EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.17.11

Cablegate: Sarkozy Promotes Monopolies in China, French Government Backs ‘Community Patent’ (aka EU Patent, Harmonisation)

Posted in Cablegate, Europe, Intellectual Monopoly, Patents at 4:44 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Cablegate

Summary: The position of the Nicolas Sarkozy regime on intellectual monopolies including patents

POOR CHINA. The West is too obsessed with (afraid of) this highly productive nation that exports almost everything people buy in the shops if it’s economic to transport by ship. Japan et al. try to limit China's trade using intellectual monopolies, which can impede domestic production under independent brands (Apple, for instance, is notorious for shutting down competing factories in China under the pretext of “IPR”). In any event, according to the following Cablegate cable (under ¶4), the Nicolas Sarkozy regime “recently ratified the London protocol and would support adoption of a Community patent during its presidency, he said. “Common reflection” on patent harmonization issues was a potential area for TEC discussion. France also was supportive of the International Anti-counterfeiting and Piracy Agreement (?) (ACTA).”

The information came from Novelli, who “had accompanied President Sarkozy to China in late 2007 and the message on IPR had been “very firm.” Pushing together for a stronger Chinese approach on IPR was important.” Important to who? Surely not the Chinese population.

The position from Paris and EU authorities matters a lot and the cable below is not so out of date. It’s also about ACTA.


VZCZCXYZ7332
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHFR #0386/01 0641756
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 041756Z MAR 08
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2152
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE

UNCLAS PARIS 000386 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT PASS USTR 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON [Economic Conditions], ETRD [Foreign Trade], 
ENRG [Energy and Power], PREL [External Political Relations],
EAGR [Agriculture and Forestry], EUR, FR [France; Corsica] 
SUBJECT: FRENCH RECEPTIVE TO A/S SULLIVAN'S PITCH ON TEC 
 
REF: 2/11 PARIS POINT ON FRENCH GMO LAW 
 
¶1. (U) Embassy Action Request Para 14. 
 
¶2. (SBU) Summary:  In February 13-14 meetings French Trade 
Minister Novelli, MFA Economic Director Masset and PM 
Diplomatic Advisor Lapouge told A/S Dan Sullivan they would 
be supportive of the Trans-Atlantic Economic Council (TEC) 
as an important part of France's EU presidency.  On other 
issues Novelli said France would pay attention to 
"reciprocity" in EU foreign economic relations during its 
presidency.  France's position on agricultural bio- 
technology was evolving, with the amended draft law on GMOs 
recently approved by the French Senate a more "balanced" 
approach than that of the initial draft.  Lapouge said 
energy supply issues would figure among France's EU 
presidency priorities and briefed on PM Fillon's early 
February trip to Kazakhstan.  End summary. 
 
Novelli on TEC, 100% Screening, IPR 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
 
¶3. (SBU) In a February 13 meeting A/S Sullivan, accompanied 
by Ambassador Stapleton and SE Boyden Gray, told French 
Trade Junior Minister Herve Novelli the U.S. hoped France 
would put the TEC high on its agenda for the French EU 
presidency.  He underscored that the TEC not only could 
help deepen transatlantic economic relationship by reducing 
and harmonizing regulatory barriers, but also it has a much 
broader strategic rationale:  enabling the U.S. and EU to 
more closely coordinate economic policies vis-`-vis rising 
economic powers.  France's endorsement would be key to a 
successful TEC, and one that helped ensure the 
institution's longevity.  Novelli said the GOF saw the TEC 
as "very important" and the French presidency could "play a 
key role" in advancing it.  But the May TEC and June U.S.- 
EU Summit would precede the French presidency and it would 
be important to focus on these first. 
 
¶4. (SBU) Novelli described cargo security and IPR as GOF 
priorities (both in and out of the TEC).  U.S. requirements 
for 100% screening of containers were a top French concern 
given the "costs it would impose" on trans-Atlantic trade. 
Novelli saw convergence in U.S. - French interests on IPR. 
France recently ratified the London protocol and would 
support adoption of a Community patent during its 
presidency, he said. "Common reflection" on patent 
harmonization issues was a potential area for TEC 
discussion.  France also was supportive of the 
International Anti-counterfeiting and Piracy Agreement (?) 
(ACTA).  Novelli had accompanied President Sarkozy to China 
in late 2007 and the message on IPR had been "very firm." 
Pushing together for a stronger Chinese approach on IPR was 
important. 
 
Environmental Issues 
- - - - - - - - - - 
 
¶5. (SBU) In the wake of its late 2007 "Grenelle" 
environmental pact France would be "exemplary" on cutting 
carbon emissions.  The GOF was considering a variety of 
eco-taxes (and had already implemented some) as part of 
this effort.  It would use its EU presidency to encourage 
an "awakening" on the use of such measures among its EU 
partners.  Cuts in CO2 emissions were inevitable, Novelli 
said, the key would be to do so without impacting French 
productivity. (Note: Novelli said nothing about France's 
proposal for a carbon tax on imports from countries that do 
not impose binding limits on CO2 emissions. End note) 
A/S Sullivan underscored U.S. - EU convergence on climate 
change, especially through the Major Economies process. 
 
¶6. (SBU) Sullivan raised the issue of GMOs, and Novelli 
said the GOF's position was evolving.  The French Senate 
had passed a "more balanced" amended version of the GMO law 
than the one presented to parliament (ref).  The position 
of Minister of Ecology and Sustainable Development Borloo 
was shifting, Novelli claimed, "in spite the views of 
environmental groups."  France's current ban on MON810 
"could be lifted," he said, though he did not specify the 
timing or circumstances of a possible rescission. 
 
Reciprocity 
- - - - - - 
 
¶7. (SBU) Novelli previewed other priority issues within his 
remit for the French presidency.  The GOF would pursue a 
European Small Business Act, to include regulatory 
simplification and access to public procurement.  The GOF 
had presented its ideas in Brussels to "enrich the debate" 
and the Commission was preparing an initial draft.  The GOF 
would encourage movement towards freer trade and investment 
regimes, but on the basis of reciprocity.  The GOF wanted 
Europe to be "as open as our partners," but it would demand 
a level playing field.  Discussion on EU trade defense 
measures was a possible "element" in France's strategy for 
pursuing reciprocity. 
 
¶8. (SBU) France continued to hope for a Doha deal, Novelli 
said, but it "must be balanced."  The GOF felt the 
Commission had done the "maximum," in fact surpassing 
negotiating mandates on agriculture and industrial access. 
France would not "sacrifice its interests" for the sake of 
a deal.  Sullivan underscored very strong U.S. commitment 
to getting a "good, ambitious" agreement.  He also noted 
the importance of maintaining a public commitment to open 
trade and investment, saying that foreign direct investment 
was a net benefit regardless of reciprocal limitations that 
partners might impose. 
 
TEC Strategic Dialogue Timely 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - 
 
¶9. (SBU) In a separate meeting MFA Economic Director 
Christian Masset echoed Novelli's support for the TEC.  He 
warmed to A/S Sullivan's description of the strategic 
nature of the TEC as demonstrated by the dialogue that had 
occurred over lunch at the November meeting.  Such dialogue 
could be particularly useful given that France would host 
EU summits with a number of key developing economies during 
its presidency, including China and India. 
 
¶10. (SBU) Masset expanded on the French EU presidency 
priorities of climate change and energy.  The GOF would 
look to move forward with Phase II of the Emissions Trading 
System, the framework directive on renewables, and a 
directive for carbon capture and storage.  To reach 2020 
reduction goals, half of the gains would come through the 
functioning of the ETS, the other half from sectors not 
covered by the trading system.  It would take strong action 
in both areas to achieve EU goals. 
 
¶11. (SBU) On energy security, France would "put more 
emphasis" on dialogue with the Central Asia/Caspian region 
on diversification.  Masset was keen on A/S Sullivan's 
views on the region, and Sullivan highlighted elements of 
his latest trip to Turkey, Azerbaijan, and Turkmenistan. 
Masset and Sullivan also touched on eventual membership of 
India and China in the IEA (septel). 
 
PM Fillon in Kazakhstan 
- -  - - - - - - - - - - 
 
¶12. (SBU) PM Fillon's diplomatic advisor Jacques Lapouge 
briefed Sullivan on the Prime Minister's early February 
visit to Kazakhstan (the first such visit in 15 years). 
Calling the trip "pretty encouraging," Lapouge said Fillon 
brought a message of support for development of westward 
hydrocarbon supply routes.  Supply diversification would, 
in fact, be a theme of the French EU presidency.  Lapouge 
said Nazarbayev talked to Fillon about shipping product 
across the Caspian, as well as a possible pipeline skirting 
the southern shore of the Caspian.  He expressed continued 
interest in a pipeline to Iran. 
 
¶13. (SBU) On other issues, Lapouge responded positively to 
A/S Sullivan's briefing on TEC (though an advisor had heard 
disappointment at EU technical levels over a perceived lack 
of progress on EU issues at the first TEC).  On G8, the 
former Sous-Sherpa questioned whether there was sufficient 
follow-through in meeting commitments, notably on ODA.  The 
body's "credibility is at stake," Lapouge thought.  On IPR, 
the Heilegendamm Process must aim high and not be pulled 
down to the lowest common denominator.  Lapouge indicated 
the French were interested in keeping alive their proposal 
for a FATF-like body for IPR in G8 discussions. 
 
Embassy Action Request 
- - - - - - - - - - - 
 
¶14. (SBU) French views on energy supply diversification 
opportunities in the Caspian Basin are evolving.  With the 
GOF ready to engage more actively on energy diplomacy in 
the region during its EU presidency, this is an auspicious 
time to contribute to French thinking.  Post encourages the 
visit of an appropriate Department, or inter-agency, 
delegation to Paris in the coming months for in-depth 
discussions with French counterparts on these issues. 
 
¶15. (U) A/S Sullivan has cleared this cable. 
 
ROSENBLATT

In the next post we shall look at cables from Brussels.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Orrin Hatch, Sponsored the Most by the Pharmaceutical Industry, Tries to Make Its Patents Immune From Scrutiny (PTAB)

    Orrin Hatch is the latest example of laws being up for sale, i.e. companies can 'buy' politicians to act as their 'couriers' and pass laws for them, including laws pertaining to patents



  2. Links 17/6/2018: Linux 4.18 RC1 and Deepin 15.6 Released

    Links for the day



  3. To Keep the Patent System Alive and Going Practitioners Will Have to Accept Compromises on Scope Being Narrowed

    35 U.S.C. § 101 still squashes a lot of software patents, reducing confidence in US patents; the only way to correct this is to reduce patent filings and file fewer lawsuits, judging their merit in advance based on precedents from higher courts



  4. The Affairs of the USPTO Have Turned Into Somewhat of a Battle Against the Courts, Which Are Simply Applying the Law to Invalidate US Patents

    The struggle between law, public interest, and the Cult of Patents (which only ever celebrates more patents and lawsuits) as observed in the midst of recent events in the United States



  5. Patent Marketing Disguised as Patent 'Advice'

    The meta-industry which profits from patents and lawsuits claims that it's guiding us and pursuing innovation, but in reality its sole goal is enriching itself, even if that means holding science back



  6. Microsoft is Still 'Cybermobbing' Its Competition Using Patent Trolls Such as Finjan

    In the "cybersecurity" space, a sub-domain where many software patents have been granted by the US patent office, the patent extortion by Microsoft-connected trolls (and Microsoft's 'protection' racket) seems to carry on; but Microsoft continues to insist that it has changed its ways



  7. Links 16/6/2018: LiMux Story, Okta Openwashing and More

    Links for the day



  8. The EPO's Response to the Open Letter About Decline in Patent Quality as the Latest Example of Arrogance and Resistance to Facts, Truth

    Sidestepping the existential crisis of the EPO (running out of work and issuing many questionable patents with expectation of impending layoffs), the PR people at the Office choose a facts-denying, face-saving 'damage control' strategy while staff speaks out, wholeheartedly agreeing with concerned stakeholders



  9. In the United States the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Which Assures Patent Quality, is Still Being Smeared by Law Firms That Profit From Patent Maximalism, Lawsuits

    Auditory roles which help ascertain high quality of patents (or invalidate low-quality patents, at least those pointed out by petitions) are being smeared, demonised as "death squads" and worked around using dirty tricks that are widely described as "scams"



  10. The 'Artificial Intelligence' (AI) Hype, Propped Up by Events of the European Patent Office (EPO), is Infectious and It Threatens Patent Quality Worldwide

    Having spread surrogate terms like “4IR” (somewhat of a 'mask' for software patents, by the EPO's own admission in the Gazette), the EPO continues with several more terms like “ICT” and now we’re grappling with terms like “AI”, which the media endlessly perpetuates these days (in relation to patents it de facto means little more than "clever algorithms")



  11. Links 15/6/2018: HP Chromebook X2 With GNU/Linux Software, Apple Admits and Closes a Back Door ('Loophole')

    Links for the day



  12. The '4iP Council' is a Megaphone of Team UPC and Team Battistelli at the EPO

    The EPO keeps demonstrating lack of interest in genuine patent quality (it uses buzzwords to compensate for deviation from the EPC and replaces humans with shoddy translators); it is being aided by law firms which work for patent trolls and think tanks that propel their interests



  13. Grünecker, Hoffmann Eitle, Maiwald and Vossius & Partner Find the Courage to Express Concerns About Battistelli's Ugly Legacy and Low Patent Quality

    The astounding levels of abuse at the EPO have caused some of the EPO's biggest stakeholders to speak out and lash out, condemning the Office for mismanagement amongst other things



  14. IAM Concludes Its Latest Anti-§ 101 Think Tank, Featuring Crooked Benoît Battistelli

    The attack on 35 U.S.C. § 101, which invalidates most if not all software patents, as seen through the lens of a Battistelli- and Iancu-led lobbying event (set up by IAM)



  15. Google Gets Told Off -- Even by the Typically Supportive EFF and TechDirt -- Over Patenting of Software

    The EFF's Daniel Nazer, as well as TechDirt's founder Mike Masnick, won't tolerate Google's misuse of Jarek Duda's work; the USPTO should generally reject all applications for software patents -- something which a former Commissioner for Patents at the USPTO seems to be accepting now (that such patents have no potency after Alice)



  16. From the Eastern District of Texas to Delaware, US Patent Litigation is (Overall) Still Declining

    Patent disputes/conflicts are increasingly being settled outside the courts and patents that aren't really potent/eligible are being eliminated or never brought forth at all



  17. Links 13/6/2018: Cockpit 170, Plasma 5.13, Krita 4.0.4

    Links for the day



  18. When the USPTO Grants Patents in Defiance of 35 U.S.C. § 101 the Courts Will Eventually Squash These Anyway

    Software/abstract patents, as per § 101 (Section 101) which relates to Alice Corp v CLS Bank at the US Supreme Court, are not valid in the United States, albeit one typically has to pay a fortune for a court battle to show it because the patent office (USPTO) is still far too lenient and careless



  19. Buzzwords and Three-Letter Acronyms Still Abused by the EPO to Grant a Lot of Patents on Algorithms

    Aided by Microsoft lobbying (with its very many patent trolls) as well as corrupt Battistelli, the push for software patenting under the guise of "artificial intelligence" ("AI") carries on, boosted by Battistelli's own "Pravda" (which he writes for), IAM Magazine



  20. The United States is Far Better Off With the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), So Why Do Lawyers Attack It?

    The anti-PTAB lobby (which is basically the pro-troll or pro-litigation lobby) continues to belittle and insult PTAB, having repeatedly failed to dismantle it; in the meantime PTAB is disarming several more patent trolls and removing from the system patents which were granted in error (as well as the associated lawsuits)



  21. Links 12/6/2018: Neovim 0.3 and Wine 3.10

    Links for the day



  22. Corrupt Benoît Battistelli Promotes Software Patents in IAM's Patent Trolls-Funded Event in the United States

    With less than 3 weeks remaining for Battistelli's term he engages in gross revisionism, lobbying, and even looting of the patent office



  23. The EPO's 'Expert' Georg Weber is Still Advocating Software Patents in Europe (But He Disguises Them Using Buzzwords)

    The EPO's overzealous support for software patents continues unabated while the European Parliament looks the other way; this is part of the plan to expand patent scope in Europe and flood the continent with low-quality patents (causing a ruinous litigation boom like in China)



  24. Battistelli's EPO is Outdoing North Korea When It Comes to Propaganda and Abuses Against Staff

    Battistelli’s ‘scorched Earth’ approach — his sole legacy at the EPO — has left many workers in mental breakdowns (if not dead), but to celebrate the ‘Battistelli years’ three weeks before the end of his term the Office issues new propaganda material (pertaining exclusively to the Battistelli years, 2010 to 2018) while Battistelli-leaning media offers ‘cover’



  25. IPBC, a Patent Trolls-Funded Event of IAM, is Advancing the Attacks on Section 101/Alice

    Andrei Iancu preaches to the litigation 'industry' in an event (lobbying opportunity) organised by the patent trolls' lobby, IAM



  26. PTAB Carries on Undeterred and Unabated, Courts Are Becoming Less Tolerant of Low-Quality Patents

    With the shift away from the Eastern District of Texas (EDTX) and with PTAB applying growing levels of scrutiny to patents the likelihood that abstract patents will endure at the patent office or the courts is greatly diminished



  27. Apple v Samsung Not Over, Hearing on a New Design Patent Trial Next Month

    Apple's legal battles against phones that have Linux inside them simply aren't ending; meanwhile, there's more evidence that Apple would be wise to simply push for patent reforms, namely further restrictions on patent scope



  28. Links 11/6/2018: Qt 5.9.6 and Weblate 3.0.1 Released

    Links for the day



  29. Latest Docket Reports Show That the American Courts/Legal System Still Anything But Patents-Hostile

    "Damages" (or so-called 'harm') from patent infringement, as demonstrated in the US earlier this month, still an overrated concept which leads to overinflated "compensation" for infringement; the patent microcosm's claims that US courts have become "anti-patent" are laughable at best



  30. Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe Blind to Its Participation in a Scam Around Patents on Nature

    For over $20,000,000 (so far) the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe has agreed to pretend that it has something to do with controversial patents of Allergan, in effect grossly abusing the concept of tribal immunity while at the same time enabling privatisation of nature


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts