EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.15.11

Apple’s Patent War on Linux Turns Back Against Apple, Which Allegedly Resorts to Using Patent Trolls

Posted in Apple, GNU/Linux, Google, Microsoft, Patents at 7:03 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

SD

Summary: Apple’s aggressive moves against Linux-powered phones/tablets end up putting Apple’s business at risk and Apple is seen paying trolls, possibly with ill intent

THE behaviour of Apple has become increasingly relevant to us because Apple attacks Free/Open Source software.

The patent hoarding of Apple is further exacerbated with additions that are later being used to block sales of Android devices. There is reactionary motion to ban Apple devices as means of deterrence and the outcome can be serious for Apple’s business.

Ironically, the fight which was started by Apple does not turn out too well, at least not in the conventional way.

As we showed a couple of days ago, it is now Apple that risks embargo. In an article from Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols he labels this “revenge” and notes that:

A German court has just issued a preliminary injunction on Motorola’s behalf that blocks European sales of all Apple’s 3G-enabled devices.

A Microsoft booster helps show that Apple is additionally hurting open standards with its software patents. To quote:

Opera developer Haavard Moen has accused Apple of repeatedly using patents to undermine the development of Web standards and block their finalization.

World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), the industry group that governs and oversees the development of Web standards, requires that every specification it approves be implementable on a royalty-free basis, barring extraordinary circumstances that justify an exception to this rule. The specifications can contain patented technology, as long as royalty-free patent licenses are available.

Nilay Patel, who previously (as in this case) spread anti-Android (and thus Apple-sympathetic) messages through boosters who had helped Microsoft lobbyists, seeds this story, which goes along the lines of “Samsung did not play nice with Apple”. Meanwhile, “Apple appears to have entered an unusual deal with a company commonly referred to as a patent troll.” Ars Technica writes:

Apple may be using patent troll to do its legal dirty work

It appears that Apple has made a deal with patent troll Digitude Innnovations to help the company’s efforts to sue nearly every major mobile device maker. Digitude earlier this month launched one of its first legal attacks against Nokia, RIM, Motorola, HTC, LG, Samsung, Sony, and even Amazon, filing a patent infringement claim with the International Trade Commission. Conspicuously absent from that list is iPhone maker Apple, which until late November owned two of the patents being used to target “certain mobile devices” from its competitors.

We have already seen Microsoft using patent trolls as proxies in attacks on Android, so let’s keep an eye on this. Apple is desperate to block Android because its core business may depend on it. Apple previously paid the world’s biggest patent troll.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

8 Comments

  1. Michael said,

    December 15, 2011 at 7:52 pm

    Gravatar

    Please show a shred of evidence to support your claim the battles were started by Apple.

    Just a shred… would be more than you have shown so far.

  2. Charles Oliver said,

    December 15, 2011 at 9:37 pm

    Gravatar

    Hmm, I thought it was generally well known that Apple was the original aggressor in the current spate of court cases. There’s a nice Steve Jobs quotes on that, to paraphrase: crush Android, competition bad, thermonuclear underpants.

    In the end though the patent system is all bad. Apple and Microsoft might be an investors in Intellectual Ventures, the patent troll par excellence, but then so is Google.

    Apple might spin out a patent troll company but then Google will probably do the same via Motorola Mobility (if they don’t, they leave Apple with an advantage).

    In the end nothing will crush Android, so Apple are maybe only protecting short term profits with their attempt to slow Android dominance.

    It is interesting that a company started by a couple of hippies is such a corporate cupcake these days. Pity really. I think Apple and Microsoft have done good stuff in the past. Ok they might have bought a lot of the stuff that they are known for but Google bought Android.

  3. Charles Oliver said,

    December 15, 2011 at 9:53 pm

    Gravatar

    Oh yeah, Apple is King Canute* trying to hold back the tide of Android.

    * Actually Canute was trying to prove that there are limits to power but that’s not how it’s portrayed, mostly**.

    ** If repeated enough a falsehood can seem to ring true, like “Windows works better” or “Chrome is more secure than Firefox”***.

    *** Of course that Asus campaign was maybe penance exacted by Microsoft for the original EEEPC, and Google paid for the research that shows Chrome is the most secure browser ****

    **** obviously picked up a trick from the IE bag * <- infinite loop.

  4. Michael said,

    December 15, 2011 at 9:54 pm

    Gravatar

    Hmm, I thought it was generally well known that Apple was the original aggressor in the current spate of court cases. There’s a nice Steve Jobs quotes on that, to paraphrase: crush Android, competition bad, thermonuclear underpants.

    Let us look at the history… what came before Samsung’s undeniable copying of Apple?

    As far as I know that was the start between Samsung and Apple… though Google’s copying of iOS might be considered the start as well.

    In the end though the patent system is all bad. Apple and Microsoft might be an investors in Intellectual Ventures, the patent troll par excellence, but then so is Google.

    I agree there are massive problems with the patent system – but what other than patents protects an innovative company from the type of behavior Samsung has shown?

    Apple might spin out a patent troll company but then Google will probably do the same via Motorola Mobility (if they don’t, they leave Apple with an advantage).

    I do not pretend to understand all of the details of these patent wars – and I certainly do not hold Apple blameless. Nor Google. Sounds like you pretty much agree… where Roy just focuses on attacking Apple and Google. That is one of the things I argue against.

    In the end nothing will crush Android, so Apple are maybe only protecting short term profits with their attempt to slow Android dominance.

    I tend to agree… and do not know what their long term strategy is. One good thing to come from this is both Apple and Google are being pushed to innovate… for now it seems Apple is (overall) ahead but Google is not standing still.

    It is interesting that a company started by a couple of hippies is such a corporate cupcake these days. Pity really. I think Apple and Microsoft have done good stuff in the past. Ok they might have bought a lot of the stuff that they are known for but Google bought Android.

    I think there is room for all three companies in the mobile space… and think the competition is good for all of us.

    The problem I see is where to draw the line from being inspired by the competition – which is natural and good – and out and out copying the competition which is clearly wrong. Apple thinks Google crossed the line… maybe they did and maybe they did not. Samsung, however, clearly did – as the links above so clearly show.

  5. walterbyrd said,

    December 15, 2011 at 11:13 pm

    Gravatar

    > “Let us look at the history… what came before Samsung’s undeniable copying of Apple?”

    “Undeniable” my ass. The JooJoo/crunchpad had rounded corners, and a flat screen, and it had a prototype out before the iPad.

    Aside from those “ideas” not being from Apple to begin with, the ideas are laughably frivolous.

    What other ideas did Apple “re-invent?” How about color icons, and kinetic scrolling?

    Apple is clearly trying to restrain free trade with a series of frivolous IP lawsuits.

    Michael Reply:

    “Let us look at the history… what came before Samsung’s undeniable copying of Apple?”

    “Undeniable” my ass. The JooJoo/crunchpad had rounded corners, and a flat screen, and it had a prototype out before the iPad.

    I was not clear: undeniable to rational people. I posted the evidence.. and said nothing about rounded corners or flat screens. Look at the evidence. I showed it to you. If you have something showing contrary evidence I would love to see it.

    Aside from those “ideas” not being from Apple to begin with, the ideas are laughably frivolous.

    Again, I am talking about the evidence, not your wishes. If you have evidence please show it.

    What other ideas did Apple “re-invent?” How about color icons, and kinetic scrolling?

    Apple completely re-invented the phone and then the tablet. Nobody was doing what they were before them. Look at the reports when it first came out.

    Apple is clearly trying to restrain free trade with a series of frivolous IP lawsuits.

    If you have evidence of this – something to counter what you have been shown – then please show it. Without that you are speaking of your wishes and not of what the evidence shows.

  6. mcinsand said,

    December 17, 2011 at 8:11 pm

    Gravatar

    Apple started it, with that garbage design patent on rounded corners, among others. As we get to read more of these examples, we see how corrupted the patent system has become. After Apple and MS have so sleazily, dishonestly intimidated the markets with patents that no-one knowledgeable in the art would have filed as novel, I certainly feel no sympathy for them. In the end, though, they might well become allies; they may have loved software patents when they thought they could suppress innovation and competition, but they may well use reserves to fight against software patents in the end. FOSS now has significant backers, so this isn’t like the old days when the duopoly could run a small company out of business with legal defense fees.

    Woo-hoo! I do hope this is the start of Apple and MS getting what they deserve! Their efforts to exerminate choice might be exterminated, after all!

    Michael Reply:

    Apple started it, with that garbage design patent on rounded corners, among others.

    That happened *after* Samsung had already done what you have shown:

    For Apple’s lawsuit to have started it, Apple would need to have a time machine to somehow have started it before that which the lawsuits were a reaction to. Now while Apple’s backup solution is called “Time Machine”, I assure you it is not a real time machine that allows your claim to be accurate.

    In other words: you are claiming that something that happened *after* the start of the battle is the start.

    As we get to read more of these examples, we see how corrupted the patent system has become.

    Oh, it is horribly broken… and Apple has been pushed to make some rather odd claims as they use this broken system. As have others. No doubt.

    After Apple and MS have so sleazily, dishonestly intimidated the markets with patents that no-one knowledgeable in the art would have filed as novel, I certainly feel no sympathy for them.

    This is not about your emotional reaction, “sympathy” as you say. I am looking at this rationally – and the evidence is clear: when your “first” act is proceeded by a obviously “sleazy” behavior by Samsung, then it is Samsung who acted first and Apple which *reacted*. You do not like the reaction. So be it.

    In the end, though, they might well become allies; they may have loved software patents when they thought they could suppress innovation and competition, but they may well use reserves to fight against software patents in the end. FOSS now has significant backers, so this isn’t like the old days when the duopoly could run a small company out of business with legal defense fees.

    There is no “duopoly”. Roy made that up.

    Woo-hoo! I do hope this is the start of Apple and MS getting what they deserve! Their efforts to exerminate choice might be exterminated, after all!

    Elimination of choice? You made that up, too.

    When you simply make things up such as some imaginary “duopoly” and some fictitious person or group who is against choice, you severely hurt your own credibility.

What Else is New


  1. The Rule of Law and Justice Don't Exist Inside the EPO, Confirms the International Labour Organisation (ILO)

    Further analysis of the latest rulings from the ILO -- decisions that were long expected



  2. A Day in the Life of... Battistelli's Banana Republic

    This is part 5 of a fictional diary from the EPO



  3. Links 1/12/2016: Devuan Beta, R3 Liberates Code

    Links for the day



  4. Two ILO Decisions on EPO Cases Are Released, at Least One Judgment is Considered Good for Staff

    Years later (as justice is too slow, partly because of the EPO, being the principal culprit that clogs up the ILO's tribunal system) there is a couple of new judgments about EPO abuses against staff



  5. Dutch and French Politicians Complain About the European Patent Office, British Media Coverage Regular Now

    Pressure from the political systems, the scientific community and from the media is growing, as it becomes abundantly apparent that the EPO cannot go on like this



  6. Links 30/11/2016: Git 2.11, GOG Surprise Tomorrow

    Links for the day



  7. The UPC Scam Part IV: Bumps Along the Road for UPC, With or Without the UK and Brexit

    A sobering reality check regarding the UPC, no matter what Lucy Neville-Rolfe says under pressure from Battistelli and some selfish law firms that are based in London



  8. The UPC Scam Part III: The “Patent Mafia”

    Bigwigs like Lucy Neville-Rolfe and Benoît Battistelli, together with Team UPC and its tiny minority interests (self enrichment), are conspiring to hijack the laws of Europe, doing so across many national borders with unique and locally-steered patent policy in one fell swoop



  9. The UPC Scam Part II: The Patent Echo Chamber at Work, Prematurely Congratulating Itself in Its 'News' Sites





  10. The UPC Scam Part I: EPO-Bribed Media Outlets Lie to Brits (and to Europeans) About the UPC

    An introductory article in a multi-part series about UPC at times of Brexit and Lucy Neville-Rolfe's bizarre sellout to Battistelli



  11. European Public Service Union Asks EPO Administrative Council “to Re-establish the Rule of Law at the European Patent Office”

    The chinchillas of the Administrative Council are assertively asked to tackle the abusive management of the EPO, which gets condemned not only by CERN but also EPSU, which is working with the Dutch government to end lawlessness at the EPO



  12. Links 29/11/2016: Core Apps Hackfest, MuckRock Goes FOSS

    Links for the day



  13. ILOAT Decisions: Upcoming Publication of Two EPO Cases (Abuse Against Staff)

    Reminder about tomorrow's "exceptional public delivery" from the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and a request for additional information



  14. Mixing Politics and EPO: How Battistelli Defies the Very Basic Rules of the Office

    A reminder of the fact that Battistelli was entrenched in French politics even while he was serving at the EPO



  15. EPO DG1 Principal Director “Out of the Muppet Show”

    The ridicule of EPO management is a symptom of a poisonous work environment which now resembles an assembly line of bad patents, where employees are treated unfairly, severely, and in clear defiance of labour laws



  16. Learning From the Mistakes of the US Patent System (and More Latterly China) When Assessing Patent Maximalism

    The warning signs coming both from the East and from the West, demonstrating the pitfalls of a policy too permissive on patents and thus on litigation



  17. The International Labour Organisation Once Again Proves Useless for Labour of the EPO

    The International Labour Organisation (ILO) is once again failing too serve justice, instead just sending complaints elsewhere, in effect into a black hole



  18. CERN Slams the European Patent Office for Abuse of Employees

    The European Organisation for Nuclear Research known as CERN is openly condemning EPO management and the Administrative Council for violation of human/labour rights, not to mention the other abuses that are rampant under Battistelli's notorious regime



  19. Links 28/11/2016: X-Plane 11 Beta, Early Work For C++20, Microsoft Hole in RHEL

    Links for the day



  20. Patents Roundup: Patent Trolls, Patent Quality, and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”)

    A week's roundup of patent news from the United States, where there's a mixture of good news, bad news, good reporting, and misleading (or selective) reporting



  21. Patent Attorney Mark Summerfield: EPO Administrative Council “Members Should be Ashamed.”

    A recent comment about Battistelli's misbehaviour and the Administrative Council's utter failure to get a grip on him



  22. EPO Caricature: Slowing Down Justice and Giving Luxury Cars as Gifts

    The latest cartoon making the rounds is about SLAPP and alleged bribery in Croatia (more on that soon)



  23. Director Lee's USPTO Managed to Drain the Swamp Filled by David Kappos and His Colleagues, But Trump Will Likely Dismiss Her Soon

    Just as the USPTO begins to get its act together and limit patent scope based on reasonably liberal SCOTUS Justices there are many reports suggesting that the Director of the USPTO will be driven out, courtesy of the Trump presidency that will also perturb SCTOUS



  24. Danger of Letting a Bunch of Patent Law Firms Attempt to Hijack the European Patent System With UPC

    Team UPC, a collective of self-serving patent lawyers who produce nothing of substance, hopes that some time tomorrow the UPC will miraculously be revived in Britain even though it's extremely unlikely



  25. Links 27/11/2016: Linux 4.8.11, Linux 4.4.35, and Distrowatch Rankings

    Links for the day



  26. Caught in a Lie Again: EPO Management Just Cannot Stop Lying, Even About People Whom It Gags Using Threats (to Cover Up Battistelli's Abuses)

    Benoît Battistelli's decision to dismiss staff representatives (in complete violation of what the Administrative Council demanded) is accompanied by yet more face-saving lies (clearly a sackable offense in a public institution which is functional and not a global laughing stock)



  27. Benoît Battistelli's Affinity for Tiny Countries Exploits the Ease of 'Buying' Their Votes

    The tyrannical boss of the EPO keeps his job by ensuring that small nations with a vote of equal weight to that of nations like France or Germany simply behave like "yes men" or at worst abstain from voting



  28. The Sad State of German Anti-Corruption Authorities and Investigative Journalism, as Demonstrated by the EPO

    A personal view on why the EPO manages to get away with so many abuses while the media and watchdogs like Transparency International (TI) play along by doing nothing at all about it



  29. China Creates a Patent Bubble That Contributes to Patent Inflation

    China's obsession with patent quantity rather than quality (a disease that has infected the current boss of the EPO) is a cause for concern, except perhaps to patent lawyers who in the short term enjoy the temporary inflation (before hyper-inflation and implosion)



  30. Links 26/11/2016: VLC 360, Wine 1.9.23

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts