EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

07.12.12

Microsoft is Working to Make Android Non-Free by Extortion, Apple Works to Ban It

Posted in Apple, Microsoft, Patents at 4:51 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Setting up barriers to freedom

Gated doot

Summary: The duopoly continues its war on Android, with each side adopting a different approach

THE patent extortion by Microsoft continues because small companies give up. To quote one report about the latest, “Microsoft has announced that two more makers of Android-based devices, Coby Electronics and Aluratek, have signed on to the company’s patent licensing programme. Both Coby Electronics and Aluratek make low-cost Android tablets; Aluratek makes an Android 4.0 based tablet called the Cinepad which costs between $150 and $220 and Coby Electronics makes a Android 2.3 based Kyros tablet which retails for as little as $80.”

One reader sent us the link and asked, “what is going on? When will this end?”

“The problem is that Microsoft, as an award for racketeering, is already making money from many Android sales.”The matter of fact is, enough vendors remain which don’t pay Microsoft even a single dime. We have a growing list of companies to avoid. Meanwhile, argues Pogson, companies start to recognise that Microsoft tax is indeed a tax that they need not really pay, not in an age of Linux domination anyway. “Expect to see competition on retails shelves with that other OS getting less shelf-space in the future,” Pogson writes. “Wintel was worried about prices when a PC was ~$1K for a box and the OS cost 15% of the price. Imagine how terrified they are when the OS costs 50% or more of the price of a small cheap PC and on the same shelf a consumer is likely to see $200 and $100 prices for essentially the same hardware with the higher price covering that other OS… When prices are no longer hidden from consumers, choices will be made and M$’s share of the pie will plunge. The ultimate horror for Wintel? Seeing */Linux on all PCs everywhere in retail spaces. The house of cards will have the monopoly-card removed this fall.”

Microsoft is trying to make Android/Linux non-free (non-gratis) as means of deterring manufacturers and shops from making and stocking non-Windows devices. This is not going to work though; in fact, it is already failing because Android continues to grow. The problem is that Microsoft, as an award for racketeering, is already making money from many Android sales. This sheer injustice needs to stop.

Apple in the mean time is trying to altogether embargo some Android devices. Although it has been unsuccessful in the UK, Apple continues its litigation war in continental Europe (mostly via Holland and Germany) and in the US, with the aid of ITC and USPTO.

Reuters says that US politicians assess the effects of such bans. To quote: “The Congress is considering whether companies that hold patents essential to a standard, such as a digital movie format, should be forbidden from asking that infringing products be banned from the U.S. market.”

Andy Updegrove writes more on a related subject: “If you’ve been following the ongoing mobile operating system wars between companies like Motorola Mobility, Apple, Google and Samsung, you may recall that the biggest hammer a patent owner can wield is to prevent a competitor from selling a product. In the regular courts, this is achieved by obtaining an injunction, which is a court order that bars such sales from occurring. In this situation, the patent owner claims that it can’t be adequately compensated after the fact by damages.

“Recently, a judge in the Apple case questioned software patents as a whole.”“But the US courts haven’t been favorable to this approach since a key Supreme Court ruling in 2006, leading companies to seek an alternate route to a similar result: a judgment by the International Trade Commission (ITC), barring the competitor from importing any product into the U.S. that infringes on the patent. If that patent is essential for implementing a standard that is, in turn, essential to performing the device’s function, then you’ve effectively barred its competitor from being a competitor at all – at least in the U.S.”

Over at Groklaw, professor Mark Webbink covers another case which can have a profound effect on patenting in the US. “In a split decision of a three-judge panel of the Federal Circuit in CLS Bank International and CLS Services Ltd v. Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd.,” he writes, “the Court once again established that it has no clue what is or is not patentable subject matter. (CLS [PDF; Text]). The majority opinion written by Judge Linn again returns to the favored theory of the diehards on the Federal Circuit that almost anything involving a computer is patentable. The dissent, provided by Judge Prost, criticizes the majority for, for all intents and purposes, ignoring the recent rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court, and in particular the Prometheus decision.”

Recently, a judge in the Apple case questioned software patents as a whole. At the moment, the best we can do it impede the spreading of software patents — a subject we’ll cover in a later post about Europe.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

10 Comments

  1. walterbyrd said,

    July 14, 2012 at 1:04 pm

    Gravatar

    July 14, 2012: Samsung’s request for expedited Galaxy Nexus hearing accepted, Apple groups them with “pirates, thieves and counterfeiters”

    http://phandroid.com/2012/07/14/samsungs-request-for-expedited-galaxy-nexus-hearing-accepted-apple-groups-them-with-pirates-thieves-and-counterfeiters/

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I guess LG should group Apple “pirates, thieves and counterfeiters”.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    s/group Apple/group Apple with/

  2. walterbyrd said,

    July 14, 2012 at 1:05 pm

    Gravatar

    July 14, 2012: Apple Sends Cops To Seize Galaxy Nexus, Tab Bought After Ban

    http://www.damnocrazy.com/4/apple-sends-cops-seize-galaxy-nexus-tab-bought-after-ban

    Mikko Reply:

    satire website

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Apple’s past behaviour makes it harder to detect as satire.

  3. walterbyrd said,

    July 14, 2012 at 1:10 pm

    Gravatar

    July 13, 2012: Apple sent takedown letters to retailers selling Galaxy Nexus and Galaxy Tab 10.1

    http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/13/3157505/apple-retailer-galaxy-nexus-tab-10-1-takedown-order

    I got the story published on slashdot. It is being discussed now:

    http://apple.slashdot.org/story/12/07/14/1239250/apple-tells-retailers-to-stop-selling-certain-samsung-devices

    July 14, 2012: Here’s what Apple’s takedown notice to Galaxy Nexus retailers looks like

    http://www.imore.com/heres-what-apples-takedown-notice-galaxy-nexus-retailers-looks

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Apple seems quite nervous.

  4. walterbyrd said,

    July 14, 2012 at 1:13 pm

    Gravatar

    Somebody alert Apple lawyers!

    —–
    Nexus 7: Google tablet takes off as retailers sell out

    GameStop said on Friday it had already run through its first two allocations of the tablet.

    http://newyork.newsday.com/news/nation/nexus-7-google-tablet-takes-off-as-retailers-sell-out-1.3837912
    —–

    Please join #BoycottApple on plus.google.com

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Thanks for the links. I will use them.

What Else is New


  1. Links 19/2/2018: Linux 4.16 RC2, Nintendo Switch Now Full-fledged GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  2. PTAB Continues to Invalidate a Lot of Software Patents and to Stop Patent Examiners From Issuing Them

    Erasure of software patents by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) carries on unabated in spite of attempts to cause controversy and disdain towards PTAB



  3. The Patent 'Industry' Likes to Mention Berkheimer and Aatrix to Give the Mere Impression of Section 101/Alice Weakness

    Contrary to what patent maximalists keep saying about Berkheimer and Aatrix (two decisions of the Federal Circuit from earlier this month, both dealing with Alice-type challenges), neither actually changed anything in any substantial way



  4. Makan Delrahim is Wrong; Patents Are a Major Antitrust Problem, Sometimes Disguised Using Trolls Somewhere Like the Eastern District of Texas

    Debates and open disagreements over the stance of the lobbyist who is the current United States Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division



  5. Patent Trolls Watch: Microsoft-Connected Intellectual Ventures, Finjan, and Rumour of Technicolor-InterDigital Buyout

    Connections between various patent trolls and some patent troll statistics which have been circulated lately



  6. Software Patents Trickle in After § 101/Alice, But Courts Would Not Honour Them Anyway

    The dawn of § 101/Alice, which in principle eliminates almost every software patent, means that applicants find themselves having to utilise loopholes to fool examiners, but that's unlikely to impress judges (if they ever come to assessing these patents)



  7. In Aatrix v Green Shades the Court is Not Tolerating Software Patents But Merely Inquires/Wonders Whether the Patents at Hand Are Abstract

    Aatrix alleges patent infringement by Green Shades, but whether the patents at hand are abstract or not remains to be seen; this is not what patent maximalists claim it to be ("A Valentine for Software Patent Owners" or "valentine for patentee")



  8. An Indoctrinated Minority is Maintaining the Illusion That Patent Policy is to Blame for All or Most Problems of the United States

    The zealots who want to patent everything under the Sun and sue everyone under the Sun blame nations in the east (where the Sun rises) for all their misfortunes; this has reached somewhat ludicrous levels



  9. Berkheimer Decision is Still Being Spun by the Anti-Section 101/Alice Lobby

    12 days after Berkheimer v HP Inc. the patent maximalists continue to paint this decision as a game changer with regards to patent scope; the reality, however, is that this decision will soon be forgotten about and will have no substantial effect on either PTAB or Alice (because it's about neither of these)



  10. Academic Patent Immunity is Laughable and Academics Are Influenced by Corporate Money (for Steering Patent Agenda)

    Universities appear to have become battlegrounds in the war between practicing entities and a bunch of parasites who make a living out of litigation and patent bubbles



  11. UPC Optimism Languishes Even Among Paid UPC Propagandists Such as IAM

    Even voices which are attempting to give UPC momentum that it clearly lacks admit that things aren't looking well; the UK is not ratifying and Germany make take years to look into constitutional barriers



  12. Bejin Bieneman Props Up the Disgraced Randall Rader for Litigation Agenda

    Randall Rader keeps hanging out with the litigation 'industry' -- the very same 'industry' which he served in a closeted fashion when he was Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit (and vocal proponent of software patents, patent trolls and so on)



  13. With Stambler v Mastercard, Patent Maximalists Are Hoping to Prop Up Software Patents and Damage PTAB

    The patent 'industry' is hoping to persuade the highest US court to weaken the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), for PTAB is making patent lawsuits a lot harder and raises the threshold for patent eligibility



  14. Apple Discovers That Its Patent Disputes Are a Losing Battle Which Only Lawyers Win (Profit From)

    By pouring a lot of money and energy into the 'litigation card' Apple lost focus and it's also losing some key cases, as its patents are simply not strong enough



  15. The Patent Microcosm Takes Berkheimer v HP Out of Context to Pretend PTAB Disregards Fact-Finding Process

    In view or in light of a recent decision (excerpt above), patent maximalists who are afraid of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) try to paint it as inherently unjust and uncaring for facts



  16. Microsoft Has Left RPX, But RPX Now Pays a Microsoft Patent Troll, Intellectual Ventures

    The patent/litigation arms race keeps getting a little more complicated, as the 'arms' are being passed around to new and old entities that do nothing but shake-downs



  17. UPC Has Done Nothing for Europe Except Destruction of the EPO and Imminent Layoffs Due to Lack of Applications and Lowered Value of European Patents

    The Unified Patent Court (UPC) is merely a distant dream or a fantasy for litigators; to everyone else the UPC lobby has done nothing but damage, including potentially irreparable damage to the European Patent Office, which is declining very sharply



  18. Links 17/2/2018: Mesa 17.3.4, Wine 3.2, Go 1.10

    Links for the day



  19. Patent Trolls Are Thwarted by Judges, But Patent Lawyers View Them as a 'Business' Opportunity

    Patent lawyers are salivating over the idea that trolls may be coming to their state/s; owing to courts and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) other trolls' software patents get invalidated



  20. Microsoft's Patent Moves: Dominion Harbor, Intellectual Ventures, Intellectual Discovery, NEC and Uber

    A look at some of the latest moves and twists, as patents change hands and there are still signs of Microsoft's 'hidden hand'



  21. Links 15/2/2018: GNOME 3.28 Beta, Rust 1.24

    Links for the day



  22. Bavarian State Parliament Has Upcoming Debate About Issues Which Can Thwart UPC for Good

    An upcoming debate about Battistelli's attacks on the EPO Boards of Appeal will open an old can of worms, which serves to show why UPC is a non-starter



  23. The EPO is Being Destroyed and There's Nothing Left to Replace It Except National Patent Offices

    It looks like Battistelli is setting up the European Patent Office (EPO) for mass layoffs; in fact, it looks as though he is so certain that the UPC will materialise that he obsesses over "validation" for mass litigation worldwide, departing from a "model office" that used to lead the world in terms of patent quality and workers' welfare/conditions



  24. IBM is Getting Desperate and Now Suing Microsoft Over Lost Staff, Not Just Suing Everyone Using Patents

    IBM's policy when it comes to patents, not to mention its alignment with patent extremists, gives room for thought if not deep concern; the company rapidly becomes more and more like a troll



  25. In Microsoft's Lawsuit Against Corel the Only Winner is the Lawyers

    The outcome of the old Microsoft v Corel lawsuit reaffirms a trend; companies with deep pockets harass their competitors, knowing that the legal bills are more cumbersome to the defendants; there's a similar example today in Cisco v Arista Networks



  26. The Latest Lies About Unitary Patent (UPC) and the EPO

    Lobbying defies facts; we are once again seeing some easily-debunked talking points from those who stand to benefit from the UPC and mass litigation



  27. Speech Deficit and No Freedom of Association at the EPO

    True information cannot be disseminated at the EPO and justice too is beyond elusive; this poses a threat to the EPO's future, not only to its already-damaged reputation



  28. No, Britain is Not Ratifying 'Unitary' Anything, But Team UPC Insinuates It Will (Desperate Effort to Affect Tomorrow's Outcome)

    Contrary to several misleading headlines from Bristows (in its blog and others'), the UPC isn't happening and isn't coming to the UK; it all amounts to lobbying (by setting false expectations)



  29. The EPO's Paid Promotion of Software Patents Gets Patent Maximalists All Excited and Emboldened

    The software patents advocacy from Battistelli (and his cohorts) isn't just a spit in the face of European Parliament but also the EPC; but patent scope seems to no longer exist or matter under his watch, as all he cares about is granting as many patents as possible, irrespective of real quality/legitimacy/merit



  30. Andrei Iancu Begins His USPTO Career While Former USPTO Director (and Now Paid Lobbyist) Keeps Meddling in Office Affairs

    The USPTO, which is supposed to be a government branch (loosely speaking) is being lobbied by former officials, who are now being paid by private corporations to help influence and shape policies; this damages the image of the Office and harms its independence from corporate influence


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts