09.16.10

Gemini version available ♊︎

Microsoft ‘Pulls a Russia’ in Brazil

Posted in America, Asia, Free/Libre Software, FUD, GNU/Linux, Microsoft at 6:50 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Brazilian flag

Summary: Microsoft Latin America takes additional steps to crack down on adoption of GNU/Linux in the region (e.g. in all Brazilian schools), using old FUD and indoctrination/brainwashing of journalists

A FEW days ago we shared transcripts of an audiocast explaining how Microsoft overcomes Free software policies in Brazil. We also have this wiki page about Microsoft’s dirty dealings in Brazil.

“Microsoft criticizes Brazilian government’s position about free software” teaches us this new page which highlights new FUD and contains responses in there:

Microsoft criticizes Brazilian government’s position about free software

The president of Microsoft Latin America, Hernán Rincón, sent word to Brazilian government: “innovation software does not happen in the hands of governments but the private sector.”

The statement came after he was questioned about the government’s position of supporting programs with open source like Linux.

In a meeting with journalists from Latin America in Bellevue, Wash., he said this morning: “Governments have to ask: what business is to serve their citizens and develop software? Innovation is at private sector. ”

According to Rincon, free programs require more work and investment from the government to keep them running and updated – which does not happen when companies take care of that for the government.

Brazil is already on Microsoft's hit/hot/heat list/map because of high GNU/Linux adoption over there, and the same goes for Russia (see this discussion and Microsoft table from a very recent post). A few days ago we explained how shameless damage control after the Russia case/blunder actually helps Microsoft stifle GNU/Linux adoption in Russia. OpenBytes called it what it is.

Which I believe shows that this is now an exercise in damage control as Microsoft did not envisage a situation where the story would become so big.

Too little too late Microsoft, these new licenses should have been in place years ago if you really are pro-NGO.

Even Human Rights First slammed Microsoft over it.

Public Knowledge from Washington had this to say:

This week, the New York Times reported that Russian authorities were searching the offices and seizing the computers of public interest non-governmental organizations (NGOs) disfavored by the government, under the guise of enforcing Microsoft copyrights. Microsoft itself seemed to have some role in this enforcement practice as well, with its lawyers in these cases apparently pressing for criminal charges and refusing to pass on to authorities evidence that the software was legitimately purchased.

One of the first things Microsoft said in its defense was that it was required to obey Russian laws when it operates there—certainly true of any company operating overseas. But the unique situation here is that, since the charges against the organizations stem from ostensible infringements of Microsoft’s copyrights, Microsoft holds the ultimate key to preventing these particular abuses of the law.

Now that proprietary software EULAs are upheld in US courts (covered just days ago), it is abundantly clear that no ‘donation’ of proprietary software is worthwhile. It’s a rent and it’s also a lock-in. Jos Poortvliet, the OpenSUSE Community Manager, recommends “another way for Freedom” in Russia:

This past weekend the New York Times ran a story on how the Russian government has used software licensing to squelch dissent protests and prevent environmentalists and other activists from organizing. The article explains how Russian police stop or stymie dissent activities, by seizing the activist’s computers with the excuse that they were using pirated software. With the data obtained from those computers, the activist’s plans become known to the government leading to several arrests.

Though Microsoft has responded by issuing a blanket license for NGOs, reading this article made me think there is another, better way to prevent the police from using this high-tech tactic without the entanglements of licensing. While it won’t stop an authoritarian government from crushing dissenters, using Free and Open Source Software can make it harder for police operating in suppressive regimes to legitimize this type of action.

First, the philosophy of Freedom deeply permeates the men and women in the community who develop Open Source Software and has resulted in many freedom-protecting innovations. Things like GPG encyption and the TOR technology, which make anonymous communication possible for millions of users in countries like China and Iran. Not to mention the fact, that in the open source world we have a strong focus on security and protection from threats like viruses or potential ‘backdoors’ put into commercial software through pressure from governments.

Brazil has understood the importance of freedom (liberty) for quite some time and hopefully its schools will successfully resist Microsoft's Russia-like attacks on GNU/Linux in Brazilian schools. See the posts below for background.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

4 Comments

  1. Agent_Smith said,

    September 16, 2010 at 7:03 am

    Gravatar

    The microsoftie comment was out of desperation. Our state bank, Banco do Brasil, is thriving with Linux in its desktops, far more control, reliability, safety(no virus/malwares) and cost effectiveness than any commercial solution. Let them talk. After all, are just empty words. The latest stuxnet malwares show the M$ option is no option at all.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Siemens got hit in a major way.

  2. Agent_Smith said,

    September 16, 2010 at 7:41 am

    Gravatar

    Here, a nice article on the microsoftie comments:

    http://bsrsoft.com.br/portal/bsrsoft/bsrsoft-dev-editorial-porque-a-microsoft-erra-ao-continuar-criticando-o-uso-do-software-open-source/

    It translates to english too, via Google Translate, in the text.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    For the sake of those who need an English translation, here’s what Google outputs:

    BSRSoft Dev: Editorial – Why Microsoft is wrong to continue criticizing the use of Open Source software

    In this Tuesday, September 14, 2010 , the president of Microsoft Latin America , Hernán Rincón , criticized the decision by some governments in the region , including and especially Brazil, to encourage – Or even require – the adoption of free software on their public services and educational systems.

    Commented: “With all due respect to Brazil, but what should be the role of government ? Software development or improve the lives of people? ”

    Made several mistakes, apparently intentionally, because there it is the CEO of Microsoft in the region that predictably defends the business model of the software closed.

    Committed error when it linked the use of free software by the Brazilian government to a hypothetical need for internal software development .

    Forgot purposeful way , that free software , ready, is freely available out there. In most cases, no further development is needed.

    Much of what is done simply , is to choose the necessary software ( free) and if no internal staff of the public service authorized to install and maintain it, to hire a specialized company to provide the necessary support. Only in this case does not come to Microsoft because up until today this does not provide support for free software.

    And despite all this , software development is still a trivial task for all governments around the world . Why this would be an aberration in Brazil ?

    The Brazilian government prefers , and often requires the presentation of free software in their bids for various reasons, including:

    * Many Brazilian companies can provide support and free software under development , creating jobs , training manpower in advanced technologies and creating leading-edge technology ;
    * Chance of impartial and complete audit of what strategic sectors of government are running on their computers , preventing eavesdropping via back-doors in the programs, for example;
    * Technological independence and independence of the supplier;
    * Ensuring interoperability between different systems that use open protocols ;

    Are good reasons for any government in the world prefer open source and free.

    The NSA ( National Security Agency U.S. that specializes in electronic eavesdropping ) runs Linux on internal workstations to have access to the code of every program they use.

    The DoD (Department of Defense ) follows similar line .

    The government of France for the same reasons and also in Brazil.

    Apparently Microsoft has been attacking the Brazilian initiative pro open source , since Brazil makes up 45 % of sales are in Latin America , this being the region with the best curve of profitability for the company today.

    Are defending the goose that lays golden eggs. at the expense of spreading disinformation and fear.

    And just in these days that Microsoft has been fanning for everyone to hear , which coexists well with the free software and even ” loves free software. ”

    Words are worth nothing in the wind . What really works are concrete actions.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. [Meme] Alexander Ramsay and Team UPC Inciting Politicians to Break the Law and Violate Constitutions, Based on Misinformation, Fake News, and Deliberate Lies Wrapped up as 'Studies'

    The EPO‘s law-breaking leadership (Benoît Battistelli, António Campinos and their corrupt cronies), helped by liars who don't enjoy diplomatic immunity, are cooperating to undermine courts across the EU, in effect replacing them with EPO puppets who are patent maximalists (Europe’s equivalents of James Rodney Gilstrap and Alan D Albright, a Donald Trump appointee, in the Eastern and Western Districts of Texas, respectively)



  2. Has the Administrative Council Belatedly Realised What Its Job in the European Patent Organisation Really Is?

    The "Mafia" which took over the EPO (the EPO's own workers call it "Mafia") isn't getting its way with a proposal, so it's preventing the states from even voting on it!



  3. [Meme] Team UPC is Celebrating a Pyrrhic Victory

    Pyrrhic victory best describes what's happening at the moment (it’s a lobbying tactic, faking/staging things to help false prophecies be fulfilled, based on hopes and wishes alone), for faking something without bothering to explain the legal basis is going to lead to further escalations and complaints (already impending)



  4. Links 24/1/2022: Scribus 1.5.8 and LXLE Reviewed

    Links for the day



  5. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 23, 2022

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 23, 2022



  6. [Meme] Team UPC Congratulating Itself

    The barrage of fake news and misinformation about the UPC deliberately leaves out all the obvious and very important facts; even the EPO‘s António Campinos and Breton (Benoît Battistelli‘s buddy) participated in the lying



  7. Links 24/1/2022: pgBadger 11.7 Released, Catch-up With Patents

    Links for the day



  8. The Demonisation and Stereotyping of Coders Not Working for Big Corporations (or 'The System')

    The war on encrypted communication (or secure communications) carries on despite a lack of evidence that encryption stands in the way of crime investigations (most criminals use none of it)



  9. On the 'Peak Hacker' Series

    Hacker culture, unlike Ludditism, is ultimately a movement for justice, for equality, and for human rights through personal and collective emancipation; Dr. Farnell has done a good job explaining where we stand and his splendid series has come to a close



  10. Links 23/1/2022: First RC of Linux 5.17 and Sway 1.7 Released

    Links for the day



  11. Peak Code — Part III: After Code

    "Surveillance perimeters, smart TVs (Telescreens built to Orwell's original blueprint) watched over our living rooms. Mandatory smart everything kept us 'trustless'. Safe search, safe thoughts. We withdrew. Inside, we went quietly mad."



  12. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, January 22, 2022

    IRC logs for Saturday, January 22, 2022



  13. Links 23/1/2022: MongoDB 5.2, BuddyPress 10.0.0, and GNU Parallel 20220122

    Links for the day



  14. A Parade of Fake News About the UPC Does Not Change the General Consensus or the Simple Facts

    European Patents (EPs) from the EPO are granted in violation of the EPC; Courts are now targeted by António Campinos and the minions he associates with (mostly parasitic litigation firms and monopolists), for they want puppets for “judges” and for invalid patents to be magically rendered “valid” and “enforceable”



  15. Welcome to 2022: Intentional Lies Are 'Benefits' and 'Alternative Facts'

    A crooks-run EPO, together with the patent litigation cabal that we’ve dubbed ‘Team UPC’ (it has nothing to do with science or with innovation), is spreading tons of misinformation; the lies are designed to make the law-breaking seem OK, knowing that Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos are practically above the law, so perjury as well as gross violations of the EPC and constitutions won’t scare them (prosecution as deterrence just isn’t there, which is another inherent problem with the UPC)



  16. From Software Eating the World to the Pentagon Eating All the Software

    “Software is eating the world,” according to Marc Andreessen (co-founder of Netscape), but the Empire Strikes Back (not the movie, the actual empire) by hijacking all code by proxy, via Microsoft, just as it grabbed a lot of the world’s communications via Skype, bypassing the world's many national telecoms; coders need to fight back rather than participate in racist (imperial) shams such as GitHub



  17. Links 22/1/2022: Skrooge 2.27.0 and Ray-Tracing Stuff

    Links for the day



  18. IRC Proceedings: Friday, January 21, 2022

    IRC logs for Friday, January 21, 2022



  19. Peak Code — Part II: Lost Source

    "Debian and Mozilla played along. They were made “Yeoman Freeholders” in return for rewriting their charters to “work closely with the new Ministry in the interests of all stakeholders” – or some-such vacuous spout… because no one remembers… after that it started."



  20. Links 22/1/2022: Ubuntu MATE 21.10 for GPD Pocket 3, MINISFORUM Preloads GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  21. Computer Users Should be Operators, But Instead They're Being Operated by Vendors and Governments

    Computers have been turned into hostile black boxes (unlike Blackbox) that distrust the person who purchased them; moreover, from a legislative point of view, encryption (i.e. computer security) is perceived and treated by governments like a threat instead of something imperative — a necessity for society’s empowerment (privacy is about control and people in positions of unjust power want total and complete control)



  22. Peak Code — Part I: Before the Wars

    Article/series by Dr. Andy Farnell: "in the period between 1960 and 2060 people had mistaken what they called "The Internet" for a communications system, when it had in fact been an Ideal and a Battleground all along - the site of the 100 years info-war."



  23. Links 21/1/2022: RISC-V Development Board and Rust 1.58.1

    Links for the day



  24. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, January 20, 2022

    IRC logs for Thursday, January 20, 2022



  25. Gemini Lets You Control the Presentation Layer to Suit Your Own Needs

    In Gemini (or the Web as seen through Gemini clients such as Kristall) the user comes first; it's not sites/capsules that tell the user how pages are presented/rendered, as they decide only on structural/semantic aspects



  26. The Future of Techrights

    Futures are difficult to predict, but our general vision for the years ahead revolves around more community involvement and less (none or decreased) reliance on third parties, especially monopolistic corporations, mostly because they oppress the population via the network and via electronic devices



  27. [Meme] UPC for CJEU

    When you do illegal things and knowingly break the law to get started with a “legal” system you know it’ll end up in tears… or the CJEU



  28. Links 20/1/2022: 'Pluton' Pushback and Red Hat Satellite 6.10.2

    Links for the day



  29. The Web is a Corporate Misinformation/Disinformation Platform, Biased Against Communities, Facts, and Science

    Misinformation/disinformation in so-called 'news' sites is a pandemic which spreads; in the process, the founder of GNU/Linux gets defamed and GNU/Linux itself is described as the problem, not the solution to the actual problems



  30. Links 20/1/2022: McKinsey Openwashing and Stable Kernels

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts