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/apple-ipad-drm-petition-mailed.

In a cover letter to Jobs, Defective by Design said, “5,000 people in
24 hours took time out of their day to call you out on this, and
demand change. There is still time for you to do the right thing in
the next 60 days, before the iPad actually goes on sale. You can drop
the DRM from the device and the App Store, and actually embrace the
ideals you claim to stand for — creativity, freedom, and
individuality.” The full text of the letter is online at
http://www.defectivebydesign.org/jobs-ipad-letter.

About the Free Software Foundation

The Free Software Foundation, founded in 1985, is dedicated to promoting
computer users’ right to use, study, copy, modify, and redistribute computer
programs. The FSF promotes the development and use of free (as in freedom)
software — particularly the GNU operating system and its GNU/Linux variants –
and free documentation for free software. The FSF also helps to spread
awareness of the ethical and political issues of freedom in the use of
software, and its Web sites, located at fsf.org and gnu.org, are an important
source of information about GNU/Linux. Donations to support the FSF’s work can
be made at http://donate.fsf.org. Its headquarters are in Boston, MA, USA.

Media Contacts

John Sullivan
Operations Manager
Free Software Foundation
+1 (617) 542 5942
campaigns@fsf.org

Holmes Wilson
Campaigns Manager
Free Software Foundation
+1 (617) 542 5942
campaigns@fsf.org

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

7 Comments

  1. your_friend said,

    February 7, 2010 at 12:20 pm

    Gravatar

    It is amusing that Apple is once again collecting arrows in the back as Microsoft’s pioneer. iPhone, iTouch and iPad are all exactly what Bill Gates said the world should have when MIT tried to deliver a $100 laptop for educational purposes. He sneered at OLPC’s “tiny screen” and said that phones that talk to larger screens should be used instead in the developing world. He strangely thought that TVs and other large screens were common or desirable because his brain is entrenched in the broadcast past and his business model depends on that kind of centralized power. It is no surprise that Gates and Apple demand the complete lack of software freedom found in all of the Apple hype products, nor is is a surprise that the form factor would evolve. GNU/Linux users have enjoyed the benefits of this form factor for a decade or so and there are countless commercial devices that exploit GNU/Linux on it. The irony is that Gate’s vision for ruling the developing world’s computing future is largely confined to a wealthy world niche. The developing world can not afford all of the taxes and restrictions non free software dumps on computing. They will inevitably be drawn to free software and hardware makers that cater to this will be the winners, not Microsoft or Apple.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Do not forget Surface. According to CNET, it was Gates’ insistence that kept it from dying before launch (Robbie Bach knew it would fail) and I suspect he also had something to do with the concept, which hardly even appeals to the super-rich.

    Another disastrous prediction from Gates was the SPOT Watch.

    More recent examples here.

    your_friend Reply:

    The surface is more of a marketing and hype generation tool than a product. Of course the idea is obvious, has been done before and it is even desirable when done with the user in control. Microsoft has tried to deploy these things where people will see them, casinos, hotel lobbies, airports and other high profile places. They are fitted with bluetooth and are used to track customers, but that has not apparently been enough to justify their costs and unreliability which a partner once called, “so Microsofty.” Microsoft claims to ahve invented every they copy from others and use displays like this to convince gullible people that Microsoft is a technology company. As the “Evangelism is War” slide show put it, “It’s not about the customer, it’s not about the tech, it’s about Microsoft.” Microsoft wants people to talk about them not nifty tables.

    iPad, on the other hand, is where Apple would like their products to go. The form factor is essentially a $40 picture frame that they will sell for $400. The the customer then faces a long line of restriction forced tie in sales and subscriptions. Both iPhone and iPod are successful precursors to this and both of them run off the same cheap hardware that should be available in free software form but is not.

    Gates greedily dreamed of forcing the iPad/iPhone/iPod model onto the developing world as he realized the days of two thousand dollar computers were numbered. It was from that perspective that he lambasted the more appropriate OLPC a $100 laptop with cooperative networking, low power consumption for off grid use, and software that can be modified to do what the user wants. Free software cuts middle men like Microsoft out of the picture. Restrictions are designed to draw revenue that no one should have to pay and the developing world can not afford.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Some moments ago I found the first article in months that actually mentioned Surface. It’s about it coming to Australia a long time after its debut in the US; only one publication found it worth covering.

    I have some decent posts coming tomorrow. Microsoft crumbles, so let’s keep up Free software advocacy.

  2. Chips B. Malroy said,

    February 7, 2010 at 6:44 pm

    Gravatar

    Quote: “Let’s remember that Apple is a company that relies on a niche. Apple only sells products in few countries that are wealthy, but in the majority of the world, Apple is not even an option which is why GNU/Linux market share is higher overall.”
    ——————————————————————————————————-
    Both Ballmer and Gates come out with statements they are not supposed to, but in Ballmers case its an graph even. After paying sites like Net Apps to skew and spread the lies, the truth came out.

    Apple is a niche, because of the price. And on many things they cooperate with MS. In fact during the Antitrust case, MS bought 25% stake of Apple non-voting stock. Not sure MS ever sold that stake either. But I think there is a point where we might see more competition between Apple and MS soon. Apple likes the high prices, make no mistake about that. It will do nothing that it thinks will cannibalize its premo market above $1000 laptops in the USA. The problem for Apple, is as prices still drop on regular OEM laptops, Apple is starting to sell a few less, but not that many. Also, Apple would like to expand its market. The Ipad being one of those efforts. And here lies the problem, by next Xmas season, Arm will be out here in the USA, most likely. ARM may further the race to the bottom for Intel based OEM PC’s. While this spells trouble for MS, its also a problem for Apple, as Apple will also need to come out with cheaper computers than they already have. or reduce prices. Say a $700 to $800 Mac Laptop instead of an $999 one? And you see where this is going? It would mean Apple would do about the same thing in the USA to this market
    that they did to MS in the plus $1000 laptop market.

    It will not be the end for MS, but it could be a far less profitable MS by just this years end.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Microsoft already has debt. Friends of mine are not sure how profitable it really is.

    your_friend Reply:

    That graph is far too optimistic. We should not conclude that Mr. Balmer’s graph is true simply because it contradicts other things Microsoft has said in the past. Liars at Microsoft contradict themselves regularly. It is likely that the graph underestimates both Apple and GNU/Linux. They do this by using the same selective and fraudulent statistics they used for Zune and Vista/Windows 7 marketshare. When complaining about “piracy” Microsoft sockpuppet BSA claims 41% of software on PCs is “pirated” but the graph above looks more like 25 to 30%. From what I’ve seen in people’s homes over the last ten years, the real unlicensed figure is likely more than 50% in the US and higher world wide. In the last ten years, a large portion of that unlicensed number has moved to free software rather than fool around with Microsoft and all the malware it brings, especially when it comes under the table. When talking to investors, Microsoft says that 90% of the world’s desktops use Windows and are paying the Microsoft tax. When buying new laws to protect their monopoly, Microsoft cries about “piracy” and says that no one is giving them any money. When talking about GNU/Linux, they will always say “no more than 2% of the market”. Their internal emails showed “comp-hot” regions of the world where free software was widely used. The success of free software in places like Brazil is unquestionable and it’s doing better than Microsoft will tell you everywhere.

What Else is New


  1. In Apple v Samsung Patents That Should Never Have Been Granted May Result in a Billion Dollars in 'Damages'

    A roundup of news about Apple and its patent cases (especially Apple v Samsung), including Intel's role trying to intervene in Qualcomm v Apple



  2. Links 20/5/2018: KDevelop 5.2.2 and 5.2.3, FreeBSD 11.2 Beta 2

    Links for the day



  3. Aurélien Pétiaud's ILO Case (EPO Appeal) an Early Sign That ILO Protects Abusers and Power, Not Workers

    A famous EPO ‘disciplinary’ case is recalled; it’s another one of those EPO-leaning rulings from AT-ILO, which not only praises Battistelli amid very serious abuses but also lies on his behalf, leaving workers with no real access to justice but a mere illusion thereof



  4. LOT Network is a Wolf in Sheep's Clothing

    Another reminder that the "LOT" is a whole lot more than it claims to be and in effect a reinforcer of the status quo



  5. 'Nokification' in Hong Kong and China (PRC)

    Chinese firms that are struggling resort to patent litigation, in effect repeating the same misguided trajectories which became so notorious in Western nations because they act as a form of taxation, discouraging actual innovation



  6. CIPU is Amplifying Misleading Propaganda From the Chamber of Commerce

    Another lobbying event is set up to alarm lawmakers and officials, telling them that the US dropped from first to twelfth using some dodgy yardstick which favours patent extremists



  7. Patent Law Firms That Profit From Software Patent Applications and Lawsuits Still 'Pull a Berkheimer' to Attract Business in Vain

    The Alice-inspired (Supreme Court) 35 U.S.C. § 101 remains unchanged, but the patent microcosm endlessly mentions a months-old decision from a lower court (than the Supreme Court) to 'sell' the impression that everything is changing and software patents have just found their 'teeth' again



  8. A Year After TC Heartland the Patent Microcosm is Trying to 'Dilute' This Supreme Court's Decision or Work Around It

    IAM, Patent Docs, Managing IP and Patently-O want more litigation (especially somewhere like the Eastern District of Texas), so in an effort to twist TC Heartland they latch onto ZTE and BigCommerce cases



  9. Microsoft Attacks the Vulnerable Using Software Patents in Order to Maintain Fear and Give the Perception of Microsoft 'Safety'

    The latest patent lawsuits from Microsoft and its patent trolls (which it financially backs); these are aimed at feeble and vulnerable rivals of Microsoft



  10. Links 19/5/2018: Mesa 18.0.4 and Vim 8.1

    Links for the day



  11. Système Battistelli (ENArque) at the EPO is Inspired by Système Lamy in Saint-Germain-en Laye

    Has the political culture of Battistelli's hometown in France contaminated the governance of the EPO?



  12. In Australia the Productivity Commission Decides/Guides Patent Law

    IP Australia, the patent office of Australia, considers abolishing "innovation patents" but has not done so yet (pending consultation)



  13. Fishy Things Noticed Ahead of the Passage of a Lot of EPO Budget (Applicants' Money) to Battistelli's Other (and Simultaneous) Employer

    Observations and odd facts regarding the affairs of the council in St Germain; it certainly looks like Battistelli as deputy mayor and the mayor (Arnaud Péricard) are attempting to hide something



  14. Links 18/5/2018: AsteroidOS 1.0 Released, More Snyk/Black Duck FUD

    Links for the day



  15. Today's EPO Financially Rewards Abuses and Violations of the Law

    Battistelli shredded the European Patent Convention (EPC) to pieces and he is being rewarded for it, perpetuating a pattern of abuses (and much worse) being rewarded by the European Patent Organisation



  16. So-Called 'System Battistelli' is Destroying the EPO, Warn Insiders

    Low-quality patent grants by the EPO are a road to nowhere but a litigious climate in Europe and an unattractive EPO



  17. Rise in Patent Trolls' Activity in Germany Noted Amid Declining Patent Quality at the EPO

    The UPC would turn Europe into some sort of litigation ‘super-state’ — one in which national patent laws are overridden by some central, immune-from-the-law bureaucracy like the EPO; but thankfully the UPC continues its slow collapse



  18. EPO's Battistelli Taking Days Off Work for Political 'Duties' (Parties) in His French Theatre Where He'll Bring Buckets of EPO Budget (EPO Stakeholders' Money)

    More tales from Saint-Germain-en-Laye...



  19. Links 16/5/2018: Cockpit 168, GCompris 0.91, DHCP Bug

    Links for the day



  20. The EPO's 'Inventor Award' Scam: Part III

    An addendum to the "inventor of the year" affair, namely the case of Remmal



  21. Apple and Microsoft Are Still Suing Companies -- Using Patents of Course -- Which 'Dare' Compete (by Leveraging GNU/Linux)

    The vanity of proprietary software giants — as the latest news serves to reveal — targeting companies with patent lawsuits, both directly and indirectly



  22. The Anti-PTAB (Patent Quality), Anti-§ 101 Lobby is Losing Its Mind and It Has Become Amusing to Observe

    The rants about the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), the courts and even the law itself have reached laughable levels; this reveals that the real agenda of patent maximalists is endless litigation and their methods boil down to those of an angry mob, not legal professionals



  23. EPO Has Become Overzealous About Software Patents, Probably More So Than Almost Anywhere Else

    The promotion of an extreme patent regime in Europe continues unabated; whether it succeeds or not depends on what EPO examiners and citizens of Europe can do



  24. Links 15/5/2018: Black Duck's Latest FUD and the EFF's EFFail FUD Debunked Further

    Links for the day



  25. Xiaomi, Samsung, TCL and Others Demonstrate That in a World With an Abundance of Stupid Patents Like Design Patents Nobody is Safe

    The "Cult of Patents" (typically a cabal of law firms looking to have everything on the planet patented) has created a battlefield in the mobile world; every company, once it gets big enough, faces a lot of patent lawsuits and dying companies resort to using whatever is in their "portfolio" to destroy everyone else inside the courtroom (or demand 'protection' money to avert lawsuits)



  26. A Google-Centric and Google-Led Patent Pool Won't Protect GNU/Linux But Merely 'Normalise' Software Patents

    Patent pools, which are basically the wrong solution to a very clear problem, continue to expand and promote themselves; the real solution, however, is elimination of abstract patents, notably software patents



  27. The Patent Microcosm is Still Looking for Ways to Bypass CAFC/PTAB Invalidation of Many US Patents

    In pursuit of patent maximalism (i.e. a status quo wherein US patents — no matter their age — are presumed valid and beyond scrutiny) pundits resort to new angles or attack vectors, ranging from the bottom (IPRs) to the top (Supreme Court)



  28. Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs) Make the United States a Much Better Place for Innovation and Creation

    Jim Logan of Personal Audio LLC (a patent troll) suffers one final blow and other news of interest serves to show just how valuable IPRs have become in the US



  29. The EPO Has Become Extremely Corrupt and Dishonest

    Corruption at the EPO is becoming an easy-to-see epidemic/problem, even if much of the media turns a blind eye to it (partly because of the corruption that's aimed at controlling media coverage)



  30. Reader's Post: The Last Delusion of Benoît Battistelli Before His Departure on June 30th

    “The last delusion of Battistelli before his departure next June 30″ — an informal article contributed by a Techrights reader


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts