EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

05.10.17

Another Victim of Battistelli’s Monarchy: Dutch Contractors

Posted in Europe, Patents at 4:26 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

The EPO with flags that are more appropriate

Nouvel building
“The cost of that renovation [Battistelli's new penthouse] is impossible to ascertain due to it being lumped in with the massive construction costs of the new [Nouvel] building.” –Kieren McCarthy for The Register

Summary: How TBI Holding, the company that ‘won’ the tender (as notorious as these can be), is actually a victim of EPO underpaying for the work, having also spent some of the budget on Battistelli's new penthouse

THE Nouvel building which is a fire hazard has become the subject of Dutch journalism quite recently.

“Battistelli likes to boast about investing 250 million in a new building,” Petra Kramer told me yesterday. “But it turns out that the contractor who is building the new office expects to lose 22.3 million euro on it,” she continued. “An article I missed last month,” she said, shows that “Battistelli does not only exploit employees, he exploits contractors as well.”

Kramer has translated the article (Source: fd.nl; Paywalled, workaround: Google the headline, click the search result. It doesn’t work with any other search engine.) and wrote the following summary of it:


The EPO’s Battistelli likes to boast how his office is a boon to the Dutch economy. As NRC reported in March last year: “We’re investing 250 million in a new office-building. We add 1 billion in revenue to the Dutch economy.”

Upon closer inspection it turns out that 25% of the EPO’s contribution to the Dutch economy is not so much of a contribution. It’s actually leeching. The contractor that won the tender for building the new office did so at the bottom of the market in 2013 when we were struck by the eurocrisis.

On top of that, the EPO used a “relatively new form of contracting” which outsources all the risk to the contractor. The contractor is fully responsible for “for design, system engineering and testing”. In other words: the EPO exploits contractors like they exploit their employees. It’s akin to a person overeating at an all you eat can buffet and then blaming the restaurant for throwing up.

TBI Holding, the contractor, expects to lose 22.3 million euros, which means the EPO got away by paying 10% less than the actual costs of the project. In retrospect they lament having entered into the contract too light-heartedly.

TBI Holding had a great year, for example they built 20% more homes than in 2015 but their bottom line, the net profit, was crushed by the EPO. According to Financieel Dagblad (the Dutch Financial Times), TBI holding could have made a profit of 15 million, thanks to the EPO the end-result is a net loss of 16.7 million.

Source used: fd.nl


Remember that the EPO is immune and thus safe from litigation/prosecution in this case.

Here is the full translation of the corresponding article:

Construction of European Patent Office curtails TBI

The Rotterdam builder TBI suffered losses in 2016 by a project that was taken at risk in crisis times. For the new building of the European Patent Office in Rijswijk, a provision of € 22.3 mln was made last year. Together with the merger costs of two subsidiaries last year, a net loss of 16.7 mln resulted.

This is apparent from Friday’s published annual figures of the group. TBI Holding is known for subsidiaries as J.P. Van Eesteren, Mobilis and the fused Croonwolter & Dros.

‘Underlying good year’

Sperling, chairman of TBI, states that 2016 was “underlying a good year”. House sales increased by 35%, the order book increased by almost 20% and the solvency criterion for financial soundness improved to 36%. Without the EPO set-back, the net profit would have been 5.6% higher at € 15 mln.

‘The huge provision is disappointing,’ said Sperling.

The new construction of the European institution has been taken at the bottom of the market. In 2013, a relatively new contract form was signed, with the full responsibility for design, system engineering and testing at the contractor.

Too light-hearted

That responsibility proved complex, intensive and costly according to the chairman of the board. Sperling: “We considered this too light-hearted. In retrospect, we had to ask for a higher price. ”

The three divisions in which the companies of TBI are grouped booked varying results. At Technology, operating revenues decreased, but operating profit increased. The margin thus increased from 0.6% to 0.9%. Construction and development increased sales and results. The margin increased from 1.9% to 2.6%. At Infra, volume and price pressure was maintained. Sales rose, but operating profit fell to € 300,000, which dropped the margin from 1.9% to 0.1%.

So much for ‘helping’ the Dutch economy…

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Short: Highly Misleading and Unscientific Graphics From the EPO for an Illusion of Growth

    A look at the brainwash that EPO management is distributing to staff and what's wrong with it



  2. Short: EPO Explains to Examiners Why They Should and Apparently Can Grant Software Patents (in Spite of EPC)

    Whether it calls it "CII" or "ICT" or "Industry 4.0" or "4IR", the EPO's management continues to grant software patents and attempts to justify this to itself (and to staff)



  3. Links 21/4/2018: Linux 4.9.95, FFmpeg 4.0, OpenBSD Foundation 2018 Fundraising Campaign

    Links for the day



  4. As USPTO Director, Andrei Iancu Gives Three Months for Public Comments on 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Software Patenting Impacted)

    Weeks after starting his job as head of the US patent office, to our regret but not to our surprise, Iancu asks whether to limit examiners' ability to reject abstract patent applications citing 35 U.S.C. § 101 (relates to Alice and Mayo)



  5. In Keith Raniere v Microsoft Both Sides Are Evil But for Different Reasons

    Billing for patent lawyers reveals an abusive strategy from Microsoft, which responded to abusive patent litigation (something which Microsoft too has done for well over a decade)



  6. Links 20/4/2018: Atom 1.26, MySQL 8.0

    Links for the day



  7. Links 19/4/2018: Mesa 17.3.9 and 18.0.1, Trisquel 8.0 LTS Flidas, Elections for openSUSE Board

    Links for the day



  8. The Patent Microcosm, Patent Trolls and Their Pressure Groups Incite a USPTO Director Against the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and Section 101/Alice

    As one might expect, the patent extremists continue their witch-hunt and constant manipulation of USPTO officials, whom they hope to compel to become patent extremists themselves (otherwise those officials are defamed, typically until they're fired or decide to resign)



  9. Microsoft's Lobbying for FRAND Pays Off as Microsoft-Connected Patent Troll Conversant (Formerly MOSAID) Goes After Android OEMs in Europe

    The FRAND (or SEP) lobby seems to have caused a lot of monopolistic patent lawsuits; this mostly affects Linux-powered platforms such as Android, Tizen and webOS and there are new legal actions from Microsoft-connected patent trolls



  10. To Understand Why People Say That Lawyers are Liars Look No Further Than Misleading Promotion of Software Patents

    Some of the latest misleading claims from the patent microcosm, which is only interested in lots and lots of patents (its bread and butter is monopolies after all) irrespective of their merit, quality, and desirability



  11. When News About the EPO is Dominated by Sponsored 'Reports' and Press Releases Because Publishers Are Afraid of (or Bribed by) the EPO

    The lack of curiosity and genuine journalism in Europe may mean that serious abuses (if not corruption) will go unreported



  12. The Boards of Appeal at the European Patent Organisation (EPO) Complain That They Are Understaffed, Not Just Lacking the Independence They Depend on

    The Boards of Appeal have released a report and once again they openly complain that they're unable to do their job properly, i.e. patent quality cannot be assured



  13. Links 18/4/2018: New Fedora 27 ISOs, Nextcloud Wins German Government Contract

    Links for the day



  14. Guest Post: Responding to Your Recent Posting “The European Patent Office Will Never Hold Its Destroyers Accountable”

    In France, where Battistelli does not enjoy diplomatic immunity, he can be held accountable like his "padrone" recently was



  15. The EPO in 2018: Partnering With Saudi Arabia and Cambodia (With Zero European Patents)

    The EPO's status in the world has declined to the point where former French colonies and countries with zero European Patents are hailed as "success stories" for Battistelli



  16. For Samsung and Apple the Biggest Threat Has Become Patent Trolls and Aggressors in China and the Eastern District of Texas, Not Each Other

    The latest stories about two of the world's largest phone OEMs, both of which find themselves subjected to a heavy barrage of patent lawsuits and even embargoes; Samsung has meanwhile obtained an antisuit injunction against Huawei



  17. The EPO Continues to Lie About Patent Quality Whilst Openly Promoting Software Patents, Even Outside Europe

    EPO patent quality continues to sink while EPO management lies about it and software patents are openly being promoted/advocatedEPO patent quality continues to sink while EPO management lies about it (the article above is new) and software patents are openly being promoted/advocated



  18. SCOTUS on WesternGeco v Ion Geophysical Almost Done; Will Oil States Decision Affirm the PTAB's Quality Assurance (IPRs) Soon?

    Ahead of WesternGeco and Oil States, following oral proceedings, it's expected that the highest court in the United States will deliver more blows to patent maximalism



  19. Links 17/4/2018: Linux 5.x Plans and Microsoft's 'Embrace'

    Links for the day



  20. The European Patent Office (EPO) Grants Patents in Error, Insiders Are Complaining That It's the Management's Fault

    The EPO has languished to the point where patents are granted in error, examiners aren't happy, and the resultant chaos benefits no-one but lawyers and patent trolls



  21. The European Patent Office Will Never Hold Its Destroyers Accountable

    With only one in seven EPO stakeholders believing that Battistelli's pick (António Campinos) will turn things around for the better, it certainly does not seem like people are happy and there's no real hope that Battistelli will ever be held accountable for his abuses after his immunity expires



  22. With Liars Like These...

    The European Patent Office continues to lie about the Unified Patent Court (UPC) amongst other things, still revealing its reluctance to say anything which is truthful or work to repair the damage caused by Benoît Battistelli



  23. Links 16/4/2018: Linux 4.17 RC 1, Mesa 18.0.1 RC, GNOME 3.28.1

    Links for the day



  24. IAM, Patently-O and Watchtroll (the Patent Trolls' Lobby) Try to Stop Patent Oppositions/Petitions (PTAB)

    In spite of fee hikes, introduced by Iancu's interim predecessor, petitions (IPRs) at the PTAB continue to grow in number and the patent maximalists are losing their minds over it



  25. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is Ending Software Patents One Patent at a Time

    At an accelerating pace and with growing determination, PTAB (part of AIA) crushes patent trolls and software patents; the statistics and latest stories speak for themselves



  26. Academics and Think Tanks for Patent Maximalism

    Right-wing think tanks and impressionable academics continue to lobby for patent maximalism, rarely revealing the funding sources and motivations; in reality, however, such maximalism mainly helps large (already-wealthy) corporations, monopolists, and law firms



  27. Killing Patent Quality and Encouraging 'Covert' Software Patents Using the Buzzwords Du Jour

    The epidemic of buzzwords and/or hype waves that are being exploited to dodge or bypass patent scope/limitations, as seen in Europe and the US these days



  28. Crisis of Quality at the EPO Extends to Staff (Notably Examiners) and Management as Institutional Integrity is Severely Compromised

    A rather pessimistic but likely realistic outlook for the European Patent Office (EPO), which seems unable to attract the sort of staff it attracted for a number of decades



  29. The 'Blockchaining' of Software Patents (to Dodge the Rules/Guidelines) Now Coming to Europe

    A lot of software patents are being declared invalid (or not granted in the first place); having said that, using all sorts of hype waves (like calling databases “blockchains”) firms and individuals manage to still be granted software patents and sometimes patent trolls hoard these



  30. Links 14/4/2018: Wine 3.6, KDE Elisa 0.1

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts