EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.02.10

Novell May be Going Private, Hedge Fund Has Cash

Posted in Finance, Microsoft, Novell, SCO at 7:01 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Elliott Associates logo

Summary: Novell is having a ‘SCO moment’ as takeover seems likely, courtesy of a funding pool whose money could come from anywhere

BIG news came in via reader “dyfet”. Just over a year ago, Canonical’s current COO (who worked for Novell) said that Novell should go private. According to this new report, it might happen shortly.

Elliott offers to take Novell private for $2 bln

[...]

This offer price represents a 21 percent premium to Novell’s Tuesday close on Nasdaq.

There will surely be a lot of coverage like this later on. Where do these funds come from? That firm seems somewhat dodgy, just just like those firms that proposed saving SCO (financial rescue of a trial against Linux).

The vulture wars

A New York hedge fund is in a court battle with the Republic of Congo over who is robbing the oil-rich but dirtpoor African nation.

[...]

Although he didn’t mention any names, the President was clearly referring to Kensington International, a Cayman Islands company that owns more than $100 million of Congo’s sovereign debt and is controlled by Elliott Associates, a $6.5 billion New York City hedge fund.

Cayman Islands? Congo? Control by proxy? What is this firm? According to this press release, it describes itself as follows:

Elliott Associates, L.P. and its sister fund, Elliott International, L.P. have more than $5.2 billion of capital under management as of July 1, 2005. Founded in 1977, Elliott Associates is one of the oldest hedge funds under continuous management. The Elliott funds’ investors include large institutions, high-net-worth individuals and families, and employees of the firm.

So in principle, a company like Microsoft too can lend some money for Elliott Associates to use that money. That’s just a theory. We’ll soon post today’s IRC logs which contain more information.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

7 Comments

  1. JohnD said,

    March 3, 2010 at 8:19 am

    Gravatar

    A little food for thought. A hedge fund isn’t going to invest in a company that’s a sinking ship financially. The same goes for any other company like M$ or SAP especially given that there are other companies out there who (according to you) are doing much better in the Linux business i.e. RedHat. Even if M$ were to make an offer for Novell I seriously doubt the DOJ would allow it to go through. Apple and most likely RedHat would make a huge stink about a company that already has a monopoly in the OS arena to expand into one of it’s only competitors’ arena. Let’s review the reasons for buying a company. Eliminate competition for similar products (usual M$ tactic), expand into new area(s), improve market share in existing areas. If Novell is circling the drain financially as you’ve tried to lead your readers to believe there is no reason to buy Novell – it will die on it’s own. For the last two Novell would only be considered if the purchaser thinks they can contribute positively to the bottom line. In short if you’re correct and Novell is purchased or taken private – you’ve been wrong about their financial status.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    No, Novell still has assets.

    By the way, rumours about takeover have floated for quite some time. Novell tried to deny them, poorly (masterful phrasing).

  2. JohnD said,

    March 3, 2010 at 8:32 am

    Gravatar

    And before you start pointing to Elliot’s statement – the keyword in the article is “undervalued”. You have someone who doesn’t have a clue about technology looking to manipulate a company in such a way as to improve on it’s investment. This is what happens when you let bean counters make decisions. IBM just laid off how many people? The world wide economy is in the toilet and this guy is looking to make a quick buck and improve his bottom line.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    IBM is probably moving jobs to India this month (I saw a report a few days ago). I’d call it offshoring/globalisation, not layoffs. Microsoft does that too to an extent (and many of its US workers are also imported).

  3. your_friend said,

    March 4, 2010 at 10:10 am

    Gravatar

    JohnD, Novell does not have to be in good financial shape or offer anything of value to society for people to want to keep it running. SCO is an example of a company that exists to harass competition through lawsuits and is mostly funded by Microsoft through intermediaries like Baystar Capital. SCO quit offering anything of net value to society about a decade ago and has been a money loser for most ofthat time. Boycott Novell noticed the same thing happening to Novell, a powerful former competitor being turned into a satellite of Microsoft and then proxy for harassing competitors. It should be pretty obvious by now that doing as Microsoft says and boosting Microsoft tech is a sure way to lose lots of money and ruin your tech business.

    Microsoft’s work with both SCO and Novell is classic anti-trust activity and the US DOJ should be acting against it. There are laws against this kind of “competition” because it offends and robs society as whole and specific companies in particular. There are limits to how well a free market serves society. Reasonable people make laws against obvious predation like mugging, high seas piracy and business trusts designed to destroy competition in markets. With Oracle eating Sun and Microsoft having devoured Yahoo, it looks like there are no free standing Unix companies left and precious few early internet giants not subjected by Microsoft. Google stands alone because Microsoft destroyed the rest. It is annoying but typical that Microsoft now screams “anti-trust” at Google because Google refuses to yield and is economically successful because of it.

    JohnD Reply:

    I’m willing to be that the last thing this guy/company wants to do is to keep Novell running. I’m betting that his goal is to take it private so he can sell off the pieces. Roy sent me some links last night about other things this guy has done and it looks like his motivator is money plain and simple.
    SCO isn’t so clear cut in the eyes of the law. M$ may have been giving money via back channels to help the lawsuits, but that’s a patent issue which is legal in the US. There is no direct assault on Linux in terms of removing it from competition – just that it “may” be infringing on patents. There is nothing for the DOJ to act on at this point. Now if M$ were to purchase Novell that would be an uphill battle because now they are gaining more market share by owning a company that sells (support) for a competing OS.
    If M$ is working behind the scenes it’s probably to get the Novell patent portfolio without having to worry about DOJ battles. They could then sell of all the Unix related stuff to trolls and God only knows what else.
    I saw the Google thing coming from a long way off. Turn about is fair play.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Microsoft did this to Google before (several times but not confirmed by Microsoft).

What Else is New


  1. Links 26/3/2017: Debian Project Leader Elections, SecureDrop and Alexandre Oliva FSF Winners

    Links for the day



  2. His Master's Voice, Jesper Kongstad, Blocks Discussion of Investigative and Disciplinary Procedures at the EPO

    The Chairman of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation is actively preventing not just the dismissal of Battistelli but also discussion of Battistelli's abuses



  3. Heiko Maas and the State of Germany Viewed as Increasingly Complicit in EPO Scandals and Toxic UPC Agenda

    It is becoming hard if not impossible to interpret silence and inaction from Maas as a form of endorsement for everything the EPO has been doing, with the German delegates displaying more of that apathy which in itself constitutes a form of complicity



  4. With IP Kat Coverage of EPO Scandals Coming to an End (Officially), Techrights and The Register Remain to Cover New Developments

    One final post about the end of Merpel’s EPO coverage, which is unfortunate but understandable given the EPO’s track record attacking the media, including blogs like IP Kat, sites of patent stakeholders, and even so-called media partners



  5. Everyone, Including Patent Law Firms, Will Suffer From the Demise of the EPO

    Concerns about quality of patents granted by the EPO (EPs) are publicly raised by industry/EPO insiders, albeit in an anonymous fashion



  6. Yes, Battistelli's Ban on EPO Strikes (or Severe Limitation Thereof) is a Violation of Human Rights

    Battistelli has curtailed even the right to strike, yet anonymous cowards attempt to blame the staff (as in patent examiners) for not going out of their way to engage in 'unauthorised' strikes (entailing dismissal)



  7. Even the EPO's Administrative Council No Longer Trusts Its Chairman, Battistelli's 'Chinchilla' Jesper Kongstad

    Kongstad's protection of Battistelli, whom he is supposed to oversee, stretches to the point where national representatives (delegates) are being misinformed



  8. Thanks to Merpel, the World Knows EPO Scandals a Lot Better, But It's a Shame That IP Kat Helped UPC

    A look back at Merpel's final post about EPO scandals and the looming threat of the UPC, which UPC opportunists such as Bristows LLP still try hard to make a reality, exploiting bogus (hastily-granted) patents for endless litigation all around Europe



  9. EPO Critics Threatened by Self-Censorship, Comment Censorship, and a Growing Threat to Anonymity

    Putting in perspective the campaign for justice at the EPO, which to a large degree relies on whistleblowers and thus depends a great deal on freedom of the press, freedom of speech, and anonymity



  10. Links 25/3/2017: Maru OS 0.4, C++17 Complete

    Links for the day



  11. Judge and Justice Bashing in the United States, EPC Bashing at the EPO

    Enforcement of the law based on constitutional grounds and based on the European Patent Convention (EPC) in an age of retribution and insults -- sometimes even libel -- against judges



  12. Looking for EPO Nepotism? Forget About Jouve and Look Closely at Europatis Instead.

    Debates about the contract of Jouve with the EPO overlook the elephants in the room, which include companies that are established and run by former EPO chiefs and enjoy a relationship with the EPO



  13. Depressing EPO News: Attacks on Staff, Attacks on Life, Brain Drain, Patents on Life, Patent Trolls Come to Germany, and Spain Being Misled

    A roundup of the latest developments at the EPO combined with feedback from insiders, who are not tolerating their misguided and increasingly abusive management



  14. It Certainly Looks Like Microsoft is Already Siccing Its Patent Trolls, Including Intellectual Ventures, on Companies That Use Linux (Until They Pay 'Protection' Money)

    News about Intellectual Ventures and Finjan Holdings (Microsoft-funded patent trolls) reinforces our allegations -- not mere suspicions anymore -- that Microsoft would 'punish' companies that are not paying subscription fees (hosting) or royalties (patent tax) to Microsoft and are thus in some sense 'indebted' to Microsoft



  15. Links 24/3/2017: Microsoft Aggression, Eudyptula Challenge Status Report

    Links for the day



  16. Bernhard Rapkay, Former MEP and Rapporteur on Unitary Patent, Shoots Down UPC Hopes While UPC Hopefuls Recognise That Spain Isn't Interested Either

    Germany, the UK and Spain remain massive barriers to the UPC -- all this in spite of misleading reports and fake news which attempted to make politicians believe otherwise (for political leverage, by means of dirty lobbying contingent upon misinformation)



  17. Links 23/3/2017: Qt 5.9 Beta, Gluster Storage 3.2

    Links for the day



  18. The Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation Has Just Buried an Innocent Judge That Battistelli Does Not Like

    An innocent judge (never proven guilty of anything, only publicly defamed with help from Team Battistelli and dubious 'intelligence' gathering) is one of the forgotten casualties of the latest meeting of the Administrative Council (AC), which has become growingly complicit rather than a mere bystander at a 'crime' scene



  19. Nepotism at the European Patent Office and Suspicious Absence of Tenders for Big Projects

    Carte blanche is a French term which now perfectly describes the symptoms encountered in the European Patent Office, more so once led by a lot of French people (Battistelli and his friends)



  20. “Terror” Patent Office Bemoans Terror, Spreads Lies

    Response to some of the latest utterances from the European Patent Office, where patently untruthful claims have rapidly become the norm



  21. China Seems to be Using Patents to Push Foreign Companies Out of China, in the Same Way It Infamously Uses Censorship

    Chinese patent policies are harming competition from abroad, e.g. Japan and the US, and US patent policy is being shaped by its higher courts, albeit not yet effectively combating the element that's destroying productive companies (besieged by patent trolls)



  22. 22,000 Blog Posts

    A special number is reached again, marking another milestone for the site



  23. The EPO is Lying to Its Own Staff About ILO and Endless (Over 2 Years) EPO Mistrials

    The creative writing skills of some spinners who work for Battistelli would have staff believe that all is fine and dandy at the EPO and ILO is dealing effectively with staff complaints about the EPO (even if several years too late)



  24. EPO’s Georg Weber Continues Horrifying Trend of EPO Promoting Software Patents in Defiance of Directive, EPC, and Common Sense

    The EPO's promotion of software patents, even out in the open, is an insult to the notion that the EPO is adhering to or is bound by the rules upon which it maintains its conditional monopoly



  25. Protectionism v Sharing: How the US Supreme Court Decides Patent Cases

    As the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) starts delivering some decisions we take stock of what's to come regarding patents



  26. Links 22/3/2017: GNOME 3.24, Wine-Staging 2.4 Released

    Links for the day



  27. The Battistelli Regime, With Its Endless Scandals, Threatens to Crash the Unitary Patent (UPC), Stakeholders Concerned

    The disdain and the growing impatience have become a huge liability not just to Battistelli but to the European Patent Office (EPO) as a whole



  28. The Photos the EPO Absolutely Doesn't Want the Public to See: Battistelli is Building a Palace Using Stakeholders' Money

    The Office is scrambling to hide evidence of its out-of-control spendings, which will leave the EPO out of money when the backlog is eliminated by many erroneous grants (or rejections)



  29. In the US Patent System, Evolved Tricks for Bypassing Invalidations of Software Patents and Getting Them Granted by the USPTO

    A roundup of news about patents in the US and how the patent microcosm attempts to patent software in spite of Alice (high-impact SCOTUS decision from 2014)



  30. “Then They Came For Me—And There Was No One Left To Speak For Me.”

    The decreasing number of people who cover EPO scandals (partly due to fear, or Battistelli's notorious "reign of terror") and a cause for hope, as well as a call for help


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts