EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

04.06.10

Microsoft’s Hardware Business is Failing, So Microsoft Sues Rival for Patent Violation

Posted in Hardware, Microsoft, Patents at 3:12 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Hardware circuits

Summary: Zune, Mobile, and Xbox are having a very hard time, so Microsoft starts suing companies (using patents) in what seems like unnecessary aggression

ALMOST everything that Microsoft tries in hardware inevitably fails pretty badly. Leading examples include Zune, phones, and Xbox. Microsoft is just losing a lot of money. Here is a new article about what happened to the Zune:

The Zune’s failure sent the company dow a very different path than Apple’s. Jobs & Co. were able to use the iPod’s success to launch the iPhone, and now the iPad. Microsoft’s mobile OS has struggled against the mobile operating system Apple uses, probably because Redmond never had a cell phone of its own to carry Windows Mobile as a follow-on product to the Zune.

When it comes to phones, Microsoft is just rebranding around the Vista 7 name. Further refinements are still being applied to the name, as if dropping the “Windows Mobile” name would save the dying platform from its rapid decline.

Microsoft is not very confident about the coolness of the name of its newest operating system for mobile phones named Windows Phone 7 Series. The coolest name would have been WP7S! But Microsoft has decided to chop the word ‘series’ from the ‘Windows Phone 7 Series’. The phone will now be called Windows Phone 7.

Microsoft is also patenting user interfaces (software) around “Windows Phone 7″ [1, 2, 3]. Is Microsoft preparing to sue like Apple did [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]? Based on its statement about the case [1, 2], it’s not impossible.

This brings us to Xbox. Microsoft has begun using patents aggressively. The monopolist is going litigious again (as it did against Primax and against TomTom for example). Here is some of the latest coverage:

Microsoft Launches Legal Battle Against UK-based Datel

Microsoft Sues Datel Over 360 Controllers

Microsoft Going After British Control Pad Company

Microsoft Sues Datel Over Game Controllers

Microsoft Sues U.K.-Based Control Pad Company

Microsoft Suing Datel For Copying Controller Design

Microsoft sues Datel for allegedly copying Xbox gamepads

Microsoft sues UK company over Xbox 360 controller

Microsoft suing Datel over controller design

Microsoft sues Datel for patent infringement on gamepads

Microsoft has filed suit (PDF) in a Seattle court and with the ITC against British gaming accessories maker Datel for patent infringement. Redmond claims the peripheral company stole various design patents from the Xbox 360 controller.

At first glance, Datel’s $30 TurboFire and $50 WildFire controllers obviously bear much resemblance to Microsoft’s Xbox 360 gamepad, though minor aesthetics do vary. To be fair, plenty of other companies have similar clones, but they must have more than just trivial differences.

So it’s about appearance. As we showed earlier, Microsoft is patenting user interfaces too. It’s bordering on fashion patents, which are some of the most controversial out there. As Openbytes puts it, “MS looking for scraps off the table?”

Why should you invent anything when you can merely patent the idea and then wheel out your portfolio when you think the time is right? Readers to Openbytes may remember Microsoft’s holodeck which was reported here and now it seems Datel is next in line for an “attack of the drones” albeit Microsoft legal.

Datel is apparently infringing the following patents, D521,015, D522,011, D547,763, D581,422, D563,480, and D565,688 but in a nutshell its about Datel’s controller looking like Microsoft’s. – Is this an example of Microsoft settling for scraps off the floor because of the increase in popularity to alternatives of most of its product base? – If so I think we can expect more “spiteful” behaviour as Microsoft can’t be best pleased that they lost the appeal in the i4i case.

There is actually more trouble for Xbox right now. Firstly, we have witnessed serious security issues that resemble account cracking from a few years back (en masse hijacking). Victims now include a top Microsoft employee (the Xbox Live director):

Microsoft’s ‘Major Nelson’ Suffers Xbox Live Account Theft

A Microsoft representative confirmed that a group of hackers gained temporary control of the Xbox Live Account owned by Larry Hryb, the Xbox Live programming director who goes by the online handle “Major Nelson.”

Hacker targets Xbox Live director

Microsoft’s Major Nelson Has XBL and Gamercard Account Hacked

Microsoft Investigating Major Nelson Account Hack

OMG! Major Nelson falls victim to Xbox Live hack attack

Article: Major Nelson’s account hacked

Microsoft’s Major Nelson gets hacked

Xbox Live Director’s Account Hacked! (Are You Next?)

This probably confirms the stereotype that Microsoft cannot handle security.

Xbox 360 is also limited by design, just like Apple products. In the news we have:

Microsoft again says no browser for 360

Microsoft: Xbox 360 Isn’t Getting A Web Browser

Microsoft’s Xbox 360 Will Never Have a Browser

Microsoft officially declares that the Xbox 360 will not be receiving a browser.

What a waste of hardware. It’s not even good hardware and it still receives immense public slapping for the defective components and overall design. Also in the news today:

When Microsoft posted the enhanced game update to the Xbox Live Marketplace on March 30, it made a fatal error by making the download available before the Call of Duty game itself was updated to accept the download.

As a result, the game crashed for hours for people who legitimately purchased the content, while Microsoft struggled to fix the problem that it had apparently never dealt with before.

With quality and service of this level, is it surprising that Microsoft loses billions in hardware?

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

3 Comments

  1. williami said,

    April 6, 2010 at 5:34 am

    Gravatar

    Boy, M$ would rather die fighting than just give up, even through their hardware products are failling, they still just want to get money by suing people for ridiculous reasons.

  2. Jose_X said,

    April 6, 2010 at 5:26 pm

    Gravatar

    The patent system: Carving up the market ahead of time.

    The US patent system amounts to a “communist government leader” opening up an office and asking anyone that wants to control production of a class of products to write up a general description of those product characteristics they want to control.

    Out with competition and collaboration! The applicants each get 20 years of control.

    Other details: If two or more applicants file overlapping claims, then the first one gets control. Also, if an existing product already falls under one of these claim descriptions, then the definition/scope of the description is adjusted to bypass that specific product. Also, being awarded control requires payment of a very large fee.

    What an inefficient system this is! One person, not the most skilled either (and perhaps among the greediest and someone already wealthy), gets ultimate control for 20 years over all future innovation and creations that happen to fall within their territory. They can halt anything they don’t like and can divert income streams into their pockets. Other people’s superior or even pre-existing variations count for nothing in comparison.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    “[Y]ou’re creating a new 20-year monopoly for no good reason.”

    David Kappos (currently head of the USPTO) speaking about patents

What Else is New


  1. CAFC Meddling in PTAB Affairs; Unified Patents Fights a Good Fight by Invalidating Software Patents

    A look at how the AIA's Patent Trial and Appeal Board is invalidating software patents post-Alice, with or without involvement of patent courts



  2. Early Certainty That Benoît Battistelli is Dangerously Clueless and a Major Risk to the EPO

    The chaos which Team Battistelli is assured to deliver if it doesn't treat scientists like scientists, instead viewing them as a production line with rubber-stamping duties



  3. OIN Makes Claims About “Open Source Innovation”, But It Produces Nothing and Protects Virtually Nobody

    The Open Invention Network (OIN) reports growth, but in practical terms it does little or nothing to help developers of Free/Open Source software



  4. Links 27/7/2016: New CrossOver, Blackmagic for GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  5. The Death of Software Patents and Microsoft's Coup Against Yahoo! Made the Company Worthless

    A look at what happens to companies whose value is a house of software patents rather than code and a broad base of users/customers



  6. Munich Attack Mentioned by EPO But Not Ansbach

    The EPO does the usual right-wing thing (exploiting disaster/emergency for domestic crackdowns), but some bemoan the omission of the explosion at Ansbach (also in Germany)



  7. Kluwer Thinks People Are Clueless About the Unitary Patent System and Pretends It's Business as Usual

    Flogging the dead UPC horse at times of great uncertainty (enough to bring the UPC to a standstill)



  8. Almost Everything That the Government Accountability Office Says is Applicable to the EPO

    The Government Accountability Office in the United States produces reports which can serve as a timely warning sign to the European Patent Office, where patent quality is rapidly declining in order to meet 'production' goals



  9. Microsoft Says It Loves Linux, But Its Anti-Linux Patent Trolls Are Still Around and Active

    Highlighting just two of the many entities that Microsoft (and partners) use in order to induce additional costs on Free (as in freedom) software



  10. Links 26/7/2016: Microsoft Growing Desperate, Linux 4.8 Visions

    Links for the day



  11. Links 25/7/2016: Linux 4.7 Final, PostgreSQL 9.6 Beta 3

    Links for the day



  12. Leaked: Boards of Appeal Face 'Exile' or 'Extradition' in Haar After Standing up to Battistelli

    A look at some of the latest moves at the European Patent Office (EPO), following Battistelli's successful coup d’état which brought the EPO into a perpetual state of emergency that perpetuates Battistelli's totalitarian powers



  13. The US Government Accountability Office (GAO) Comes Across as Against Software Patents, Relates to the EPO as Well

    Some analysis of the input from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) with focus on the EPO and software patents



  14. In the US, Patent Trolls Engage in Patent Wars and Shakedowns, Whereas in China/Korea Large Android OEMs Sue One Another

    Highlighting some of the differences between the US patent system and other patent systems



  15. Links 24/7/2016: Elive 2.7.1 Beta, New Flatpaks and Snaps

    Links for the day



  16. Links 23/7/2016: Leo Laporte on GNU/Linux, Dolphin Emulator’s Vulkan Completion

    Links for the day



  17. Links 22/7/2016: Wine 1.9.15, KaOS 2016.07 ISO

    Links for the day



  18. Haar Mentioned as Likely Site of Appeal Boards as Their Eradication or Marginalisation Envisioned by UPC Proponent Benoît Battistelli

    Not only the Staff Union of the European Patent Office (SUEPO) is under severe attack and possibly in mortal danger; the increasingly understaffed Boards of Appeal too are coming under attack and may (according to rumours) be sent to Haar, a good distance away from Munich and the airport (half an hour drive), not to mention lack of facilities for visitors from overseas



  19. EPO Attaché Albert Keyack Viewed as Somewhat of a Mole, Reporting From the US Embassy in Brazil Until Shortly Before the Temer Coup

    Public responses to the role played by Albert Keyack on behalf of the United States inside the European [sic] Patent Office



  20. EPO Insiders Explain Why the EPO's Examination Quality Rapidly Declines and Will Get Even Worse Because of Willy Minnoye

    Public comments from anonymous insiders serve to highlight a growing crisis inside the European Patent Office (EPO), where experienced/senior examiners are walking away and leaving an irreplaceable bunch of seats (due to high experience demands)



  21. Patents Roundup: BlackBerry, Huawei, PTAB, GAO, Aggressive Universities With Patents, and Software Patents in Europe

    Various bits and pieces of news regarding patents and their fast-changing nature in the United States nowadays



  22. Glimpse at Patent Systems Across the World: Better Quality Control at the USPTO Post-America Invents Act (2011), Unlike the EPO Post-Battistelli (2010)

    While the EPO reportedly strives to eliminate pendency and appeal windows altogether (rubberstamping being optimal performance as per the yardstick du jour), the USPTO introduces changes that would strengthen the system and shield innovation, not protect the business model of serial litigants



  23. Blockstream Has No Patents, But Pledges Not to Sue Using Patents

    Blockstream says that it comes in peace when it comes to software patents, which triggers speculations about coming Blockchain patent wars



  24. Links 21/7/2016: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, Linux Mint 18 “Sarah” Xfce Beta

    Links for the day



  25. Links 21/7/2016: An Honorary Degree for Alan Cox, Looks Back at DebConf16

    Links for the day



  26. EPO USA: Under Battistelli, the 'European' Patent Office Emulates All the Mistakes of the USPTO

    Conservative Benoît Battistelli is trying to impose on the European Patent Office various truly misguided policies and he viciously attacks anyone or anything that stands in his way, including his formal overseers



  27. Links 19/7/2016: ARM and Opera Buyout

    Links for the day



  28. Large Corporations' Software Patenting Pursuits Carry on in Spite of Patent Trolls That Threaten Small Companies the Most

    With unconvincing excuses such as OIN, large corporations including IBM continue to promote software patents in the United States, even when public officials and USPTO officials work towards ending those



  29. Battistelli Has Implemented De Facto EPO Coup to Remove Oversight, Give Himself Total Power, and Allegedly Give UPC Gifts (Loot) to French Officials

    Benoît Battistelli's agenda at the EPO is anything but beneficial to the EPO and suspicions that Battistelli's overall agenda is transitioning to the UPC to further his goals grow feet



  30. EPO Social [sic] Report is a Big Pile of Lies That Responsible Journalists Must Ignore

    A reminder of where the EPO stands on social issues and why the latest so-called 'social' report is nothing but paid-for propaganda for Battistelli's political ambitions


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts