EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS


Cablegate: Microsoft Helps the United States Ban Encrypted Communication in Cuba

Posted in America, Cablegate, Microsoft at 3:33 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz


Summary: A confidential cable from just 2 years ago shows the background to Microsoft’s IM ban in several countries that the US views as enemies

IN MAY of 2009 we wrote repeatedly about Microsoft playing along with political sanctions by banning particular countries. The following Cablegate cable, titled “CUBANS DISAPPOINTED BY MICROSOFT; INSPIRED BY IRAN,” shows what diplomats were saying about it. It’s marked “C O N F I D E N T I A L” (far higher than most cables of this kind) and it is easy to see why. We are highlighting a few bits of interest:

DE RUEHUB #0361/01 1701858
R 191858Z JUN 09
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 HAVANA 000361 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/18/2029 
HAVANA 00000361  001.2 OF 002 
Classified By: COM Jonathan Farrar for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d) 
1.  (C) The decision by Microsoft and others to block certain 
internet communication services in Cuba works directly 
against U.S. goals to advance people-to-people interaction. 
The growing Cuban virtual community has privately and 
publicly expressed its disappointment.  Bloggers remain 
undeterred, however, in their effort to break Cuba's 
information blockade and are inspired by current events in 
Iran and the expanded use of mobile phones to receive and 
transmit information.  This cable contains an action request 
in paragraph 6.  End Summary. 
2.  (C) Cuban bloggers Yoani Sanchez and Claudia Cadelo 
recently expressed disappointment in Microsoft's decision to 
block access to Windows Live Instant Messenger for internet 
users in Cuba (and other state sponsors of terrorism) through 
their respective blogs, Generacion Y and Octavo Cerco.  The 
Cuban Government strictly controls internet usage and 
restricts access to several internet sites (including many 
blogs), even for tourists in Cuban hotels.  In shutting down 
Instant Messenger, both bloggers commented that Microsoft is 
in effect doing the work of Cuban Government censors for 
them.  The bloggers worry that potential further action to 
avoid violations of the U.S. embargo by foreign internet and 
software companies may negatively affect the growing cyber 
community in Cuba.  Tech savvy Cubans can get around the 
restrictions by using proxy servers based outside Cuba or 
third party messenger hosts, but most Cubans are simply 
forced to do without. 
3.  (C) Microsoft and other providers of similar free, 
downloadable software (Note:  Google Talk is also blocked. 
End Note) claim that the encrypted code used in these 
programs is restricted by U.S. Export Administration 
Regulations.  The Cuban official press predictably (and 
hypocritically) took advantage of the situation to criticize 
Microsoft's decision as "the latest turn of the screw in the 
United States' technological blockage against the island" and 
"a truly harsh violation" of Cuba's rights.  Publicity around 
Microsoft's decision comes at a critical time in U.S.-Cuba 
relations as we await the pending implementation of the 
policy changes announced by the White House on April 13 to 
"authorize greater telecommunications links with Cuba to 
advance people-to-people interaction at no cost to the U.S. 
government."  Furthermore, Claudia Cadelo wrote in her June 
10 blog that she had heard rumors that the social networking 
site Facebook may follow Microsoft's example.  Operating a 
Facebook account does not require the user to download any 
software.  Thus, Facebook does not share the same concerns 
related to export restrictions as the downloadable messenger 
sites.  Per conversations with the Department, Facebook 
reported this week that it blocks Cuban access to 
applications and advertising, but not to normal social 
networking operations.  We understand from Cuban contacts 
that Cubans continue to successfully access Facebook 
accounts, although a local USINT employee tried to sign up 
for an account at a hotel on June 17 and received a message 
from Facebook that he was "ineligible to sign up." 
4.  (C) At the same time, Cuban bloggers are paying close 
attention to current events in Iran, in particular the use of 
social media such as Twitter, Facebook, and mobile phones to 
inform and influence domestic and international opinion. 
Yoani Sanchez wrote in her blog on June 17 that what is 
HAVANA 00000361  002.2 OF 002 
happening in Iran and its dissemination through the Internet 
is a lesson for Cuban bloggers.  Sanchez told us separately 
that the use of mobile phones (including iphones) to transmit 
information, share blogs, and even access the internet is a 
significant and growing phenomenon in Cuba.  As a great 
source of information hidden by the official press, she also 
praised the new service called "Granpa" (www.granpa.info) 
that sends news articles to Cuban mobile phones via SMS text 
messages (Note: USINT staff have since signed up for this 
service and receive several articles a day.  As of yet, 
neither we nor our contacts know who runs Granpa.  End Note.) 
 She lamented, however, that Cuba was clearly not yet at the 
same level of connectivity as Iranian society. 
5.  (SBU) Cuban dissidents are also following developments in 
the cyber community.  Well known dissident Oswaldo Paya 
published, through the blog Bitacora, a message of solidarity 
with the Cuban blogger community in early June.  Paya urged 
bloggers to "be the voice of those who have no blog" and 
congratulated them for "this initiative to proclaim the 
people's right to the internet and for their courage in the 
struggle for the liberation of truth, which is imprisoned in 
6.  (C) The Cuban government continues to see the internet as 
a threat and remains committed to restricting and controlling 
access.  Internet communication and social networking sites 
are becoming more and more popular in Cuba as a means of 
communicating across the island and accessing family, 
friends, and information from off the island.  This new media 
is important not just for increasing people-to-people 
contact, but also for helping Cubans share their stories and 
as a way to inform, organize, and mobilize civil society. 
ACTION REQUEST:  Post requests Department assistance in 
removing any regulatory obstacles that limit Cuban access to 
free internet communications without jeopardizing national 
7.  (C) Cuban state telecommunications monopoly ETESCA 
announced earlier this year that it hopes to add 250,000 new 
mobile phone users in 2009, which is nearly twice as many new 
subscribers as in 2008 and a 50 percent increase over the 
current total (about 470,000).  We hear that within days 
ETECSA may announce a significant drop in prices for 
initiating service and making international calls in an 
effort to capture more hard currency.  In this context, a 
liberal implementation of the changes in U.S. policy 
announced on April 13 regarding telecommunications may help 
facilitate Iran-style democratic ferment in Cuba. 

It does not say that among the US population the sanctions against Cuba are overwhelmingly unpopular. Those in positions of power in the US just want to oppress and somehow get rid of the existing Cuban government, even if they do so by hurting innocent civilians (collateral damage). It is actually part of the strategy, as by making the population upset they hope to incite the population against the government and perhaps overthrow it without outside intervention.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New

  1. As European Patent Office Management Covers up Collapse in Patent Quality Don't Expect UPC to Ever Kick Off

    It would be madness to allow EPO-granted patents to become 'unitary' (bypassing sovereignty of nations that actually still value patent quality); it seems clear that rogue EPO management has, in effect, not only doomed UPC ambitions but also European Patents (or their perceived legitimacy, presumption of validity)

  2. António Campinos -- Unlike His Father -- Engages in Imperialism (Using Invalid Patents)

    Despite some similarities to his father (not positive similarities), António Campinos is actively engaged in imperialistic agenda that defies even European law; the EPO not only illegally grants patents but also urges other patent offices to do the same

  3. António Campinos Takes EPO Waste and Corruption to Unprecedented Levels and Scale

    The “B” word (billions) is thrown around at Europe’s second-largest institution because a mischievous former EUIPO chief (not Archambeau) is ‘partying’ with about half of the EPO’s all-time savings, which are supposed to be reserved for pensions and other vital programmes, not presidential palaces and gambling

  4. Links 15/6/2019: Astra Linux in Russia, FreeBSD 11.3 RC

    Links for the day

  5. Code of Conduct Explained: Partial Transcript - August 10th, 2018 - Episode 80, The Truth About Southeast Linuxfest

    "Ask Noah" and the debate on how a 'Code of Conduct' is forcibly imposed on events

  6. Links 14/6/2019: Xfce-Related Releases, PHP 7.4.0 Alpha

    Links for the day

  7. The EPO is a Patent Troll's Wet Dream

    The makers of software and games in Europe will have to spend a lot of money just keeping patent trolls off their backs — a fact that seems to never bother EPO management because it profits from it

  8. EPO Spreading Patent Extremists' Ideology to the Whole World, Now to South Korea

    The EPO’s footprint around the world's patent systems is an exceptionally dangerous one; The EPO amplifies the most zealous voices of the patents and litigation ‘industry’ while totally ignoring the views and interests of the European public, rendering the EPO an ‘agent of corporate occupation’

  9. Guest Post: Notes on Free Speech, and a Line in the Sand

    We received this anonymous letter and have published it as a follow-up to "Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF"

  10. Links 13/6/2019: CERN Dumps Microsoft, GIMP 2.10.12 Released

    Links for the day

  11. Links 12/6/2019: Mesa 19.1.0, KDE neon 5.16, Endless OS 3.6.0 and BackBox Linux 6

    Links for the day

  12. Leaked Financial 'Study' Document Shows EPO Management and Mercer Engaging in an Elaborate “Hoax”

    How the European Patent Office (EPO) lies to its own staff to harm that staff; thankfully, the staff isn't easily fooled and this whole affair will merely obliterate any remnants of "benefit of the doubt" the President thus far enjoyed

  13. Measuring Patent Quality and Employer Quality in Europe

    Comparing the once-famous and respected EPO to today's joke of an office, which grants loads of bogus patents on just about anything including fruit and mathematics

  14. Granting More Fundamentally Wrong Patents Will Mean Reduced Certainty, Not Increased Certainty

    Law firms that are accustomed to making money from low-quality and abstract patents try to overcome barriers by bribing politicians; this will backfire because they show sheer disregard for the patent system's integrity and merely lower the legal certainty associated with granted (by greedy offices) patents

  15. Links 11/6/2019: Wine 4.10, Plasma 5.16

    Links for the day

  16. Chapter 10: Moving Forward -- Getting the Best Results From Open Source With Your Monopoly

    “the gradual shift in public consciousness from their branding towards our own, is the next best thing to owning them outright.”

  17. Chapter 9: Ownership Through Branding -- Change the Names, and Change the World

    The goal for those fighting against Open source, against the true openness (let's call it the yet unexploited opportunities) of Open source, has to be first to figuratively own the Linux brand, then literally own or destroy the brand, then to move the public awareness of the Linux brand to something like Azure, or whatever IBM is going to do with Red Hat.

  18. Links 10/6/2019: VLC 3.0.7, KDE Future Plans

    Links for the day

  19. Patent Quality Continues to Slip in Europe and We Know Who Will Profit From That (and Distract From It)

    The corporate media and large companies don't speak about it (like Red Hat did before entering a relationship with IBM), but Europe is being littered and saturated with a lot of bogus software patents -- abstract patents that European courts would almost certainly throw out; this utter failure of the media to do journalism gets exploited by the "big litigation" lobby and EPO management that's granting loads of invalid European Patents (whose invalidation goes underreported or unreported in the media)

  20. Corporate Front Groups Like OIN and the Linux Foundation Need to Combat Software Patents If They Really Care About Linux

    The absurdity of having groups that claim to defend Linux but in practice defend software patents, if not actively then passively (by refusing to comment on this matter)

  21. Links 9/6/2019: Arrest of Microsoft Peter, Linux 5.2 RC4, Ubuntu Touch Update

    Links for the day

  22. Chapter 8: A Foot in the Door -- How to Train Sympathetic Developers and Infiltrate Other Projects

    How to train sympathetic developers and infiltrate other projects

  23. Chapter 7: Patent War -- Use Low-Quality Patents to Prove That All Software Rips Off Your Company

    Patents in the United States last for 20 years from the time of filing. Prior to 1994, the patent term was 17 years from when the patent was issued.

  24. The Linux Foundation in 2019: Over 100 Million Dollars in Income, But Cannot Maintain Linux.com?

    Today’s Linux Foundation gets about 0.1 billion dollars per year (as explained in our previous post), so why can’t it spend about 0.1% of that money on people who write for and maintain a site that actually promotes GNU/Linux?

  25. Microsoft and Proprietary Software Vendors a Financial Boon for the Linux Foundation, But at What Cost?

    The Linux Foundation is thriving financially, but the sources of income are diversified to the point where the Linux Foundation is actually funded by foes of Linux, defeating the very purpose or direction of such a nonprofit foundation (led by self-serving millionaires who don't use GNU/Linux)

  26. The Linux Foundation as a Facilitator of Microsoft's Abduction of Developers (for GitHub, Azure, Visual Studio and Windows)

    There’s a profoundly disturbing pattern; in a rush for influence and money the Linux Foundation inadvertently (or worse — consciously and deliberately) paved the way to Microsoft’s more modern version of Embrace, Extend, Extinguish (EEE)

  27. Links 8/6/2019: FreeBSD 11.3 Beta 3, Git 2.22.0 and IPFire 2.23

    Links for the day

  28. Microsoft Peter is a Pedophile, Arrested Without Bail

    "Microsoft Peter" turns out to be a very sick man, much like people who apply for a job at Microsoft, knowing the company's dirty dealings and crimes

  29. Links 7/6/2019: IceWM 1.5.5, IBM Layoffs, Kdenlive 19.04.2

    Links for the day

  30. This Week's US Senate Hearings on Patents Are a Farce, Just as Expected

    With few exceptions like the EFF, Senate hears testimonies from stacked panels (full of lobbyists and think tanks), set up for the sole purpose of misleading Senate and helping them buy a law

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts