Gemini version available ♊︎

Readers’ Input Wanted, Regarding Microsoft (Updated)

Posted in Microsoft, Site News at 3:32 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Woman voter

Summary: Poll time – deciding on this site’s focus

On the right hand side (menu) we have a new, single-question poll (scroll down a bit to see it). It says: “Should Techrights reduce focus on Microsoft?”

Techrights currently looks at Microsoft very closely because Microsoft actively works against software freedom. Should Techrights instead be more focused on other threats to software freedom, at the expense (but not exclusion) of Microsoft?

Voting ought to take just 5 seconds and the majority vote really will determine this site’s direction.

As side news, last night we created an identi.ca group. If you have an identi.ca, feel free to join us.

Update: We have a little problem with the poll because caching makes all visitors’ requests be funneled through the same IP address. The only apparent way around this was to make the poll open to registered users and registered users only. We apologise for this.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.


  1. satipera said,

    June 27, 2010 at 5:27 am


    I can understand why it makes sense to reduce emphasis on Microsoft but I still voted no. The reason I voted no was because this a campaigning website and needs to reach people who are presently unaware of why we need software freedom. I came to Linux and then became a supporter of software freedom because of Microsoft abuses that were apparent and obvious to me because I used their software. Reducing the emphasis on Microsoft will mean that much of the coverage will not seem relevant to the average Microsoft computer user and they will not then become interested in the wider issues of software freedom.

    slave5tom Reply:

    I have a similar experience as satipera. Dealing with many designed “limitations” on software features, such as one outlook account per computer and tedious searching for device drivers for older printers, I switched to GNU/Linux because it just worked. Only after using GNU/Linux did I discover the long list of Microsoft abuses. Keep up the good work on this site. People need to know the intensional acts to disrupt free software, bully hardware and software vendors and Microsoft’s unethical (and sometimes illegal) business practices.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    To tell you the truth, I considered stopping coverage of Microsoft (with as much emphasis) not because I lost interest in scrutinising it but because it takes a lot of time researching. I mean, a lot of time (to ensure accuracy and breadth).

    So far I can see that most people are in favour of keeping this focus, so unless the poll results change, there will be no change to the current focus and tomorrow I will post in high volume about Microsoft.

  2. Jose_X said,

    June 27, 2010 at 1:40 pm


    Roy and other contributors, you all should consider your needs and what motivates you. That’s how this game works.

    My opinion on software:

    Software is used everywhere. It runs society. It runs research (in advanced technologies and at today’s speed). It runs the Internet. Etc Etc.

    This is why software patents, for example, are such an important class of patents to get eliminated: they affect all of society and will have an even greater impact tomorrow. If we care about competitive access to business, competitive access to drugs, competitive access to schools, competitive access to government, competitive access to art/multimedia, competitive access to xxx…, and freedoms in general, then we will find ourselves constantly bumping up against software.

    Microsoft+friends’ ambitions, skill (in particular in deception), and current power/influence are too great to downplay relative to many of their peers and to other less related groups.

    All of this said, I don’t think an effort should be made to force news or to ignore other news. And as stated at the top, one should follow his/her heart, needs, nose, etc. We don’t need more slaves. And changing times will require changes in focus and approach. Humans will always love drama, but it can wear down and sometimes even slow down solutions.

    I voted “no”, but that should be taken more as an expression of whom or what I consider to be a very important threat to many things today.

    More importantly, at least as concerns software, I’m for growing the awareness of the negatives of proprietary platforms and of the value of Linux, FOSS, GPL, etc, and for improving FOSS relative to the alternatives.

    Can the effort put into news best be used in say creating advocacy games and marketing/letter-writing/etc efforts?

    Of course, there are many important issues beyond software, issues that more directly and immediately affect a lot of people. Addressing these through FOSS solutions would be ideal!

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:


    You contributed a few popular articles before. Is there any way you can contribute more (even if just copies)? My problem is that I already have my hands full but there is enough space for more.

    For that matter, anyone who reads this and wants to post an article can mail it to roy at schestowitz dot com for publishing. It’s a community site after all.

  3. pinguinpat said,

    June 27, 2010 at 3:12 pm


    Respect for the Techrights project in the first place!! I’m not really surprised that the research takes a lot of time.

    To the point: I think that Microsoft will play the game even more dirty because the further evolves , the more they are positioned with they’re back against the wall.

    It will be very interesting to see what elements of the Microsoft pack will do what.

    I’m not into violence at all but when you have a fight with a group of persons, it’s always wise to stick with one of them!


    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I’m not a big fan of campaigns, petitions, and protests. I don’t find them to be as effective as exposing the perpetrators and spreading the word; it leads to change in behaviour (embargo/boycott, scared perpetrators, company policy changes, brand value erosion).

    Companies don’t like bad publicity; people with signs in the streets have a limited reach and no targeting of audience (e.g. arbitrary bystanders vs. people who search the Web for a particular topic).

    The Web has changed the dynamics of backlash, research, and general exploration (cooperation and idea sharing). You mentioned “violence”; that’s what people in the uncivilised world/underworld still do.

    pinguinpat Reply:

    The violence part is only a bad translation of a Dutch proverb free interpreted by me of course :)

    Although exposing those perpetrators could be summarized as a battle between Gandhi and multinationals!

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    At one stage, activists in India did wage a protest titled “Boycott Novell” (inspired but not organised by us).

  4. Agent_Smith said,

    June 27, 2010 at 5:32 pm


    No way, expose M$, crApple, IBM, OiN, Novell, Google. Name the cows, expose their wrong doings. People has to know what happens down the table. Go on Mr. Schestowitz

  5. twitter said,

    June 28, 2010 at 6:07 pm


    Keep after Microsoft, they deserve it and you know how to give it to them. You should not veer away from an area that you have developed an expertise in. While it might take a long time for you to back up what you say, others will take longer or may be so drowned in Microsoft PR that they can’t form the thought in the first place. The company is still the biggest impediment to free software use and worst violator of software user’s rights and privacy. Thanks for all the hard work.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    If I’m left with less time, then I’ll need to reprioritise.

DecorWhat Else is New

  1. Links 19/05/2022: PostgreSQL 15 Beta 1 and Plasma 5.25 Beta

    Links for the day

  2. A Libera.Chat Anniversary and Happy Birthday (Maybe the Last) to 'Leenode'

    What became known as the so-called ‘Leenode’ is a cautionary tale, but maybe it is also a blessing in disguise because IRC as a whole seem to have become a lot more decentralised (as everything should be)

  3. Links 19/05/2022: The Gradual Fall of Netflix/DRM

    Links for the day

  4. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, May 18, 2022

    IRC logs for Wednesday, May 18, 2022

  5. Links 18/05/2022: Qt Company Loses Chief; OpenSUSE Leap Micro 5.2 and RHEL 9 Final

    Links for the day

  6. Jim Zemlin's Wife is Funded by Puppies (Microsoft)

    Jim Zemlin — like his wife — is bagging millions from Microsoft, but that’s clearly a conflict of interest for the Linux Foundation

  7. Links 18/05/2022: More Defections From WordPress to Gemini

    Links for the day

  8. Links 18/05/2022: PikaScript and cURL's Annual User Survey

    Links for the day

  9. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, May 17, 2022

    IRC logs for Tuesday, May 17, 2022

  10. Phoronix: Microsoft and Phoronix Sponsor (and Close Microsoft Partner) AMD All Over the Place

    When you’re taking massive 'gifts' from AMD (and also some from Microsoft) maybe it’s not surprising that editorial decisions change somewhat…

  11. EPO Has No F-ing Oversight

    Earlier today SUEPO mentioned this new article demonstrating that EPO President António Campinos can very obviously and blatantly violate the Code of Conduct of the Office without facing any consequences; there are translations too, so the report is now available in four languages

  12. [Meme] Linux-Rejecting Foundation

    The Linux Foundation never really leads by example; by default, it uses proprietary software

  13. Linux Foundation Almost Never uses Open Source

    The Linux Foundation uses proprietary software (look where they hire and take money from) and be sure they're probably not even aware of it

  14. Links 17/05/2022: Many More Games on GNU/Linux, YaST Development Report

    Links for the day

  15. Links 17/05/2022: Rocky Linux 8.6 and Budgie Desktop in Fedora

    Links for the day

  16. Patent Examiners Rising Up Against EPO Abuse

    Unhappy with the law-breaking autocracy (the EPO‘s management breaks the law as a matter of routine), fast-deteriorating working conditions and rapidly-decreasing quality of work (or lack of compliance with the law), workers have escalated further, topping off strikes and industrial actions with a large-scale petition

  17. [Meme] What Managers (Really) Mean by Acting Professionally

    The myth of 'professionalism' needs to die along with the façade of conformity as prerequisite for employment (Linus Torvalds can work just fine in a bathrobe in his own home)

  18. Internal Poll: 93% of European Patent Office (EPO) Workers Are Unhappy With the EPO

    On top of strike/s and industrial action/s there are now also petitions; at the EPO, almost all staff is "disgruntled" because of utterly corrupt and defunct leadership

  19. Links 17/05/2022: OpenSUSE Leap 15.4 Release Candidate

    Links for the day

  20. IRC Proceedings: Monday, May 16, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, May 16, 2022

  21. Links 16/05/2022: FreeBSD 13.1 and Inkscape 1.2 Released

    Links for the day

  22. Archiving Latest Posts in Geminispace (Like a Dated Web Directory But for Gemini)

    Earlier today we saw several more people crossing over from the World Wide Web to Gemini; we're trying to make a decent aggregator and archive for the rapidly-expanding Geminispace, which will soon have 2,500 capsules that are known to Lupa alone

  23. Microsoft Vidal Does Not Want to Listen (USPTO is Just for Megacorporations)

    Microsoft Vidal knows her real bosses. They’re international corporations (multinationals like Microsoft), not American people.

  24. Links 16/05/2022: China Advances on GNU/Linux and Maui 2.1.2 is Out

    Links for the day

  25. Jim Zemlin: Chief Revenue Officer in 'Linux' Seat-Selling Foundation

    Board seats in the Linux Foundation are basically a product on sale, based internal documents

  26. Reminder: Linux Foundation's Last IRS Filing is Very Old (Same Year the CFO Left)

    People really need to ask the Linux Foundation, directly, why its filings are years behind; this seems like a sensitive subject

  27. Linux Foundation Does Not Speak for GNU/Linux Users

    There's a serious problem in the "Linux" world as the so-called 'Linux' Foundation claims to speak for us (the GNU/Linux community) while in fact speaking against us (on the payroll of those looking to extinguish us)

  28. IBM's Lennart Poettering on Breaking Software for Pseudo Novelty

    Recently-uploaded ELCE 2011 clip shows a panel with Linus Torvalds, Alan Cox, Thomas Gleixner, Paul McKenney, and Lennart Poettering (relevant to novelty or perceived novelty that mostly degrades the experience of longtime users, e.g. Wayland and systemd)

  29. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, May 15, 2022

    IRC logs for Sunday, May 15, 2022

  30. Links 15/05/2022: Linux 5.18 RC7 and Calls for More Mass Surveillance

    Links for the day

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts