EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

11.11.10

Microsoft’s Future Goes Dark as Stock Dumped, Vista Phony 7 [sic] Fails, and Microsoft Sues Linux Rivals Instead

Posted in Courtroom, GNU/Linux, Google, Microsoft at 5:18 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Ballmer on patents

Summary: Microsoft litigation against Linux (not just via proxies like SCO and maybe Acacia) is chosen as a principal route by this company that cannot compete and whose biggest investors are bailing out

JUDGING by Microsoft’s behaviour alone (never mind the layoffs, dead products, departing managers, etc.), Microsoft is in serious trouble. It’s SCO’s successor. Its market presence with Windows and Office is the only thing which really keeps it going for the time being (same with few of SCO’s remaining deployments), and that too is an eroding market where Microsoft relies on chasing poor people (whom it labels “pirates”).

“BlackRock cuts Microsoft stake below 5 percent,” alerts Reuters.

BlackRock (BLK.N), one of the biggest holders of Microsoft Corp (MSFT.O) shares, has cut its stake in the software company below 5 percent, according to a regulatory filing on Tuesday.

As another headline put it (all caps), “BLACKROCK AND STEVE BALLMER ARE SELLING MICROSOFT SHARES, SHOULD YOU? (BLK,MSFT)”

BlackRock (NYSE:BLK), which is one of Microsoft’s (NASDAQ:MSFT) largest shareholders, cut its stake to below 5%, just days after Steve Ballmer sold 50 million shares of the company.

Chips B. Malroy gave us those two links along with some insights last night, quoting the above as saying: “At the end of last quarter, BlackRock’s major units held about 470 million Microsoft shares, according to Thomson Reuters data, about 5.5 percent of the company.”

“Just like the CEO of Microsoft, Steve Ballmer,” argues Malroy, “BlackRock has no expectations of MS stock rising. In fact, this next link maybe the reason for all the selling.”

“Just like the CEO of Microsoft, Steve Ballmer, BlackRock has no expectations of MS stock rising.”
      –Chips B. Malroy
To put some of these recent developments in context, Ballmer will possibly lose his job if he does not manage to keep up and catch up with the mobile market. He joked about it about a month ago and last week we started urging for people to share sales figures of Vista Phony 7 [sic], where Silverlight came to die. Just as we wrote some days ago, they refused to give numbers, which was indicative of failure because they always brag when they can.

Well, we finally have some numbers regarding Vista Phony 7 [sic] sales. It’s looking pretty ugly. The Inquirer‘s headline says that “Microsoft is failing to shift many Windows Phone 7 handsets” (just as The Inquirer claims to have predicted).

Over here in Blighty, Microsoft and mobile operators have been cagey about releasing sales figures, making vague statements about “strong demand” that did nothing to quell speculations that WP7 hasn’t got off to a rousing start. The 40,000 handsets that Microsoft apparently has sold in the US in the first 24 hours are a sign that even after the Vole spent hundreds of millions of dollars on marketing, punters are simply not buying into the hype.

“Market researchers claim that the Vole’s WP7 handset partners have managed to flog only 40,000 WP7 smartphones during the first 24 hours on sale in the US,” Malroy quotes it as saying. He adds: “So is the WP7 to become the “next of Kin?” Or rather, the next Kin.”

One of the original reports with the number can be found here (“Microsoft Sells 40K Windows 7 Phones”). It says that:

The anemic sales number does not include the 89,000 Microsoft employees that will be given free Windows 7 phones.

Vista Phony 7 [sic] is doing pretty poorly and “Microsoft reps declined to comment,” according to the article. Anything they say would help verify the embarrassing reports. To put things in perspective, Google (Android’s nearly sole maintainer) activates 5 times more Linux phones than Microsoft does upon hyped-up product launch. How many units per day ship with Vista Phony 7 [sic] after this launch? Could it be less than 10,000 a day? That’s quite likely. The few people who bought “KIN” (just 503 people according to Gruber) are sometimes getting rid of them on eBay. Is Vista Phony 7 [sic] too going the way of the dodo (“KIN”) within years? Microsoft made a big bet on it by giving it to all of its employees (for internal use, so Silverlight may now be required for internal use too). One has to remember that Vista Phony 7 [sic] users are Microsoft employees a lot of the time. Microsoft seems to have also made some deal with Dell. Few other companies would adopt such an immature product because, as IDG helps show, a platform being “Windows”-labeled is not expected to be secure, either.

Many businesses will not be able to support Microsoft’s Windows Phone 7 operating system, which began shipping in the United States today. Like the competing Google Android, Windows Phone 7 does not support on-device encryption to protect data stored on it. Many businesses require such encryption to be able to access corporate data through EAS (Exchange ActiveSync) policies and automatically block connections from devices that don’t support device-level encryption.

Users will get the error code 85010013 when trying to sync their email on a Windows Phone 7 device, rather than an English description of the problem. Microsoft’s support forum confirms the lack of on-device encryption support.

So, just like Swiss cheese, Windows would not be what it is without lots of holes. The ‘secure’ Wi-Fi is simply flawed in Vista Phony 7 [sic]:

A flaw possibly linked to Windows Phone 7 itself may be preventing devices from connecting to secure Wi-Fi points, new owners have discovered since launch. Those trying to reach a locked network are told they “couldn’t reach the Wi-Fi network” even when using a known good password. The issue doesn’t appear confined to one device and has affected at least the Dell Venue Pro and HTC HD7, BGR has heard.

This makes Vista Phony 7 [sic] unsuitable for many business-oriented uses. What’s left for it to go after? Any niche at all? Probably not.

“Microsoft employees can meanwhile use yuppie-Nuremberg defense to justify extorting the competition.”Microsoft has a Plan B however. If it cannot make something which works, then it wishes to make money from other companies’ products (which do work). Continuing its tradition of extortion (Horacio and his thugs can just sue more), Microsoft recently initiated two lawsuits against Motorola. Microsoft tries to make this company along with other companies surrender and pay Microsoft for Linux without even a challenge. It’s racketeering [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7].

Some would conveniently try to label Microsoft a “patent troll”, but as long as Microsoft delivers a mobile platform — no matter how useless it is — Microsoft can’t be called “patent troll” due to these cases of aggression while extorting Android phone makers. Microsoft employees can meanwhile use yuppie-Nuremberg defense to justify extorting the competition. There’s no good excuse for such a behaviour.

“While it might be too early to tell if WP7 is the complete failure like Kin was,” argues Malroy, “the rumors coming out seem to support this. Could this be why Steve Ballmer and BlackRock are selling shares off? After all, Steve Ballmer already knows the WP7 sales figures from Europe, which he is not sharing with the world. But he is dumping stock. As WP7 maybe starting to fail in a big way, Microsoft turns to more legal action. And Motorola countersues MS:”

The lawsuit comes just a day after Microsoft filed its second lawsuit against Motorola in recent months. Last month, Microsoft took aim at Motorola for the alleged infringement of nine patents in Motorola handsets that use Google’s Android mobile software. On Tuesday, Microsoft filed suit against Motorola over licensing terms for technology Microsoft uses in its Xbox game machines.

Motorola Mobility filed the current lawsuit in the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida and the Western District of Wisconsin, it said in a statement Wednesday. The patents are related to a number of technologies, including digital video coding, e-mail technology including in Exchange, Messenger and Outlook, and Windows Live instant messaging software. Motorola also directly attacked the Xbox patents in question in the recent Microsoft case, which are related to video coding and Wi-Fi technology.

“Since WP7 cannot compete with Android based on Linux kernel,” says Malroy, “MS sues companies that use Android like Motorola. Clear sign of the coming end for Microsoft when a company is desperate and cannot compete. This lawsuit is most likely MS attempting to apply more pressure on MS to settle on using Android and pay MS. Which resulted in Motorola counter suits. Motorola is not going away quietly. Is this all that Ballmer and Microsoft have, lawsuits because they cannot compete and turn out products that sell without monopoly power?”

Wayne Borean’s ongoing roundup called “Microsoft Death Watch” is now accumulating evidence from Business Insider and it includes the news about Vista Phony 7 [sic]:

So if Microsoft only sold 40,000 phones on the first day, it’s quite possible that Windows Phone 7 is going to be a flop. There are also rumors of stores that sold out however. Whether this is because of limited stock, or because of higher interest in some areas, we don’t know. A final rumor was that there have been shortages of touch screens, and that this may have affected launch stock.

So to summarise, as long as Vista Phony 7 [sic] is around, Microsoft cannot be called a “patent troll”, but it’s clear that litigation against rivals is Microsoft’s plan for the future. It’s all about software patents and the only ones which are named correspond or refer to FAT, which should give Mono a clue. Microsoft APIs are an Achilles heel and ActiveSync too is an example. We’ll expand on Mono in the next post.

“That’s extortion and we should call it what it is. To say, as Ballmer did, that there is undisclosed balance sheet liability, that’s just extortion and we should refuse to get drawn into that game.”

Mark Shuttleworth

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

8 Comments

  1. dyfet said,

    November 11, 2010 at 7:10 am

    Gravatar

    Hmm…missed in the summary, or in fact any of the coverage either, is the part of Motorola demanding that Microsoft stop shipping those “infringing features” on ex-box, windows, exchange, etc? Are they manning up to file for an injunction ala i4i and Microsoft Word, but against virtually the entire product line?! Sounds like it! When you live by the patent, you sure do die by it too :).

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Oiaohm has told me that Motorola created a whole division or separate company just to deal with those issues, so Microsoft chooses the wrong company to fight with. Unlike TomTom, Motorola is actually recovering.

    Patent-wise, Microsoft is not as strong as some companies like IBM. The fact that they race towards patent litigation tells us something about desperation.

    dyfet Reply:

    I agree that Microsoft has managed to find Daryl’s (SCO) old footgun in this case. Nobody likes the mafia or these patent “protection racket” thugs. So it was inevitable they would eventually pick on a company willing to fully fight back.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Let’s not forget Salesforce.

    The Mad Hatter Reply:

    Motorola is a dangerous company. I think that Microsoft made a huge mistake going the Tony Soprano route with them, and that now Microsoft knows this, we will see a fast, sealed settlement so that no one knows how much Microsoft had to pay to make this go away.

    Roy, BTW, you should check your Word Press settings, it looks like it’s set to only allow three comments. Tim had the same problem.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Is that three comments per day? Odd, I don’t think there’s something that should limit anything. Can you please give a more detailed explanation so that I’ll know where to check?

    The Mad Hatter Reply:

    No, it’s threaded comments, you settings are limiting threads to three comments deep. Look under Settings, Discussion, Enable threaded (nested) comments, it is currently set at three. I like ten myself.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Oh, that one. Well, I’ve used a plug-in for threads since WordPress 2.0 when this functionality was not available in the core/trunk of WP. Moving the threading ‘metadata’ from the plugin to WordPress’ tables is no simple task AFAIK.

What Else is New


  1. More Media Reports About Decline in Quality of European Patents (Granted by the EPO)

    What the media is saying about the letter from Grünecker, Hoffmann Eitle, Maiwald and Vossius & Partner whilst EPO communications shift attention to shallow puff pieces about how wonderful Benoît Battistelli is



  2. Beware Team UPC's Biggest Two Lies About the Unitary Patent (UPC)

    Claims that a Unified Patent Court (UPC) will commence next year are nothing but a fantasy of the Liar in Chief, Benoît Battistelli, who keeps telling lies to French media (some of which he passes EPO money to, just like he passes EPO money to his other employer)



  3. Diversity at the EPO

    Two decades of EPO with 16-17 years under the control of French Presidents (and nowadays predominantly French management in general with Inventor Award held in France almost half the time) is "diversity at the EPO"



  4. Orrin Hatch, Sponsored the Most by the Pharmaceutical Industry, Tries to Make Its Patents Immune From Scrutiny (PTAB)

    Orrin Hatch is the latest example of laws being up for sale, i.e. companies can 'buy' politicians to act as their 'couriers' and pass laws for them, including laws pertaining to patents



  5. Links 17/6/2018: Linux 4.18 RC1 and Deepin 15.6 Released

    Links for the day



  6. To Keep the Patent System Alive and Going Practitioners Will Have to Accept Compromises on Scope Being Narrowed

    35 U.S.C. § 101 still squashes a lot of software patents, reducing confidence in US patents; the only way to correct this is to reduce patent filings and file fewer lawsuits, judging their merit in advance based on precedents from higher courts



  7. The Affairs of the USPTO Have Turned Into Somewhat of a Battle Against the Courts, Which Are Simply Applying the Law to Invalidate US Patents

    The struggle between law, public interest, and the Cult of Patents (which only ever celebrates more patents and lawsuits) as observed in the midst of recent events in the United States



  8. Patent Marketing Disguised as Patent 'Advice'

    The meta-industry which profits from patents and lawsuits claims that it's guiding us and pursuing innovation, but in reality its sole goal is enriching itself, even if that means holding science back



  9. Microsoft is Still 'Cybermobbing' Its Competition Using Patent Trolls Such as Finjan

    In the "cybersecurity" space, a sub-domain where many software patents have been granted by the US patent office, the patent extortion by Microsoft-connected trolls (and Microsoft's 'protection' racket) seems to carry on; but Microsoft continues to insist that it has changed its ways



  10. Links 16/6/2018: LiMux Story, Okta Openwashing and More

    Links for the day



  11. The EPO's Response to the Open Letter About Decline in Patent Quality as the Latest Example of Arrogance and Resistance to Facts, Truth

    Sidestepping the existential crisis of the EPO (running out of work and issuing many questionable patents with expectation of impending layoffs), the PR people at the Office choose a facts-denying, face-saving 'damage control' strategy while staff speaks out, wholeheartedly agreeing with concerned stakeholders



  12. In the United States the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Which Assures Patent Quality, is Still Being Smeared by Law Firms That Profit From Patent Maximalism, Lawsuits

    Auditory roles which help ascertain high quality of patents (or invalidate low-quality patents, at least those pointed out by petitions) are being smeared, demonised as "death squads" and worked around using dirty tricks that are widely described as "scams"



  13. The 'Artificial Intelligence' (AI) Hype, Propped Up by Events of the European Patent Office (EPO), is Infectious and It Threatens Patent Quality Worldwide

    Having spread surrogate terms like “4IR” (somewhat of a 'mask' for software patents, by the EPO's own admission in the Gazette), the EPO continues with several more terms like “ICT” and now we’re grappling with terms like “AI”, which the media endlessly perpetuates these days (in relation to patents it de facto means little more than "clever algorithms")



  14. Links 15/6/2018: HP Chromebook X2 With GNU/Linux Software, Apple Admits and Closes a Back Door ('Loophole')

    Links for the day



  15. The '4iP Council' is a Megaphone of Team UPC and Team Battistelli at the EPO

    The EPO keeps demonstrating lack of interest in genuine patent quality (it uses buzzwords to compensate for deviation from the EPC and replaces humans with shoddy translators); it is being aided by law firms which work for patent trolls and think tanks that propel their interests



  16. Grünecker, Hoffmann Eitle, Maiwald and Vossius & Partner Find the Courage to Express Concerns About Battistelli's Ugly Legacy and Low Patent Quality

    The astounding levels of abuse at the EPO have caused some of the EPO's biggest stakeholders to speak out and lash out, condemning the Office for mismanagement amongst other things



  17. IAM Concludes Its Latest Anti-§ 101 Think Tank, Featuring Crooked Benoît Battistelli

    The attack on 35 U.S.C. § 101, which invalidates most if not all software patents, as seen through the lens of a Battistelli- and Iancu-led lobbying event (set up by IAM)



  18. Google Gets Told Off -- Even by the Typically Supportive EFF and TechDirt -- Over Patenting of Software

    The EFF's Daniel Nazer, as well as TechDirt's founder Mike Masnick, won't tolerate Google's misuse of Jarek Duda's work; the USPTO should generally reject all applications for software patents -- something which a former Commissioner for Patents at the USPTO seems to be accepting now (that such patents have no potency after Alice)



  19. From the Eastern District of Texas to Delaware, US Patent Litigation is (Overall) Still Declining

    Patent disputes/conflicts are increasingly being settled outside the courts and patents that aren't really potent/eligible are being eliminated or never brought forth at all



  20. Links 13/6/2018: Cockpit 170, Plasma 5.13, Krita 4.0.4

    Links for the day



  21. When the USPTO Grants Patents in Defiance of 35 U.S.C. § 101 the Courts Will Eventually Squash These Anyway

    Software/abstract patents, as per § 101 (Section 101) which relates to Alice Corp v CLS Bank at the US Supreme Court, are not valid in the United States, albeit one typically has to pay a fortune for a court battle to show it because the patent office (USPTO) is still far too lenient and careless



  22. Buzzwords and Three-Letter Acronyms Still Abused by the EPO to Grant a Lot of Patents on Algorithms

    Aided by Microsoft lobbying (with its very many patent trolls) as well as corrupt Battistelli, the push for software patenting under the guise of "artificial intelligence" ("AI") carries on, boosted by Battistelli's own "Pravda" (which he writes for), IAM Magazine



  23. The United States is Far Better Off With the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), So Why Do Lawyers Attack It?

    The anti-PTAB lobby (which is basically the pro-troll or pro-litigation lobby) continues to belittle and insult PTAB, having repeatedly failed to dismantle it; in the meantime PTAB is disarming several more patent trolls and removing from the system patents which were granted in error (as well as the associated lawsuits)



  24. Links 12/6/2018: Neovim 0.3 and Wine 3.10

    Links for the day



  25. Corrupt Benoît Battistelli Promotes Software Patents in IAM's Patent Trolls-Funded Event in the United States

    With less than 3 weeks remaining for Battistelli's term he engages in gross revisionism, lobbying, and even looting of the patent office



  26. The EPO's 'Expert' Georg Weber is Still Advocating Software Patents in Europe (But He Disguises Them Using Buzzwords)

    The EPO's overzealous support for software patents continues unabated while the European Parliament looks the other way; this is part of the plan to expand patent scope in Europe and flood the continent with low-quality patents (causing a ruinous litigation boom like in China)



  27. Battistelli's EPO is Outdoing North Korea When It Comes to Propaganda and Abuses Against Staff

    Battistelli’s ‘scorched Earth’ approach — his sole legacy at the EPO — has left many workers in mental breakdowns (if not dead), but to celebrate the ‘Battistelli years’ three weeks before the end of his term the Office issues new propaganda material (pertaining exclusively to the Battistelli years, 2010 to 2018) while Battistelli-leaning media offers ‘cover’



  28. IPBC, a Patent Trolls-Funded Event of IAM, is Advancing the Attacks on Section 101/Alice

    Andrei Iancu preaches to the litigation 'industry' in an event (lobbying opportunity) organised by the patent trolls' lobby, IAM



  29. PTAB Carries on Undeterred and Unabated, Courts Are Becoming Less Tolerant of Low-Quality Patents

    With the shift away from the Eastern District of Texas (EDTX) and with PTAB applying growing levels of scrutiny to patents the likelihood that abstract patents will endure at the patent office or the courts is greatly diminished



  30. Apple v Samsung Not Over, Hearing on a New Design Patent Trial Next Month

    Apple's legal battles against phones that have Linux inside them simply aren't ending; meanwhile, there's more evidence that Apple would be wise to simply push for patent reforms, namely further restrictions on patent scope


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts